LOS ANGELES (AP) – Lawyers for Sean “Diddy” Combs dismissed a lawsuit from a girl who accused him of sexual assault, filing a motion Friday to dismiss certain claims that weren’t lawful when the alleged incident occurred.

The motion, filed in a New York court, said Combs couldn’t be sued because certain laws didn’t exist when Joi Dickerson-Deal brought charges against him in 1991.

The music mogul’s lawyers want some statues of Dickerson-Deal’s claims, akin to revenge porn and human trafficking, to be dismissed with prejudice.

In a deposition last yr, she said Combs “intentionally drugged her” after which brought her home and sexually assaulted her after a date in Harlem when she was a 19-year-old college student.

The lawsuit alleges that Combs recorded the assault on video without her knowledge and later shared it with several friends in the music industry. He denied the allegations, accusing her of trying to make the most of a New York law that temporarily prolonged the statute of limitations.

Combs’ lawyers say Dickerson-Deal filed the criticism nearly three many years after his alleged misconduct, and New York State’s Revenge Porn Act was not codified until 2019.

His lawyers also pointed to several others, including New York’s Trafficking Victims Services Act, which went into effect in 2007.

The Associated Press doesn’t typically name individuals who say they have been victims of sexual abuse unless they arrive forward publicly, as Dickerson did.

Last month, federal authorities raided Combs’ properties in Los Angeles and Miami as part of a sex trafficking investigation. The criminal investigation has significantly tightened scrutiny of Combs, who has been a defendant in several recent sexual harassment trials.

Featured Stories

In Combs’ lawsuit, settled a day after it was filed in November, his former protégé and girlfriend, R&B singer Cassie, sued him, alleging years of sexual abuse, including rape. The lawsuit said he forced her to have sex with male prostitutes while he filmed them.

In February, the music producer filed a lawsuit alleging that Combs forced him to solicit prostitutes and pressured him to have sex with them.

Combs’ other accuser was a girl who claimed he raped her twenty years ago when she was 17.

Combs and his lawyers have denied all allegations in the lawsuit.

An try and honor Nina Simone’s legacy on the 21st anniversary of her death has reignited the furore surrounding the controversial biopic starring Zoe Saldana as the late icon earlier this week. The film “Nina” premiered in April 2016, but even before the premiere there have been strong reactions about the actress changing her appearance for the role.

In this role, the “Avatar” standout wore a prosthetic nose that flared her nostrils, an Afro wig and was covered in deep-tinted makeup that mimicked Simone’s mahogany skin.

The “I Put a Spell On You” singer died of natural causes after a battle with cancer on April 21, 2003. She was 70 years old.

Her estate shared a post on X celebrating her life with a surprising portrait of Simone. However, retweets and replies reveal that she is endlessly attached to the cinematic flop from almost a decade ago. “I just got mad again.” he wrote user X, who re-shared the post together with photos of Saldana and Simone.

Another response To read“I still can’t believe they blackfaced her. And what’s worse, she agreed!” A one that rated Saldana based on her acting skills he wrote“I confirm what someone says. Zoe did a great job playing her and I enjoyed the movie. She’s nothing like her, but she got the job done.

I just got mad again. https://t.co/NZBsbS8aOR pic.twitter.com/8JF98EHLxv

— Princess (@themultiplemom) April 21, 2024

According to Hollywood reporterMary J. Blige was originally cast for the role, but financial problems led to her departure from the production. Saldana, who identifies as a Black Latina with Dominican, Puerto Rican and Haitian roots, responded to early outcry from fans of the legendary artist who were unhappy with her participation in the concert.

“I never should have played Nina,” she said during a 2020 interview with Bese. “I should have done everything I could with the advantage I had 10 years ago – which was a different lever, but it was leverage nonetheless – I should have tried everything I could to cast a black woman in a role that was uniquely perfect black woman,” Saldana added.

Four years earlier, nonetheless, she took a distinct position.

“Women’s stories aren’t important enough, especially black women’s stories. I made my choice,” Saldana told Allure. “Do I continue to pass the script around and hope that the “right” black person does it, or do I say, “You know what? Whatever consequences this may bring, my casting is nothing compared to the fact that this story needs to be told.”

Simone’s daughter, Simone Kelly, echoed similar sentiments, speaking out against the film, which was released a yr after the official What Happened to Miss Simone documentary.

“There are many great actresses of color who could better represent my mother and bring her to the screen with the right script, the right team and a sense of wanting to bring the truth of my mother’s journey to the masses,” said Kelly the New York Times 4 years before the film saw the light of day.

Sam Waymon, Nina’s brother, shared scathing comments about the casting when he told the New York Daily News that it was “an insult to our people and their fight and all the things that Nina represented in her music and all the things that she stood for in own life. It takes a lot of courage and audacity to do this.” He said of Saldana’s dark complexion that it is “what we consider blackface.”

Michaela Coel in my opinion looks a lot like her, probably unrelated, but seeing these photos of Nina it reminded me of someone and I just remembered who pic.twitter.com/D9g8JDtRqr

— 🤠Sairam💜 (@CZApolitica) April 22, 2024

Saldana has previously mentioned that her success in films is due in part to her roles in science fiction series such as “Star Trek” and “Guardians of the Galaxy.” She claimed that the characters she chose suspended reality, allowing her to be colorblind as an artist and allowing fans to not care about her ethnicity and skin color.

Elsewhere, reacting to the estate’s well-intentioned posts, many people suggested that “I May Destroy You” actress Michaela Coel should be cast as the “High Priestess of Soul” if ever another attempt to tell her life’s story results in It will be possible. for the big screen.

NEW YORK (AP) – #MeToo founder Tarana Burke has heard it before. Whenever there’s a legal setback, the movement is deemed dead in the water. Legal success and presto, it got here to life again.

And so Burke, who coined the phrase “Me Too” nearly twenty years ago based on her work with survivors of sexual assault, stated again after New York’s highest court on Thursday overturned Harvey Weinstein’s 2020 rape conviction. : The #MeToo reckoning is greater than another court case. It’s still there and dealing.

The most blatant piece of evidence, Burke said: “Ten years ago, we couldn’t have brought a man like Harvey Weinstein into the courtroom.” In her view, the movement was responsible for this massive cultural shift – no matter the Hollywood mogul’s ultimate legal fate.

Likewise, Anita Hill, who tried to take the long view at her 1991 Supreme Court confirmation hearing, tried to take the long view after a legal setback that baffled many survivors and her supporters and, for greater than 1 / 4, became the face of the fight against sexual harassment. – 100 years before the Weinstein case, which launched the #MeToo movement.

In addition to his academic profession, Hill currently heads the Hollywood Commission, which goals to combat harassment in the entertainment industry. On Thursday, she sought to guarantee survivors that progress is real.

“I want those who are saddened by the New York Court of Appeals decision to know that no single legal ruling can ever compare to the tremendous progress we have made together in the anti-sexual violence movement,” Hill told The Associated in an email Press.

“The movement will continue,” she added, “fueled by the truth of our testimonies. There will be changes in our systems and culture.”

It was, after all, a difficult morning for survivors of sexual assault across the country, as Burke acknowledged at a rapidly arranged news conference in Manhattan after the court’s ruling attended by activists including Ashley Judd, certainly one of Weinstein’s first accusers.

In what Judd called an “act of institutional betrayal,” New York’s highest court ordered a brand new trial by a 4-3 majority, saying the first one prejudiced Weinstein, 72, by issuing inappropriate rulings, including allowing some accusers to testify about the allegations it was not a part of the case. Weinstein, nonetheless, will remain in prison because he was convicted of one other rape in Los Angeles in 2022.

Among those that testified in New York was Dawn Dunning, a supporting witness who told the court how Weinstein put his hand up her skirt and fondled her genitals during a business meeting.

Dunning told the AP through her lawyer, outstanding #MeToo lawyer Debra Katz, that she was “shocked” by Thursday’s ruling and handled a variety of emotions, including asking herself: “Is it all for nothing?”

“It took me two years of my life,” Dunning said. “I needed to live it day by day. I needed to experience the terror of confronting Weinstein. But would I do it again? Yes.”

She said that when confronted by the producer, she faced her worst fear and realized that he had no power over her. And she was proud that her testimony helped other women deserve justice.

Katz said she spoke to Dunning and other accusers – women who felt “gutted” – reminding them of the vital role they played in the broader fight against sexual abuse and violence.

“They witnessed this at great personal cost. (…) It changed their lives,” Katz said. “And feeling like it was all in vain is a very, very bad feeling.”

Still, Katz was confident that Weinstein could be convicted in a brand new trial.

“Their testimony was invalidated by the court today for legal reasons,” Katz said. But “no one doubted the truthfulness of what they testified about or the courage of their testimony. And although it is a failure in this case, I truly believe that their testimony changed the world.”

The testimony fundamentally modified the way people view and reply to problems with sexual violence in the workplace, she said.

“Their courage has grown beyond this case – people continue to come forward, people continue to support other victims who have come forward to report sexual assault and sexual violence, and I truly believe there is no going back from this,” Katz said.

This opinion is shared by Erika Rosenbaum, a Montreal actress who got here forward together with her own accusations against Weinstein in 2017 and has since spoken to numerous groups, especially young people, about sexual harassment and abuse over the years.

“Anyway, I feel like (#MeToo) is a movement that is getting stronger all the time,” Rosenbaum said in an interview. “It’s very much a movement of incremental steps, sharing stories and supporting each other. And that doesn’t change with the court’s decision… Because it’s very much a culture change. There are ups and downs, there are fights. But this is something that will last.”

Like her, many supporters saw the moment, nonetheless depressing, as a chance to call for renewed efforts to spread the #MeToo message.

“Today’s decision does not erase the truth of what happened,” said Fatima Goss Graves, head of the Time’s Up legal defense fund. It’s vital to recollect, she said, “that one well-known case doesn’t define this movement. We are strength.”

Featured Stories

Graves noted that since 2018, the fund has supported roughly 9,000 individuals who have filed sexual harassment complaints and funded 300 lawsuits. The fund is run by the National Women’s Law Center in Washington, D.C.; the broader Hollywood-based group, founded in 2017, transferred all of its assets to the fund in January 2023.

Burke emphasized in the interview that while legal progress is mandatory to realize progress, “the judicial system has never been a friend to survivors. That’s why we need movements, because in the past movements have pushed the legal system to do the right thing.”

Burke said she spent the morning talking to accusers, including actress Annabella Sciorra, who testified during her 2020 trial that Weinstein raped her.

“I understand how devastating and how disgusted and how angry — I just understand the whole range of emotions that so many of them must be feeling,” Burke said. “And I hope they understand for those of us who survived, who will probably never see our day in court, that they are still heroes to us.”

Burke, who spoke about her past as a victim of violence, added that she could never imagine facing her own perpetrator in court.

“So just the fact that they had to do this to hold someone like Harvey Weinstein accountable for his crimes is amazing,” she said.