Connect with us

Technology

Hebbia raises nearly $100 million in Series B round for AI-powered document search led by Andreessen Horowitz

Published

on

render of document search

Hebbiaa startup that uses generative artificial intelligence to search large documents and return responses has raised nearly $100 million in Series B funding led by Andreessen Horowitz, in response to three individuals with knowledge of the matter.

The company was valued at between $700 million and $800 million in this round, although TechCrunch was unable to confirm whether that valuation was provided before or after the capital raise. (One possible scenario is $700 million pre-capital/$800 million post-capital). Hebbia disclosed in SEC filings in May that by that point $93 million of the expected $100 million had been raised, but we learned from two those who the round had reached almost $100 million and had been closed.

Hebbia and Andreessen Horowitz didn’t reply to a request for comment.

Hebbia was founded in 2020 by George Sivulka, who launched the corporate while working on his PhD in electrical engineering at Stanford University. Sivulka was inspired by his friends working in the financial industry who told him that they spent a part of their long work weeks searching for information in SEC filings and other dense documents. Sivulka believed that AI could help them save hours in the office and provides them more time to rest and sleep.

Hebbia’s AI can review billions of documents directly, including PDFs, PowerPoints, spreadsheets and transcripts, and return specific answers, the corporate says.

The startup sells its products primarily to financial services firms, including hedge funds and investment banks. But its product may also be used by law firms and other skilled fields.

The latest funding brings Hebbia’s total capital raised to over $120 million. The company raised $30 million in a Series A round in September 2022 led by Index Ventures with participation from Radical Ventures.

The company’s product is comparable to Glean, whose software can pull information in plain English from a wide range of business applications. In February, Glean raised $200 million in a Series D round at a $2.2 billion valuation, led by Kleiner Perkins and Lightspeed.

This article was originally published on : techcrunch.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Technology

Raspberry Pi releases the Pico 2W, a $7 wireless-capable microcontroller board

Published

on

By

Get to know Raspberry Pi Pico 2Wa tiny board designed around a microcontroller that permits you to construct large-scale hardware projects. Raspberry Pi once more uses its own, RP2350 well documented microcontroller.

But what’s a microcontroller again? As the name suggests, microcontrollers will let you control other components or electronic devices. Regular Raspberry Pis are general-purpose single-board computers, while microcontrollers are specifically designed to interact with other components.

Microcontrollers are often low-cost, small and really energy efficient. As you may see in the image above, the Pico 2W has dozens of input and output pins (small yellow holes around the board) on its sides that it uses to speak with other components.

Hobbyists normally start creating a microcontroller-based project with a file bread cutting board to avoid soldering. Later they will solder the microcontroller to other parts.

Unlike traditional Raspberry Pi computers, microcontrollers don’t run a full-fledged operating system. Your code runs directly on the chip.

In addition to C and C++, Pico 2 W supports MicroPython, a Python-inspired language for microcontrollers, for programming purposes. The latest board maintains hardware and software compatibility with previous generation boards.

The latest $7 Pico 2W processor features a dual-core, dual-architecture processor running at 150MHz. When developing a microcontroller, you may make a choice from a pair of Arm Cortex-M33 cores and a pair of open-hardware Hazard 3 RISC-V cores.

Arm Cortex-M33 cores are widely utilized in the microcontroller world, but some may prefer RISC-V cores. Everything could be configured in software, so that you do not have to decide on one microcontroller over one other when ordering latest boards.

The Pico 2W has 4MB of onboard flash memory for code storage, while the RP2350 has 520KB of onboard SRAM. I’ll say it again: this just isn’t a computer beast. It’s a microcontroller!

In terms of wireless capabilities, Pico 2W supports Wi-Fi (2.4 GHz 802.11n) and Bluetooth 5.2. It could be nice to get 5 GHz support for versatility, but possibly we are able to achieve that in the next version.

If you do not need wireless features for price or compliance reasons, Raspberry Pi also offers Pico 2 without this feature for $5.

Raspberry Pi products are increasingly utilized by firms involved in industrial and electronics production. When Raspberry Pi became a public company this yr, it reported that the industrial and embedded segment accounted for 72% of its sales.

This might be why you may buy single pieces of Pico 2 boards in addition to spools of 480 pieces. This is what the Pico 2 microcontroller board spool looks like:

Image credits:Raspberry Pi /

This article was originally published on : techcrunch.com
Continue Reading

Technology

Entrepreneur Marc Lore on ‘founder mode’, bad hiring and why avoiding risk is deadly

Published

on

By

Entrepreneur Marc Lore has already sold a complete of two corporations for billions of dollars. Now he plans to start out delivering takeaway food Wonder made public in a couple of years, at an ambitious valuation of $40 billion.

We recently spoke in person with Lore in New York about Wonder and its ultimate goal of constructing meal planning easier, but we also touched on Lore’s management philosophy. Below is a part of what he said on the topic, flippantly edited for length and clarity.

Lore on the so-called founder modewhere founders and CEOs actively engage not only with their direct reports, but in addition with “skip level” employees to make sure that small challenges don’t grow to be big ones (Brian Chesky works this fashion, as does Nvidia’s Jensen Huang, Elon Musk and Sam Altman, amongst others):

Yes, I didn’t just like the founding mode because I operate in a different way. I focus very much on the concepts of vision, capital and people. We meet weekly with the leadership team and spend two hours every week on the core elements of vision, strategy, organizational structure, capital plan, our performance management systems, compensation systems, behaviors and values ​​- akin to: things you’re thinking that are already set.

You think, “Oh, yeah, we’ve done certain behaviors before. We have already established the values. We dealt with performance management. We have our strategy.” But as you grow and develop quickly, it’s amazing how much it evolves over time, and you must sustain with it… and just speak about it and speak about it.

When everyone is fully aligned and you have got really good people, you simply allow them to do it; I do not have to get entangled in any respect. So I won’t go into the small print of what people do, so long as they know the nuances of the strategy and vision. When you connect that together with your team and they achieve that with their very own team, everyone is moving in the correct direction.

What Lore thinks about hiring the correct people:

I actually, really care about hiring rock stars. That is, one and all (I hire). I used to think you could possibly interview someone and inside an hour resolve whether or not they were a rock star. I actually thought so, and I believe other people think so too.

It’s not possible. I’ve employed hundreds of individuals. You cannot tell in an hour-long interview whether someone is a rock star, and it’s normal to get honeyed. Someone talks about a great game, sounds good, says the correct things, has the correct experience, and then it doesn’t work out and you wonder why.

I began going back to resumes and attempting to draw correlations, and I discovered that there was a definite pattern that superstar resumes had that distinguished them from non-superstar resumes. This doesn’t suggest that somebody who doesn’t have a superstar resume cannot be a superstar. I miss these people, it’s okay. But after I see someone with a superstar resume, they’re almost all the time a superstar. When I interview them, I already know that I would like to rent them, and it’s more about ensuring that I’m not missing anything from a behavioral, cultural, or values ​​standpoint – we would like it to be compatible.

However, your resume must show a demonstrable level of success in each position you have got worked in. This means multiple promotions. This means staying with the corporate long enough to advance, and leaving and moving from one company to a different is a giant step. Superstars don’t move sideways. They don’t move from a great company to a bad one because bad corporations must pay more to draw people, so sometimes they shake loose individuals who should not that good, who just need to go for the cash.

But you discover someone who’s (at the highest) 5% and you take a look at their CV and it’s like: boom, boom, promotion, promotion, promotion, promotion, promotion, promotion, and then a giant jump… promotion, promotion, big jump . When I get a resume that shows a visual level of success, I take it and pay them what they need. It’s very essential for me to get this superstar there. And you are constructing an organization of superstars.

You have to have a correct performance management system in place in order that they know exactly what they should do to get to the following level. Because superstars are very motivated. They need to know what they should do to get to the following level, especially Generation Z. They need to know and get promoted every six months.

Finally, Lore talks about his belief that taking more risks is the solution to secure a startup’s future, even when this approach could seem counterintuitive to many:

People all the time underestimate the risk of the establishment and overestimate the risk of introducing change. I see it over and all over again.

If you have got a life-threatening disease and the doctor says, “You have six months to live,” at that time you may go on a trial drug or anything, even when it’s extremely dangerous (it should look good). Basically, you are trying to take a risk to avoid inevitable death.

If you are super healthy and every thing’s going great and someone says, “Take this experimental drug; it can make you live longer” (many individuals will say), “You know what? It’s too dangerous. I’m really healthy. I don’t desire to die from this drug.”

However, startups are very different from large corporations. When you’re employed at a big company like Walmart (whose US e-commerce business Lore tracked selling is certainly one of his corporations), it’s about incremental improvement. There is no incentive to take risks.

As a startup founder, you’ll likely die. Every day that you just live and do that startup, there is a risk that you’re going to die. The probability is 80% and only a 20% likelihood it should actually work. So you have got to take this into consideration when making decisions. You must search for opportunities to take risks to cut back your risk of death. The establishment is the worst thing you may do. Doing nothing is the most important risk you may take.

This article was originally published on : techcrunch.com
Continue Reading

Technology

Australian government withdraws disinformation law

Published

on

By

The Australian government has withdrawn a bill that might have imposed penalties on online platforms as much as 5 percent their global income in the event that they fail to stop the spread of disinformation.

The bill, backed by the Labor government, would enable the Australian Communications and Media Authority to create enforceable rules on disinformation on digital platforms.

IN statementCommunications Minister Michelle Rowland said the bill would “provide an unprecedented level of transparency, holding big tech accountable for its systems and processes to prevent and prevent the spread of harmful misinformation and disinformation online.”

However, she said that “based on public statements and conversations with senators, it is clear that there is no way this proposal could be passed through the Senate.”

When a revised version of the bill was introduced in September, Elon Musk, the owner of X (formerly Twitter), criticized it in a one-word post: “Fascists.”

Shadow communications minister David Coleman was a vocal opponent of the bill, arguing it could encourage platforms to suppress free speech to avoid penalties. Because the bill seems dead now, Coleman sent that it was a “shocking attack on free speech that betrayed our democracy” and called on the Prime Minister to “rule out any future version of this legislation”.

Meanwhile, Rowland in his statement called on Parliament to support “other proposals to strengthen democratic institutions and keep Australians safe online”, including laws to combat deepfakes, enforcement of “truth in political advertising during elections” and regulation of artificial intelligence .

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese can be moving forward with a plan to ban children under 16 from using social media.

This article was originally published on : techcrunch.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending