Connect with us

Politics and Current

GOP takes aim at Biden’s executive order on voter registration

Published

on

ATLANTA (AP) — Republicans and conservative activists are increasingly attacking an executive order issued three years ago by the Biden administration that goals to expand voter registration, saying it’s unconstitutional and an try and interfere within the November election.

A recent fundraising email from the GOP political motion committee is an example of the way it frames the regulation, claiming it forces federal agencies to “act as Biden’s personal Get Out the Vote machine.” A Republican-led House committee recently issued subpoenas for agency directors, and a bunch of GOP secretaries of state asked the Supreme Court to take up a case difficult the order.

Despite opposition from the appropriate, there is no such thing as a indication that the ordinance would favor voters of 1 party over the opposite.

Advertisement

White House spokeswoman Robyn Patterson said the administration will proceed to guard the voting rights of eligible residents no matter political affiliation. Biden issued such an order in 2021 as Republican legislatures across the country debated a wave of state voting restrictions based on false claims that widespread fraud cost former President Donald Trump his re-election.

“These are baseless claims made by the same people who spread debunked lies about the 2020 election and used those same debunked lies to enact laws across the country that make it harder to vote and more easily subvert the will of the people,” Patterson said in a press release .

A “Vote Here” sign is seen outside a polling place on November 8, 2022 in Sandy Springs, Georgia. After months of candidate campaigning, Americans are voting within the midterm elections to make your mind up tight races across the country. (Photo: Alex Wong/Getty Images) – Source: Photo: Alex Wong / Getty Images

Here’s what the order does, what federal agencies have done up to now to comply with it, and what Republicans are saying about it.

This is to make voting easier

Biden issued an executive order on March 7, 2021, noting the federal government’s “obligation to ensure that registering to vote and the act of voting is simple and easy for all who are eligible to do so” and that it might be implemented “in accordance with applicable law.” Agency leaders were asked to submit a strategic plan inside 200 days.

Advertisement

The order ordered updates to the federal website Vote.gov, including ensuring voting information is out there in greater than a dozen languages. The site does indirectly address voter registration, but connects visitors with state and native election offices to start the registration process.

The order specifically mentions the Department of Defense and asks it to determine procedures to be sure that active-duty military personnel have the chance to register annually, update their voter registration information, or request an absentee ballot.

It also directs the Department of Justice to supply educational materials about registering and voting to people in federal custody as they prepare for release, together with details about rules that will prohibit them from voting.

Republicans query this approach

A 12 months after the order was issued, congressional Republicans sent a letter to the White House expressing concerns that the administration had overstepped its authority and ordered federal agencies to interact in activities beyond their missions.

Advertisement

Republicans say the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food and Nutrition Service has informed state agencies that the prices of providing voter registration services are allowable administrative expenses under the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and will be “reimbursed at 50 percent.”

“The use of the multibillion-dollar National Nutrition Program to implement the Biden administration’s voter registration program is not only a cause for concern, but requires further analysis,” the Republicans wrote.

According to a former White House official who helped implement the order, the letter didn’t indicate that states administer the food assistance program and that states were specifically directed to supply voter registration information under a federal law passed years ago.

Justin Levitt, who was a senior policy adviser at the White House, also said the agency was merely reiterating earlier guidance that these expenses were reimbursable.

Advertisement

Months later, Republicans sent letters to federal agencies requesting information on plans to implement the order. They also included repealing an executive order in a sweeping election bill introduced last 12 months.

Last month, the chairman of the House Administration Committee sent letters requesting documents related to the order and set a two-week deadline for its implementation. Then the chairman, Wisconsin Republican Bryan Steil, issued a subpoena. He called the federal regulation “another attempt by the Biden administration to tip the scales before 2024.”

A White House official said the Office of Management and Budget sent an initial response and other agencies were working to answer the committee because it issued the subpoenas.

Order requires state entry

While federal agencies didn’t publicize their proposals, they did announce steps they were taking to implement the order.

Advertisement

Levitt, a lawyer and constitutional law expert, called the order groundbreaking but limited in scope. While federal law allows agencies to help with voter registration, he said military recruitment offices were the one ones doing so before Biden issued the executive order. He also said the federal agency can only do it if a state requests it.

“Most of what the agencies did was either directly do what the states asked them to do or clarify the rules so people know what the rules are,” Levitt said.

In Kansas and New Mexico, two Native American colleges run by the U.S. Department of the Interior served as voter registration agencies. Kentucky and Michigan said they’d designate Veterans Administration offices of their states. Michigan also plans so as to add offices for the federal Small Business Administration.

I’m asking for the intervention of the Supreme Court

A bunch of Republicans who function their state’s top election officials were also critical of the order, calling it undue federal influence over the administration of state elections.

Advertisement

West Virginia Secretary of State Mac Warner sent a letter in May 2022 asking Biden to repeal it and spoke against it during congressional testimony last 12 months. A couple of months ago, he issued a press release saying his state would refuse to just accept any voter registration forms collected by federal agencies.

“Adding federal agencies to an already complex administrative process will make it even more difficult for election officials to provide timely and accurate election registration services,” he said in an April statement.

In May, Warner and eight other GOP secretaries of state filed a petition with the U.S. Supreme Court asking the justices to take up a case difficult that ruling. The others were from Arkansas, Indiana, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, New Hampshire, Tennessee and Wyoming.

Featured Stories

The court rejected the request to take up and choose the case by the tip of June and can take care of it for the primary time only in early autumn, at the primary private conference of judges. In the unlikely event that the court agrees to listen to the case, hearings is not going to be held until early next 12 months.

Advertisement

“Innocent as ordered”

Republicans opposing the executive order called it “Bidenbucks,” an obvious reference to the controversy that erupted after the 2020 election when Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg donated over $350 million to the inspiration. non-profit organization which was later distributed to election offices. Republicans say the “Zuckerbucks” campaign was an try and profit Democrats.

David Becker, a former Justice Department lawyer who heads the Center for Election Innovation and Research, said the timing of heightened criticism – years after Biden’s executive order and just months before the presidential election – is noteworthy.

“It’s portrayed as a deep-state power grab, when in fact it’s about ensuring that eligible citizens working with the federal government can easily register or update their registration,” Becker said. “It’s as harmless as an order.”

He said a vital advantage of the federal regulation is that voters already registered have the chance to update their information. It provides more accurate voter rolls, which Republicans say is required.

Advertisement

“It’s good for election integrity. It encourages participation,” Becker said. “It used to be uncontroversial.”

This article was originally published on : thegrio.com
Advertisement

Politics and Current

The Department of Defense takes off and then restores the “Dei” website honoring the black medal of honor

Published

on

By

The US Department of Defense removed a website dedicated to a black veteran who served in the Vietnam war, characterizing his honorary medal as a medal “Dei”, but later restored the website after online fury. . side As a matter of the matter, he looked that Army General Charles Calvin Rogers, who received the Presidential Honorary Medal from President Richard Nixon in 1970. According to the defense article in 2021, Rogers stays the highest wounded Black American who received the prestigious Medal of Honor.

(Photo: Defense Department)

“A full long attack of black leadership, disassembly of the protection of civil rights, imposing unjust anti-dei regulations and unprecedented historical erasing in the defense department is a clear sign that New Jim Crow is promoted by our commander.”

Advertisement

Rogers, born in sorted America in 1929, entered the American army just before the army desegregation. In the early Nineteen Fifties and the Sixties, he climbed the ranks, becoming a significant. Later he trained an artillery unit and gained his first battalion order at Fort Lewis in Washington.

According to the Department of Defense, Rogers was commanded by the 1st Battalion, 5. Artillery, 1st Infantry Division. In July 1967 he was sent to Vietnam, where he spent two years at the battle. When the Rogers Battalion was attacked by the North -Wietna Vietnamese army on October 31, 1968, Gen. Rogers led soldiers in the battle. Despite the wounded during the battle, he continued the fight and killed several hostile soldiers on this process.

The battalion finally successfully overcome the invasion; However, there have been two other attacks of different defense lines. Rogers was wounded for the third time and ultimately was unable to proceed the fight, but he still managed and encouraged. Twelve American soldiers were killed and several dozen others were injured in the battle; However, military files show that the losses on the enemy side were much higher.

Harriet Tubman posthumously called a general in the Veteran Day ceremony

Rogers wounds were finally treated and returned to the USA in August 1969. The following 12 months, May 14, 1970, he received a medal of honor from President Nixon during the White House ceremony. He still served in the army, commanding more units and served in high -level leadership tasks. After 32 years of service, General Rogers retired in 1984 as the essential general.

When he returned to civil life, Rogers was ordained a Baptist minister and lived in Germany. Later he died of prostate cancer on September 21, 1990, at the age of 61. His stays were buried at the Arlington National Cemetery in Virginia.

Advertisement

Since the office of office, President Trump and the Secretary of Defense Pete HegeSth have condemned the variety of US troops and to return armed services to the culture “based on merit”. Last month, President Trump released General Charles “CQ” Brown Jr. as chairman of joint chiefs of staff. Brown was praised by Trump in 2020, when he called him the head of the US Air Force.

Asked why President Trump released General Brown, the press secretary of the White House Karoline Leavitt said that Brown “does a bad job.”

The Court of Appeal raises the blocks on the order of Trump limiting programs of diversity, capital and integration

(Tagstranslat) black veterans

This article was originally published on : thegrio.com
Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics and Current

The Federal Court of Appeal raises the block to the orders of Trump Dei

Published

on

By


The Court of Appeal with three judges allowed to implement the policy of anti-varnish, own capital and the inclusion of Donald Trump, but the decision just isn’t final, it simply gives administrative freedom to implement this policy, while proceedings regarding politics.

According to the judges, they raised the order issued by a lower federal court in February, and in the opinions of three judges, which explained their voices, the judges indicated that the administration would find a way to prove that they’d respect the right to the first amendment and anti -discrimination provisions.

This, despite the two judges who arouse the fears that the orders of Trump’s administration could potentially violate the structure if federal officials implement them too eagerly due to the narrow scope of enforcement of the ordinance.

Advertisement

Judge Pamela Harris, appointed by President Joe Biden, wrote in her opinion that Trump’s orders should not intended to determine that Dei is unlawful in a broad context.

“Incense orders, about them, have a clearly limited scope,” wrote Harris. “Executive orders are not intended to determine the unlawfulness of any efforts to develop diversity, equality or inclusion, and they should not be understood like that.”

Harris continued, offering the reservation: “Actions in the field of execution of agencies that go beyond a narrow scope of orders, can increase the serious first amendment and fears regarding the proper process.”

The primary judge Albert Diaz, the denominator of President Barack Obama, also argued that the aggressive implementation of executive orders focused on diversity, justice and inclusion in the federal government can present problems in addition to Dei defense.

Advertisement

“I also wonder how the administration enforces these executive orders,” wrote Diaz. “It is not clear what types of programs – formal or informal – the administration is trying to eliminate.”

Diaz continued: “When this country covers true diversity, it recognizes and respects the social identity of its people. When he promotes true justice, it opens possibilities and provides equal opportunities for everyone. And when his policy is really integration, he creates an environment and culture in which everyone is respected and valued. What could be more American? The country is not favorable, scrubbing the shameful moments of its past. “

Unlike the other two judges, Judge Allison Rushing, Trump’s denominator, argued that the defense of other dei judges was disputed on their roles as judges.

“The view of each individual judge about whether some executive is a good politics is not only irrelevant to fulfill our obligation to settle matters and controversy in accordance with the law, this is unacceptable issues,” Rushing wrote. “The opinion of the judge that Dei programs” deserve praise, not Opprobrium “, should not absolutely play a role in deciding about this matter.”

Advertisement

(Tagstranslat) diversity

This article was originally published on : www.blackenterprise.com
Continue Reading

Politics and Current

Donald Trump wanders when he confronted with the promise to reduce food prices on the first day, he later says that he cannot “guarantee” Americans will not pay again

Published

on

By

This is an issue that gained his presidency, many political analysts agree, and Donald Trump promised inflation and rising prices of products and every day services “will fall and they will go down quickly” if he were elected.

How fast? Trump was very specific.

“When I win, I will immediately lower the prices, starting from the first day” He said then.

Advertisement
President Donald Trump made every effort to support the conversation when he was directly asked about lowering food prices for Americans. (Photo Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

Americans believed him, but almost a month of his presidency did not fall in any respect. Eggs, most noticeably, cost greater than ever.

When asked about it on Sunday interview With anchor Fox News Channel, Bret Baier, Trump had no answer, as a substitute wandering about “the most beautiful word in English”, tariffs that most economists predict that he will go to consumers the most difficult.

Here is the exchange:

Baier: “There are some signs, consumer trust on the market, they are a bit shaken. So if everything goes to the set, when you think that families would be able to feel falling prices, groceries, energy? Or maybe you talk to them, wait, inflation can get worse until it’s better? “

Trump: “No, I think we will become rich – and look, we are not so rich now. We owe $ 36 trillion. This is because we allow all these nations to use us. The same as $ 200 billion with Canada. We are guilty of $ 300 – we have a deficit with Mexico in the amount of $ 350 billion. I’m not going to do this. I will not let it. “

Advertisement

First, a couple of corrections. According to politicsThe general industrial deficit with Canada falls about $ 41 billion when making an allowance for the surplus in the US in services.

Compared to other US countries, they’re extremely wealthy, boasting the highest gross domestic product in the world, amounting to USD 27.7 trillion. Adapting to the population, the USA ranks fourth in a wealthy place, following only Luxembourg, Norway and Switzerland.

Advertisement

Of course, the gliding domestic debt puts the country in the wet. And of the last three presidents, nobody added more to the deficit than … Trump during their first term. In fact, Trump spent the same in a single semester as Barack Obama in two parts.

According to AxiosJoe Biden spent half in a single semester than Trump in the first 4 years of office: USD 4.8 trill per Trump and $ 2.2 trillion per biden. And this excludes expenses due to Covid.

The truth is that the economy might be a burden for anyone who won the presidency, and rapidly growing debt levels coincide with high percentage rates and more people coming in retirement.

Trump began to return before Sunday, the first Speaking NBC News The fact that he could not “guarantee” that prices would fall “, in an interview with time, saying:” It is difficult to reduce the situation when he will grow, when he grew. You know, it’s extremely difficult. “

Advertisement

In an interview with NBC, Trump said that the tariffs would fix all the pieces.

“Americans cost nothing,” he said. “They created a great economy for us.”


Advertisement
This article was originally published on : atlantablackstar.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending