US Senator Cory Booker, dn.j., broke the record of the longest speech delivered on the floor of the Senate on Tuesday, when he protested to the first 71 days of administration of President Donald Trump. Booker officially broke the record at 19:19, paradoxically, Booker exceeded the previous record – 24 hours and 18 minutes – organized by Senator Stroma Thurmond, a segregation that used the Senate procedure generally known as a filibuster to dam the adoption of regulations regarding breakthrough civil rights for Black Americans.

Almost 70 years ago, Thurmond, the White “Dixiecrat” from Southern Carolina, began to the floor of the Senate to stop the adoption of the Act on civic rights of 1957, which was the first draft bill on civic rights transferred by law after restructuring. Ultimately, Filibuster Thurmond didn’t win. Although the law intended for equal voice rights for Black Americans had little influence, he also established key mechanisms for the protection of civil rights by establishing the US Civil Rights and the Department of Citizenship of the US Department of Justice.

Composed to the rehearsal of the Act of 1957, security for the Black Americans deprived of defense rights, Democrats indicate that the protest of Senator Booker was an motion that may harm black and other sensitive communities.

“Senator Booker is on the floor, he talks about everything that comes from the Movement for Civil Rights … When we talk about what came out of the 1960s, such as Medicaid, Medicare, Social Security, protecting economic possibilities,” said Brown. He emphasized these social programs “they actually help people keep on the surface and equalize opportunities.”

Booker called the alarm by a message that “we can no longer act under the understanding of business as usual,” says Antjuan Seawright, a democratic strategist that advises several democratic members of the congress. Seawright said that the senator from New Jersey showed “unusual business … not only leadership, but also setting an example of how we need to color outside the line.” He continued: “Not only black Americans, but all those who care about keeping democracy on the right track, as we know, must be and should be.”

Democrats indicate that it is usually symbolic that the black man beat a record of white segregation equivalent to Thurmond. “He is able to do it in a body that has not been built to us to serve, to be honest,” said Brown. He added that the “act of courage” strengthens “the resistance of the black community in our country.”

“We had to withstand many things in this country, regardless of whether it is physical, regardless of whether it is socio-economic or political attacks,” brown contested. “Speech that Senator Booker uses his body, just like black people in this country, to fight for the development of other people, the fight against the oppression of a group of people is quite significant for black experiences in America.”

He also doesn’t surprise democrats that Booker can be a senator who would break such a record. “He was always a man on a mission. He always had granularity, Grind and was always a man on the mission of providing results for his community and our country,” said Seawright, who also noted that Booker is a member of the Congress Black Club, which is understood at Hill Capitol as “Congress’s conscience.”

He explained: “I think he understands the importance of strong, wide arms on which he stands, and the opportunity to remain faithful to the mission.”

Just before breaking the Thurmond record on the Senate floor, Booker confirmed the segregation heritage for somebody who “tried to stop the laws on which I am standing.” He added: “I am not here because of his speech. I am here despite his speech. I am here because as powerful as he was stronger.”

The BBC reports that Elon Musk’s billionaire has donated $ 1 million to voters from Wisconsin before loud elections in the Supreme Court in a state in the state despite calling the prosecutor general to stop him.

Musk announced the award at the end of March 2025 before the Supreme Court elections in Wisconsin on Tuesday, April 1. Just just a few hours earlier, the General Prosecutor Josh Kaul argued in the trial that the gift violated state law prohibiting in exchange for voices. However, the judge in Pennsylvania said that the gift was legal, claiming that prosecutors didn’t prove that it was an illegal lottery.

During the rally, it took place on March 30, Musk said: “We just want the judges to be judges,” before they distributed two high checks to voters who allegedly signed a petition to stop the judges of “activists”. The race could Reverse the control over the state of the Supreme Court For Republicans and have become the most costly court elections in America’s history.

According to the price exceeding $ 90 million, the conservative judge of Waukesha, Brad Schimel, supported by President Donald Trump and the Doge leader, acts against the Susan Crawford, who was against the judge of the Ferrity, who was supported by liberal judges of the Supreme Court Wisconsin.

The winner will replace the liberal judge Ann Walsh Bradley, who retires at the end of his term.

Despite the transfer of $ 14 million to Schimel’s campaign, justice apparently tried to scale back the ties with the owner of Tesla, claiming that he was not planning to be at a rally. “I have no idea what he is doing. I have no idea what this rally is,” said Schimel.

Kaul was not the just one who protested against the hand. The inhabitants of Wisconsin gathered in front of the Green Bay town hall, protesting against its appearance and competition.

When the clips of the rally began to flow into on social media, the recipients of the check value $ 1 million were exposed, and allegedly Nicholas Jacobs was. A political analyst of the press nation published a photograph of Musk and a young man, claiming that Jacobs resembles the chairman of Wisconsin College Republicans, who has the same name.

The second control went to the graphic designer of Ekaterina Diestler. This isn’t the first time the owner of SpaceX escaped with wealthy gifts. In 2024, he gave a money prize of USD 1 million per day to voters in seven states of battlefield, including Wisconsin, in the event that they signed a petition supporting the rights of first and second amendments.

The Trump administration gave schools and universities throughout the country for just two weeks to eliminate the initiatives of diversity or the risk of losing federal funds. IN note published on Friday, The US Education Department ordered institutions to stop using “racial preferences” in terms of parties, financial assistance, employment or other areas. Schools have 14 days to eliminate any practice that considers the race to be an element, which may dramatically transform the life of the campus.

Teachers throughout the country try to assess their risk, wondering whether to fight for policies that they think are legally reasonable. The directive played can increase every thing from application essays to studies to the Faculty and Student Organizations.

The note defines repression as an effort to combat discrimination. “Thanks to this guidelines, the Trump administration manages schools to put an end to the use of racial preferences and racial stereotypes in his programs and activities – the victory of justice, civil rights and the constitution,” said assistant to the secretary for civil rights Craig Trainor.

“Schools work under the pretext that the choice of students for” diversity “or similar euphemisms does not choose them on the basis of a race. There is no more assessment of students in accordance with the merits, achievements and character – not a harmful color of their skin, “added Trainor.

The response of civil rights groups and better education leaders was fast. Many say that the unclear language has been designed to have a cool effect, pressing schools to abandon all programs affecting the breed – even those that might keep in court.

“Creating a sense of risk associated with working, which can promote various and friendly campuses, is much more a goal than a clear statement of existing law,” Jonathan Fansmith, senior vp for presidency relations at the American Council on Education, Association of Presidents of the University The Associated Press said.

The directive relies on previous executive ordinances of Trump prohibiting diversity, own capital and integration (Dei) and cites the Supreme Court’s decision in 2023, which lost conscious racing parties to study. “In short, educational institutions can neither separate or segregate students based on the race, nor separate benefits or burden based on the race,” is alleged on the note.

The Education Department also reduces $ 600 million to subsidies for teacher training programs that promote such concepts, critical theory and activism of social justice, calling them “divide”.

The uncertainty of how far this anti-dei order reaches was visible last week confirmation hearing For the secretary for education, Linda McMahon. Asked if African American history courses would violate the president’s order, McMahon admitted that she was not certain.

Despite the pressure, some education leaders call schools to an exaggerated response. The Association of School Superintendists reminded members that the recent guidelines usually are not legally binding, and all financing cuts would require long investigations.

“We are not sure if the district should not do anything but reading the instructions, talks with a legal advisor and assessing the community’s interest in maintaining existing programs,” said Sasha Pudelski, director of the group’s support.

In the heart of the notes, he’s a direct challenge for admission politicians for studies. The guidelines warn that schools cannot use essays as a way to apply for the applicant’s race – a key problem since the Supreme Court’s judgment on the left room for college kids to discuss the race in personal statements. The important judge John Roberts awarded this chance, but warned that universities couldn’t use essays as a niche to achieve racial diversity.

The note can also be addressed to schools which have eliminated normalized testing requirements. He claims that dropping the requirements of SAT and ACT to increase racial diversity is illegal, although many universities have left standard tests due to fear that they favor wealthy students.

Many years of practices – comparable to recruitment in insufficiently represented areas or obtaining lists of potential students based on academic and demographic aspects – will be seen as a legal risk. Scholarships for college kids of specific racial environments are also studied. While legal experts are still debating whether the Supreme Court’s decision extends to financial assistance, some institutions have already removed racial criteria from some scholarships.

The National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators is working on understanding the implication of the note. “The last thing that students need when planning, how to pay for studies is uncertainty when or whether they will receive financial assistance they rely on,” said the group in a press release for the Associated Press.

Trump called to completely eliminate the education department, and the Department of Government Elon Musk (Doge) has already lowered dozens of federal contracts that were considered a waste.