Connect with us

Politics and Current

Watch: NABJ Panel’s Analysis of Trump and His History of Disrespecting Black Journalists

Published

on

For Ryan, the 2017 NABJ Journalist of the Year award winner, the invitation from the Republican presidential candidate’s organization was personal. Although the NABJ said in 2018 that it was appalled by the treatment of Ryan and other black reporters, comparable to Abby Phillip and Yamiche Alcindor, the black press advocacy group decided to ask someone who has made years of harmful and demeaning remarks about black women journalists.

The forty fifth president of the United States lashed out at ABC News’ Rachel Scott, who’s black, saying the wording of her query, during which she challenged him for making racist comments, was rude and “disgusting.” Scott cited Trump’s past comments about black reporters covering events on the White House, in addition to harsh comments about black prosecutors who brought the twice-impeached and convicted former president to justice.

Republican presidential candidate and former President Donald Trump speaks with Rachel Scott, senior congressional correspondent for ABC News, during a question-and-answer session on the National Association of Black Journalists (NABJ) convention on July 31, 2024 in Chicago. (Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images)

Following NABJ’s controversial panel with Trump, the organization’s founders met to ascertain a strategic management plan and discuss the Trump controversy, in addition to other issues which have landed the historic organization in unwanted headlines world wide.

“What I saw was a lack of accountability from an organization that claimed to want to hold someone accountable,” Reign said of the hour-plus delay to the session. Trump complained profusely in regards to the convention’s “poor” equipment, which he blamed for the panel not starting on time. NABJ has not yet officially commented on the matter.

The panel’s audience gasped audibly multiple times in moments of shock and awe, including when Trump falsely accused his presidential opponent, Vice President Kamala Harris, at one point decided to “turn black.”

As ABC’s Scott identified to Trump on Wednesday, Harris, who can also be South Asian, has all the time identified as a black woman. The vice chairman’s mother is Southeast Asian and her father is Jamaican.

Featured Stories

This article was originally published on : thegrio.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics and Current

Kamala Harris Considers Running for Governor in 2026 and Returning to the Presidency in 2028

Published

on

By

Kamala Harris, Will Kamala Harris run again, Will Kamala Harris run for governor of California, Will Kamala Harris run again in 2028, Should Kamala Harris run in 2028, theGrio.com

After a devastating and decisive defeat to Donald Trump in the 2024 presidential election, Vice President Kamala Harris is keeping her options open regarding her political future once she leaves office next 12 months.

Harris told her advisers and close allies: ‘I’ll stay in the fight’ Policy reports. However, it isn’t known what this fight will appear like.

According to Harris’ inner circle, the vice chairman is considering a run for California governor when Gov. Gavin Newsom’s term-limited term ends in 2026. Harris also hasn’t ruled out running for president again in 2028. However, insiders told the news outlet that it’s unlikely Harris could achieve this each.

While Harris, who left Washington last week for a vacation to Hawaii along with her family and advisers, has loads of time to resolve her next move, those close to the vice chairman have made clear she is going to remain a critical voice of Trump and his recent administration.

Politico notes that another choice for Harris is to create an independent entity as former vice chairman in which she would proceed to travel the country, give speeches and maintain political relationships if she runs for public office again.

Donna Brazile, a longtime Democratic strategist who’s a detailed adviser to Harris, told Politico that the vice chairman gained “a lot of political capital” as the Democratic presidential candidate in 2024. Although Harris lost the presidential election, including the popular vote, she won the most votes of any presidential candidate Democrats outside of President Joe Biden’s 2020 vote totals.

“You can’t waste this by making rash decisions,” Brazile said.

According to the latest survey conducted by Puck News/Echelon InsightsHarris stays the favorite of influential Democrats in a possible 2028 presidential campaign. The vice chairman won 41% amongst those polled, well above average support for Newsom, Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro, Maryland Gov. Wes Moore, Republican Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and others.

Kamala Harris, theGrio.com
WASHINGTON – OCTOBER 29: Democratic presidential candidate U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris waves during a campaign rally at the Ellipse on October 29, 2024 in Washington, DC. Per week before Election Day, Harris delivered her “closing speech,” a speech in which she outlined her plan for America and urged voters to “turn the page” on the Republican presidential candidate, former U.S. President Donald Trump. (Photo: Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

Democratic strategist Joel Payne said he “doesn’t see why Kamala Harris doesn’t have a place in the future of the Democratic Party,” noting that she only has 100 days to construct a presidential campaign after President Biden dropped out of the race three months before Election Day .

Meghan Markle shares why she

Even as Democrats pointed fingers at one another after Trump’s victory, Payne added: “I believe Kamala Harris has something to be pleased with. I believe it will be shortsighted to just lay it at the feet of Kamala Harris, which is what happened to Democrats this cycle.

This article was originally published on : thegrio.com
Continue Reading

Politics and Current

Alabama Grandma Beaten and Killed by Cops – New FBI Documents Revealed Proposing Closure for Black Family After Decades

Published

on

By

Cold Case Records Describe Horrific Murder of Black Woman by Law Enforcement Officers Over Alleged Untaxed Whiskey in 1945, Providing Family with Closure

It was March 23, 1945, when 4 white cops entered Hattie DeBardelaben’s estate in Alabama, accusing her of manufacturing and selling untaxed whiskey.

The 46-12 months-old black mother of seven denied the allegations and consented to police searching her property.

However, law enforcement officials killed her by punching her repeatedly and breaking her neck in front of her 15-12 months-old son, who was arrested for attempting to defend his mother.

Court records describe the horrific murder of a black woman by law enforcement officers over alleged untaxed whiskey in 1945, leading to family closure
Mary and Dan DeBardelaben (left and right), whose grandmother Hattie DeBardelaben (center) was murdered by law enforcement officers in 1945, were ultimately locked up after the federal government released documents referring to the murder and cover-up about their grandmother. (Photos: Facebook and National Archives and Records Administration)

However, an FBI investigation conducted on the request of the NAACP concluded that she died of a heart attack and closed the case several months later. One of the cops involved in her death, Clyde Smith, later became sheriff of Autauga County.

The case remained secret for many years until last month, when the National Archives and Records Administration released 69 pages of documents from a Cold Case Civil Rights Records Act investigation signed by President Donald Trump in 2019.

The pending case of Hattie DeBardelaben was the primary set of records released under the act, providing closure for the victim’s grandchildren, whose parents never told how their grandmother died.

“I cried for days because I couldn’t believe what happened to my grandmother,” said 74-12 months-old Mary DeBardelaben AL.com.

“It was a cover-up,” said her brother, Dan DeBardelaben CNN. “That is exactly what happened – these documents clearly show that.”

The documents, which may be read here, here and here, make clear the horrific law enforcement murder case and the resulting government cover-up that, unfortunately, still continues.

“Hattie DeBardelaben’s name may not be familiar to most people, but her death at the hands of law enforcement officers in 1945 was sadly typical of the violence – and even death – that many black Americans experienced in the Jim Crow South.” – Margaret Burnham, co-chair of the National Security Review Board Civil Rights in preparatory proceedings, said the statement.

“Although federal agents investigated her death on the time, the perpetrators were never dropped at justice. “We hope, however, that the release of these recordings after so many years will provide some answers for her descendants, and at the same time shed light on a dark chapter in our nation’s history.”

Murder

Clyde White, who was an Autauga County sheriff’s deputy on the time, told the FBI that he had received complaints that DeBardelaben was selling illegal whiskey, so he contacted agents of the federal Alcohol Tax Unit, which was the forerunner of today’s Alcohol, Tobacco, and Federal Drug Enforcement Administration. firearms and explosives.

White said he drove as much as the DeBardelaben farm with three ATU agents: John H. Barrenbrugge, J.C. Moseley and L.O. Smith.

White said they only found a quart of whiskey and a couple of empty jugs of stinking whiskey, and decided to arrest her for the whiskey and Edward for interfering with arrest, although he didn’t describe exactly how the boy interfered beyond saying “these white sons of bitches don’t they’ll search this house.

White told FBI agents that they never hit DeBardelaben or her son and nephew and that DeBardelaben walked to the automotive without limping or complaining.

He also claimed that DeBardelaben died suddenly within the backseat of a automotive as they were driving to the Platville County Jail.

However, DeBardelaben’s 15-12 months-old son, Edward Lewis Underwood, gave a really different version of events to the FBI, telling investigators that he had just returned home from school when law enforcement officers stopped on the family farm within the countryside near Selma and asked his mother if she had some whiskey for sale.

He said his mother told officers she did not have the whiskey and that they may search the home although they did not have a warrant.

But then her 16-12 months-old nephew, James Callier, got here home from school and the officers ordered him to sit down on the bottom, but he didn’t seem to listen to them, so considered one of the officers walked as much as him and punched him, prompting Callier to take the seat next to Underwood.

“Leave him alone. She’s going to come back home,” DeBardelaben told police in defense of her nephew, which led to her beating and death.

Edward described a terrifying scene by which the identical policeman who had punched his cousin walked as much as his mother and punched her, knocking her down and causing her to fall onto a pot of boiling water she was using for laundry.

She tried to stand up, but then two ATU agents hit her again, causing her to fall onto a pot of boiling water.

“She stood up again and they each hit her again. This time she fell to her knees, keeping each hands on the bottom.

The agents then lifted her off the bottom and placed her in a chair, where she remained speechless, “panting and grunting like a person whose breath had been cut off.”

Edward said he called his two older brothers who were working within the fields to come back to the home, Johnnie and Bennie DeBardelaban, but after they approached the home, two cops pulled out their guns and ordered them to the bottom while the opposite two cops dragged them mother to the automotive, placing her within the backseat with Edward.

As they drove, Hattie begged the boys to stop and let her drink water from a close-by stream, but they ignored her request and continued driving.

She then began vomiting, so that they stopped the automotive and let her vomit on the side of the road. When she finished vomiting, Edward pulled her back into the automotive and they continued driving, but then she passed out.

They stopped the automotive again and White went to the stream, filled a bottle with water and let her son wipe her face and let her drink, but she was already dying.

“He’s my baby,” were her last words in reference to Edward, her youngest son, who was trying his hardest to assist his mother.

When they arrived at Plattville Jail, she was already dead, so that they locked Edward in a cell and contacted local undertakers to take his mother’s body to the funeral home.

Concealment

Dan Albright, a black undertaker at a neighborhood funeral home in Platville, told the FBI that the sheriff contacted him about collecting the body from the jail around 6:30 p.m. that evening. Albright said her body was still within the back seat of the police automotive and that she was “foaming from her mouth and nose, just like a boar’s foaming.”

He also said the sheriff contacted Dr. James Tankersley, who examined her body while it was still within the squad automotive and determined she had died of a heart attack despite signs of a broken neck.

“The only thing I noticed that was different from the other bodies was that every time we lifted the body, the head fell back,” Albright told investigators. “I didn’t tell the doctor anything in regards to the neck. After examination, the doctor concluded that she died of heart problems.

That evening, at Edward’s request, one other black undertaker, Fred Williams, picked up the body from the unique funeral home in Plattville and transported it to his funeral home in Selma, where the subsequent morning he examined it and determined that she had not died from a broken neck, but he reached this conclusion without performing a neck dissection.

He also emphasized that greater than 12 hours had passed since she was killed and rigor mortis had occurred, which might make it inconceivable to make a full determination.

According to A Medical examination from 2016it’s inconceivable to totally determine whether a neck fracture has occurred without performing a neck autopsy, concluding the next:

According to 1 researcher, rigor mortis, or the stiffening of muscles after death, affects the neck inside hours of death, peaking after 12 hours. Medical examination 2023.

The FBI also interviewed DeBardelaben’s doctor, a white man named J. S. Chisholm, who had treated her for 10 years, and told investigators that her health had all the time been high quality until a few month earlier, when she began complaining of shortness of breath and swollen feet.

He said he diagnosed her with a heart murmur and said she could probably live a standard life, “but it was not unusual for a person in her condition to die suddenly, especially if subjected to any unusual strain or excitement.”

This was enough for investigators to shut the case on June 30, 1945, concluding that the cops had done nothing mistaken, and of their report they stated the next.

After reading the documents of Dan and Mary DeBardelaban, whose father was Bennie DeBardelaban, considered one of the young men working within the fields when their mother died, they finally understood why the family never told them how their grandmother died, even when she visited her growing up within the grave . All seven of her children have since died.

“You know, my dad and his brothers and cousins ​​witnessed what really happened,” Dan told AL.com.

“I’m sure this example was extremely traumatic for my father and was considered one of the the reason why he never said a word nor did he or his other six sisters and brothers seek advice from us about what happened. “

This article was originally published on : atlantablackstar.com
Continue Reading

Politics and Current

Washington’s power has modified. Here’s how the ACA could change

Published

on

By

ACA, Trump ACA, Republicans ACA, Trump Obamacare, Republicans Obamacare, Medicare, Republicans Medicare, Medicare and Medicaid, Republicans Medicaid, Republican Congress, theGrio.com

Trump teased ACA overhaul; other Republican lawmakers have said changing the laws referred to as Obamacare can be a priority.

President-elect Donald Trump’s return to the White House could embolden Republicans who need to weaken or repeal the Affordable Care Act, but implementing such sweeping changes would still require overcoming procedural and political hurdles.

Trump, a longtime opponent of the ACA, expressed interest in changing the health law during the campaign. Additionally, some senior Republican lawmakers – who will now control each the House and Senate – have said changing the landmark 2010 laws referred to as Obamacare can be a priority. They argue that the law is simply too expensive and an overreach of the government’s powers.

The ruling trio is setting the stage for potentially seismic changes that could limit the expansion of Medicaid laws, raise uninsured rates, weaken patient protections and increase premium costs for hundreds of thousands of individuals.

“The Republicans’ plans — they don’t say they’re going to repeal the ACA, but their set of policies could amount to the same goal or worse,” said Sarah Lueck, vice chairman for health policy at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities , a research and policy institute. “This can happen through legislation and regulation. We are ready for anything. It can take many forms.”

Over the years, Republicans in Congress have solid dozens of votes in an try and repeal the law. They didn’t accomplish that in 2017, when Trump became president, despite serving in each chambers and the White House, largely because some GOP lawmakers wouldn’t support laws they believed would cause such a marked increase in the uninsured rate .

Similar opposition to the amendment to the law may appear again, especially as polls show ACA protections are popular.

While neither Trump nor his GOP allies have detailed what they’d change, House Speaker Mike Johnson said last month that the A.C.A. needs “massive reform” and can be included in the party program if Trump wins.

Congress could theoretically amend the ACA and not using a single Democratic vote, using a process referred to as “reconciliation.” But the narrow margins by which Republicans control the House and Senate mean that only a handful of “no” votes could derail the effort.

Many of the more ambitious goals would require Congress. Some conservatives have called for changing the funding formula for Medicaid, the federal government’s medical health insurance program for low-income people and other people with disabilities. The idea could be to make use of budget reconciliation to get lawmakers to agree to cut back the share the federal government pays to the growing population. The group that will be most affected could be mostly higher-income adults and adults who do not need children, moderately than “traditional” Medicaid beneficiaries similar to pregnant women, children and other people with disabilities.

A conservative idea that will allow individuals to make use of ACA subsidies for exchange-traded plans that violate the health law would likely require Congress. This could encourage healthier people to make use of subsidies to purchase cheaper and stingier plans, raising premiums for older and sicker consumers who need more comprehensive coverage.

“This is like a plan to repeal the ACA,” said Cynthia Cox, vice chairman and director of the Affordable Care Act program at KFF, the nonprofit health information organization that owns KFF Health News. “It’s repeal by another name.”

Congress would likely be needed to pass a proposal to transfer a few of consumers’ ACA subsidies to health savings accounts to cover qualified medical expenses.

Trump could also decide to bypass Congress. He did so during his last term, when the Department of Health and Human Services invited states to use for waivers to change how they pay for Medicaid programs – limiting federal funds in exchange for greater state flexibility in running the program. Waivers are popular in each blue and red states as other changes to Medicaid are made.

“Trump will do whatever he thinks he can,” said Chris Edelson, an assistant professor of presidency at American University. “If he wants to do something, he’ll just do it.”

Republicans have an alternative choice to weaken the ACA: They simply cannot do anything. Temporary, increased subsidies that reduce the cost of premiums — and have contributed to the nation’s lowest-ever uninsured rate — will expire at the end of next 12 months without congressional motion. Then there could be contributions double or moreon average, for subsidized consumers from 12 states which have signed up for the federal ACA exchange – in accordance with KFF data.

This would mean fewer people could afford the costs of the ACA exchanges. And while the number of individuals covered by employer plans is prone to increase, it’s estimated that between 2024 and 2033 there can be a further 1.7 million uninsured people annually, in accordance with federal estimates.

Many of the states that will be hardest hit, including Texas and Florida, are represented in Congress by Republicans, which could prompt some lawmakers to think about ending the subsidies.

The Trump administration may determine to stop defending the law against lawsuits in search of to overturn parts of it. One of the most characteristic cases questions the ACA requirement for insurers to cover some preventive services totally free, similar to cancer screenings and alcohol use counseling. About 150 million people now profit from the coverage requirement.

If the Justice Department withdrew its petition after Trump took office, plaintiffs wouldn’t need to comply with the coverage requirement — which could trigger similar challenges with broader consequences. A recent Supreme Court ruling left the door open to legal challenges from other employers and insurers in search of the same relief, said Zachary Baron, director of Georgetown University’s Center for Health Policy and Law.

Meanwhile, Trump could initiate changes from his first day in the Oval Office through executive orders, i.e. directives which have the force of law.

“Early executive orders will give us an idea of ​​the policies the administration plans to pursue,” said Allison Orris, a senior fellow at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. “Early signaling through executive orders will send a message about what guidance, regulations and policies may follow.”

In fact, Trump relied heavily on these orders during his previous term: An October 2017 order directed federal agencies to start modifying the ACA and ultimately increased consumer access to health plans that were illegal. He could issue similar orders early in his latest term, using them to start the strategy of forcing changes in the law, similar to increased oversight of potential fraud.

The administration could take other steps early on that will conflict with the ACA, similar to limiting federal aid funding and helping people enroll in ACA plans. Both actions depressed registration during the previous Trump administration.

Trump could also use regulation to implement other conservative proposals, similar to expanding access to medical health insurance plans which can be inconsistent with ACA consumer protections.

The Biden administration has held back Trump’s efforts to expand so-called short-term health plans, disparaging the plans as “junk” insurance because they could not cover certain advantages and will refuse to cover individuals with pre-existing health problems.

The Trump administration is anticipated to make use of regulations to reverse Biden’s decision, allowing consumers to maintain and extend their plans for much longer.

But drafting the rules became rather more complicated after a Supreme Court ruling that said federal courts not needed to defer to federal agencies facing legal challenges to their authority. As a result, any Trump-era HHS rules may require greater efforts to dam them in the courts.

Some individuals with ACA plans say they’re concerned. Dylan Reed, a 43-year-old small business owner from Loveland, Colorado, remembers the pre-ACA days and doesn’t need to return to the days when insurance was difficult to get and he couldn’t afford.

In addition to attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and anxiety, he suffers from scleroderma, an autoimmune disease related to: joint pain and numbness in the limbs. Even on the ACA plan, he estimates he pays about $1,000 a month for medications alone.

He worries that without the ACA’s protections, it can be difficult to seek out coverage for his pre-existing conditions.

“It’s definitely a scary thought,” Reed said. “I probably would have survived. I would just be in so much pain.”

KFF Health News is a national newsroom dedicated to publishing in-depth journalism on health issues and is one among the predominant operating programs of KFF – an independent source of research, polls and journalism on health policy. Find out more about KFF.

!function(){var g=window;g.googletag=g.googletag||{},g.googletag.cmd=g.googletag.cmd||(),g.googletag.cmd.push(function(){ g.googletag.pubads().setTargeting(“film-recommended-film”,”true”)})}(); ( () => { ( ( cb ) => { window.tpd = window.tpd || {}; if ( true === tpd.cmpReady ) { console.log( ‘(TPD)(Brid) CMP was already ready, working player.’ ); cb(); } let tpdCmpReadyListener = () => { console.log( ‘(TPD)(Brid) Event ready for CMP began, running player.’ ); window.removeEventListener( ‘tpd:cmpCb’, tpdCmpReadyListener( ‘script’ ); s.src=”https://player.target-video.com/player/build/targetvideo.min.js”; s.async = true; let goal = document.getElementById( ‘Brid_21904’ ); goal ); window._bp = window._bp ||. {“div”:”Brid_21904″,”obj”:{“id”:”41122″,”width”:”1280″,”height”:”720″,”stickyDirection”:”below”,”playlist”: “21904”}} );

This article was originally published on : thegrio.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending