Connect with us

Politics and Current

‘Politics Explained’: Are Biden or Trump to Blame for Inflation? And How Will Harris or Trump Change the Economy?

Published

on

Inflation has been a serious concern for voters in the upcoming election, with many pointing fingers at President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris. But is it fair to blame them entirely for the rising cost of products? The answer, like the causes of inflation itself, is complex.

While inflation is currently at its lowest point since March 2021, many families are still battling higher prices. News and social media show that some voters are blaming the Biden-Harris administration for the rising costs. In this episode of “Politics Explained,” we take a have a look at theories about inflation that consider that inflation simply didn’t start with one president.

During former President Donald Trump’s administration, Trump often boasted about low unemployment and economic growth, much of which he inherited from Obama AdministrationHowever, Trump’s decision to engage in trade wars, particularly with China, has led to the imposition of tariffs which have disrupted supply chains and in some cases led to higher prices for consumers.

Advertisement

Then got here the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, which severely disrupted global supply chains and led to skyrocketing prices. As travel restrictions and labor shortages intensified, inflation soared, deepening the economic crisis.

In response to the pandemic, the U.S. government has taken significant steps to stabilize the economy. Trump signed the bipartisan CARES Act in 2020, providing relief funds to tens of millions of Americans. But some economists theorize that the surge in money flowing into the economy, combined with tight supplies, fueled demand and helped drive up prices. When Biden took office in 2021, the economy was still reeling from the effects of the pandemic. His administration signed one other stimulus package despite concerns about inflation.

Global aspects like the war in Ukraine and company price gouging also played a big role in inflation. Companies that posted record profits during the pandemic often kept prices high whilst supply-chain disruptions subsided. Still, many Americans looked to President Biden to fix the problem — but additionally they blamed him.

Historically, U.S. presidents have been blamed for inflation and economic crises, even when their control over them was limited. In the Seventies, President Jimmy Carter faced heavy criticism for high inflation (and his “talking about feeling unwell,” contributing to his loss to Republican candidate Ronald Reagan. Similarly, George H. W. Bush lost reelection to Bill Clinton due to the recession of the Nineties.

Advertisement

So what did Joe and Kamala do about inflation?

The Biden-Harris administration has taken steps to combat inflation. In 2022, President Biden has allowed the release of oil reserves to lower gas prices, passed an inflation-reduction bill and backed the Federal Reserve’s decision to raise rates of interest to slow spending. But the query stays whether these measures will ease voters’ concerns.

As the 2024 election approaches, Harris and Trump have outlined their economic plans. Trump is promising more tariffs, which economists say could further increase inflation. Harris, in turn, is promising support middle and low income families thanks to tax breaks and solving the problem of corporate price gouging.

Ultimately, voters may judge candidates not only by who does more to fix the economy, but in addition by who tells the most compelling story about their efforts to achieve this. The debate over the president’s responsibility for inflation is as much about perception because it is about policy.

Advertisement

With elections approaching, society will soon determine whose narrative it trusts more.

Featured Stories

This article was originally published on : thegrio.com
Advertisement

Politics and Current

The White House responds to the rumors of the pardon of Trump Derek Chauvin among the renovated connection Marjorie Taylor Greene

Published

on

By

Despite the earlier releases of President Donald Trump and the White Federal House of Pardoning for Derek Chaubin, a former police officer in Minneapolis sentenced to the murder of George Floyd, rumors with potential pardon were renovated.

When this month this month is approaching the fifth anniversary of Floyd’s murder, Governor of Minnesota Tim Walz and Minneapolis officials indicated that they were preparing for the possibility of presidential pardon for Chauvin and later anxieties in the city.

Advertisement

“I think we are prepared for it. Thanks to this presidency, it looks like it could be something they would do” – according to reporters, the Governor Walz recently told journalists Minnesota Star Tribune.

Walz, who was against Trump as the vp of Kamali Harris in the 2024 election, said that his office received “without an indication” whether the White House would give a pardon to Chauvin, who was convicted Up to 21 years after admitting federal allegations for violating Floyd and a youngster in a separate incident. Chauvin was too convicted Up to 22.5 years in prison for the second -cycle murder at the state level.

“If Donald Trump exercises his constitutional law, whether I agree-and I definitely disagree with him-if it seems pardon, we will simply transfer Derek Chauvin to take his 22 and a half years in prison in Minnesota,” Walz said.

Commissioner for the Security of the Community Minneapolis Todick Barnette admitted that city officials heard rumors about potential pardon; Similarly, nonetheless, he emphasized: “Derek Chauvin would remain behind bars, having a state sentence, even if his federal allegations are pardoned.”

Advertisement

He said in an announcement that “there is no reliable intelligence about any pardon or planned interference here in Minneapolis.”

Discussions about Trump potentially pardoning chauvins have been consistent since he returned to the White House in January. Conservatives are continually calling the president to pardon the disgraced officer. Republican US representative Marjorie Taylor Greene renovated the public campaign to pardon Chauvin on Wednesday, writing On X: “I definitely support the pardon of Derek Chauvin and release from prison.”

Marjorie Taylor Greene, Thegrio.com
United States-6 February: Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., Says during a press conference at Capitol Visitor Center on the resolution “Stating that President Donald Trump was not involved in the uprising”, on Tuesday, February 6, 2024.

The conservative fire brand also falsely claimed that Floyd “died of drug overdose”, despite two medical examinations, determining that he died by murder. Chauvin especially held his knee around Floyd’s neck for over 9 minutes until Floyd’s death, despite the multiple black man “I can’t breathe”.

In March, the press secretary of the White House Karoline Leavitt told journalists about the possible forgiveness: “The president was asked and answered this question. He said that he was not considering it at that time.”

Minneapolis agrees to browse police training and force politics after the murder of George Floyd

The president undertaking such an motion could be in the position he took in 2020 as a president when Floyd was murdered.

“It’s a terrible thing,” Trump he said In the White House in 2020, “we all saw what we saw. It’s hard to come up with something other than what we saw. It should never happen.”

Advertisement

The Prosecutor General in Minnesota Keith Ellison, who managed the prosecution of the State Criminal Case Chauvin, said in an announcement that President Trump has no right to forgive the state belief of Chauvin, “and” the only possible goal could be to express even greater disrespect for George Floyd.

He said clearly: “Derek Chauvin murdered George Floyd in front of the whole world.”

(Tagstranslate) Donald Trump (T) Trump administration (T) George Floyd

Advertisement
This article was originally published on : thegrio.com
Continue Reading

Politics and Current

Maryland Governor Wes Moore signs 170 bills to the right

Published

on

By

Maryland Governor Wes Moore


Maryland Gov. Wes Moore It takes the state to latest heights After signing 170 bills in state law, it informs CBS News Baltimore.

Bills, signed on May 13, relate to various topics, from the range of abortion to reckless driving.

The subsidy program for public health abortion (HB 930) concerns the financing of reproductive healthcare, establishing a fund coping with improving access to abortion take care of the inhabitants of Maryland, specializing in people without advanced financial resources.

Advertisement

The first black state governor also signed the Chesapeake Bay Legacy Act (HB 506), which is targeted on ways to improve popular water so as to increase economic growth in the region.

After the Chesapeake Bay Foundation announced concern about Trump’s administration plans for exceeding budget cuts to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (Noaa), Moore signed provisions that can support farmers in the development of more efficient methods of agriculture as well as to improving oyster aquaculture.

Senate Bill 590, Sergeant Patrick KEPP, corrects the regulations regarding Maryland motorized vehicles to strengthen penalties for a reckless and aggressive driving. Named in honor of a police officer of Montgomery, who was paralyzed from impact by a reckless driver, the Act adapts the system of status of the driver’s points, increasing to two points for neglected driving of the vehicle and 6 points for the transition by 30 km / h or greater than limiting speed.

According to the latest law, aggressive driving might be marked as behaviors, comparable to not compliance with traffic control devices, a dangerous passage and never being lifted by pedestrians.

Advertisement

The state account 901 is directed to the environment by increasing the recycling speed, reduced waste and emphasize the use of a sustainable packaging. Manufacturers will now be obliged to submit a five -year plan by July 2028, which identifies the recycling and recycling content goals.

Other bills are intended for such issues as real estate, public security, medical debt and wild nature.

Viewers consider that signing bills increases the light of Moore’s headlights in the Democratic Party as a possible presidential candidate in 2028.

The democratic strategist of Jon Reinish called Moore “one of the most fresh faces of the party, the most dynamic leaders”, but according to Moore, whose name He was once mentioned As a possible colleague from the former vice chairman of Kamali Harris on a democratic ticket in 2024, he told co -hosts ABC that there have been no plans to search for an oval office.

Advertisement

“I’m not running,” said Moore. “I am now very excited about work that is now happening in the state of Maryland.”

However, some democratic analysts feel movements that he does in another way.

“He does not do much to discourage this speculation at 2028 … his schedule was contrary to his message,” said the democratic strategist with Maryland Len Foxwell.

Moore recently provided the start address of the Lincoln University, HBCU in Pennsylvania, in addition to the major address of democracy at the Brennan Center Awards in New York.

Advertisement

Reinish said people should give attention to Moore.

“It happens in well-known television programs. It goes to the early states,” said Reinish. “I think that most people at this stage would be a cursory denial. But again look at what they do, not what they say.”

(Tagstranslat) gov. There was moore

Advertisement
This article was originally published on : www.blackenterprise.com
Continue Reading

Politics and Current

FEMA limits emergency training before the hurricane season

Published

on

By


In the Hurricane season for lower than two weeks, the Federal US FEMA FEMA disaster limited training for state and native rescue managers.

Sources acquainted with this case informed Reuters that a reduction or Cutting training can leave communities vulnerable to a storm less prepared to handle the consequences of hurricanes.

The forecasts predict the intensive season of hurricanes in 2025 and claim that the forecasts already indicate the amazing similarities to the destructive season 2024. One of the key indicators of this 12 months’s forecast are warm waters in the Persian Gulf and the Caribbean, which drive the development of the storm.

Advertisement

reports that AccuWeather provides 13-18 named storms in 2025.including seven to 10 hurricanes, three to five fundamental hurricanes and three to six direct effects on the United States.

Another disturbing AccuWeather forecast is that the season is to start out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out out quickly. Forecasts predict that the season, which could start on June 1, will then have a stake, after which pickup from September to November, like last 12 months’s pattern.

“Don’t get my way,” warns the acting director of FEMA

FEM’s decision to limit training couldn’t is vulnerable to be present in a worse time.

Season 2024 was one amongst the costliest record -breaking. AccuWeather estimates it Storms in 2024 caused about $ 500 billion in total compensation and economic losses.

Advertisement

President Donald Trump was recently released by the head of FEM, Cameron Hamilton, the day after Hamilton told the legislators that the agency must be preserved. His sentiments appear amongst unprecedented dismissals in federal agencies, because the administration prioritizes the federal workforce.

Hamilton’s successor, David Richardson, reportedly told FEMA employees that he would “escape”, every staff against his implementation of Trump’s vision for a smaller agency. On the phone, tHee Associated Press reportsHe warned that 20% of the employees he estimated may resist the changes.

“Don’t bother me if you are 20% of people,” said Richardson, in accordance with AP. “I know all the tricks. I am just as inclined to achieve the President’s intention as I made sure that I performed my duties when I took maritime infantry to Iraq.”

Advertisement

(Tagstranslate) fema

This article was originally published on : www.blackenterprise.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending