Connect with us

Business and Finance

Australia plans to ban the export of live sheep. What will this mean for the industry?

Published

on

This month, the federal government announced the plan ban on the export of live sheep, which is to enter into force on May 1, 2028.

The announcement coincided with the release of the long-awaited film report by an independent panel appointed to investigate this issue.

Animal welfare advocates immediately embraced the news, after long campaigning for a ban.

But agricultural organizations expressed their opinion deep concerns about its potential impact on the sector. They too he argued a four-year transition window will not be enough time to adapt.

New Zealand has introduced a complete ban on the export of all live animals in 2023.
Graham Flett/AP

Australia just isn’t the first country to introduce a ban on the export of live animals, even though it reacted quite early.

Neighboring New Zealand has imposed approx Together on the export of live animals, which entered into force in April last 12 months.

In December, the UK also presented regulations banning the export of live animals intended for slaughter and fattening. The case is gaining momentum across the European Union.

So are such bans really the death knell for the sheep industry, as is usually argued, or are they simply an inevitable part of the needed transformation?

The deepening division between the city and the countryside

One of the earliest effects of this proposal was: increase tensions in Australia between state and federal governments, and between urban and rural communities.

Western Australia alone accounts for 99% of Australia’s live sheep exports. Groups opposing the ban do he framed it as one other example of the east coast of “inner city” Australia dictating terms to rural Western Australians.

WA Farmers president John Hassell speaks at a press conference wearing a T-shirt that says: hashtag keepthesheep
On Wednesday, representatives of many agricultural industry bodies met the Minister of Agriculture during breakfast after the adoption of the budget.
Mick Tsikas/AAP

However, the “West vs. the rest” narrative can itself be misleading. Questionnaire commissioned by the RSPCA, it was found that over 70% of Western Australians were in favor of a ban.

Will it really crush the sheep industry?

The extent of the impact of the ban will, of course, rely on the broader importance of live animal exports to the sheep sector and the ability of the industry to adapt. Adaptation could mean transferring this supply to the domestic processing market or the expansion of other enterprises.

Supporters of the ban argue that livestock exports are only a small part of the sheep industry. According to government data, Australia’s lamb and mutton export industry was value AUD 4.5 billion in 2023.

However, live sheep exports by sea accounted for lower than 2% of this trade and price roughly $77 million. To further emphasize the point, supporters of the ban identified that this trade only means 0.1% of Australia’s total agricultural exports.

Opponents of the ban, meanwhile, would say that these aggregated Australian figures significantly understate the economic importance of live animal exports to WA.

Despite a marked decline over the last decade, this sector still represents an estimated value 5.4% the state’s total sheep industry exports.

Live animal cargo ship loading in Fremantle
Live animal exports are disproportionately necessary to Western Australia’s sheep industry.
Ian Geraint Jones/Shutterstock

The livestock export market also offers other advantages to producers. The possibility of selling sheep to an alternate market may increase farmers’ bargaining power in contacts with domestic processors.

In Ireland, where processing capability is extremely concentrated, this is the case in the agricultural sector he fought vigorously to keep export trade alive.

Exporting live sheep can be an answer for farmers in dry periods when feed is scarce.

How much compensation should the industry receive?

The potential economic impact of the ban has been highly disputed, but most estimates confirm that there will be financial losses.

The independent panel gave particular weight estimates generated for the WA government. They estimate the cost at about $123 million a 12 months if there isn’t any substitution with other corporations, or $22 million a 12 months if farmers switch to crop production.

When spread across the farm, losses estimated in some studies may appear relatively small.

However, the current financial and climate challenges in the region are intense, and even a small reduction in revenue could push some corporations and their owners to breaking point.

The government has proposed a $107 million package to help with the transition, which incorporates $64.6 million to help sheep producers make the most of existing and emerging opportunities and $27 million to support the marketing of sheep products at home and abroad.

The support just isn’t only addressed to farmers. The government admits that the ban will affect all corporations throughout the supply chain – carriers, commodity traders, feed producers.

Bales of hay lying in the paddock
Feed producers are part of the extensive supply chain supporting the sheep industry.
Peter Kleinau/Unsplash

The effectiveness of this support is determined by the way it is implemented, the extent of its use and the effectiveness it may well mitigate the transformation.

The planned marketing support will have a way more indirect impact, with high uncertainty as to the extent to which the projected losses will actually be offset by increased demand.

Given the uncertainty about the actual costs that will be incurred, it’s difficult to assess the adequacy of payments. Federal Minister of Agriculture Murray Watt he sees them as generousindicating that $107 million is five times the lower end of the estimated range for annual losses.

The WA government, nevertheless, argued that the transition payments were completely insufficient.

However, there have been no export ban transition payments in New Zealand and it seems that none have been proposed in the UK either.

The situation in Australia reflects the historical importance of the livestock export sector to the sheep supply chain.

What’s next?

Sheep in the field look curiously towards the camera.
The sheep industry is moving towards a future without live animal exports.
Photography by Hideaki Edo/Shutterstock

As part of the sheep industry’s social license to operate, it seems prudent for businesses to plan for a future without livestock exports. At the same time, policymakers should work to increase the sector’s resilience to the significant financial and climate challenges it faces.

But politics is a fickle beast. In New Zealand, a recently elected coalition announced plans to reverse the country’s ban under Art sustained pressure from industry.

The Australian National Party has already made it clear that it too will push for a change in the situation.

While it is obvious that a majority of the population is opposed to the export of live animals, this majority could also be thinner than you may think. AND last survey in New Zealand support for a ban was just 51%.

Ultimately, this type of political uncertainty can only reduce incentives for businesses to adapt.

This article was originally published on : theconversation.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business and Finance

Crypto surges after Trump’s election – but is it a good ethical investment?

Published

on

By

Estimated 18 million Americans are invested cryptocurrency– says the Federal Reserve. And the United States has just chosen pro-crypto-president.

Cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin have change into trendy digital resource. Supporters say crypto undermines capitalism because it bypasses traditional bankers. Crypto perhaps offer quick riches together with an environment of high-tech sophistication.

Early adopters reaped enormous advantages, and plenty of of them became millionaires and billionaires.

Currently, there are approx 100,000 cryptocurrency millionaires. Moreover, cryptocurrency wealth has been built Fairshake, the most important political lobbying group within the US During the last election, it helped elect 253 pro-crypto candidates.

But is cryptocurrency a good ethical investment?

as business professor who studies the technology and its implications, I even have identified three ethical harms related to cryptocurrency which will give investors pause.

Three wrongs

The first harm is excessive energy consumptionparticularly Bitcoin, the primary decentralized cryptocurrency.

Bitcoins are created or “mined” by tens of hundreds of computers in huge data centers, which contributes significantly to carbon emissions and environmental degradation. Bitcoin mining, which accounts for the lion’s share of cryptocurrency’s energy consumption, uses as much as 0.9% of worldwide electricity demand – near Australia’s annual energy demand.

Secondly, unregulated and anonymous cryptocurrencies are the payment system of alternative for criminals fraud, tax evasion, human trafficking AND ransomware – the latter cost victims an estimated $1 billion in fraudulent cryptocurrency payments.

Until about a decade ago, these bad actors generally moved and laundered money through money and shell corporations. However, around 2015, many individuals switched to cryptocurrency, which is a much less cumbersome type of service dirty money anonymously.

The bank cannot store or transfer money anonymously. By law it is a bank passively complicit in money laundering if not enforced get to know your customer measures to curb bad actors resembling money launderers.

However, within the case of cryptocurrency, legal and ethical responsibility can’t be transferred to the bank – the bank doesn’t exist. So who is complicit? Any member of the cryptocurrency ecosystem will be seen as ethically complicit in enabling illegal activities.

Enegix employees work at a data center in Ekibastus, Kazakhstan, certainly one of the world’s largest Bitcoin mines, January 3, 2023.
Meiramgul Kussainova/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images

I find these first two harms to be probably the most ethically troubling. The first harms the Earth, the second undermines global systems of trust – the interplay of institutions that underpin economic activity and social order.

The third problem of cryptocurrency is its predatory culture.

A predatory system, especially without regulatory oversight, exploits small investors. And some cryptocurrencies have enriched their founders by reaping the advantages lack of investor knowledge about virtual currency.

Some cryptocurrencies, especially smaller coins and initial coin offerings, do Characteristics of Ponzi schemes.

For example, the now defunct Bitconnect promised investors big profits who exchanged their Bitcoins for Bitconnect tokens. New investors’ money paid out “profits” to the primary layer of investors with later investors’ money.

Ultimately, Satish Kumbhani, founding father of Bitconnect, decided to achieve this indicted by a federal grand juryand from 2024 his whereabouts are unknown.

A pernicious myth

In addition to the ethical harms of cryptocurrency, there is a pernicious myth surrounding digital coin. The myth of inclusion is the idea that cryptocurrency has the facility to profit especially socially disadvantaged people without a checking account.

The world’s poor who wouldn’t have bank accounts and who could use cryptocurrency for international money transfers to family back home don’t necessarily enjoy the advantages of cryptocurrencies. It’s for this reason need pay conversion and transfer feessay, dollars to cryptocurrency, after which from cryptocurrency to the local currency of the person receiving the cash transfer.

In fact, the distribution of crypto assets is largely concentrated among the many wealthy. A 2021 study found that simply 0.01% of Bitcoin owners controls 27% of its value.

The democratization of finance is often presented as a move geared toward breaking the dominance of traditional financial institutions – private banks and government central banks. However, this narrative didn’t prove true.

Instead, a latest elite emerged: cryptocurrency creatorsearly supporters of i conservatorswho modify the cryptocurrency’s software code and influence its future direction. This group exercises disproportionate control, including over cryptocurrency management. All of this reflects the concentration of power that cryptocurrency was intended to dismantle.

Just a little more ethical?

To be fair, the cryptocurrency community has not ignored the criticism, including calls for greater environmental awareness.

In early 2021, community members founded Cryptocurrency Agreement. The group has recruited around 250 crypto corporations to cut back environmental damage.

The following 12 months, Ethereum took its most important step with its Ether coin. It has reduced its size energy consumption by over 99% by migrating to a coin mining mechanism called “proof of stake”, which doesn’t require miners to unravel complex, energy-intensive puzzles to validate transactions.

It was a daring move. However, Bitcoin, the most important cryptocurrency, has not followed in Ethereum’s footsteps. Bitcoin stands out in that its energy consumption exceeds that of another cryptocurrency.

A worker stands between two rows of bitcoin mining machines along a wall.
A employee installs a latest row of bitcoin mining machines on the Whinstone US bitcoin mining facility in Rockdale, Texas, October 9, 2021.
Mark Felix/AFP/AFP via Getty Images

To address other harms of cryptocurrency, some Regulatory authorities began to regulate the cryptocurrency market in 2023, the European Union, the United Kingdom and the United States have launched efforts to curb criminality and protect investors.

In January 2024, US regulators listed funds allowedthat are popular investment funds for investing in cryptocurrencies. The move was intended to assist small investors trade in a safer market.

However, normalizing cryptocurrency trading could have perverse ethical consequences.

For example, probably the most successful ‘ethical’ fund in 2023, Nikko Ark Positive Change Innovation Fundwas successful with a 68% return because he bet on cryptocurrencies. Its manager rationalized this investment by repeating the parable that cryptocurrency allows “providing financial services to underbanked people

Where does all this leave the ethical investor?

I consider that investors have two clear ethical options regarding cryptocurrencies: they will abandon Bitcoin or no less than put money into other cryptocurrencies that minimize harm, especially environmental harm.

However, even so-called ethical investments raise hidden ethical issues.

Many ethical investors put money into the so-called ESG funds that emphasize social or environmental impact. Some of those ESG funds may avoid holdings in oil corporations by investing directly or not directly in cryptocurrencies.

This doesn’t seem ethically coherent.

While cryptocurrency offers exciting opportunities and the potential for prime returns, its environmental impact, links to criminality and predatory nature pose significant ethical challenges.

This article was originally published on : theconversation.com
Continue Reading

Business and Finance

Daymond John celebrates the fifth annual Black Entrepreneurs Day

Published

on

By

shark tank, Black Entrepreneurs Day, Daymond, John, deal, stalker, grants, Black entrepreneurs


Daymond John will have a good time the fifth anniversary of Black Entrepreneurs Day in Atlanta for the first time.

November 22, John’s signature Black Entrepreneur Day (BED) will take over Atlanta’s historic Fox Theater to have a good time Black Excellence and Opportunity. This 12 months’s event is free for all to attend and includes brand activations that enable participants to reinforce their business and brand for the foreseeable future.

From insightful discussions with inspiring guests to the NAACP Small Business Powershift Grant Program, which can award over $1 million in grants to over 40 Black-owned businesses, Black Entrepreneurs Day offers the whole lot a Black business owner needs to raise take your corporation to the next level the next level. This 12 months’s event is special for John; In addition to hosting BED in Atlanta for the first time, the event shall be streamed live for all to enjoy.

“We’re doing it live this year and we’re always trying to improve what we have,” John says BLACK ENTERPRISES.

“I think we added another element to it called ‘Entrepreneur Square,’ where if you want to come early, you can come in and a company like Constant Contact takes photos. Hilton for Business, Chase, Chase Wealth Management is there, US Navy. You add a lot of different things to it.”

It shall be a star-studded event featuring Grammy-winning artist and philanthropist Kelly Rowland, iconic artist Flavor Flav, influential media personality Charlamagne tha God, Olympic gymnast Jordan Chiles (presented by JP Morgan Wealth Management), financial educators Rashad Bilal and Troy Millings with “Earn Your Leisure” and a live performance by multi-platinum Atlanta rapper 2Chainz presented by Raising Cane’s.

Through the NAACP small business Powershift grant program, entrepreneurs can do exactly that use to the Powershift Grant program and grow to be one in every of 40 firms awarded a share of grants value over $1 million. This 12 months, partners including JPMorgan Chase, Hilton, T-Mobile for Business and Constant Contact will contribute a complete of $100,000 in grants, with each grant valued at $25,000.

“We are very passionate about what we do,” John says of the Black community. “I think we can now gain more power by democratizing the retail space with solutions like artificial intelligence and social media. Let’s support each other and support each other.”

Given the strong sponsorship support for BED 2024, John sees it as clear evidence that giant corporations recognize the value of investing in the Black community, even in the face of opposition from anti-DEI efforts.

“There are many other cultures that love to support us as well. They love our music, they love our food, they love everything about us and they just want to know how they can support us,” notes John.

“I think if we look at it this way, it means we can never gain or thrive on our shortcomings, but we can always find those gems and ways to grow from what we are. We are a resilient nation loved by all.”

Launched in 2020 to handle the challenges facing the community in the wake of the events surrounding George Floyd, Black Entrepreneurs Day was established to shift the focus from hardship to empowerment. Designed to uplift Black entrepreneurs, the event goals to teach and encourage through conversations with iconic Black leaders and celebrity guests, features celebrity musical performances and offers key financial support through the NAACP Powershift Grant program.

Tickets for Black Entrepreneurs Day 2024 are free and may be purchased at: BlackEntrepreneursDay.com Now. Press play to learn more about this 12 months’s event.


This article was originally published on : www.blackenterprise.com
Continue Reading

Business and Finance

Black Girl Digital on a mission to empower diverse creators

Published

on

By

Black girl digital, LaToya bond, LaToya shambo


Meet Black Girl Digital (BGD Media), one among the fastest-growing multicultural, independent marketing agencies within the makerspace, is led by two dynamic Black women entrepreneurs.

Founded and led by CEO LaToya Shambo and CMO Latoya Bond, Digital black girl goals to deliver revolutionary, data-driven marketing solutions tailored to the brands and creators who’re shaping the longer term of promoting and commerce. With a long time of combined experience, these two business leaders have come together to create an agency uniquely equipped to navigate the complexities of multicultural marketing.

“The mission of Black Girl Digital is really about how to bring brand and creators together to go beyond partnerships and build a deeper relationship,” says Shambo BLACK ENTERPRISES.

The pair first met while collaborating on the 2023 Black Girl Digital Awards. While many individuals discuss women competing in business, Shambo and Bond saw a chance to mix their strengths and platforms.

“We went through the process of working together and I saw her talent and she saw my talent. We noticed that we both had these unique skills that worked really well together,” Shambo says.

Combining Black Girl Digital’s expertise in influencer marketing with the BBM Agency’s strength in celebrity business management, BGD Media is uniquely equipped to handle the intricacies of multicultural marketing.

“Because her company was more involved in paid marketing, brand management and communications strategy, it really complemented what we did on the Black Girl Digital side, through partnerships with corporate brands and diverse creators,” Shambo explains.

“Together, we have been able to join forces and offer our brands and creators a full range of media and marketing services, thanks to which the partnership goes deeper rather than superficial.”

Shambo attributes BGD Media’s success to its multimarketing service offering that “brings the customer closer to the creator and the creator closer to the customer.” One of the newest initiatives is the inaugural Black Influencer Weekend, which goals to showcase to major brands and corporations how Black creators are usually not only setting trends, but additionally driving significant cultural and economic change across industries.

During the three-day event, over 1,500 participants engaged in vigorous discussions and activations focused on community, connection and variety amongst creators. Highlights included the VIP Creator Games Night featuring bowling competitions and life-size Connect 4 video games, creating what Shambo describes as a “creator playland.”

On October 2, participants took part in a day stuffed with inspiring and influential discussions in the course of the Influencer Summit. Speakers included media personality Yandy Smith; creative director of beauty and lifestyle Tiarra Monet; and NCAA champion and ladies’s basketball coach Sydney Carter. Conversations covered topics equivalent to balancing a profession outside of social media, maintaining mental health, and constructing meaningful partnerships.

The weekend concluded with the third annual Black Girl Digital Awards, where content creators equivalent to Druski, Monet McMichael and Kai Cenat were honored for his or her power, position and recognition across various platforms. Additionally, business leaders equivalent to Yandy Smith, Marvet Britto and Mona Scott-Young have been recognized as pioneers of influence and visionaries redefining the digital landscape.

At its core, Black Girl Digital is about tackling the complexities of multicultural marketing, demonstrating that representation matters and that success comes when brands connect with communities on a human and private level.

“It’s not a monolith. This is not just one group of Black people. There are many people and many cultures in the Black community,” Shambo says. “Being able to express it. But that’s really why brands work with us. Because we are able to accommodate the different cultures found in each community.”

“We also mainly focus on the passion points and interests of audiences in these communities,” she added.

What’s next for Black Girl Digital? Shambo seeks global domination.

“These will be the Global Influencer Awards,” he says.


This article was originally published on : www.blackenterprise.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending