Politics and Current
‘Politics Explained’: Are Biden or Trump to Blame for Inflation? And How Will Harris or Trump Change the Economy?
Inflation has been a serious concern for voters in the upcoming election, with many pointing fingers at President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris. But is it fair to blame them entirely for the rising cost of products? The answer, like the causes of inflation itself, is complex.
While inflation is currently at its lowest point since March 2021, many families are still battling higher prices. News and social media show that some voters are blaming the Biden-Harris administration for the rising costs. In this episode of “Politics Explained,” we take a have a look at theories about inflation that consider that inflation simply didn’t start with one president.
During former President Donald Trump’s administration, Trump often boasted about low unemployment and economic growth, much of which he inherited from Obama AdministrationHowever, Trump’s decision to engage in trade wars, particularly with China, has led to the imposition of tariffs which have disrupted supply chains and in some cases led to higher prices for consumers.
Then got here the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, which severely disrupted global supply chains and led to skyrocketing prices. As travel restrictions and labor shortages intensified, inflation soared, deepening the economic crisis.
In response to the pandemic, the U.S. government has taken significant steps to stabilize the economy. Trump signed the bipartisan CARES Act in 2020, providing relief funds to tens of millions of Americans. But some economists theorize that the surge in money flowing into the economy, combined with tight supplies, fueled demand and helped drive up prices. When Biden took office in 2021, the economy was still reeling from the effects of the pandemic. His administration signed one other stimulus package despite concerns about inflation.
Global aspects like the war in Ukraine and company price gouging also played a big role in inflation. Companies that posted record profits during the pandemic often kept prices high whilst supply-chain disruptions subsided. Still, many Americans looked to President Biden to fix the problem — but additionally they blamed him.
Historically, U.S. presidents have been blamed for inflation and economic crises, even when their control over them was limited. In the Seventies, President Jimmy Carter faced heavy criticism for high inflation (and his “talking about feeling unwell,” contributing to his loss to Republican candidate Ronald Reagan. Similarly, George H. W. Bush lost reelection to Bill Clinton due to the recession of the Nineties.
So what did Joe and Kamala do about inflation?
The Biden-Harris administration has taken steps to combat inflation. In 2022, President Biden has allowed the release of oil reserves to lower gas prices, passed an inflation-reduction bill and backed the Federal Reserve’s decision to raise rates of interest to slow spending. But the query stays whether these measures will ease voters’ concerns.
As the 2024 election approaches, Harris and Trump have outlined their economic plans. Trump is promising more tariffs, which economists say could further increase inflation. Harris, in turn, is promising support middle and low income families thanks to tax breaks and solving the problem of corporate price gouging.
Ultimately, voters may judge candidates not only by who does more to fix the economy, but in addition by who tells the most compelling story about their efforts to achieve this. The debate over the president’s responsibility for inflation is as much about perception because it is about policy.
With elections approaching, society will soon determine whose narrative it trusts more.
Featured Stories
Politics and Current
As an Afro-Latina, I struggle to understand why Latinos voted for Trump – essence
Celeste Polanco
As we tried to discuss the election results, my mother’s hopeless voice welcomed my call. I heard my stepdad cheer, “Yay!” within the background. Unfortunately, he’s one among the numerous Latinos who supported Trump’s presidency. Anger surged through my body as I heard my father figure praising a person who could care less concerning the woman he “loved” probably the most – my mother. This is the truth for many Latinos who cannot understand why other Latinos would vote for Donald Trump.
54% Latinos voted for Trump, 18% greater than within the 2020 election. These are the identical men who got here from women. By electing a person who has made countless racist comments about our own culture, they’ve concurrently turned their backs on the ladies they got here here to vote for. As an Afro-Latina, seeing these results online and in my family is deeply disheartening and an enormous sign of disrespect.
In the Latino community, men are placed on a pedestal by the ladies within the household. These women cook, clean, raise children, work or stay at home for their careers, and more. Women carry Latinas on their backs just to be paid to accomplish that, with their rights to their bodies questioned. These usually are not only the bodies of their moms and wives, but additionally of their grandmothers, daughters and granddaughters. The results of this election are a transparent signal that the Latino pedestal has been held too high for too long. Trump-supporting Latinos bask within the election ends in the presence of the ladies they were supposed to protect.
Some of those men have a good time with 37% Latinas who voted for Trump are 7% greater than in 2020. These are the identical women who almost definitely won’t have the proper to end an unwanted pregnancy. This also concerns a more essential issue – these women placed on a pedestal a person who doesn’t respect them.
Donald Trump has been outspoken about women’s bodies and has even been accused of sexual assault, and yet women still select him. As Latinas, we’d like to stop supporting and making excuses for men who don’t select us in our home or country. This is our way of showing our daughters that it’s okay to accept disrespect. We also show them that there is no such thing as a “no” in politics.
Voting for Donald Trump is an act of violence against many groups, but especially against women. Healing is how I and plenty of others get through this time. I found peace in allowing my tears to flow and soften as I released my anger. By embracing the healing process, we as women can move forward.
Go for a walk, cry, shout, block, unfollow, end friendships and set boundaries. This is your healing process; there is no such thing as a right or unsuitable way to do it. Your emotions usually are not very high. They are on time. And despite what is occurring in our country, please remember: You and your body still matter.
Politics and Current
Biden will meet with Trump over a White House tradition that Trump broke four years ago
President-elect Donald Trump, the forty seventh latest president of the United States of America, will meet with President Joe Biden within the Oval Office on Wednesday as a part of the tradition of a peaceful transition of power on the White House.
The peaceful transfer of power dates back to 1801, when the president of the outgoing administration transferred power to the brand new administration and the opposing political party. At that time, the nation’s second president, John Adams, peacefully handed over the presidency to Thomas Jefferson.
But on Wednesday morning, President Biden will offer Trump something he couldn’t afford after being elected in 2020: a meeting with the present president within the White House Oval Office.
This 12 months, then-President Trump falsely accused Democrats of stealing the presidential election from him so as to install former Vice President Biden because the forty sixth president of the United States.
Trump’s vice chairman, Mike Pence, selected to follow the Constitution and certify the outcomes of the 2020 election, declaring Biden the winner of the Electoral College – against Trump’s wishes. As a results of President Trump’s election lies, which included encouraging his voters to “fight like hell” or “they won’t have a country anymore,” a mob of Trump supporters attacked the Capitol constructing after attending Trump’s “Stop the Steal” conference. ” so January 6, 2021
For Trump, the tradition of outgoing and incoming presidents is ironic because, as president-elect, he needed to face then-President Barack Obama during his meeting within the Oval Office to rejoice the approaching peaceful transition. The meeting got here after Trump fiercely attacked Obama and his Democratic presidential opponent, Hillary Clinton, in 2016.
Trump and Obama met within the Oval Office on November 16, 2018. The two politicians had never met in person before, which was very true after the rancorous and racist presidential campaign.
To the dismay of Black Americans and Democrats, Trump softly launched his presidential bid based on the racist claim that Obama was not a U.S. citizen. In this fashion, based on critics, Trump desired to delegitimize Obama’s historic victory within the 2008 presidential election.
During the planned and expected meeting, Obama was then described as “presidential” and “professional,” putting aside his hatred of the campaign and meeting with Trump for about 90 minutes, well longer than the scheduled time. The discussion on the agenda included various topics intended to assist the brand new president achieve a peaceful transfer of power.
While President Biden is extending presidential courtesy to Trump’s latest but familiar White House transition team, sources say there may be bad blood there. Once again through the 2024 election cycle, Trump used racist and slander tactics against his Democratic opponent, Vice President Kamala Harris.
During his first appearance on the Oval with President Obama, next to whom a bronze bust of Martin Luther King Jr. stands on the best side of the hearth, Trump told the press within the room: “It was a meeting that was supposed to last maybe 10 or 15 minutes and we were just getting to know each other.” “.
The New York native continued: “We have never met. That’s why I have great respect for it.”
“The meeting lasted almost an hour and a half, and for my part it could have lasted for much longer. We really discussed a lot of various situations,” Trump said on the time.
Trump, clearly impressed and in need of help dealing with his latest job within the White House – which former first lady Michelle Obama famously described as a “dark job” when prodding him at this 12 months’s DNC conference – told reporters: “I’m looking forward to being with the president in the long run, including with an advisor.”
As Democrats and others attempt to shake off the collective depression attributable to Harris’ stunning loss to Trump, many are looking forward to what to anticipate from a second Trump administration.
In the 2024 presidential election, Trump won the favored vote and the Electoral College – the primary Republican to achieve this since 2004. Trump received barely more electoral votes than within the last election, giving him a bonus. But the primary obstacle for Democrats was voter turnout, as apathy among the many party appeared to rear its head.
Regardless of the end result, Johnson offered hope to the country, stating: “We have to keep pushing and hoping.”
Politics and Current
A Washington police officer who shot a black man with his hands in the air over a stop sign, then dragged his body and slammed it into the ground, remains on the force despite an $8 million payout to his family
The city of Lakewood, Washington, has reached an agreement with the family of a 26-year-old black man who was shot thrice by an officer who claimed he was acting in self-defense.
He said Joquin died on May 1, 2020, after Officer Michael Wiley stopped him for running a stop sign. The $8 million settlement announced last week is coming to an end federal civil rights lawsuit Joquin’s parents filed a criticism against the officer, who claimed their son had lunged for a gun lying on the floor of his vehicle.
According to the lawsuit, Wiley approached Joquin’s automobile with a gun drawn and told him, “Shut up or you’ll get shot.” The lawsuit states that Joquin, as Wiley requested, had his hands up when he was shot. After the shooting, Wiley allegedly pulled Joquin out of the automobile and “threw him to the ground.”
Wiley was involved in one other expensive suit v. Lakewood in 2017. He was one in every of three officers found by a jury answerable for the death of one other young black man, Leonard Thomas, for a record $15.1 million. A post-trial settlement was reached in exchange for $13 million and a promise not to appeal.
Thomas was holding his 4-year-old son when he was shot in the stomach by a Lakewood SWAT sniper. Wiley reportedly announced “Jackpot!” Testimony shows he spoke on the police radio after Thomas was shot and later praised his colleague for taking the “million-dollar f–king shot,” according to trial testimony. Thomas bled to death, begging cops not to take his boy.
Evidence from Thomas’ trial “revealed that Wiley was an exceptionally aggressive officer who had an insufficient understanding of the use of force, was willing to use weapons, explosives and unnecessary force, and who demonstrated a striking lack of concern for life,” Joquin filed the family’s lawsuit.
Wiley remains in service. Joquin’s lawsuit alleged that Lakewood police were “unreasonable and reckless” in continuing to employ him regardless that a jury in Thomas found that he had violated the victim’s civil rights.
A previous attempt to dismiss Joquin’s lawsuit was blocked by the US District Judge David Estudillo. Wiley, the judge wrote in his August order, had a “documented history of using force against people he helped detain.”
He said there was enough evidence for the jury to find that “Joquin did not engage in furtive or threatening behavior during the encounter.”
Dawn Kortner, Joquin’s mother, he said in a 2021 interview, she never believed Wiley’s account.
“I feel like it’s overkill,” Kortner said. “He took steps he shouldn’t have taken. I believe he was too aggressive and I would like him to be held accountable for what he did. He shouldn’t receive a pension and sit at home and enjoy his children when we will not enjoy Said.
Pierce County Prosecutor’s Office Attorney Mary Robnett declined to press charges against Wiley for Joquin’s death.
In a letter to Lakewood Police Chief Mike Zaro, Robnett cited Joquin’s “unpredictable and dangerous behavior” in running a stop sign in front of police on a busy road. She also concluded that bullet trajectory evidence showed that Joquin didn’t raise his hands when Wiley shot him.
Wiley was also cleared for internal examination.
In a statement, Lakewood officials said: “Any life cut short is a tragedy and we can only imagine the suffering and pain they experience. The decision to reach an agreement was made with the best outcome for all parties involved in mind.”
-
Press Release8 months ago
CEO of 360WiSE Launches Mentorship Program in Overtown Miami FL
-
Business and Finance5 months ago
The Importance of Owning Your Distribution Media Platform
-
Press Release7 months ago
U.S.-Africa Chamber of Commerce Appoints Robert Alexander of 360WiseMedia as Board Director
-
Business and Finance8 months ago
360Wise Media and McDonald’s NY Tri-State Owner Operators Celebrate Success of “Faces of Black History” Campaign with Over 2 Million Event Visits
-
Ben Crump7 months ago
Another lawsuit accuses Google of bias against Black minority employees
-
Fitness7 months ago
Black sportswear brands for your 2024 fitness journey
-
Theater8 months ago
Applications open for the 2020-2021 Soul Producing National Black Theater residency – Black Theater Matters
-
Ben Crump8 months ago
Henrietta Lacks’ family members reach an agreement after her cells undergo advanced medical tests