The former Vice President Joe Biden admits that some of the laws on the control of crime and law enforcement agencies in 1994, which exploded mass imprisonment in the United States and would proceed to devastate the Black and Brown communities, was a “mistake”, however it repeated that it was widely supported by black leaders and that she was still opposing the police.

During the town hall in Philadelphia, on Thursday, Biden, chief architect Bill, said it was a distinct time. “The black club voted for him, every black mayor supported him all over the board,” he said.

Referring the act on violence against women, which was part of the act, Biden blamed you for harmful parts of the provisions, unlike something that’s by nature bad with the bill itself.

“But there were mistakes here,” he said. “The error came in the scope of what you did locally.”

Biden is comfortable to skip, they’re state incentives baked in the bill. He also skipped the way Democrats push the rhetoric of “hard crime” when comfortable and social justice indicates that this just isn’t the case.

“The liberal wing of the Democratic Party concerns 100,000 cops. The liberal wing of the Democratic Party affects 125,000 new prison cells,” said Biden in 1994 on the Senate floor. “I would like to see the conservative wing of the Democratic Party.”

After the adoption of the Act, signed by the then President Bill Clinton, many states would soon transfer their very own version of the provisions on “three strikes” and can be granted True in the subsidies of the sentence construct and expand prisons. In addition, the AtlanticTodd S. Purdum reports, “A 2002 Urban Institute Study He stated that in the years 1995–1999 nine states adopted such provisions for the first time, and 21 others changed existing regulations to qualify for funds. Until 1999, a total of 42 states had such provisions. At the same time, many states adopted their own stricter conviction, which only tightened this trend. “

Crime bill He had wide black supportBut not “every black mayor”, as Biden said. At that point, NAACP called this “Crime against the American nation. “When it passed in 1994, it was with the help of the overwhelming majority of the Black Congress Club and the support of Nimby Black Community Community, who believed that the increased penalty would save” good “black children from” bad “black children who were allegedly involved in criminal activities Michelle Alexander He explained that some leaders were reluctant to support the law and expected reinvestment in black communities – school, higher apartments, healthcare and work. But it happened.

Before the Crime Act in 1994 could undergo the house, Clinton agreed to remove Act on racial justice– which might allow trapped people to death sentences based on data indicating that racial prejudice was an element at the time of their trial.

The bill was also deprived of $ 3.3 billion-a third party from preventive programs-and a provision that may make 16,000 drug criminals eligible for early release.

Today, the USA is the largest prison in the world. And in 2019, talking a few criminal account project during breakfast in Washington, wherein they commemorate the ninetieth birthday of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., a former vice chairman, said: “It was an enormous mistake he made. Experts told us that “you may never come back with a crack” … It is trapped the whole generation. “

Despite this reality and as protests against rock violence and remodeling the world, Biden continued to defend his opposition to Movement at the Black Lives call to reject the police. However, he repeated his position that nobody needs to be imprisoned for using drugs, that marijuana needs to be decriminalized and that individuals with registration of cannabis needs to be cleaned. Instead of prisoners, he said that the United States should construct rehabilitation centers as a substitute and make mandatory treatment.

Of course, not all drug use is problematic, and compulsory rehabilitation just isn’t much different from imprisonment. In addition, most researchers agree that there is no such thing as a evidence that mandatory rehabilitation is acting, According to a worldwide Boston Medical Center evaluation.

A chilly case of Alonzo Brooks, a person from Kansas, who died mysteriously in 2003 Many sourcesHis body was now exhumed as a part of the investigation into his premature death.

In times, press reports and the newly launched Netflix series claim that Brooks participated in the East Central Kansas event in April 2004 and never returned home. A month later, his body was found in a close-by stream. Brooks was only 23 years old.

Last 12 months, the FBI again opened the case in his death, which is taken into account a possible hate crime. At the starting of this month, the inclusion in the latest season introduced the unclear matter to thousands and thousands of latest people. In an announcement last month From Stephen Mcallister, a lawyer of the American district Kansas, noticed that the time had come for the truth behind Brooks’ death to be known to the world. “The code of silence must be broken,” McAllister wrote. “The Alonzo family deserves to know the truth and it’s time to serve justice.” He suspects that “many people” know what happened to him on this deadly night in April 2004.

Since the re -opening of the case, the FBI has offered USD 100,000 for suggestions resulting in arrest in his case. Official Twitter account He presented some details now known to the federal authorities. This includes the place where Brooks’s body was found, where his things were found and what happened to the original autopsy about his death.

In his first public comments regarding the investigation in the matter of Russian interference in the presidential election in 2016, a special adviser Robert Mueller said on Wednesday that his hands are sure, Reports.

“Seating the president for a crime was not an option that we could consider,” said Mueller in his comments in the Department of Justice on Wednesday morning.

“According to the long -term policy of the department, the president cannot be accused of a federal crime,” Mueller continued. “The Special Advisor Office is part of the Department of Justice … If we were sure that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would say it.”

Mueller said that the investigation was officially closed and announced his resignation, explaining that even when he relied on it, he didn’t testify before the Congress regarding any offense, stating: “The report is my testimony.”

See how Mueller presents his statement below: