Connect with us

Business and Finance

Bold climate action benefits more than just the environment – ​​it also benefits business

Published

on

As the challenges of climate change grow, businesses are feeling increasing pressure to take action.

To avert disaster, this may have to transcend simply following latest regulations and minimum standards. Business must lead in good faith.

Yet taking daring action on climate change remains to be too often presented as a compromise of sorts – because taking action comes at a value, doing good for the environment comes at the expense of doing good business.

Our latest research challenges this myth. We found that improving carbon efficiency can transcend solving environmental problems and deliver tangible financial benefits.

Our testA study covering almost twenty years of information from corporations in the Asia-Pacific region finds that higher carbon management is related to significantly lower financial risk.

This is proof that taking action isn’t any longer just an environmental requirement, but also a very important financial strategy.



Lower risk in every category

The Asia-Pacific region is home to some the world’s largest carbon dioxide emittersincluding China, Japan and South Korea.

Businesses operating in the region are facing increasing pressure from regulators, investors and consumers to scale back their environmental impact.

Businesses around the world can not ignore the have to take daring climate action.
Damitha Jayawardena/Shutterstock

Our tests examined over 9,000 annual observations (comparable to annual reports) from 13 Asia-Pacific countries from 2002 to 2021. The study aimed to look at the relationship between carbon efficiency and three common varieties of business risks: idiosyncratic, systematic, and total risk.

Idiosyncratic risks are people who a particular company faces, while systematic risks are people who affect the entire market, comparable to economic crises. As you may expect, total risk combines all of them.



We found that higher corporate carbon performance was related to lower levels of risk in all three categories.

Companies that actively took action to administer and reduce their carbon emissions enjoyed lower stock price volatility, lower company-specific risk and were less sensitive to market-wide economic shocks.

The absolute risk reduction varied from 1.22% in Taiwan to as much as 4% in Australia.

These lower risk levels reflect more than just these corporations being higher at following the rules. There has been a seismic shift in how the market views business behavior and in what we expect.

It’s a form of halo effect. Companies with higher carbon credentials are seen as higher positioned to achieve the broader marketplace—whether it’s coping with regulatory changes, business disruptions, or reputational risks. All of that could make them more attractive to investors.

Stronger management, stronger effect

Our study also found that in countries with higher standards of corporate governance – including aspects comparable to environmental regulations, effective law enforcement and anti-corruption measures – there was a stronger association between carbon efficiency and lower levels of risk.

Risk reduction was more pronounced in countries with strong governance frameworks, including Australia.
Wysznia Terrace/Shutterstock

What drives this effect? ​​It is most probably that in countries with strong governance frameworks, corporations with solid environmental credentials are rewarded with lower borrowing costs and better market valuations.

This teaches policymakers a very important lesson.

It suggests that implementing measures comparable to emissions trading systems, harmonised climate change performance indicators and national commitments to international climate agreements could bring increase financial benefits carbon efficiency.

Creating such a business environment creates strong financial incentives for corporations that take action and allows them to align their very own carbon reduction efforts with national and global goals.

Unique challenges offer unique opportunities

Despite the obvious benefits of improving carbon efficiency, businesses in the Asia-Pacific region face some unique challenges.

Emerging economies in the region, comparable to Indonesia, Thailand and the Philippines, often have lower base levels carbon efficiency in comparison with their more advanced counterparts.

This is basically on account of differences in how strict regulations are, what key government institutions are able to, and lower levels of economic development. But these challenges are also opportunities.

Businesses operating in these emerging markets have a possibility to proactively adopt global best practices and lead the transition to a low-carbon economy.

What can we learn?

Our research delivers necessary insights for investors, corporations and all of us.

For investors, our research highlights how necessary an organization’s environmental performance could be. Companies with poor carbon performance may face higher risks overall. This could mean that higher returns are required to compensate investors for those risks.

On the other hand, corporations that take significant steps to administer their carbon emissions are more prone to have stable money flow and lower volatility, which might boost investor confidence.

For businesses, the message is obvious. Investing in carbon management is just not just an ethical or regulatory obligation – it’s a sound financial decision.

By improving their carbon performance, corporations can lower their overall risk exposure, attract sustainability-minded investors, improve their access to capital markets and lower their borrowing costs.

Strong climate action doesn’t must be a compromise. As the world faces the challenge of living with climate change, the link between environmental responsibility and financial performance will only grow stronger.

This article was originally published on : theconversation.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business and Finance

How a Black-owned radio station stayed independent for 50 years while other media became corporatized.

Published

on

By

WDKX, WDKX Radio, WDKX Rochester, Rochester radio stations, B lack-owned radio stations, WDKX Andria Langston, theGrio.com

If you have ever checked out a radio station’s call letters, it can have gave the impression of they were just letters to you.

But at WDKX radios in Rochester, New York, the letter “D” stands for Frederick Douglass, “K” stands for Martin Luther King Jr., and “X” stands for

In a media environment where many Black radio stations that air promoting to Black listeners usually are not Black-owned, WDKX exemplifies the legacy and power of independent Black media. This yr the station is celebrating 50 years in business.

According to African American Public Radio Consortiuman estimated 10,000 industrial radio stations broadcast each day within the U.S., but lower than 1% are black-owned. This discrepancy reveals greater than just an ownership gap; highlights a systemic problem that ends in fewer Black leaders being accountable for the voices and messages that claim to talk for Black people.

“Anyone can play black music or turn on black shows, but with black creators there is a different kind of authenticity and connection,” says Andria Langston, current co-owner of WDKX and national sales manager.

Langston is Andre Langston’s daughter and granddaughter Andrew Langstonwho founded WDKX in 1974 in Rochester. While the northern New York city is commonly considered a destination for abolitionists like Frederick Douglass, that does not imply racism wasn’t prevalent in the realm.

Andrew Langston (right) is the founder and visionary of WDKX Radio, which he founded in 1974. (Photo via WROC-TV)
(*50*)
Andria Langston poses along with her father, Andre Langston, current owner of WDKX radio in Rochester, New York, who made sure the station remained independently owned. (Photo courtesy of The Langston Family)
(*50*)

“My grandfather was a visionary, and interestingly enough, he moved to Rochester, New York, because he was promised a job at CBS,” Langston tells Grio. “But when he got there and they saw he was black, they didn’t want to show him on TV. Being in Rochester during the Rochester Riots, my grandparents saw there was a need to tell our story.”

Today, WDKX is a model of resilience, being certainly one of the last independently operated Black-owned radio stations within the United States. The station organizes community events and highlights issues related to health, education and politics. Its mission is deeply rooted within the vision of Mr. Langston, who overcame regulatory and racial barriers to create a platform dedicated to authentic Black voices. For Andria, who began learning the station’s operations on the age of 5, that is of great importance.

“I’m a third-generation owner and seeing my grandfather build this station throughout my life and my father continuing it, I think it’s a testament to the American dream; what can be achieved with persistence and community and simply focusing on your goals,” Langston tells theGrio.

(*50*)

Like many Black-owned public radio stations, WDKX attracts socially and culturally aware listeners who help keep this legacy alive. Although many African-American public radio stations are licensed by universities – accounting for 70% of all such stations, including NPR affiliates – WDKX is certainly one of the few that also operates independently.

This weekend, as WDKX celebrates its fiftieth anniversary, it does in order a testament to the importance of getting Black people in media. From its commitment to unfiltered storytelling to its ability to construct authentic connections, WDKX stays a critical voice in an era where community-centered, Black-owned media is required greater than ever. For listeners in Rochester and beyond, WDKX is greater than just a radio station. It reminds us of the strength and resilience that comes from having your personal narrative.

“My grandfather was in his 40s when he finally started a radio station,” Langston explains. “So you may have a dream in your 20s and it should take you years to comprehend it. Don’t surrender in your dreams. To proceed. Because you have got time and there may be enough for everyone here.

Featured Stories

This article was originally published on : thegrio.com
Continue Reading

Business and Finance

No, the boom in battery factories in America is not over – construction of the largest factories is proceeding as planned and it is planned to employ over 23,000 people

Published

on

By

The United States is experiencing the largest-ever boom in investment in clean energy production, driven by laws such as the bipartisan bill Act on infrastructure investments and employment and Act on reducing inflation.

They have these rights used billions of dollars government support to drive private sector investment in clean energy supply chains across the country.

For several years, one of us, Jay Turner, and his students at Wellesley College have been tracking clean energy investments in the U.S. and sharing the data on the website The big green machine website. This study shows that since the Inflation Control Act went into effect in 2022, firms have announced 225 projects with a complete investment of $127 billion and the creation of greater than 131,000 latest jobs.

You could have seen on the news that these projects are in danger of failure or significant delays. In August 2024, the Financial Times reported this. 40% of over 100 projects he assessed that they were delayed. These include battery production, renewable energy and metals and hydrogen projects, as well as semiconductor manufacturing plants. The technology industry magazine The Information recently warned of this 1 in 4 firms left from government subsidies for investment in batteries.

Workers assemble battery packs for electric vehicles in Spartanburg, South Carolina. New battery factories in the state will help move the supply chain closer to U.S. electric vehicle factories.
BMW

We checked all 23 battery cell factories announced or prolonged since the Inflation Reduction Act was signed into law – just about all of them are gigafactories which might be expected to produce greater than 1 gigawatt-hour of battery cell capability. These factories have one of the highest employment potentials of all the projects supported by the Act.

We wanted to discover whether the U.S. clean energy production boom was about to fizzle out. Most of what we learned is reassuring.

The largest battery factories are on the right track

While exact investment amounts are difficult to determine, our study shows that planned capital expenditure shall be $52 billion, which would supply 490 gigawatt-hours of battery production capability per 12 months – enough to put about 5 million latest electric vehicles on the road.

While not all 23 firms have announced hiring plans, the facilities are expected to create nearly 30,000 latest jobs, with projects primarily in the U.S. Southeast, Midwest and Southwest.

We wanted to know whether these projects were progressing as planned or whether there have been delays or problems.

To do that, we first contacted local and state economic development agencies. In many cases, local and state tax incentives support these projects. Where possible, we now have tried to confirm the status of the project through public data Or formal announcements. In other cases, we looked for messages to see in the event that they existed construction proof Or hiring.

Our study shows that 13 of 23 projects are on the right track, with total planned capital investment exceeding $40 billion and production capability of nearly 352 gigawatt hours per 12 months. Importantly, they include most of the largest projects with the largest investments and expected production.

Our calculations show that 77% of total planned capital investment, 79% of proposed jobs, and 72% of planned battery production are on the right track, meaning the project is likely to be accomplished roughly on time and overall as expected. result. level of investment and employment.

Three projects are on the bubble. These have shown progress but have experienced delays in construction or financing.

Five others show deeper signs of distress. We do not yet have enough information to draw conclusions about the two projects.

An example of an ongoing project is the Envision AESC battery plant in Florence, South Carolina. His the scale has been enlarged twice since it was first announced in December 2022. It is now a $3 billion investment with the goal of producing 30 gigawatt-hours of batteries per 12 months supplies the BMW factory in Woodruff, South Carolina.

In early October 2024, South Carolina Secretary of Commerce Harry Lightsey visited the Envision i facility published a video. Construction of the plant began in February 2024, and 850 employees are working six days per week to complete the 1.4 million square foot facility by August 2025. Once full production begins, the project shall be accomplished expected to hire 2,700 people.

The 2024 elections could end or speed up the boom

However, much relies on what is going to occur in the upcoming elections.

Our data suggests that the real risk facing these projects and projects like them is not sluggish demand for electric vehicles, as some suggest – in fact demand continues to grow. It’s not the local opposition that did it either it only slowed down a number of projects.

The the biggest risk is policy change. Many of these projects are counting on advanced manufacturing tax credits approved by the Inflation Reduction Act through 2032.

During the campaign, Republicans are promising to repeal key laws under Biden, including the Inflation Reduction Act, which incorporates funding for grants and loans to support clean energy, as well as tax incentives to support domestic manufacturing.

While an entire repeal of the Act could also be unlikely, an an administration hostile to clean energy redirect unspent funds to other purposes, slow the pace of grants or loans by slow project approvals, or find other ways to make tax incentives tougher to obtain. Although our research focused on the battery industry, concerns concern investments in wind energy AND solar energy too.

So will the great U.S. boom in clean energy production soon come to an end? Our data is optimistic, but the policy is uncertain.

This article was originally published on : theconversation.com
Continue Reading

Business and Finance

Jaylen Brown is launching his own sports brand thanks to Kobe Bryant

Published

on

By


NBA champion Jaylen Brown did the other of most superstars once they were offered a giant contract. He turned down the offer, but as a substitute decided to start his own brand, crediting the thought to the late Kobe Bryant.

In an exclusive interview with and , a Boston Celtics player discussed his latest enterprise, 741, a footwear and sports brand. After meeting with several firms and never feeling the offers thrown at him, Brown announced that he followed the trail that the nice Kobe planned. The Lakers legend was planning to start his own sports company, so he decided to do the identical.

After turning down $50 million in sponsorship deals, he launched 741 in September.

“Honestly, I got the thought from Kobe (Bryant), rest in peace. Before his death, he planned to launch his own shoe brand, sign contracts with athletes and offer them higher deals and percentages. I remember reading an article about it and pondering it was bullshit. I analyzed my own experiences of working for big corporations and the way they value your creativity and also you. I’ve tried every brand and none of them stood out. Everyone approaches things the identical way. I used to be on the lookout for a brand of the long run, not a brand of the past. I could not find it so I had to start.

Brown also stated that he also helped design products for his line. Outside of design, he said that creating 741 allowed him to explore his creativity.

“I designed all the pieces myself. I used to be just on the factory in South Korea, on the road, ensuring all the pieces was done the way in which I believed it must be. I’ve done probably close to $50 million value of deals (from other brands) to start something on my own. And it wasn’t because I didn’t like the cash they were offering. It’s because these contracts pigeonholed me and didn’t allow me to be creative.

Brown also said he didn’t want to force anything when it comes to brand promotion. He favors a slow-build approach and admitted that “it doesn’t have to be the hottest brand on the street tomorrow.”


This article was originally published on : www.blackenterprise.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending