In an interview with Donald Trump, the presumptive candidate of the Republican Party, said that he wants to speed up deportations using the US military, deploy the National Guard to suppress protests, gut the US civil service and that he believes white people stand anti-white prejudice, which the 2025 Project also argues for by describing affirmative motion as affirmative discrimination.

IN extensive interview, published on April 30, Trump lays out his vision for America, which some have described as interconnected dreams of a dictator. Presidential historian Douglas Brinkley described Trump’s second presidency in the magazine as heralding “the end of our democracy” and “the birth of a new kind of authoritarian presidential order.”

As we reported, President Joe Biden attended the May 1 event he called the long interview a must-read. He told the gang gathered for a Native Asian and Hawaiian Pacific Islander fundraiser on the Mayflower Hotel in Washington, D.C.: “Trump gave a protracted interview to TIME magazine. It’s coming out, you will have to read it. This is a must-read. This election is about competing values ​​and competing visions for America,” Biden added. “Trump’s values ​​and visions are anger, hatred, vengeance and vengeance.”

In addition to his tacit support for the goals of Project 2025, the Republican Party’s code-named project to reshape the complete US government in Trump’s image, the GOP nominee has been staunchly opposed to what he has described as anti-white bias.

“If you have a look at the Biden administration, it’s type of anti-everything, depending in your specific views. They are against Catholics. They’re going against plenty of different people… I feel there’s a transparent anti-white bias in this country and that cannot be allowed either,” Trump said. “Honestly, I do not think it might be very difficult to solve. However, I consider that the present law may be very unfair. And education may be very unfair and suppressed. However, I do not think it’s going to be a giant problem. But if you look now, you will notice that there may be absolute prejudice against white (people) and that could be a problem.

The Republican Party as an entire has been engaged in a long-running anti-DEI attack, most prominently exemplified by the controversy the party has generated over critical race theory. Critical race theory is actually a way of American society through the lens of laws and other points of the American social structure that perpetuate systemic racism. Although the speculation doesn’t appear in any K-12 textbooks, it’s mentioned in several K-12 education proposals put forth by Republican governors similar to Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders. The Republican Party can also be attacking DEI policies and departments at higher education institutions, saying they shouldn’t receive state funding since it is discriminatory.

However, civil rights leaders similar to Alvin B. Tillery, director of the Center for the Study of Democracy and Diversity at Northwestern University, and Marc Morial, president of the National Urban League, see Republican Party activism as a part of a framework that began throughout the days of segregation. Morial said that conservatives “stand for restoring white privilege” and that they “stand for policies that were used during the era of segregation in America.”

An appeals court overturned the conviction of a former Miami police officer found guilty of beating a Black woman in 2019 after she called police for help when her white neighbor pointed a shotgun at her.

Alejandro Giraldo, who once worked as a field training officer for the Miami Police Department, was convicted on March 5, 2019, of battery and misconduct within the arrest of 31-year-old Dyma Loving.

Loving called 911 the identical day after a white neighbor pointed a shotgun at her and her friend, Adrianna Greene. A neighbor, Frank Tumm, began calling them “whores” and using racial slurs as they walked on the sidewalk past his house. According to police body camera footage, when the ladies screamed and called him a “son of a bitch,” he grabbed a gun and pointed it at them.

Cellphone and body camera footage shows multiple officers responding to the decision. One of the officers questioned Tumm, who said he never had a gun. According to reports, he was released the identical day and arrested only a week later, on March 12, when he was charged with assault with a deadly weapon.

As Giraldo interviewed each women, who vividly described their encounter with their neighbor, he began threatening to commit Loving to a mental hospital and have her arrested if she didn’t “rest.” When Loving tries to clarify that she must call her children, Giraldo grabs her, pushes her against a fence and puts his arm around her head to push her to the bottom, the video shows.

Loving was initially charged with disorderly conduct and resisting arrest. Both charges were dropped two weeks after the arrest.

Giraldo’s arrest report, which included his misconduct plea, was crucial to the appeals court’s decision to vacate his conviction.

In the report, he wrote that “Love began to behave aggressively and was disobedient
orders” and through his meeting she became “even more nervous, very irritated and uncooperative.”

“SM. Loving began shouting at us, causing a scene in a residential area. Ms. Loving was asked several times to stop shouting and cooperate. Ms. Loving was informed that the investigation was discontinued due to her screaming and aggressive behavior” – Giraldo – it was written within the report.

The appeals court judges ruled that prosecutors didn’t present a sufficient objective argument to support their claim that Giraldo intentionally falsified the arrest report. They found that Giraldo’s “subjective interpretation” of Loving’s behavior through the meeting was not adequately rebutted and subsequently intent to jot down false statements couldn’t be proven.

“Giraldo’s subjective account of the events depicted does not rise to the level of knowledge or deliberate falsification,” the three-judge panel wrote in its opinion. “After reviewing the footage, it can be concluded that Giraldo’s description is not manifestly false or inaccurate. (…) Because Giraldo’s subjective interpretation was not clearly disproved by objective facts, it did not – and could not – rise to the level of intentional falsity.”

The three-judge panel of Florida’s Third District Court of Appeals in Miami further argued that because prosecutors told the trial court that the false arrest report charge helped establish the battery charge, the second charge was challenged.

“The trial court erred in denying Giraldo’s motions for a judgment of acquittal. “The State acknowledged at the oral hearing that if the motion for acquittal by reason of official misconduct had been granted, it should not have initiated a count of beatings because the arrest would have been lawful,” the judges wrote. “We therefore set aside the final conviction and sentence and forward the motion for a judgment of acquittal in both cases.”

The court dismissed each his misconduct and the battery charges.

Giraldo’s attorney said he was “excited and satisfied” with the ruling. State Attorney Katherine Fernandez Rundle expressed disappointment.

“Based on the Court’s ruling, we cannot reopen the case. While we’re disillusioned by the Court’s decision, we understand and respect its decision,” Rundle said: according to Local 10. “Police officers have a very difficult job and hindsight is 20/20. As a result, the law gives them great latitude, making it difficult to prosecute them for their conduct and actions while performing their official duties.”

Giraldo was fired from the Miami Police Department and convicted on June 22, 2022, on charges stemming from Loving’s arrest. He was sentenced to 364 days in prison and 18 months probation. He was released on bail on the same day his prison sentence began.

His former boss told NBC6 he was surprised by the ruling overturning Giraldo’s conviction.

“While I respect the District Court of Appeals’ decision, I am surprised,” former Miami-Dade Police Director Juan Perez said in a statement: according to NBC6. “The jury, not the state’s attorney, decided the guilty verdict.”

The Miami Herald reports that Giraldo is predicted to attempt to regain his position as a police officer. To accomplish that, he might want to reapply for recertification as a state police officer.

WASHINGTON (AP) — Halle Berry is joining a gaggle of bipartisan senators to push for laws that might dedicate $275 million to research and education about menopause, a major hormonal change that middle-aged women undergo.

The laws calls on the federal government to spend extra money on clinical trials for menopause, in addition to hormone therapy to treat hot flashes and other symptoms.

On Thursday, Berry, 57, screamed outside the U.S. Capitol about menopause. She said it was a word her own doctor told her that he was afraid to say in her presence.

“I’m in menopause, OK?” Berry shouted, causing the crowd to chuckle. “Shame needs to be removed from menopause. We need to talk about this very normal part of our lives that is happening. Our doctors can’t even say a word to us, let alone guide us through the entire journey.”

In recent months, the top Hollywood actress has spoken candidly about the painful symptoms she experienced during perimenopause, which occurs before menopause when a lady’s estrogen levels begin to decline. The doctor initially misdiagnosed her with herpes, a sexually transmitted disease for which each Berry and her partner tested negative.

Under the proposal from Democratic Sen. Patty Murray of Washington and Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, $125 million can be allocated for clinical, public health and medical research on menopause. The remaining money will help detect and diagnose menopause, train doctors in menopause treatment and raise public awareness about it.

Featured Stories

“Menopause is not a bad word, it is not something to be ashamed of and it is not something that Congress or the federal government should ignore,” Murray said.

The bill is supported by 17 senators – three Republicans, 13 Democrats, one independent and all women. Several senators said Thursday they hoped the bill would encourage doctors, women and men, to speak more openly about key health achievements experienced by all women.

In addition to Berry, other celebrities have began talking more about menopause on talk shows and interviews, and some have even began selling menopause-related products. Last yr, President Joe Biden launched a brand new initiative to improve the federal government’s research on women’s health, including menopause. Dr. Monica Bertagnolli, director of the National Institutes of Health, said too little is understood about women’s health in any respect stages of life. Her agency is the federal government’s leading medical research arm.

While the laws removed what is normally one in all Congress’s biggest hurdles – gaining bipartisan support – its prospects are uncertain. It’s difficult to get bills through Congress at any time, and the challenges at the moment are compounded by divisions on the Hill and the dwindling variety of days on the legislative calendar before the November election.

For funding for menopause research to change into a reality, the women’s group will need to gain the support of their colleagues. Congress is overwhelmingly represented by men.

Murkowski said she looks forward to the support from her colleagues. “If men went through menopause, we would have adequately and appropriately funded menopause research decades ago.”