Connect with us

Technology

Google says Epic’s demands arising from antitrust case win are “unnecessary” and “far beyond the scope” of the ruling

Published

on

In a brand new filing, Google is taking a stand against multiple Fortnite developers, Epic Games proposed remedies after the court found that Google had engaged in anti-competitive practices in its Play Store. Following the jury’s decision late last yr, either side presented their arguments about how Google should change its behavior in light of the verdict. For its part, Epic Games issued a crazy list of demands, this included access to the Play Store’s catalog of apps and games for six years, the ability to distribute your personal app store on Google Play without spending a dime, and way more. It also desired to put an end to any deals, incentives and offers, in addition to penalties that will allow the Play Store or Google Play Billing to realize a bonus over its rivals.

The tech giant’s surprising and quick defeat was a historic ruling, especially since Epic Games largely lost an identical antitrust case against Apple that was not heard by a jury. In the Epic-Apple lawsuit, the court ruled that Apple isn’t a monopoly, but agreed that developers should have the option to direct their customers to alternative routes to pay online. The case was appealed to the Supreme Court, which refused to listen to it, leaving the lower court’s ruling in force.

Although the jury in the Google case was convinced that the tech giant had used its market power illegally, it didn’t choose next steps – that is as much as the judge. The recent filing, together with Epic’s proposal, will help inform Judge James Donato during a hearing scheduled for May 23 on what actions must be taken next to examine Google’s power.

Epic Games had it in April specific your demands in the proposed injunction, found here. Overall, Epic wants Google to permit users to download apps from any app store or the Internet, depending on their preferences. He doesn’t want Google to have the option to dam OEMs or carriers or force them to favor Google Play. He also doesn’t want Google to have the option to impose additional fees for routing through the Play Store, which Epic Games also argues is an anti-competitive practice.

The Fortnite creator moreover asked the court to implement other changes, including giving Epic access to the Play Store catalog so it will probably update users’ apps by surprise screens or additional fees. Additionally, Epic wants developers to have the option to inform users learn how to pay for his or her apps and services elsewhere and how much they’ll save by doing so. It desires to eliminate the requirement to make use of Google’s “User Choice Billing” service, which offers only small discounts to developers who process payment transactions themselves, and way more.

Google obviously disagrees on how the court should proceed.

In an announcement, Google’s vp of government affairs and public policy, Wilson White, called Epic’s demands excessive and unnecessary.

“Epic’s demands would harm the privacy, security and overall experience of consumers, developers and device manufacturers,” it said. “Not only does their proposal go far beyond the scope of the recent US trial verdict – which we will be challenging – it is also unnecessary given the agreement we reached last year with state attorneys general from all states and many territories. We will continue to vigorously defend our right to a sustainable business model that allows us to keep people safe, work with developers to innovate and grow their businesses, and maintain a thriving Android ecosystem for all.”

In an injunction filed Thursday in a U.S. District Court in California, Google argues that Epic’s demands threaten users’ security and privacy because they deprive it of the ability to implement trust and security measures regarding the use of third-party app stores. (Apple has used an identical technique to fight regulations opening its App Store to competition, arguing that it’s liable for user privacy and security.)

Additionally, Google says it will be required to inform all third-party app stores, without the user’s consent, what apps the user has installed. This would expose the use of personal apps, including in sensitive areas resembling religion, politics and health, without rules on how this data is used.

The company also said Epic is asking it to remove protections related to sideloading of apps.

And if those arguments fail, Google uses a distinct tactic to indicate that Epic’s proposed remedies are unnecessary since it has already agreed with state attorneys general that it is going to not sign broad exclusivity agreements with developers. Epic’s proposal would further prevent Google from working with developers to deliver exclusive content through Play Store apps, which it says represents a crucial opportunity for developers.

Finally, the AG’s state settlement would allow any app store to compete for space on Android devices, Google argues, but Epic’s proposal would exclude it from the process, limiting competition. It said that without Google’s involvement, competing app stores can be underpriced, impacting OEM margins.

The judge’s upcoming decision on the treatment on this case might be interesting because it is going to set the stage for a way app stores considered monopolies could have to make concessions to permit for more competition. Although Epic lost its battle with Apple, the Justice Department’s case against the iPhone maker remains to be pending, as is its lawsuit against Google over its alleged monopoly on search. The end result of these cases will determine the extent to which the power of the tech giants stays unchecked, given the glaring lack of laws in the US to rein in tech monopolies.

This article was originally published on : techcrunch.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Technology

Marc Andreessen, Joe Lonsdale and all other VCs are reportedly running for Trump’s new committees

Published

on

By

AI, AI startups, artificial intelligence, startups

Because Elon Musk plays such a crucial role on Donald Trump’s transition team, his cronies, a lot of whom are Silicon Valley enterprise capitalists, are reportedly being encouraged to assist.

For example, VC firm Andreessen Horowitz, and particularly its co-founder Marc Andreessen, is mentioned repeatedly. He, together with Antonio Gracias and Joe Lonsdale, have reportedly been asked to help on Musk’s advisory panel, the Department of Government Efficiency, which is examining ways to beat the technical challenges of collecting data on federal programs. The Washington Post on Sunday.

They are among the many few other Silicon Valley tycoons who are being tapped.

Gracias is the co-founder of Valor Equity Partners, which has done well through the years in backing Musk firms, including SpaceX and Tesla (he was a board member of the latter from 2007 to 2021). Lonsdale is the co-founder of VC firm 8VC and an energetic supporter of defense technologies (reminiscent of Anduril) and other government technologies reminiscent of financial software provider OpenGov. Lonsdale worked under billionaire VC Peter Thiel and helped co-found Palantir. Andreessen Horowitz has been a serious investor in SpaceX since around 2022 and is buying more shares as possible, as TechCrunch previously reported, and Andreessen has been a vocal supporter of Musk.

The DOGE commission hopes to recommend program cuts and fewer federal employees, Musk and former presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy explained in Wall Street Journal editorial. last week. They wrote that additionally they expected a legal response. The group plans to launch a podcast within the near future, reports the Washing Post.

Meanwhile, Andreessen Horowitz can be said to be running for a position on the Trump administration’s promised cryptocurrency advisory board. It will probably be staffed by several crypto industry executives who need to help the United States set crypto policy, the industry they told Reuters last week. Reuters reports that Brian Quintenz, head of cryptocurrency policy at a16z, has already advised Trump’s team.

Another VC being discussed for a spot on this committee is Paradigm, an investment firm co-founded by Fred Ehrsam, the previous co-founder of Coinbase. Paradigm focuses on cryptocurrency/blockchain investments. Coinbase, which is just not a VC firm but funds its own corporate firm, Coinbase Ventures, can be fascinated by the commission, sources told Reuters.

Meanwhile, Thiel’s former student Michael Kratsios, who served as chief technology officer in the primary Trump administration, was reportedly hired to handle tech policy on Trump’s transition team. The case was reported by “Polityka” last week. Kratsios was known for authoring Trump’s 2020 pro-AI investment executive order. Before joining the federal government, he worked for Thiel Capital. However, Kratsios is just not currently a VC. According to him, he has been working at AI Scale AI since 2021 LinkedIn.

Lonsdale and a16z couldn’t immediately be reached for comment. They also didn’t reply to a request for comment from The Washington Post.

This article was originally published on : techcrunch.com
Continue Reading

Technology

Instagram is taking over Snapchat with a new location sharing feature

Published

on

By

Instagram logo

Instagram introduces the power for users to share their locations with friends via DM (direct messages) – company announced on Monday. The feature indicates that the Meta-owned social network desires to challenge services like Apple’s “Find My” and Snapchat’s Snap Map, that are popular ways to ascertain the location of friends and family members in real time.

The launch of this feature is not a complete surprise, as earlier this 12 months it was noted that Instagram was testing a way for users to see their friends’ live locations. It’s price noting that one other Meta messaging app, WhatsApp, has been allowing users to share live locations with others for quite a while.

Unlike Apple and Snapchat, which let you share your location with others indefinitely, Instagram only allows users to achieve this for an hour. Instagram says this feature might be used to coordinate arrival times or find friends in crowded places.

Image credits:Instagram

You can share your location with one person or in a group chat. When you share your location, only people in a specific chat will give you the chance to see where you might be, and your location can’t be shared with other chats. You’ll also see an indicator at the highest of your chat reminding you that you just’re currently sharing your current location.

All lively locations expire after one hour. Given that WhatsApp permits you to share your location with others for as much as eight hours, it’s possible that Instagram’s deadline on location sharing could change in the long run.

According to the corporate, the new feature is available in chosen countries. TechCrunch asked for more details.

On Monday, Instagram also announced that users can now customize their chat names by adding nicknames for themselves or others. The company says this feature might be used to share insider jokes or just shorten long usernames.

You can create a nickname by tapping the chat name at the highest of the conversation after which choosing “Nicknames.” Here you’ll be able to select the username of the person you must assign a nickname to. Nicknames are only visible in your DMs.

Additionally, Instagram is rolling out 17 new sticker packs with over 300 stickers that might be shared in chat.

This article was originally published on : techcrunch.com
Continue Reading

Technology

Raspberry Pi releases the Pico 2W, a $7 wireless-capable microcontroller board

Published

on

By

Get to know Raspberry Pi Pico 2Wa tiny board designed around a microcontroller that permits you to construct large-scale hardware projects. Raspberry Pi once more uses its own, RP2350 well documented microcontroller.

But what’s a microcontroller again? As the name suggests, microcontrollers will let you control other components or electronic devices. Regular Raspberry Pis are general-purpose single-board computers, while microcontrollers are specifically designed to interact with other components.

Microcontrollers are often low-cost, small and really energy efficient. As you may see in the image above, the Pico 2W has dozens of input and output pins (small yellow holes around the board) on its sides that it uses to speak with other components.

Hobbyists normally start creating a microcontroller-based project with a file bread cutting board to avoid soldering. Later they will solder the microcontroller to other parts.

Unlike traditional Raspberry Pi computers, microcontrollers don’t run a full-fledged operating system. Your code runs directly on the chip.

In addition to C and C++, Pico 2 W supports MicroPython, a Python-inspired language for microcontrollers, for programming purposes. The latest board maintains hardware and software compatibility with previous generation boards.

The latest $7 Pico 2W processor features a dual-core, dual-architecture processor running at 150MHz. When developing a microcontroller, you may make a choice from a pair of Arm Cortex-M33 cores and a pair of open-hardware Hazard 3 RISC-V cores.

Arm Cortex-M33 cores are widely utilized in the microcontroller world, but some may prefer RISC-V cores. Everything could be configured in software, so that you do not have to decide on one microcontroller over one other when ordering latest boards.

The Pico 2W has 4MB of onboard flash memory for code storage, while the RP2350 has 520KB of onboard SRAM. I’ll say it again: this just isn’t a computer beast. It’s a microcontroller!

In terms of wireless capabilities, Pico 2W supports Wi-Fi (2.4 GHz 802.11n) and Bluetooth 5.2. It could be nice to get 5 GHz support for versatility, but possibly we are able to achieve that in the next version.

If you do not need wireless features for price or compliance reasons, Raspberry Pi also offers Pico 2 without this feature for $5.

Raspberry Pi products are increasingly utilized by firms involved in industrial and electronics production. When Raspberry Pi became a public company this yr, it reported that the industrial and embedded segment accounted for 72% of its sales.

This might be why you may buy single pieces of Pico 2 boards in addition to spools of 480 pieces. This is what the Pico 2 microcontroller board spool looks like:

Image credits:Raspberry Pi /

This article was originally published on : techcrunch.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending