Connect with us

Politics and Current

Pastors see black men cautious about talking about abortion policy

Published

on

WASHINGTON (AP) — Phoenix pastor the Rev. Warren H. Stewart Sr. has had countless discussions this election season with other black men about the economy, criminal justice, immigration and other issues dominating the political scene of their key swing state of Arizona. But never abortion.

“They’re about justice. They’re about Donald Trump potentially reversing all the gains of the civil rights movement. They’re not about abortion,” Stewart said.

That’s in stark contrast to what was said throughout the campaign, when President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris courted voters who supported abortion rights, while Trump and his surrogates courted voters who opposed abortion.

While black men have traditionally supported Democrats, one dominant narrative is that they will not be enthusiastic about Biden, the party’s presumptive nominee. They make up nearly 7% of the electorate, in line with a Pew Research Center evaluation, and this yr, a number of thousand votes in Arizona, Pennsylvania and other swing states could determine the race.

Democratic U.S. Rep. James Clyburn of South Carolina stays concerned that Trump’s hypermasculine campaign style is driving black male voters who feel underrepresented in mainstream politics away from the Democratic Party. Clyburn is attempting to counter that trend.

President Joe Biden (R) and Pastor Dr. J. Louis Felton pray during a church service at Mt. Airy Church of God in Christ, Sunday, July 7, 2024, in Philadelphia. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)

After his dismal debate performance fueled concerns about his age, Biden, 81, has also been attempting to shore up his loyal base, appearing recently on the Mount Airy Church of God in Christ in Philadelphia and elsewhere across the state to dispel lingering questions and rumors.

“I have never been more optimistic about the future of America, quite frankly, if we stick together,” Biden said, addressing the gang in a brief speech that mentioned Harris but didn’t mention abortion rights.

Among black clergy, few are higher placed to evaluate Biden’s character and suitability than Bishop Reginald T. Jackson.

Jackson, 70, the 132nd bishop of the African Methodist Episcopal Church, was a key organizer of Biden’s first U.S. Senate campaign in 1972. He first saw the candidate’s shortcomings up close as a student at Delaware State University.

“All this stuttering? It’s nothing new,” Jackson said from his home in Atlanta.

Jackson said Biden’s recent mishaps throughout the debate and subsequent news conferences shouldn’t deter him from boasting about his support for historically black colleges and his administration’s support for minority-owned small businesses.

“It’s almost as if the president’s accomplishments are treated as some kind of state secret,” Jackson said.

When it involves abortion, Jackson believes the federal government shouldn’t interfere in a choice that’s best left to the girl and her doctor, and says he’s pleased with the way in which the Biden campaign is handling the problem.

For the past half-century, abortion has remained a contentious issue in black Protestant churches, fraught with questions of sexuality and gender that their Christian community has historically grappled with.

In interviews, black church leaders have acknowledged that the church has not all the time been adept at talking about human sexuality, a trait they share with their mainline Protestant counterparts. In “Moral Combat: How Sex Divided American Christians and Fractured American Politics,” creator R. Marie Griffith, a professor of humanities at Washington University in St. Louis, argues that caution about discussing sex — and opposing their deeply held views on women’s sexuality specifically — lies at the foundation of lots of essentially the most divisive political issues.

One black pastor, Democratic U.S. Senator Raphael Warnock of Georgia, senior pastor of Ebenezer Baptist Church in Atlanta, has been outspoken about his support for abortion access, especially during his 2022 re-election campaign.

But Warren Stewart, who leads First Institutional Baptist Church in Phoenix, wishes Biden and Harris hadn’t talked a lot about abortion, whilst he dismissed the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe as a “political gift.” He believes abortion must be legal only in cases where the lifetime of the person giving birth is in peril.

Others disagree. Pastor Leslie D. Callahan, the primary woman to pastor a church in Philadelphia historical St. Paul Baptist Church said all men, no matter race, must determine what bodily functions they would really like the federal government to regulate. Black women have highest maternal mortality rate within the USA, in line with 2022 CDC Report.

“If you didn’t have bodily autonomy, what freedom would you have?” she asked.

She stressed that Biden, who supports protecting access to abortion, is just not being called upon to resign from the presidency, only to resign from the campaign.

“If he’s fit to govern, I don’t see why he’s not fit to run,” Callahan said. “If you’re going to examine Biden, examine his presidency and his policies. If you’re going to examine fitness, there has to be a consistent and equal examination of the fitness of his opponent.”

A row of voting machines with American flags and the words "Vote" written on them
(Adobe Stock Images)

As Trump tries to court black voters, about 7 in 10 black adults still have an overall unfavorable view of him, in line with an AP evaluation of two consecutive polls conducted in June by the AP-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research. But that number has fallen by 20 percentage points for the reason that start of 2021.

While Trump campaign officials have said black men could also be more receptive to his message, black men and girls feel similarly about him.

Black men’s view of Biden isn’t overwhelmingly positive either. An evaluation of the poll found that about half of black men have a somewhat or very positive view of Biden — in comparison with about 7 in 10 black women — and about 4 in 10 black men view the president negatively.

Pastor Otis Moss Jr., retired pastor of Olivet Institutional Baptist Church in Cleveland, certainly one of the biggest and most distinguished black churches in Ohio, is anxious about Trump’s position, saying the previous president is anxious about protecting life before birth but not after.

“The human rights of women, of women, should not be violated by someone else’s political ideology,” Moss said.

Vice President Harris, a member of Third Baptist Church in San Francisco, addressed her religious beliefs during her March visit to a Planned Parenthood clinic in Minnesota, the primary by a sitting president or vp.

“You don’t have to abandon your faith or deeply held beliefs to agree that the government shouldn’t tell women what to do with their bodies,” Harris said.

“She will consult her priest, pastor, rabbi, imam if she wants to. But does the government have the right to tell her what she can and cannot do with her body?”

Featured Stories

Individual pastoral care is more appropriate than government policy to assist women and families make difficult and complex medical decisions, including abortion, Callahan said. Many times, she said, persons are deciding between two difficult alternatives—neither is perfect.

“The last thing that needs to be considered in your decision is whether you can find a doctor who is willing to take any risks to help you achieve physical, mental and emotional health,” she said.

This election season, Planned Parenthood’s advocacy and political organizations are working to interact, educate and mobilize black men, in addition to other demographic groups. Lead organizer Jamesa Bailey, director of black campaigns at Planned Parenthood Action Fund, said their internal data suggests that after they learn about the stakes within the presidential election on abortion, they’re 3 times more prone to educate one other voter — and so they usually tend to plan to vote.

Combining the problem of protected and legal access to abortion — African Americans are greater than twice as prone to die during childbirth, and it has been well documented that tests says states with essentially the most restrictive abortion barriers have the best maternal mortality rates for black women — Black America’s Maternal Health Crisis has proven to be “very strong,” Bailey said, adding that could be why she has seen a “significant increase” in support from clergy and faith groups across the country.

By introducing themselves as religious leaders of their communities in nearly two dozen states, she said, they sought to make a daring latest statement as a community through their presence: that their faith in God doesn’t conflict with their belief in a girl’s right to decide on.

This article was originally published on : thegrio.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics and Current

Jasmine Crockett blasts Republicans for so-called white “oppression” over anti-DEI bill

Published

on

By

Jasmine Crockett, theGrio.com

On Wednesday, during a passionate speech before the committee, Sen. Jasmine Crockett, R-Texas, chided her Republican colleagues for the content of an anti-DEI bill that calls for eliminating all diversity, equity and inclusion programs and offices within the federal government.

Crockett, a 43-year-old congressional student who has change into a star within the Democratic Party because of her quite a few viral committee appearances, condemned the Dismantle DEI Act of 2024. The bill, H.R. 8706 – first introduced by Republican Vice President-elect J.D. Vance – essentially prohibit all DEI-related activities within the federal government, including all related positions, offices, training, and funding. Strikingly, the bill also prohibits federal employees working in DEI positions from transferring to a different federal position.

During a House Oversight Committee hearing wherein she responded to Rep. Clay Higgins, R-La., who repeatedly called DEI policies “oppression” — seemingly aimed toward white people, as many Republicans suggested — Crockett used the committee’s speaking time to criticize the suggestion that white individuals are oppressed in consequence of efforts to shut racial disparities in sectors resembling business, education, and health.

“You don’t understand the definition of oppression… I would ask you to just Google it,” said Crockett, who moments later read the dictionary definition of the word, adding: “Oppression is long-term cruel or unfair treatment or control, that’s the definition of oppression.” The congresswoman emphasized: “There was no oppression of the white man in this country.”

Referring to the history of chattel slavery and racial segregation within the US, the Texas lawmaker said: “Tell me which white men were dragged from their homes. Tell me which one was dragged across the ocean and that you will go to work. We will steal your wives. We will rape your wives. It didn’t happen. This is oppression.”

Attempting to further explain the importance of DEI, Crockett noted that she is barely the fifty fifth Black woman elected to Congress in its 235-year history, unlike the 1000’s of white men who’ve served on Capitol Hill.

“So if you want to talk about history and pretend it was that long ago, it wasn’t,” Crockett said, citing data showing that corporations perform higher and are more profitable after they are more diversified.

The anti-DEI movement, championed exclusively by Republicans, has led to several lawsuits invalidating federal programs, including debt forgiveness for Black farmers and business loans to Black and other disadvantaged businesses. Many states led by Republican governors have indicated that DEI – especially teaching about slavery and racism – is harmful to students, namely white students. In response, they banned such topics from public classrooms.

Jamarr Brown, executive director of Color of Change PAC, the political arm of the civil rights organization, said Congresswoman Crockett’s statements on DEI were “poignant and necessary.”

Jordan Brand amplifies Black storytelling with StoryCorps'

While the Dismantling DEI Act actually won’t be passed while Democrats control the Senate and President Joe Biden stays in office, it signals what may very well be a priority for Republicans next yr, as outlined within the pro-Trump “Project 2025” political manifesto “.

“According to Project 2025, diversity, equity and inclusion is synonymous with ‘White lives don’t matter,’” Brown noted. “Now more than ever, we at Color Of Change PAC, as well as advocates and activists across the country, must work to protect Black people and other people of color from harm resulting from anti-DEI attacks.”

Brown continued, “Civil rights protections have helped reduce mortgage discrimination, increase the number of Black physicians to counter problems such as Black maternal mortality, and provide financing for Black-owned businesses.”

He added: “Our country thrives and everyone benefits when diversity, equality and inclusion are valued rather than stifled.”

This article was originally published on : thegrio.com
Continue Reading

Politics and Current

Why is Trump delaying signing the ethics agreement?

Published

on

By

Trump, election, Vanity Fair, cover


The campaign’s legal department reports that President-elect Donald Trump is stalling the presidential transition process by refusing to sign an ethics pledge that is legally required of each sitting president

Under the Presidential Transition Act, Trump and his transition team must sign a document ensuring he avoids any conflicts of interest once he takes office. Only after the document is signed and sent to the General Services Administration (GSA) can the incoming administration gain access to federal agencies.

The transition, which President Joe Biden has promised will likely be “orderly and peaceful,” sets the tone for the Trump-Vance administration’s approach to transparency, accountability and earning the trust of Americans, all of that are seen as essential to making sure the administration fulfills its responsibilities to the U.S. people mean .

The reasons for withholding Trump’s documents are unknown, but some speculate it has to do along with his latest financial disclosure reports and for one reason particularly. Many of his holdings might be considered conflict of interest red flags, equivalent to his latest cryptocurrency business, a majority stake in his social media platform Truth Social, real estate, books and licensing deals.

It’s not only the GSA that the president-elect is avoiding. According to , Trump also refused to make use of the State Department’s secure phone lines and interpreters and kept away from using the FBI’s security clearance system. That’s why House Democrats issued latest laws on November 19 requiring Executive Office employees to have FBI security clearances. If not, Congress will likely be warned.

Democratic lawmakers and powerful Trump opponents like Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) are baffled by his transition team’s refusal to sign an ethics agreement.

“Donald Trump and his transition team are already breaking the law. I would know because I wrote the law myself,” Warren wrote in X on November 11. “Future presidents are obliged to prevent conflicts of interest and sign an ethics agreement. This is what illegal corruption looks like.”

Skepticism towards the bill, presented by Representatives Don Beyer (D-VA) and Ted Lieu (D-CA)persists. The upcoming GOP-controlled Congress is seemingly leaning toward Trump. Once back in office, Trump will give you the chance to issue security clearances to anyone he wants, no matter the FBI’s objections or whether the person faces legal charges. This latest situation involves two of Trump’s Cabinet picks – Matt Gaetz as attorney general and Pete Hegseth as defense secretary, each of whom have faced allegations of sexual misconduct.


This article was originally published on : www.blackenterprise.com
Continue Reading

Politics and Current

Social media reacts to video of Susan Smith’s tearful plea for parole 30 years after she killed her two sons and blamed their disappearance on a black man

Published

on

By

Susan Smith pleads for mercy during parole hearing

Parole was denied Wednesday for notorious South Carolina mother Susan Smith, who drowned her two young children after initially claiming a black man had kidnapped them.

“I wish I could take it back, I really do,” Smith, now 53, said. “I didn’t lie to get away with it. … I used to be just afraid. I didn’t know the way to tell the individuals who loved them that they might never see them again.

Smith said she found peace because of her Christian faith. God is a vital part of her life testified on Wednesday, “and I know he has forgiven me.”

Susan Smith pleads for mercy at her parole hearing
Susan Smith cries openly during her emotional parole hearing. (Source: ABC News live video screenshot)

It was her first appearance before the state parole board, which voted unanimously to keep her in prison for the remaining of her life. After serving 30 years, Smith is eligible for parole every two years.

“I know what I did was terrible,” she said in her testimony given via Zoom. “And I would give anything if I could go back and change it.”

“I love Michael and Alex with all my heart,” she said openly, crying and wiping away tears.

The disappearance of 3-year-old Michael and 14-month-old Alex made national headlines after their mother told the chilling story of how a black man stopped her automotive and took her children. She appeared incessantly on television, playing every bit the role of a distraught mother, and the search for her boys lasted nine grueling days.

It was then that Susan Smith, questioned by police who began to doubt her story, truthfully confessed what really happened on October 25, 1994.

Smith, then 23, strapped her sons into their automotive seats and drove the automotive into a lake near her home in Union, South Carolina.

Smith’s pleas fell on the ears of not only the parole board but in addition many on social media. As videos of her interrogation began circulating online, a whole bunch of comments condemned the mother for not seeming sufficiently remorseful about her actions.

“☠️MONSTERS should be kept in CAGES☠️”, one person wrote on Xformerly Twitter.

Another added: “I remember it when it happened. She claimed that her children were kidnapped by black people. And people believed her, unfortunately. She should be sentenced to death. He must remain behind bars until the very end.”

“I’m sure her children, strapped in their automotive seats, screamed and cried as they drowned in their own mother’s hands for her lustful pleasures. Shameful,” – wrote one other commentator.

Sixteenth Judicial District Solicitor Kevin Brackett recalled pulling Susan Smith’s automotive out of the water with her children inside. She added that these crimes shocked not only the family but your complete country.

“On behalf of the community I now represent, I do not believe she should ever be released from prison until the last living person who remembers Michael and Alex dies, and that will not happen in her lifetime. She should never have been released,” Brackett said Wednesday.

Defense lawyer Susan Smith argued that she planned to die with her sons, but jumped out of the automotive on the last minute.

Lead prosecutor Tommy Pope noted that Smith was not wet or injured when she ran for help after the automotive disappeared beneath the lake.

“Susan’s focus was always on Susan,” said Pope, who presented evidence during Smith’s murder trial that she was distraught over her breakup with one other man. Prosecutors say the connection ended because Smith had children.

“Susan made a terrible, terrible decision, choosing a man over her family,” Pope said. “If she could have put David in the car, he would have been there too.”

David Smith, Michael and Alexander’s father, who was captured entering the constructing, told the board that his ex-wife had never shown any remorse for their murder.

“It wasn’t a tragic mistake. (…) She deliberately wanted to end their lives,” he said.

David Smith testified that his grief over the loss of his sons “came close to taking my own life.”

His current wife, Tiffany Smith, says there are still days when her husband cannot get out of bed because of the pain.

“Michael and Alex didn’t get a chance at life,” she said. “They were given the death penalty.”

He said his ex-wife served just 15 years for each child. “It’s just not enough.”

Susan Smith’s attorney, Tommy Thomas, told the parole board his client’s case shows “the dangers of untreated mental health.” He said Susan Smith was not diagnosed with depression after the birth of her second child.

Her stepfather testified that he had sexually abused her for years.

Susan Smith was not a model prisoner. She was convicted multiple times, once for sex with a prison officer and one other time for drug possession. She was also threatened with punishment for providing documents with her ex-husband’s contact details.

Her lawyer said that if she was released on parole, she would live with her brother.

David Smith said if his wife applied for parole again, he could be there for the sake of his sons.

(*30*) he told the board.


This article was originally published on : atlantablackstar.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending