Connect with us

Politics and Current

GOP takes aim at Biden’s executive order on voter registration

Published

on

ATLANTA (AP) — Republicans and conservative activists are increasingly attacking an executive order issued three years ago by the Biden administration that goals to expand voter registration, saying it’s unconstitutional and an try and interfere within the November election.

A recent fundraising email from the GOP political motion committee is an example of the way it frames the regulation, claiming it forces federal agencies to “act as Biden’s personal Get Out the Vote machine.” A Republican-led House committee recently issued subpoenas for agency directors, and a bunch of GOP secretaries of state asked the Supreme Court to take up a case difficult the order.

Despite opposition from the appropriate, there is no such thing as a indication that the ordinance would favor voters of 1 party over the opposite.

White House spokeswoman Robyn Patterson said the administration will proceed to guard the voting rights of eligible residents no matter political affiliation. Biden issued such an order in 2021 as Republican legislatures across the country debated a wave of state voting restrictions based on false claims that widespread fraud cost former President Donald Trump his re-election.

“These are baseless claims made by the same people who spread debunked lies about the 2020 election and used those same debunked lies to enact laws across the country that make it harder to vote and more easily subvert the will of the people,” Patterson said in a press release .

A “Vote Here” sign is seen outside a polling place on November 8, 2022 in Sandy Springs, Georgia. After months of candidate campaigning, Americans are voting within the midterm elections to make your mind up tight races across the country. (Photo: Alex Wong/Getty Images) – Source: Photo: Alex Wong / Getty Images

Here’s what the order does, what federal agencies have done up to now to comply with it, and what Republicans are saying about it.

This is to make voting easier

Biden issued an executive order on March 7, 2021, noting the federal government’s “obligation to ensure that registering to vote and the act of voting is simple and easy for all who are eligible to do so” and that it might be implemented “in accordance with applicable law.” Agency leaders were asked to submit a strategic plan inside 200 days.

The order ordered updates to the federal website Vote.gov, including ensuring voting information is out there in greater than a dozen languages. The site does indirectly address voter registration, but connects visitors with state and native election offices to start the registration process.

The order specifically mentions the Department of Defense and asks it to determine procedures to be sure that active-duty military personnel have the chance to register annually, update their voter registration information, or request an absentee ballot.

It also directs the Department of Justice to supply educational materials about registering and voting to people in federal custody as they prepare for release, together with details about rules that will prohibit them from voting.

Republicans query this approach

A 12 months after the order was issued, congressional Republicans sent a letter to the White House expressing concerns that the administration had overstepped its authority and ordered federal agencies to interact in activities beyond their missions.

Republicans say the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food and Nutrition Service has informed state agencies that the prices of providing voter registration services are allowable administrative expenses under the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and will be “reimbursed at 50 percent.”

“The use of the multibillion-dollar National Nutrition Program to implement the Biden administration’s voter registration program is not only a cause for concern, but requires further analysis,” the Republicans wrote.

According to a former White House official who helped implement the order, the letter didn’t indicate that states administer the food assistance program and that states were specifically directed to supply voter registration information under a federal law passed years ago.

Justin Levitt, who was a senior policy adviser at the White House, also said the agency was merely reiterating earlier guidance that these expenses were reimbursable.

Months later, Republicans sent letters to federal agencies requesting information on plans to implement the order. They also included repealing an executive order in a sweeping election bill introduced last 12 months.

Last month, the chairman of the House Administration Committee sent letters requesting documents related to the order and set a two-week deadline for its implementation. Then the chairman, Wisconsin Republican Bryan Steil, issued a subpoena. He called the federal regulation “another attempt by the Biden administration to tip the scales before 2024.”

A White House official said the Office of Management and Budget sent an initial response and other agencies were working to answer the committee because it issued the subpoenas.

Order requires state entry

While federal agencies didn’t publicize their proposals, they did announce steps they were taking to implement the order.

Levitt, a lawyer and constitutional law expert, called the order groundbreaking but limited in scope. While federal law allows agencies to help with voter registration, he said military recruitment offices were the one ones doing so before Biden issued the executive order. He also said the federal agency can only do it if a state requests it.

“Most of what the agencies did was either directly do what the states asked them to do or clarify the rules so people know what the rules are,” Levitt said.

In Kansas and New Mexico, two Native American colleges run by the U.S. Department of the Interior served as voter registration agencies. Kentucky and Michigan said they’d designate Veterans Administration offices of their states. Michigan also plans so as to add offices for the federal Small Business Administration.

I’m asking for the intervention of the Supreme Court

A bunch of Republicans who function their state’s top election officials were also critical of the order, calling it undue federal influence over the administration of state elections.

West Virginia Secretary of State Mac Warner sent a letter in May 2022 asking Biden to repeal it and spoke against it during congressional testimony last 12 months. A couple of months ago, he issued a press release saying his state would refuse to just accept any voter registration forms collected by federal agencies.

“Adding federal agencies to an already complex administrative process will make it even more difficult for election officials to provide timely and accurate election registration services,” he said in an April statement.

In May, Warner and eight other GOP secretaries of state filed a petition with the U.S. Supreme Court asking the justices to take up a case difficult that ruling. The others were from Arkansas, Indiana, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, New Hampshire, Tennessee and Wyoming.

Featured Stories

The court rejected the request to take up and choose the case by the tip of June and can take care of it for the primary time only in early autumn, at the primary private conference of judges. In the unlikely event that the court agrees to listen to the case, hearings is not going to be held until early next 12 months.

“Innocent as ordered”

Republicans opposing the executive order called it “Bidenbucks,” an obvious reference to the controversy that erupted after the 2020 election when Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg donated over $350 million to the inspiration. non-profit organization which was later distributed to election offices. Republicans say the “Zuckerbucks” campaign was an try and profit Democrats.

David Becker, a former Justice Department lawyer who heads the Center for Election Innovation and Research, said the timing of heightened criticism – years after Biden’s executive order and just months before the presidential election – is noteworthy.

“It’s portrayed as a deep-state power grab, when in fact it’s about ensuring that eligible citizens working with the federal government can easily register or update their registration,” Becker said. “It’s as harmless as an order.”

He said a vital advantage of the federal regulation is that voters already registered have the chance to update their information. It provides more accurate voter rolls, which Republicans say is required.

“It’s good for election integrity. It encourages participation,” Becker said. “It used to be uncontroversial.”

This article was originally published on : thegrio.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics and Current

Matt Gaetz withdraws from Trump’s nomination for attorney general

Published

on

By


Former Florida congressman Matt Gaetz is withdrawing from President-elect Donald Trump’s presidency nomination for attorney general after backlash.

In an announcement released Nov. 21 via X, Gaetz withdrew from the nomination, saying his confirmation was a “distraction.” “I had excellent meetings with senators yesterday. I appreciate their thoughtful opinions and the incredible support from so many people. While momentum was strong, it is clear that my confirmation unfairly distracted from the critical work of the Trump-Vance transition,” he wrote.

“There isn’t any time to waste on an unnecessarily prolonged fight in Washington. “I am therefore withdrawing my name from consideration for the position of Attorney General.”

Knowing that the appointed attorney general should be able to serve on the primary day of the brand new Trump-Vance administration, waiting for legal proceedings would make it harder for Gaetz to meet that commitment. A former lawmaker is under federal investigation for allegedly paying two women to have sex and watch him appear on Fox News. Both women claim that in 2019, Gaetz also paid them to accompany him to a Broadway show. During testimony before the bipartisan House Ethics Committee, the ladies alleged that Gaetz paid them to travel across state lines to have sex almost twice.

The women were between 19 and 21 years old on the time of the alleged encounters. They testified that the disgraced congressman paid them to travel to the Bahamas with other young women – including one who alleged that she had had sex. with Gaetz when she was a minor.

After Trump announced his nomination to move the Department of Justice (DOJ), attention focused on outdated allegations, prompting the discharge of an Ethics Committee investigation report.

As committee members failed to determine whether to release the report’s findings, Sen. John Cornyn (Texas) characterised Gaetz’s potential confirmation as “Kavanaugh on steroids” in reference to the 2018 racial and sexual misconduct hearings. – Judge Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh. “He’s a smart guy, I’m sure he realizes that,” Cornyn said, in line with .

A senior member of the Judiciary Committee warned that each one details of the FBI’s investigation and committee report – each good and bad – will eventually develop into public. “It will reach us a technique or one other. There are not any secrets here,” Cornyn said.

Before withdrawing, Gaetz met with Cornynand in addition Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), Mike Lee (R-Utah), Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) and John Kennedy (R-La.) .). Vice President-elect J.D. VAnka also took part within the meetings. He encouraged lawmakers to present their former colleague a likelihood to present his vision for reforming the Justice Department and to carry off on making judgments about his fitness to serve.

At the time of Gaetz’s withdrawal, Trump had not yet issued an announcement.


This article was originally published on : www.blackenterprise.com
Continue Reading

Politics and Current

Missouri police officer fatally shot 2-month-old baby and her mother after relative called police for help, family says

Published

on

By

A Missouri family and community are mourning the tragic death of a 34-year-old woman and her infant daughter who were killed in an officer-involved shooting earlier this month.

Family members say Maria Pike and her 2-month-old daughter, Destinii Hope, were shot to death on November 7 after police were called to an apartment in Independence, Missouri, in response to a domestic disturbance.

Two-month-old Destinii Hope died together with her mother in an officer-involved shooting in Independence, Missouri on November 7, 2024. (Photo: Facebook/Talisa Coombs)

In the weeks for the reason that shooting, local law enforcement has released few details, but eyewitnesses have provided local media with their accounts of what happened.

said Talisa Coombs, the baby’s grandmother Kansas City Star that she was the one who called the police after a physical altercation with the kid’s mother. Family members say Maria Pike has had mental health issues, anger issues and most recently suffered from postpartum depression.

Coombs said that when she called the police, she thought authorities would arrive, arrest Pike and get her the assistance she needed. She told her son and Destinia’s father, Mitchell Holder, that she desired to press charges against Pike for assault.

When police arrived, Holder initially refused to allow them to inside, however the apartment constructing’s assistant manager persuaded him to let two officers inside.

Assistant manager Gavin Delaney told The Star that when police entered the apartment, Pike was sitting within the bedroom closet, holding Destinia, not doing or saying anything.

Destinia’s father, who witnessed the shooting, recounted the moments leading as much as the shooting to his sister, Ashley Greenfield.

Greenfield told The Star that when officers entered the apartment, she and Holder tried to take the baby from Pike as she moved from the closet to the bed. Greenfield stated that when Pike reached for an object on the nightstand, the officer shot the baby in the top while he was still in his mother’s arms.

Holder later recalled his horrified response to the shooting of “The Kansas City Defender.”

“They shot my baby,” Holder said outlet. “It looked like her head had exploded. Her blood splattered throughout my glasses and throughout me. All I could do was scream. I just kept repeating three words – the identical three words – “You killed her!” I screamed it. Time and time again.”

He added that Pike jumped after the primary shot and the officer opened fire on her.

Accounts vary as as to if Pike had a gun when officers entered the apartment.

Local news outlets reported that among the many few details police have released up to now concerning the shooting is that Pike was armed with a knife.

“When we arrived, officers encountered a woman who was ultimately armed with a knife,” said Independence Police Chief Adam Dustman. “As a result of this encounter, two people died, one was an armed woman and the other was a child.”

However, family members say otherwise. Before calling the police, Destinia’s grandmother stated that there have been no weapons in the home. Holder also said he never saw Pike holding a knife in the course of the encounter with police.

“Yes, I was in the room when it all happened,” Holder he said. “From what I saw, I never once saw Maria armed with anything. Honestly, I do not even know where that got here from. I heard crazy things like she held a baby hostage in a closet, that she had a knife, and all this crazy stuff that is not true. I mean, all I can say is that it’s possible she had a knife and I didn’t see it, but all I do know is that I never saw her holding anything – and I used to be there within the room.

Independence police said the investigation has been turned over to the Jackson County Police Involvement Investigative Team (PIIT), a team of detectives that investigates police shootings and use of force incidents.

Chief Dustman said just one officer, a “long-time law enforcement veteran,” fired in the course of the incident. The officer and two other people on the scene were placed on administrative leave.

Capt. Kyle Flowers, who heads the PIIT team investigating the shooting, said last week that investigators had reviewed body camera footage and planned to interview witnesses. According to KMBCthe team will turn over the findings of the investigation to the Jackson County Prosecutor’s Office, but Flowers didn’t specify exactly when that will occur.

Family members have called on authorities to release the body camera footage, which is able to hopefully reveal once and for all whether Pike was armed with a knife on the time of the shooting. They also call for punishment of the officers involved within the shooting.

“Why hasn’t the body camera footage been released?” Amber Travis, cousin of the victims, he said at a community vigil for Pike and her daughter. “Give my family a break.”

“It means a lot that the community feels the same way we do,” Holder he said. “It means the world. It won’t bring her back, but no less than we all know now we have loads of support here.

AND GoFundMe page was created to assist pay for Destinia’s funeral. As of Wednesday afternoon, greater than $3,000 had been raised.

On November 22, Destinii would have turned 3 months old.

This article was originally published on : atlantablackstar.com
Continue Reading

Politics and Current

Jasmine Crockett blasts Republicans for so-called white “oppression” over anti-DEI bill

Published

on

By

Jasmine Crockett, theGrio.com

On Wednesday, during a passionate speech before the committee, Sen. Jasmine Crockett, R-Texas, chided her Republican colleagues for the content of an anti-DEI bill that calls for eliminating all diversity, equity and inclusion programs and offices within the federal government.

Crockett, a 43-year-old congressional student who has change into a star within the Democratic Party because of her quite a few viral committee appearances, condemned the Dismantle DEI Act of 2024. The bill, H.R. 8706 – first introduced by Republican Vice President-elect J.D. Vance – essentially prohibit all DEI-related activities within the federal government, including all related positions, offices, training, and funding. Strikingly, the bill also prohibits federal employees working in DEI positions from transferring to a different federal position.

During a House Oversight Committee hearing wherein she responded to Rep. Clay Higgins, R-La., who repeatedly called DEI policies “oppression” — seemingly aimed toward white people, as many Republicans suggested — Crockett used the committee’s speaking time to criticize the suggestion that white individuals are oppressed in consequence of efforts to shut racial disparities in sectors resembling business, education, and health.

“You don’t understand the definition of oppression… I would ask you to just Google it,” said Crockett, who moments later read the dictionary definition of the word, adding: “Oppression is long-term cruel or unfair treatment or control, that’s the definition of oppression.” The congresswoman emphasized: “There was no oppression of the white man in this country.”

Referring to the history of chattel slavery and racial segregation within the US, the Texas lawmaker said: “Tell me which white men were dragged from their homes. Tell me which one was dragged across the ocean and that you will go to work. We will steal your wives. We will rape your wives. It didn’t happen. This is oppression.”

Attempting to further explain the importance of DEI, Crockett noted that she is barely the fifty fifth Black woman elected to Congress in its 235-year history, unlike the 1000’s of white men who’ve served on Capitol Hill.

“So if you want to talk about history and pretend it was that long ago, it wasn’t,” Crockett said, citing data showing that corporations perform higher and are more profitable after they are more diversified.

The anti-DEI movement, championed exclusively by Republicans, has led to several lawsuits invalidating federal programs, including debt forgiveness for Black farmers and business loans to Black and other disadvantaged businesses. Many states led by Republican governors have indicated that DEI – especially teaching about slavery and racism – is harmful to students, namely white students. In response, they banned such topics from public classrooms.

Jamarr Brown, executive director of Color of Change PAC, the political arm of the civil rights organization, said Congresswoman Crockett’s statements on DEI were “poignant and necessary.”

Jordan Brand amplifies Black storytelling with StoryCorps'

While the Dismantling DEI Act actually won’t be passed while Democrats control the Senate and President Joe Biden stays in office, it signals what may very well be a priority for Republicans next yr, as outlined within the pro-Trump “Project 2025” political manifesto “.

“According to Project 2025, diversity, equity and inclusion is synonymous with ‘White lives don’t matter,’” Brown noted. “Now more than ever, we at Color Of Change PAC, as well as advocates and activists across the country, must work to protect Black people and other people of color from harm resulting from anti-DEI attacks.”

Brown continued, “Civil rights protections have helped reduce mortgage discrimination, increase the number of Black physicians to counter problems such as Black maternal mortality, and provide financing for Black-owned businesses.”

He added: “Our country thrives and everyone benefits when diversity, equality and inclusion are valued rather than stifled.”

This article was originally published on : thegrio.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending