While the shares of the Tesla electric vehicle company starts the tank, evidently the company is Loss of fans and fans at a quick paceblaming the latest role of general director Elon Musk in Washington.

From the Hollywood elite to legislators on the capitol, the pace of eliminating Tesla vehicles increases. The winner of Golden Globe, Jason Bateman, announced his decision to do away with his Tesla, claiming that driving is like “driving a Trump sticker”. The award -winning Grammy singer Sheryl Crow shared similar thoughts in a movie showing how she sold her vehicle. Crow said that she had passed the influence of the public transmitting organization NPR, which “is threatened by President Musk, in the hope that the truth will continue to go to those who want to know the truth.”

At X Senator Mark Kelly (D-Az) said that Musk and his policy are the explanation why he abandoned his Tesla. “I bought a Tesla because it was a fast rocket ship. But now, every time I run it, I feel like a rolling billboard for a man dismantling our government and hurting people,” Kelly wrote.

“So Tesla, you’re released!”

Protests and vandalism broke out in the Tesla dealers throughout the country, because the involvement of President Donald Trump as the head of presidency performance (Doge) and the marked right -wing policy rejected buyers. The film circulated in social media showing that five Teslas are attributed to Molotov cocktails at the Las Vegas salon. When the newly appointed Prosecutor General Pam Bondi described episodes as acts of “national terrorism”, other people in the Muska circle call the billionaire to do something with this.

During the television interview, considered one of the earliest investors of Tesla, Ross Gerber, said that it was time to make a Musk decision – Get off as an organization CEO or leave the dog. “The company’s reputation has just been destroyed by Elon Muska. Sales will drop sharply, so yes, it’s a crisis. You can’t literally sell the best product on the market because the CEO is so dividing,” said Gerber, based on.

“It is time for someone to do Tesla. There are too many important things that Tesla does, so either Elon should go back to Tesla and be the general director of Tesla and give up other jobs, or should focus on the government and do what he does, but find the right director of Tesla.”

The report published at the starting of March 2025 showed that Tesla’s shares fell by 53% after the records of the highest all time achieved in mid -December 2024. A month later, S&P Global Mobility numbers revealed that Tesla’s registrations dropped by 11%, while registration for other manufacturers of electrical vehicles comparable to Ford, Chevrolet, and chevrolet Volkswagen A 44%increase was recorded. Every day, Tesla consumers are a pre -school teacher at New Jersey Megan Paulus. She took over her husband’s automotive after her death in December 2021 and mentioned that she was an excellent musk fan, even with supplies.

However, Paulus deals with how driving a vehicle will connect it with a musk policy and doesn’t want any role, and is especially serious about elevated vandalism. “I don’t want to be associated with these people anymore. I don’t want to be associated with Elon Musk anymore,” said the teacher.

“I got one of these magnets from the Slash-Bumper stickers. I did it as a substitute symbol because I was thinking about selling a car.”

French company VC Daphni He publicizes the first closing of the latest fund, Daphni Blue. The company collected EUR 200 million (about USD 215 million at current exchange rates). He expects as much as EUR 250 million (270 million dollars) by the end of the yr.

Some of the most unusual Daphni investments include Back Market, SWILE, Hubcycle and Pasqal. In general, the company has invested in 70 European startups since 2015.

Thanks to the latest fund, Daphni plans to speculate in one other 40 startups. Limited in Daphni Blue to Crédit Muuel Arkéa, Bpifrance, European Investment Fund, Pro BTP and Swen Capital Partners.

“We have to ask ourselves how we can both stand out and support technologies or services that are balanced when we invest in new projects,” the partner of the founder Pierre-Eica Leibovici told me.

“Because there are cycles at the end of the day and we see that at a given moment either the market consolidates or is dominated by American players, or ultimately there was not enough breakthrough at the beginning.”

While most VC firms recall artificial intelligence in another sentence, Daphni desires to put emphasis on learning (generally) as the major factor of the next wave of innovation: natural sciences, biology, physics, chemistry and arithmetic.

“Speaking of quantum calculation, quantum calculations are fundamental physics in combination with hardware and software,” said Leibovici. He also said that enormous language models are primarily a breakthrough of mathematics.

As a result, Daphni recruits various profiles to hitch the team. For example, a doctoral student and doctoral student are in the investment team.

“There is another element that is a new trend. The new generation of researchers is much more open to the commercialization of their basic and research used because they see all their friends around the companies,” said Leibovici.

While French universities are put aside Daphni says that a part of their budget to draw American researchers says that for this reason he didn’t determine to focus funding.

“This coincidence. We launched so long before this trend took place,” said Leibovici. Of course, Daphni is open to investing in American researchers who’re starting a startup in Europe.

Then Daphni may have to implement this newly collected capital and prove that he has found an efficient investment strategy. “Lifting is not an end in itself. What is in itself is the distribution of phrases, and therefore comes out,” said Leibovici.

Google firstly of this week he agreed to pay $ 28 million to resolve a collective claim through which alleged discrepancies of racial salaries, and Development Re -distributed debates on capital within the technology sector.

A lawsuit from 2021 claimed that Google is systematically not paying Latinos, Latinos, Indians and Black employees, favors white and Asian employees.

The plaintiffs claimed that Google had placed coloured employees in lower pay and levels of work, regardless of qualifications. The internal document leaked showed that the technological giant had coherent gaps within the scope of similar roles. Lawyers argued that the remuneration based on earlier remuneration recorded historical unevenness, disproportionately affecting marginalized groups.

The settlement, the initial consent of the Supreme Court judge Santa Clara, includes over 6,600 employees who worked at Google between February 15, 2018, and on December 31, 2024, supporters of their very own capital perceive the case as emphasizing the necessity for collective actions to reveal hidden remuneration discredits.

“Suspected salary inequality is too easily hidden without this kind of collective operation of employees,” said Cathy Coble, one of the lawyers representing the plaintiff.

The settlement of the technological giant doesn’t mean access to guilty, even though it causes control of Google and obligations.

“We have reached a resolution, but we still do not agree with the accusations that we treated someone differently and we remain involved in paying, employing and equalizing all employees,” said Google BBC spokesman.

The multi -million settlement of dollars occurs among the many wider withdrawal of activities, capital and integration (Dei) of the major American corporations. Meta, Amazon and Walmart limited Dei programs, facing political and legal challenges. Critics claim that Dei initiatives may end in reverse discrimination, while supporters consider them key to dealing with systemal inequalities.

Former Google Diversity recruiter, April Christina Curley, alleged discrimination practices. Curley, a black and strange woman, submitted a discriminatory case in 2020, claiming that Google She sabotaged her efforts Increase the representation of black and brown employees. She claimed that the CV from historically black universities and universities (HBCU) and other “unknown” schools were often rejected.

“I quickly realized all the racist that stops black and brown students outside their pipeline,” wrote Curley in a public statement. “I routinely contained suspicious recruitment practices, such as” browsing “students with” unknown (*28*).

Curley said that there was retaliation for factual just employment. She said that managers made her work difficult, harassed her and rejected her efforts to diversify the talent pipeline. According to HBCU graduate, a friend even blocked her progress.

“This white woman also told me that she never felt comfortable, supporting my work because she was” intimidated “by me and therefore never considered me the possibility of leadership,” wrote Curley.

Curley allegations comply with the critics of the struggle of the variability of the technology industry. Studies have shown that black women have significant barriers to corporate development.

Study 2020 “Women in the workplace” He emphasized the disproportionate number of black women in corporate America, which is able to less often promote, support or give mentoring to develop within the workplace on men, latines, Asian and white colleagues.

“Black women are already encountering larger development barriers than most other employees. Today they are also dealing with the disproportionate influence of Covid-19 on the black community. And the emotional stay of repetitive cases of racial violence falls hard on their arms,” ​​we read within the report.

Challenges regarding the capital of the technology industry are usually not unique to Google, but its impact strengthens discussions about responsibility. In the case of supporters of work capital, the settlement emphasizes the necessity for transparency and vigilance in solving system differences.

Because technology firms are within the face of growing control, the long run of Dei programs is uncertain. Some are afraid that reversing will worsen existing unevenness. Others say that legal challenges may lead firms to determine equality priorities in a balanced manner.

A settlement with a value of $ 28 million solves this process, but leaves wider questions on Google’s involvement in diversity and inclusion. It also establishes a precedent for similar legal challenges, potentially encouraging other technology employees to unravel discrimination practices. Settlement of a collective claim is a significant step within the constant pursuit of capital and honesty within the technology industry.