Connect with us

Health and Wellness

We talked to young people about sexual consent. They understand the concept, but they don’t always ask in the moment

Published

on

For several years now, sexual consent has been a serious topic of interest in Australia.

In early 2022, the federal government ordered in-school learning with students’ consent. This includes information about what consent is and the way to ensure a consensual relationship.

Across Australia, 4 states (Victoria, New South Wales, Queensland and Tasmania) and the Australian Capital Territory have now adopted affirmative consent laws. Although the exact wording of the regulations varies by jurisdiction, affirmative consent may be defined as the need for “each person involved in a sexual act to take steps to say or do something to determine whether the other person(s) involved consents to the sexual act.”

There were also vital campaigns, e.g Have no doubts campaign in New South Wales to educate about secure, enjoyable and consensual sex.

One of the challenges with sexual consent education is determining the way it translates into real-life situations. As part broader research In searching for to answer this query, we wanted to understand how young heterosexual men and girls understand and practice consent.

Our latest study found that although participants mostly understood the concept of affirmative consent, they didn’t always put it into practice on the spur of the moment.



Understanding sexual consent

Our study included a mixed group of 44 men and girls aged 18 to 35 who were in a relationship, dating or single. We talked to them in focus groups and presented a wide range of heterosexualities sexual consent vignettes (scenarios) to discuss.

We wanted to understand how participants thought characters should take care of such situations and the way they would take care of such scenarios themselves. The scenarios were designed to be somewhat ambiguous and didn’t provide a transparent, correct answer.

An example of a vignette we used was Julia and Marek. They meet for drinks on their first date and there is robust chemistry between them. They find yourself at Julia’s, where she tells him that she wants to take it slow and won’t have sex that night. They start kissing and they each start shedding layers of garments. Mark hesitates, unsure whether to proceed, and Julia is unsure how to signal her interest in other sorts of intimacy after establishing a boundary.

Affirmative consent is now the law in most Australian jurisdictions.
Anastazja Shurayeva/Pexels

In addition to the vignettes, we asked participants to share, amongst other things, their understanding of the concept of consent and their thoughts on gender expectations related to dating and sex.

Participants demonstrated a full understanding of consent practices in line with the affirmative consent framework. This includes understanding that each one parties are responsible with the consent of all parties involved. Danny, a 23-year-old man, said:

It’s like equal responsibility in my eyes.

Participants also noted that easy, open communication combined with consistent verbal validation is very important. As Abigail, a 26-year-old woman, said:

Both parties need to actively engage and test boundaries over time.

Theory versus reality

Even though they appeared to understand the principles of affirmative consent, participants responded in a different way when presented with different scenarios. Instead of drawing attention to equal responsibility, most participants believed that in the scenarios men were answerable for obtaining consent and girls were answerable for giving it.

When discussing the scenarios, participants emphasized the need to avoid assumptions and encourage open communication. But this angle modified as we discussed personal experiences and sexual consent. In this case, participants expected their partners to understand typical boundaries during sexual encounters, suggesting a shared sense of what’s “normal.”

In fact, participants believed that following good sexual communication practices could reduce the pleasure of sexual encounters. Some admitted that although they knew the ideal approach, they didn’t always stick to it. As Alice, a 25-year-old woman, said:

Everything goes well and we make up after which it moves to the bedroom and the whole lot just seems to flow and I feel comfortable not necessarily having to openly have this conversation from time to time.

Lenore, a 28-year-old woman, said:

Sometimes a conversation can almost destroy the atmosphere, like when the moment is (…) really hot and passionate and also you’re giving all of them the signals and they’re providing you with all the signals, after which he said, “So I just want to hang out for a while.” contact you,’ and I used to be like, ‘Dude, come on, let’s just do it.’

Jeremy, a 34-year-old man, said:

I recurrently ask someone if they’re having time, , “are you okay,” “are you okay,” and the response I get is, “No, you ruined the moment,” which I discovered quite embarrassing when someone who firmly believes in ensuring that there’ll always be consent.

Two hands form a heart shape before sunset.
In recent years, there was a greater emphasis on consensual education.
Mayura Gala/Unsplash

Participants also indicated that affirmative consent is more vital in some sexual situations than in others. Discussing certainly one of the vignettes, Lenore said:

It would really rely on what he (the character in the script) was trying, truthfully he sort of flipped me over and threw me right into a latest position, like, yes, do this. If he hit me in the face during sex without explaining it first, no. It depends entirely on what it’s and the way it is completed.

Implications

Our study is comparatively small and can’t be generalized to the wider Australian population. We also focused exclusively on consent in heterosexual relationships.

Nevertheless, our study provides some insight into how young men and girls may take care of consent during sex. The results don’t mean that education about sexual consent is ineffective. Rather, they point to a big gap between knowledge and application of this information.

Our findings also point to a broader and more complex issue: the need for a whole-of-society approach to rethinking sexual communication and consent. One in five women have experienced sexual violence, suggesting deeper problems with men’s entitlement and social attitudes towards women. Focusing on the consent of sexual partners is a technique to change attitudes.



Sexual encounters often involve complex layers of emotions and experiences influenced by culture, religion, and other aspects, with elements equivalent to shame, pleasure, joy, uncertainty, fear, and anxiety.

Understanding the complex variables that influence decision-making in these contexts is critical to creating educational resources that help people navigate sexual consent in a wide range of situations.

This article was originally published on : theconversation.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Health and Wellness

Jury awarded $310 million to parents of teenager who died after falling on a ride at Florida amusement park – Essence

Published

on

By

Sun Sentinel/Getty Images

The family of Tire Sampson, the 14-yr-old who tragically died on an amusement park ride in Orlando, Florida, in 2022, has been awarded $310 million in a civil lawsuit.

Tire, who was visiting ICON Park along with his family on March 24, 2022, fell from the FreeFall drop tower. Although he was taken to a nearby hospital, he didn’t survive his injuries.

Now, greater than two years later, a jury has held the vehicle manufacturer, Austria-based Funtime Handels, responsible for the accident and awarded the Tire family $310 million. According to reports from local news stations WFTV AND KSDKthe jury reached its verdict after about an hour of deliberation.

Tyre’s parents will each receive $155 million, according to attorney spokesman Michael Haggard.

Attorneys Ben Crump and Natalie Jackson, who represented Tyre’s family, shared their thoughts on this landmark decision via X (formerly Twitter). “This ruling is a step forward in holding corporations accountable for the safety of their products,” they said in a statement.

Lawyers stressed that Tyre’s death was attributable to “gross negligence and a failure to put safety before profits.” They added that the ride’s manufacturer had “neglected its duty to protect passengers” and that the substantial award ensured it could “face the consequences of its decisions.”

Crump and Jackson said they hope the result will encourage change throughout the theme park industry. “We hope this will spur the entire industry to enforce more stringent safety measures,” they said. “Tire heritage will provide a safer future for drivers around the world.”

An investigation previously found that Tyre’s harness was locked through the descent, but he dislodged from his seat through the 430-foot fall when the magnets engaged. Tire’s death was ruled the result of “multiple injuries and trauma.”

ICON Park said at the time that it could “fully cooperate” with the authorities.

This article was originally published on : www.essence.com
Continue Reading

Health and Wellness

Tireless HIV/AIDS advocate A. Cornelius Baker dies

Published

on

By

HIV/AIDS Advocate, A. Cornelius Baker


A. Cornelius Baker, a tireless advocate of HIV and AIDS testing, research and vaccination, died Nov. 8 at his home in Washington, D.C., of hypertensive, atherosclerotic heart problems, in response to his partner, Gregory Nevins.

As previously reported, Baker was an early supporter for people living with HIV and AIDS within the Nineteen Eighties, when misinformation and fear-mongering in regards to the disease were rampant.

According to Douglas M. Brooks, director of the Office of National AIDS Policy under President Obama, it was Baker’s Christian faith that guided him toward compassion for others.

“He was very kind, very warm and inclusive – his circles, both professional and personal, were the most diverse I have ever seen, and he was guided by his Christian values,” Brooks told the outlet. “His ferocity was on display when people were marginalized, rejected or forgotten.”

In 1995, when he was executive director of the National AIDS Association, Baker pushed for June 27 to be designated National HIV Testing Day.

In 2012, he later wrote on the web site of the Global Health Advisor for which he was a technical advisor that: “These efforts were intended to help reduce the stigma associated with HIV testing and normalize it as part of regular screening.”

https://twitter.com/NBJContheMove/status/1856725113967632663?s=19

Baker also feared that men like himself, black gay men, and other men from marginalized communities were disproportionately affected by HIV and AIDS.

Baker pressured the Clinton administration to incorporate black and Latino people in clinical drug trials, and in 1994 he pointedly told the Clinton administration that he was bored with hearing guarantees but seeing no motion.

According to Lambda Legal CEO Kevin Jennings, yes that daring attitude that defines Baker’s legacy in the world of ​​HIV/AIDS promotion.

“Cornelius was a legendary leader in the fight for equality for LGBTQ+ people and all people living with HIV,” Jennings said in a press release. “In the more than twenty years that I knew him, I was continually impressed not only by how effective he was as a leader, but also by how he managed to strike the balance between being fierce and kind at the same time. His loss is devastating.”

Jennings continued: “Cornelius’ leadership can’t be overstated. For many years, he was one in all the nation’s leading HIV/AIDS warriors, working locally, nationally and internationally. No matter where he went, he proudly supported the HIV/AIDS community from the Nineteen Eighties until his death, serving in various positions including the Department of Health and Human Services, the National Association of Persons with Disabilities AIDS, and the Whitman-Walker Clinic . Jennings explained.

Jennings concluded: “His career also included several honors, including being the first recipient of the American Foundation for AIDS Research Foundation’s organization-building Courage Award. Our communities have lost a pillar in Cornelius, and as we mourn his death, we will be forever grateful for his decades of service to the community.”

Kaye Hayes, deputy assistant secretary for communicable diseases and director of the Office of Infectious Diseases and HIV/AIDS Policy, in her comment about his legacy, she called Baker “the North Star.”.

“It is difficult to overstate the impact his loss had on public health, the HIV/AIDS community or the place he held in my heart personally,” Hayes told Hiv.gov. “He was pushing us, charging us, pulling us, pushing us. With his unwavering commitment to the HIV movement, he represented the north star, constructing coalitions across sectors and dealing with leaders across the political spectrum to deal with health disparities and advocate for access to HIV treatment and look after all. He said, “The work isn’t done, the charge is still there, move on – you know what you have to do.” It’s in my ear and in my heart in the case of this job.

Hayes added: “His death is a significant loss to the public health community and to the many others who benefited from Cornelius’ vigilance. His legacy will continue to inspire and motivate us all.”

Baker is survived by his mother, Shirley Baker; his partner Nevins, who can be senior counsel at Lambda Legal; his sisters Chandrika Baker, Nadine Wallace and Yavodka Bishop; in addition to his two brothers, Kareem and Roosevelt Dowdell; along with the larger HIV/AIDS advocacy community.


This article was originally published on : www.blackenterprise.com
Continue Reading

Health and Wellness

Bovaer is added to cow feed to reduce methane emissions. Does it pass into milk and meat? And is it harmful to humans?

Published

on

By

There are growing concerns in regards to the use of feed supplements, Bowar 10to reduce methane production in cows.

Bovaer 10 consists of silicon dioxide (mainly sand), propylene glycol (food stabilizer approved by Food Safety Australia New Zealand) and lively substance 3-nitrooxypropanol (3-NOP).

There has been an enormous amount of misinformation in regards to the safety of 3-NOP, with some milk from herds fed this additive being labeled “Frankenmilk”. Others feared it could get to humans through beef.

The most significant thing is that 3-NOP is secure. Let’s clear up some major misconceptions.

Why do we want to limit methane production?

In our attempts to limit global warming, we’ve placed the best emphasis on CO₂ because the major man-made greenhouse gas. But methane is also a greenhouse gas, and although we produce less of it, it is: a much stronger greenhouse gas than CO₂.

Agriculture is the largest a man-made source of methane. As cattle herds expand to meet our growing demand for meat and milk, reducing methane production from cows is a vital way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

There are several ways to do that. Stopping bacteria within the stomachs of cows that produce methane one approach is to produce methane.

The methane produced by cows and sheep doesn’t come from the animals themselves, but from the microbes living of their digestive systems. 3-NO stop the enzymes that perform the last step of methane synthesis in these microorganisms.

3-NOP is not the one compound tested as a feed additive. Australian product based on seaweed, Rumin8for instance, it is also in development. Saponins, soap-like chemicals present in plants, and essential oils as well has been examined.

However, 3-NOP is currently one of the popular effective treatments.

Nitrooxypropanol structure: red balls are oxygen, gray carbon, blue nitrogen and white hydrogen.
PubChem

But is not it poison?

There are concerns on social media that Bovaer is “poisoning our food.”

But, as we are saying in toxicology, it’s the dose that makes the poison. For example, arsenic is deadly 2–20 milligrams per kilogram of body weight.

In contrast, 3-NOP was not lethal on the doses utilized in safety studies, up to 600 mg 3-NOP per kg body weight. At a dose of 100 mg per kg body weight in rats, it didn’t cause any adversarial effects.

What about reproductive issues?

The effect of 3-NOP on the reproductive organs has generated numerous commentary.

Studies in rats and cows showed that doses of 300–500 mg per kg body weight caused: contraction of the ovaries and testicles.

In comparison, to achieve the identical exposure in humans, a 70 kg human would want to eat 21–35 grams (about 2 tablespoons) of pure 3-NOP every day for a lot of weeks to see this effect.

No human will likely be exposed to this amount because 3-NOP doesn’t pass into milk – is fully metabolized within the cow’s intestines.

No cow will likely be exposed to these levels either.

The cow licks itself
Cows will not be exposed to levels tested on animals in laboratory studies.
Ground photo/Shutterstock

What about cancer?

3-NOP is not genotoxic or mutagenicwhich implies it cannot damage DNA. Thus, the results of 3-NOP are dose-limited, meaning that small doses will not be harmful, while very high doses are (unlike radiation where there is no secure dose).

Scientists found that at a dose of 300 mg per kilogram of body weight benign tumors of the small intestine of female ratsbut not male rats, after 2 years of every day consumption. At a dose of 100 mg 3-NOP per kg body weight, no tumors were observed.

Cows eat lower than 2 grams of Bovaer 10 per day (of which only 10% or 0.2 grams is 3-NOP). This is about 1,000 times lower than the appropriate every day intake 1 mg 3-NOP per kg body weight per day for a cow weighing 450 kg.

This level of consumption will likely be not the result in cancer or any of them other adversarial effects.

So how much are people exposed to?

Milk and meat consumers will likely be exposed to zero 3-NOP. 3-NOP doesn’t penetrate milk and meat: is completely metabolized within the cow’s intestines.

Farmers could also be exposed to small amounts of the feed additive, and industrial employees producing 3-NOP will potentially be exposed to larger amounts. Farmers and industrial employees already wear personal protective equipment to reduce exposure to other agricultural chemicals – and it is advisable to do that with Bovear 10 as well.

Milk
3-NOP doesn’t penetrate milk and meat.
Shutterstock

How widely has it been tested?

3-NOP has been in development for 15 years and has been subject to multiple reviews by European Food Safety Authority, UK Food Safety Authority AND others.

It has been extensively tested over months of exposure to cattle and has produced no unintended effects. Some studies actually say so improves the standard of milk and meat.

Bovaer was approved for use in dairy cattle by the European Union from 2022 and Japan in 2024. It is also utilized in many other countries, including: in beef products, amongst others Australia.

A really small amount of 3-NOP enters the environment (lower than 0.2% of the dose taken), no accumulates and is easily decomposed subsequently, it doesn’t pose a threat to the environment.

Since humans will not be exposed to 3-NOP through milk and meat, long-term exposure is not an issue.

What does Bill Gates have to do with this?

Bill Gates has invested in a distinct feed processing method for methane, Australian seaweed-based Rumin8. But he has nothing to do with Bovaer 10.

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation awarded research grants to the corporate producing 3-NOP for malaria control researchnot for 3-NOP.

The bottom line is that adding 3-NOP to animal feed doesn’t pose any risk to consumers, animals or the environment.

This article was originally published on : theconversation.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending