On March 29, 1895, The New York Times told the reality.

Sandwiched in between two different articles on the resolved issue of police reform, the nearly 44-year-old newspaper published an article on the political climate in South Carolina. The article raised a “difficult issue” with the state’s upcoming constitutional convention. The unnamed journalist focused particularly on the campaign to rewrite the governing document of South Carolina after the Civil War.

The South Carolina Constitution of 1868 was the literal definition of democracy.

Written by the one and only majority Black constitutional delegation throughout the history of the Western world, revolutionary representatives have imagined a state by which “everyone is treated equally and has the fitting to equal participation in management, decision-making, etc” At a time when most northern states allowed only white men to vote, delegate WJ Whipper he proposed a crazy idea: universal suffrage for black men and ladies. He invented the American education system as we comprehend it (or as Michael Boulware Moore he calls it “America’s first free, mandatory statewide public school system“). And since the state was then 57% African American, the 1868 Constitution guaranteed democracy – or “ a government by which the final word power is exercised by the people, directly or not directly, through representation“

Featured Stories

But the New York Times wasn’t pro-black, so it didn’t praise the SC structure. And since it was not a Democratic or Republican newspaper, it didn’t condemn the bipartisan effort to repeal this testimony to democracy. Instead, the article portrayed the bipartisan effort to wrest control of the state’s political apparatus from the black majority in South Carolina as a political conundrum. “(T)here are about 120,000 black voters in the state and only 80,000 white voters,” wrote the anonymous journalist. “Suppose they figure out some way to restrict black voting rights without restricting white voting rights, which is exactly what they’re getting at… That’s a difficult problem.”

Although the Times simply presented a set of indisputable facts, the editors apparently could only consider one option to adequately describe the proposed “white man’s convention.” The headline was neither hyperbolic nor attempted to appeal to each side (frankly, in 1895 the Times had only a few Twitter followers). Instead of melodramatic clickbait, essentially the most powerful media within the country used a five-word headline that objectively summarized the whole pro-white, anti-democratic movement:

“The ‘white supremacy’ problem.”

“Who said anything about Hitler?

On Tuesday, October 23, 2024, the NY Times didn’t call Trump a white supremacist.

Following on from yesterday’s front page information, highlight this at the highest of the page Kamala Harris goes to churchThe Times published a groundbreaking A-1 story about how a 32-year-old unelected lawyer named Kamala Harris I went to parties over a quarter of a century ago. To be fair, the story about Harris going to parties greater than a quarter of a century ago is buried beneath a three-day headline about “Trump’s entire life is stuffed with scandals“

I suppose there might be something about Hitler at some point in the long run.

In NY Times article from October 22former Trump administration chief of staff John F. Kelly warns that “Trump will rule like a dictator.” According to Kelly’s bombshell interview with Michael S. Schmidt – which has not yet appeared on the front page of the Times (or the Washington Post, Politico or Axios) – fascism is a “far-right, authoritarian, ultranationalist ideology and a political movement characterised by a dictatorial leader.” According to Kelly, Trump meets these requirements.

“The former president is certainly part of the far-right environment,” Kelly said. “He is certainly authoritarian, he admires people who are dictators – that’s what he said. So he certainly fits the general definition of a fascist.” And if you happen to think this sounds a little Hitler-ish, the article is only one,308 words long, Schmidt and the Los Angeles Times mention the genocidal, dictatorial, white supremacist GOAT: “He commented more than once that, ‘You know, Hitler did some good things too,'” he added Kelly.

Adolf Hitler was a white supremacist.

Few would dispute the claim that the leader of the German Nazi Party believed that the white race was “inherently superior to other races and that white people should have control over people of other races.” For the past decade, nevertheless, the Los Angeles Times and all other mainstream media have shunned using the term to explain Hitler’s position as a candidate for president.

They are willing to elucidate that Trump “spreads his politics of grievance to non-white voters“, which of course means that “allegations racism.” Like its Nazi predecessor, “has long used degrading language against immigrants“To”stir up a racist fire” It is baffling why institutions liable for presenting an unbiased set of facts can in some way absolve themselves of presenting objective, irrefutable truth.

Or perhaps Hitler was just a populist and World War I used to be a fight against “economic anxiety.” To call Donald Trump a white supremacist, you have to not only ignore Gen. Kelly, but in addition overlook the things he he wrotethings that he he saidthings he didhis social programhis economic policies, his political team and a real dictionary. But apparently the American media is willing to do exactly that.

If Donald Trump is not a white supremacist, then white supremacy doesn’t exist.

Journalism is not only a profession, and the press is not only a business enterprise. There is a reason why freedom of the press is the First Amendment to the Constitution. This is why the New York Times is considered an establishment. That’s why the Washington Post’s motto says:Democracy dies in darkness” In America, the press is a social, political and economic necessity that gives residents with unadulterated truth.

And if not, then they’re nothing greater than social, economic, and political systems that collectively enable white people to take care of power over people of other races.”

More than a century ago, the NY Times promised “to report the news impartially, without fear or favor, without regard to party, sect or interest.” But in relation to Donald Trump, just one sentence objectively reflects the media coverage of the pro-white and anti-democratic Republican presidential candidate:

The NY Times wrote this in 1895.

Michael Harriot is an economist, cultural critic and master level Spades player. His New York Times bestseller is available wherever books are sold.

By running against a candidate known for shading the reality, if not equating it with combat, Vice President Kamala Harris is positioning herself as someone who will be trusted.

But second round of accusations the indisputable fact that she plagiarized another person’s words without citing the source could undermine that credibility, providing a minimum of an unwelcome distraction in the ultimate two weeks of the campaign.

Slow warning signal in Washington reported on Tuesday that in written congressional testimony in 2007 supporting laws making a student loan repayment program for state and native prosecutors, Harris copied almost verbatim the writings of a Republican supporting the bill.

“Both statements cite the same surveys, use the same language and make the same points in the same order, with an added paragraph here or there,” The Free Beacon stated. “They even contain the identical typos, reminiscent of missing punctuation or incorrect plurals. One error – “who” must have been “who” – was corrected by Harris, then San Francisco’s district attorney.

Of the roughly 1,500 words Harris utilized in support John R. Justice Act, nearly 1,200 of them were literally rescinded from an announcement made two months earlier by Illinois Attorney Paul Logli, the Free Beacon reports. Both argued that the bill, which did not pass Congress, would help district attorneys’ offices recruit and retain top lawyers.

This comes just every week after conservative activist Christopher Rufo accused Harris for copying greater than a dozen passages from his 2009 book “Smart on Crime” from uncited sources. The book, co-authored with Joan O’C Hamilton, was the premise for her successful 2010 campaign for California Attorney General.

On Tuesday, The Washington Free Beacon also revealed that as California’s attorney general, Harris did greater than just borrow standard legal language without attribution. In one example, the report said it included a fictionalized story a couple of human trafficking victim for illustrative purposes by a nonprofit organization and presented it as an actual case.

The original story was published by the web site Polaris project, the nonprofit organization that operates the National Human Trafficking Hotline, which clearly states that these vignettes are for informational purposes only and that key details have been modified to guard your identity. However, in November 2012, Harris released a report wherein she used one in every of these vignettes almost verbatim, but with a big change: as an alternative of Washington, D.C., where the motion took place, Harris moved the rescue operation to San Francisco.

While initially downplaying Rufo’s allegations, plagiarism expert Jonathan Bailey he said The New York Times said the allegations were “more serious” than they initially appeared.

Plagiarism scandals have disrupted political campaigns previously, especially political campaigns Joe Biden’s first presidential term. A video of a speech by the then-Delaware senator, considered a powerful contender for the 1988 Democratic nomination, was shown next to a recording made years earlier by British Labor Party leader Neil Kinnock. Biden apparently copied Kinnock’s words without citing the source and withdrew from the race every week after the video was released.

So far, the allegations against Harris have gained little publicity – Republican Party candidate Donald Trump barely mentioned it. Voters appear to have deeper concerns.

“I’d Rather Have a Department of Education, Certified Teachers, FDIC Insurance for Our Bank Deposits, Reproductive Health Care Without Fear of My Future DIL’s Arrest or Death, Access to Birth Control for My Son Because EVERYTHING DISAPPEARS, and Much More – If Trump Takes Office.” commented one Harris supporter.

Another noted that while unlucky, Harris’ accusation of copying pales as compared to her opponent, who, in keeping with The Washington Post, provided several 30,573 lies or misleading statements during his first term.

“Is this the best they can find?” added by user.

Philadelphia prosecutor Max Kennerly argued that the testimony didn’t constitute “‘plagiarism’ in any sense.”

“The National Association of District Attorneys has taken a position on an issue, and two board members have rightly stated the same position in congressional testimony two months apart,” he added. Kennerly said.

Harris has not yet commented on the 2007 congressional testimony. Her campaign actually addressed allegations of plagiarism in her book, saying it was much ado about nothing.

“Agents on the right are growing increasingly desperate as they see the bipartisan coalition of support Vice President Harris is building to win this election as Trump retreats into a conservative echo chamber, unwilling to face questions about his lies,” campaign spokesman James Singer told media . branches last week. “This is a book that has been in print for 15 years, and the vice president clearly cited sources and statistics in the footnotes and at the end.”

The man behind the statements she allegedly falsified in connection together with her congressional testimony said Harris’ staffers likely bear plenty of responsibility.

“I don’t think it’s an act of plagiarism as much as relying on people who helped write the statement by cutting and pasting,” Logli said. “They probably cut corners because they were overstretched.”

The unrest for Black men, the Democratic Party’s second-most loyal voting bloc, continues this election cycle as polls consistently show a lag in support for presidential candidate Vice President Kamala Harris.

A recent poll commissioned by Dr. Tillery shows that Kamala Harris can improve her approval rating amongst young Black male voters by 8-15% by tailoring her campaign message to how Donald Trump poses a direct threat to Black men, namely regarding to policing and rollbacks of civil rights and diversity and equality programs.

“The Democrats played it wrong and set themselves up to lose,” said Tillery, who last fall warned the then-Biden campaign about polling showing young black men were moving away from Democrats.

Tillery, who’s polled by his data firm 2040 Strategy Group, points to key policy issues that he believes are driving young black men away from Trump and back to Harris and the Democratic Party.

According to the most recent questionnaire from the Alliance for Black Equality, following Donald Trump’s record of supporting national stop-and-frisk policing and Project 2025’s proposals to eliminate DEI programs – a key tool to combat racial discrimination – young Black men’s concerns about harm to Black men increased by 23 % and 16% respectively.

The interviewer noted that black men also reacted positively when hearing about Harris’ background and her identity as a black woman. The Alliance for Black Equality can be hitting six figures ads targeting young black men with the persuasion points mentioned above regarding Harris and Trump.

“They get one of our ads that not only says the vice president is gorgeous and black, but also look what this old guy wants to do,” Tillery said. “He desires to stop you and search you. He desires to make it easier in your white boss to discriminate. “These two things are the cocktail to win this election in the next 14 days.”

Angel, a former Maryland state delegate, said she canvassed and talked to black men in cities like Philadelphia and found what their social media algorithms were displaying was “crazy.”

“Many of us who are in the political sphere … have no idea how deep this issue is,” Angel said.

“They hear it from bizarre people too. So for them it’s more trustworthy because they do not trust politicians.”

A political operative believes that the deputies the Harris campaign has dispatched to seek advice from Black voters usually are not appropriate “trusted messengers.”

Several Black men are campaigning on Harris’ behalf. Some of them are influential Democrats like former President Barack Obama, who will rally with Harris in Atlanta, Georgia, on Thursday.

Angel argues that the campaign would work higher with younger black male voices, reminiscent of web influencers and hip-hop stars, or those that come from certain life experiences, reminiscent of the Central Park Five, who were wrongly convicted in 1989 ., and later acquitted in 2002, and recently filed a defamation lawsuit against Trump.

Dr. Tillery agrees that President Obama, whom he described as “preachy,” will not be the most effective messenger for disaffected younger black men.

He explained: “That’s another weakness of the Democratic campaign… they’re sending Gen X and baby boomers as messengers.”

“We think a good solution will be to meet them where they are, in the media they like and already use, with a bit of humor and imparting a lot of knowledge,” he said.

Tillery said a greater strategy to use President Obama can be to “hit the road with young millennials and Black Gen Z influencers.” He continued, “So state your point and get out of the way.”

Criticisms aside, Dr. Tillery noted that Harris has significantly improved her approval rankings amongst younger black men surveyed by the Alliance for Black Equality.

After interviewing Charlamagne Tha God, Roland Martin and The Shade Room and publishing her “Agenda of Opportunity for Black Men,” Tillery said Harris was “starting to engage with young black men.”

He noted that support for the Democratic presidential candidate increased from 49% to 59%. But he added: “The problem is that she’s still 20 points away from where she needs to be.”

Harris’ campaign continues its efforts to achieve young Black men through paid media content partnerships with The Shade Room and Hip Hop Hollywood. Both city media outlets have launched digital series to achieve black voters. The Shade Room released a six-episode series titled “My Black Job,” which features stars reminiscent of Jermaine Dupri and Pinky Cole, in addition to Harris’ brother-in-law Tony West and others.

Hollywood hip-hop The “Black Men Read ‘Project 2025′” series goals to coach Black men concerning the dangers of Project 2025 to themselves, their families and their communities.

“They have to keep doing what they are doing,” Tillery said. “And you still need projects like ours — independent messengers — who, frankly, will just make things real.”

More history