Due to recent events, billionaire media owners Jeff Bezos and Patrick Soon-Shiong have reportedly paused their planned promotions of Vice President Kamala Harris at their newspapers, The Washington Post and The Los Angeles Times.

Their decisions irritated not only the general public but in addition their very own employees.

According to Robert Kagan, a longtime columnist for this newspaper and editor-in-chief of the Post’s opinion section, he resigned in protest and a gaggle of 11 Washington Post columnists wrote a letter critical of the newspaper’s decision.

Meanwhile, The Post’s publisher and CEO, William Lewis, said in a column published Oct. 25 that the choice to not endorse Harris is a return to the newspaper’s roots of not endorsing a selected candidate.

“We know this will be perceived in many ways, including as a tacit endorsement of one candidate, a condemnation of another, or an abdication of responsibility,” Lewis wrote. “It’s inevitable. We don’t see it that way. We consider that is consistent with the values ​​The Post has all the time stood for.

Indeed, in line with Jarvis DeBerry, opinion editor at , the alternatives made by Lewis, Bezos and Soon-Shiong are “an argument against billionaires buying newspapers”

Like Kagan on the Post, Mariel Garza, editorial editor on the Los Angeles Times, resigned in protest. Garza later said, “I’m resigning because I want to make it clear that I don’t like our silence. In dangerous times, honest people must stand up. This is how I stand.”

In addition to Garza, two more opinion editors at The LA Times also resigned over the choice to finish their endorsement of Harris.

Marty Baron, former editor-in-chief of The Washington Post, responded scathingly to Lewis’ statement on Twitter. “This is cowardice, the victim of which is democracy,” Baron wrote.

Baron indicated that Trump would “take this as an invitation to further intimidate” Bezos, and Baron characterised the choice to withdraw support as “a disturbing lack of spine in an institution renowned for courage.”

DeBerry concluded his comments by indicting the ultra-wealthy owners of each newspapers.

“Yes, there would be hell to pay if the newspaper supported Harris’ victory and Trump then turned on the press as he promised,” DeBerry wrote.

He continued: “But vulnerable people are much more likely to face hell. “It is inexcusable that the ultra-wealthy who have purchased these massive and influential platforms appear to care more about their own interests than the interests of the readers they serve.”

In addition to Baron, The Washington Post Guild, the union representing The Post’s journalists, issued a press release regarding Lewis’ comments.

“We are deeply concerned that The Washington Post, an American news organization based within the nation’s capital, will determine to stop supporting presidential candidates, especially just 11 days before a critical election. The editorial board’s role is to do exactly that: to share our views on news that impacts our society and culture, and to support candidates who will help readers,” the guild wrote.

They continued: “The message from our chief executive, Will Lewis, rather than from the newsroom itself, raises our concerns that management has interfered with the work of our members in the newsroom. According to our reporters and Guild members, an endorsement draft for Harris has already been drafted and the decision not to publish was made by The Post’s owner, Jeff Bezos. We are already seeing churn from once-loyal readers. This decision undermines the work of our members at a time when we should be building the trust of our readers, not losing it.”

Beyoncé has officially endorsed Kamala Harris for president, a strong show of support she made loud and clear at a rally in Houston on Friday. In front of an enthusiastic hometown audience, she joined Harris to defend reproductive rights, delivering a message that resonated on a deeply personal level.

“I’m not here as a star; I’m not here as a politician. I am here as a mother,” she shared with the enthusiastic crowd. “A mother who cares deeply about the world in which my children and all our children live, a world in which we have the freedom to control our bodies, a world in which we are not divided.” She urged: “Imagine our daughters growing up and seeing what is possible without ceilings and limitations. We need to vote and we need you.”

As if that wasn’t enough to bring the gang to their knees, Beyoncé was joined by best friend and Destiny’s Child bandmate Kelly Rowland to cheer her on. With the energy only Bey could bring, she introduced Vice President Harris with a plea: “It’s time for America to sing a new song. Our voices sing a chorus of unity. They sing a song of dignity and possibility. Are you ready to add your voice to a new American song?” The crowd roared in response as she concluded, “Ladies and gentlemen, please give a big and loud welcome to Texas for the next president of the United States, Vice President Kamala Harris.”

This time there was no performance – leaving a rally for Hillary Clinton in 2016. Instead, the highlight was on the presence and words of Beyoncé, who fully supported Harris’ message. Since July, Harris’ campaign has featured Beyoncé’s powerful anthem “Freedom” from the album , a song rooted within the spirit of resistance and resilience, reflecting Southern Black spirituality. The rally highlighted Harris’ fight against Texas’ restrictive abortion laws, a central issue of her platform.

Harris addressed the gang, emphasizing the urgent need to defend freedom within the face of threat. “We know that freedom cannot be given. It should not be broadcast. This is our right and we are ready to fight for it,” she said. “We have to be loud. We have to organize ourselves. We have to mobilize. We need to get energized.”

Other big names graced the rally, including: legendary Texan Willie Nelson and former speaker Jessica Alba. But it was Beyoncé’s influential appearance and words as a mother, a Texan and a black woman that set the decisive tone in a race that’s shaping up to be a decisive 12 months in 2024.

The wife of a conservative British politician was sentenced to a yr in prison for inciting racial hatred on social media.

Lucy Connolly, a 41-year-old nanny from West Northhampshire, called for the burning of hotels housing asylum seekers and mass deportations in a July 29 post on X.

Connolly’s offensive statements were published on the identical day because the Southport stabbing attacks, when three young girls were killed and lots of others injured in a stabbing attack at a Taylor Swift-inspired dance and yoga event within the north-west town of Southport.

The perpetrator, a teenage boy whose parents were from Rwanda, was falsely identified as an illegal immigrant, prompting riots by far-right groups to break out across the country. In one incident, conservative protesters violently clashed with police near a Southport mosque, setting fire to vehicles, throwing bottles at authorities and injuring police dogs. CNN.

According to Connolly’s tweet comments in regards to the judgmentread: “Now mass deportations, burn down all the fucking hotels full of bastards for all I care, and while you’re at it, take the traitorous government and politicians with you. I feel physically sick knowing what these families will now have to endure. If that makes me a racist, so be it.”

The nanny’s tirade, which was viewed by 310,000 people, immediately put her on the authorities’ radar and ultimately proved to be her undoing, as presiding judge Melbourne Inman said “intended to incite serious violence” Her racist abuse wasn’t limited to one post.

Police found inflammatory comments on her social media each before and after the Southport stabbings.

Connolly, who has no previous convictions, reportedly commented on the sword attack on X, writing: “I bet it was one of those boat raiders in my house.” According to the BBC, she also referred to a video published by a far-right activist through which he says: “I think he’s Somali” and is accompanied by a vomiting emoji.

Before she was arrested on August 6, she deleted her X account and turned to WhatsApp, boasting that she would “play the mental health card” and deny responsibility if police arrested her. The day before her arrest, she joked: “…the angry tweet about burning down hotels bit me in the ass, lol.”

Connolly and her husband, Tory councilor Raymond Connolly, lost their son in a “terrible way,” her defense attorney said, adding that “it can only have a drastically damaging effect on someone,” news outlets report. Her husband Raymond he previously told the BBC his wife was “a good person and not a racist,” explaining that she posted a “stupid, spur-of-the-moment tweet out of frustration and quickly deleted it.”

“He has children from Somalia and Bangladesh that he takes care of and loves them as his own,” he added.

Despite threatening to use her “mental health card”, the court found no evidence of a mental disorder, and Connolly ultimately pleaded guilty to intent to incite racial hatred. When questioned by police, she admitted that she didn’t like immigrants and stated that children weren’t secure of their presence, investigator Frank Ferguson said via the web site BBC.

In the judge’s remarks, he placed Connolly squarely amongst those “who will seek an excuse for violence and disorder causing injury, damage, loss and fear to completely innocent members of society, and sentences for those that incite racial hatred and disharmony in our society are aimed toward purpose of each punishment and deterrence.

She was given a 31-month sentence, of which 40 percent might be spent in prison after which suspended. Her husband can also be facing backlash after calling for the resignation of Mike Reader, the Labor MP for Northampton South.