Connect with us


Google says Epic’s demands arising from antitrust case win are “unnecessary” and “far beyond the scope” of the ruling



In a brand new filing, Google is taking a stand against multiple Fortnite developers, Epic Games proposed remedies after the court found that Google had engaged in anti-competitive practices in its Play Store. Following the jury’s decision late last yr, either side presented their arguments about how Google should change its behavior in light of the verdict. For its part, Epic Games issued a crazy list of demands, this included access to the Play Store’s catalog of apps and games for six years, the ability to distribute your personal app store on Google Play without spending a dime, and way more. It also desired to put an end to any deals, incentives and offers, in addition to penalties that will allow the Play Store or Google Play Billing to realize a bonus over its rivals.

The tech giant’s surprising and quick defeat was a historic ruling, especially since Epic Games largely lost an identical antitrust case against Apple that was not heard by a jury. In the Epic-Apple lawsuit, the court ruled that Apple isn’t a monopoly, but agreed that developers should have the option to direct their customers to alternative routes to pay online. The case was appealed to the Supreme Court, which refused to listen to it, leaving the lower court’s ruling in force.

Although the jury in the Google case was convinced that the tech giant had used its market power illegally, it didn’t choose next steps – that is as much as the judge. The recent filing, together with Epic’s proposal, will help inform Judge James Donato during a hearing scheduled for May 23 on what actions must be taken next to examine Google’s power.

Epic Games had it in April specific your demands in the proposed injunction, found here. Overall, Epic wants Google to permit users to download apps from any app store or the Internet, depending on their preferences. He doesn’t want Google to have the option to dam OEMs or carriers or force them to favor Google Play. He also doesn’t want Google to have the option to impose additional fees for routing through the Play Store, which Epic Games also argues is an anti-competitive practice.

The Fortnite creator moreover asked the court to implement other changes, including giving Epic access to the Play Store catalog so it will probably update users’ apps by surprise screens or additional fees. Additionally, Epic wants developers to have the option to inform users learn how to pay for his or her apps and services elsewhere and how much they’ll save by doing so. It desires to eliminate the requirement to make use of Google’s “User Choice Billing” service, which offers only small discounts to developers who process payment transactions themselves, and way more.

Google obviously disagrees on how the court should proceed.

In an announcement, Google’s vp of government affairs and public policy, Wilson White, called Epic’s demands excessive and unnecessary.

“Epic’s demands would harm the privacy, security and overall experience of consumers, developers and device manufacturers,” it said. “Not only does their proposal go far beyond the scope of the recent US trial verdict – which we will be challenging – it is also unnecessary given the agreement we reached last year with state attorneys general from all states and many territories. We will continue to vigorously defend our right to a sustainable business model that allows us to keep people safe, work with developers to innovate and grow their businesses, and maintain a thriving Android ecosystem for all.”

In an injunction filed Thursday in a U.S. District Court in California, Google argues that Epic’s demands threaten users’ security and privacy because they deprive it of the ability to implement trust and security measures regarding the use of third-party app stores. (Apple has used an identical technique to fight regulations opening its App Store to competition, arguing that it’s liable for user privacy and security.)

Additionally, Google says it will be required to inform all third-party app stores, without the user’s consent, what apps the user has installed. This would expose the use of personal apps, including in sensitive areas resembling religion, politics and health, without rules on how this data is used.

The company also said Epic is asking it to remove protections related to sideloading of apps.

And if those arguments fail, Google uses a distinct tactic to indicate that Epic’s proposed remedies are unnecessary since it has already agreed with state attorneys general that it is going to not sign broad exclusivity agreements with developers. Epic’s proposal would further prevent Google from working with developers to deliver exclusive content through Play Store apps, which it says represents a crucial opportunity for developers.

Finally, the AG’s state settlement would allow any app store to compete for space on Android devices, Google argues, but Epic’s proposal would exclude it from the process, limiting competition. It said that without Google’s involvement, competing app stores can be underpriced, impacting OEM margins.

The judge’s upcoming decision on the treatment on this case might be interesting because it is going to set the stage for a way app stores considered monopolies could have to make concessions to permit for more competition. Although Epic lost its battle with Apple, the Justice Department’s case against the iPhone maker remains to be pending, as is its lawsuit against Google over its alleged monopoly on search. The end result of these cases will determine the extent to which the power of the tech giants stays unchecked, given the glaring lack of laws in the US to rein in tech monopolies.

This article was originally published on :
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Registration for Startup Battlefield 200 closes tomorrow




Holy procrastination, startup founders! Tomorrow is your last likelihood to use to Startup Battlefield 200 at TechCrunch Disrupt 2024. Your last likelihood to take the Disrupt stage and pitch to an enormous audience full of first-tier global investors, a whole bunch of media outlets, and lots of other influential movers and shakers.

To the purpose: This great opportunity will soon end. Submit your application to 11:59 p.m. PDT Tomorrow, .

Summary: Benefits of Startup Battlefield 200 at TC Disrupt 2024

Once again, just a little louder for the founders within the back who can have missed our previous notes on the perks and advantages that Startup Battlefield 200 (SB 200) firms receive:

Full access to Disrupt: SB 200 founders attend Disrupt for free and receive 4 additional tickets and VIP access to all presentations, breaks and roundtables.

Free exhibition space for your entire show: SB 200 will probably be the one early-stage startup allowed to exhibit at Disrupt.

Investor interest and media exposure: Investors hunting for future unicorns and journalists looking for the subsequent big story will head to the exhibit floor to fulfill and greet the founders of SB 200.

Pitching workshops and training: SB 200 founders will probably be invited to exclusive workshops and masterclasses within the weeks leading as much as Disrupt, including special pitch training led by TechCrunch staff.

Brief information for investors and Best Contributors editors: This training will come in useful while you hit the Pitch Showcase stage. You will receive invaluable feedback and should even find your way into an investor’s portfolio.

Odds for $100,000: TechCrunch editors will select 20 startups from SB 200 to grow to be Startup Battlefield finalists. The founders of those 20 firms will receive private coaching, be featured in a TechCrunch article, and perform continue to exist stage in front of your entire Disrupt audience. The ultimate winner will take home a $100,000 zero-equity prize.

TechCrunch Disrupt will happen October 28-30 in San Francisco. Your opportunity to step onto the worldwide Disrupt stage and speed up your startup’s growth will soon come to a halt. Apply for Startup Battlefield 200 – By When?By 23:59 PDT Tomorrow. Do it!

Is your organization enthusiastic about sponsoring or exhibiting at TechCrunch Disrupt 2024? Contact our sponsorship sales team via by completing this manner.

This article was originally published on :
Continue Reading


Apple begins a new era with Apple Intelligence




The Apple Worldwide Developers Conference focused heavily on artificial intelligence. Apple has unveiled its Apple Intelligence generative artificial intelligence offering, which will probably be available on iOS later this 12 months. iOS 18 could have a host of new features, including the flexibility to schedule text messages and customize the house screen, major updates to Siri – including ChatGPT integration – and AI-generated emojis. In case you missed it, we have put together a handy summary of every thing Apple announced.

Tesla CEO Elon Musk secured enough shareholder votes to approve a stock option compensation package for 2018. The vote means he could receive a payout of as much as $56 billion, which could be the most important CEO pay package in history, but a judge in Delaware still must issue a final decision after she ruled the package was unfair.

In terms of funding news, Mistral AI has closed its much-talked about Series B funding round. The company secured €600 million (about $640 million at today’s exchange rates) in equity and debt. The new round values ​​the startup at $6 billion because it continues to compete with OpenAI, Anthropic and other AI giants.


Former NSA chief joins OpenAI: Former NSA chief, retired Army Gen. Paul Nakasone, will join OpenAI’s board and serve on its security subcommittee. read more

Tesla shareholders sue Elon Musk: Shareholders Tesla is suing Elon Musk and board members over Musk’s decision to found xAI. They claim that talent and resources are being diverted from Tesla to the new startup. read more

BeReal is bought: The French publisher of mobile applications and games Voodoo acquired BeReal for EUR 500 million. BeReal co-founder and CEO Alexis Barreyat will leave the corporate after a transition period. read more

You can hand over rings: Apple has finally allowed users to pause activity rings on Apple Watch, which is particularly useful in the event you’re sick or otherwise unable to interact in physical activity. read more

Raspberry Pi goes public: The maker of small, low-cost single-board computers priced its IPO on the London Stock Exchange at 2.80 kilos a share, valuing it at $690 million at today’s exchange rates, and quickly rose to three.70 kilos a share. read more

iPads finally get a calculator app: iPads could have a dedicated calculator app for the primary time. But, teachers, watch out. The app includes Math Notes, a new feature that does the mathematics calculations for you. read more

A new smartphone that doesn’t distract your attention: Minimalist smartphone maker Light has announced its latest model. The Light Phone III doesn’t have social media or web access, but it surely does have a larger OLED display and camera. read more

Spotify introduces internal solutions: Spotify is moving deeper into the promoting space with its first in-house creative agency, Creative Lab. The company said it’s going to also begin testing AI generative promoting. read more

Will your device have iOS 18?: Apple’s iOS 18 will probably be compatible with many Apple devices this fall, but when you wish to take full advantage of Apple Intelligence, you might have to update. read more


Apple Intelligence doesn’t attempt to be flashy: With iOS 18, Apple is taking a more cautious approach. Rather than overwhelming users with too many AI features, the corporate is rigorously implementing AI where it believes it may well actually be useful. While Apple’s AI actually is not that flashy, Sarah Perez says it’s the corporate’s way of setting the stakes for what an AI-powered device should find a way to do. read more

Tesla fans participate within the vote: Tesla and its fans have fought an unprecedented battle over Elon Musk’s $56 billion compensation package. Over the past few months, Tesla’s biggest fans have been continually attempting to get out of the vote. Sean O’Kane is examining the myriad calls to motion on Issue X to get shareholders to vote yes and reinforce their belief that Tesla is nothing without Musk. read more

Why Y Combinator encourages small seed rounds: In 2024, many Y Combinator startups only want small seed rounds, but that might scare off many institutional seed VCs. If YC startups treat these rounds more like pre-seed funding, perhaps things won’t be so bad. However, as Rebecca Szkutak writes, there are risks if firms label these smaller rounds as “seed rounds” with the goal of raising the A rank again. read more

This article was originally published on :
Continue Reading


Subscription vitamin company Care/of is closing




Care/A company offering personalized vitamin packages via subscription says that as of Monday, June 17, it can cancel all subscriptions and can not accept recent orders.

This news doesn’t come completely out of the blue, as Care/of previously revealed to the New York Department of Labor sawing that it plans to put off all 143 employees by July 3 as a result of “loss of financial resources.” Now the company is speaking in additional detail and decisively in regards to the closure, including: yesterday’s post on Instagram thanking customers and saying, “Unfortunately, we no longer have the resources to operate in the way we have been doing.”

The post doesn’t completely close the door to a relaunch, stating: “We are actively exploring options for the brand, but don’t have anything final to share right now. We hope to be in a spot where we are able to share more information soon.”

Founded in 2016 by Craig Elbert and Akash Shah, Care/of asked customers to finish a quiz about their lifestyle and values, based on which it really useful a personalised mix of vitamins and supplements. Investors included Juxtapose, Goodwater Capital, Tusk Venture Partners, Bullish and RRE Ventures.

pharmaceutical giant Bayer acquired a majority stake within the company in Care/of in 2020. Earlier this month, Bayer Chief Strategic Communications Officer Christin Miller said NutraIngredients that “stopping further investments in Care/of will enable Bayer to better invest in future innovations that help people manage their health.”

This article was originally published on :
Continue Reading


Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.