Connect with us

Technology

Tesla reached a racial discrimination settlement with a black employee

Published

on

Tesla has reached a settlement in a racial discrimination case with Owen Diaz, a black man who worked as an elevator operator at Tesla’s factory in Fremont, California, in 2015.


Following a California judge’s ruling that ordered staff in California to sue Tesla over concerns about racism at its factories, Tesla reached a settlement in a racial discrimination case with Owen Diaz, a black man who worked as an elevator operator at Tesla’s factory in Fremont, California, plant in 2015.

According to reports, Diaz did previously awarded A federal jury awarded him $3.2 million. Diaz’s attorney, Lawrence Organ of the California Civil Rights Group, who represented Diaz in his lawsuit, told the outlet in an emailed statement: “The parties have reached an amicable resolution of their disputes. The terms of the settlement are confidential and we will have no further comment.”

According to , Organ spoke with them on March 15 and told the outlet: “Owen Diaz needed enormous courage to stand up to a company the size of Tesla. Civil rights laws only work if people are willing to take these kinds of risks. Even though the litigation chapter of his life is over, Tesla still has a lot of work to do.”

The authority continued: “When I started this case, I suggested that this conduct would cease if Elon Musk made a statement and commitment to his employees that it was not tolerated. We haven’t heard anything like this after seven years of legal proceedings, when the verdict was nine figures and then seven figures. Why doesn’t he stop this behavior? This is what doesn’t make sense to me. Tesla is supposed to be the factory of the future. But this behavior comes from the Jim Crow past.”

In addition to Diaz, it’s reported that there are 6,000 Tesla employees who also worked at the identical factory as Diaz. accusing the corporate of tolerating racial prejudice. There are also pending cases filed by California and U.S. anti-bias agencies, in addition to lawsuits involving individual employees. Tesla denies the allegations in all of those cases.

The automaker also faces a lawsuit filed by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), which accuses Tesla of “violating federal law by tolerating widespread and continuing racial harassment of its Black employees and subjecting some of those employees to retaliation for standing up to the harassment.”

Tesla responded by effectively calling the EEOC’s allegations “fake news,” arguing that the allegations were inconsistent with its track record. According to Tesla, the EEOC’s lawsuit perpetuates a “false narrative that ignores Tesla’s track record of equal employment opportunity.”

noted of their reports that Tesla doesn’t have a traditional public relations office in North America, which is complicated by the actions of its most contacted representative, CEO Elon Musk. Musk is critical of DEI, often sharing spreading misinformation on Twitter/X, which he also owns, and sharing racist pseudoscience in regards to the intelligence and physiology of racial minorities on that platform.

According to Tesla, it isn’t the one company Musk is associated with that’s facing legal complaints over his social media behavior. Space X, the spaceflight company he owns amid allegations that eight employees were fired after they criticized Musk’s posts on Twitter/X. In January 2024, the National Labor Relations Board filed a grievance after Space X employees fired nine employees who posted an open letter on the corporate’s internal chat in June 2022, and Space X fired eight of them. During its investigation, the NLRB discovered at the very least 37 labor law violations.

The letter reads partially: “Elon’s behavior in the public sphere has been a frequent source of distraction and embarrassment to us, particularly in recent weeks,” the letter reads. “As our CEO and most important spokesman, Elon is seen as the face of SpaceX – every tweet Elon sends is a de facto public statement from the company. It is very important to make clear to our teams and potential talent pool that his message does not reflect our work, our mission or our values.”


This article was originally published on : www.blackenterprise.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Technology

Flipkart co-founder Binny Bansal is leaving PhonePe’s board

Published

on

By

Flipkart co-founder Binny Bansal has stepped down three-quarters from PhonePe’s board after making an identical move on the e-commerce giant.

Bengaluru-based PhonePe said it has appointed Manish Sabharwal, executive director at recruitment and human resources firm Teamlease, as an independent director and chairman of the audit committee.

Bansal played a key role in Flipkart’s acquisition of PhonePe in 2016 and has since served on the fintech’s board. The Walmart-backed startup, which operates India’s hottest mobile payment app, spun off from Flipkart in 2022 and was valued at $12 billion in funding rounds that raised about $850 million last 12 months.

Bansal still holds about 1% of PhonePe. Neither party explained why they were leaving the board.

“I would like to express my heartfelt gratitude to Binny Bansal for being one of the first and staunchest supporters of PhonePe,” Sameer Nigam, co-founder and CEO of PhonePe, said in a press release. His lively involvement, strategic advice and private mentoring have profoundly enriched our discussions. We will miss Binny!”

This article was originally published on : techcrunch.com
Continue Reading

Technology

The company is currently developing washing machines for humans

Published

on

By

Forget about cold baths. Washing machines for people may soon be a brand new solution.

According to at least one Japanese the oldest newspapersOsaka-based shower head maker Science has developed a cockpit-shaped device that fills with water when a bather sits on a seat in the center and measures an individual’s heart rate and other biological data using sensors to make sure the temperature is good. “It also projects images onto the inside of the transparent cover to make the person feel refreshed,” the power says.

The device, dubbed “Mirai Ningen Sentakuki” (the human washing machine of the longer term), may never go on sale. Indeed, for now the company’s plans are limited to the Osaka trade fair in April, where as much as eight people will have the option to experience a 15-minute “wash and dry” every day after first booking.

Apparently a version for home use is within the works.

This article was originally published on : techcrunch.com
Continue Reading

Technology

Zepto raises another $350 million amid retail upheaval in India

Published

on

By

Zepto, snagging $1 billion in 90 days, projects 150% annual growth

Zepto has secured $350 million in latest financing, its third round of financing in six months, because the Indian high-speed trading startup strengthens its position against competitors ahead of a planned public offering next yr.

Indian family offices, high-net-worth individuals and asset manager Motilal Oswal invested in the round, maintaining Zepto’s $5 billion valuation. Motilal co-founder Raamdeo Agrawal, family offices Mankind Pharma, RP-Sanjiv Goenka, Cello, Haldiram’s, Sekhsaria and Kalyan, in addition to stars Amitabh Bachchan and Sachin Tendulkar are amongst those backing the brand new enterprise, which is India’s largest fully national primary round.

The funding push comes as Zepto rushes so as to add Indian investors to its capitalization table, with foreign ownership now exceeding two-thirds. TechCrunch first reported on the brand new round’s deliberations last month. The Mumbai-based startup has raised over $1.35 billion since June.

Fast commerce sales – delivering groceries and other items to customers’ doors in 10 minutes – will exceed $6 billion this yr in India. Morgan Stanley predicts that this market shall be value $42 billion by 2030, accounting for 18.4% of total e-commerce and a pair of.5% of retail sales. These strong growth prospects have forced established players including Flipkart, Myntra and Nykaa to cut back delivery times as they lose touch with specialized delivery apps.

While high-speed commerce has not taken off in many of the world, the model seems to work particularly well in India, where unorganized retail stores are ever-present.

High-speed trading platforms are creating “parallel trading for consumers seeking convenience” in India, Morgan Stanley wrote in a note this month.

Zepto and its rivals – Zomato-owned Blinkit, Swiggy-owned Instamart and Tata-owned BigBasket – currently operate on lower margins than traditional retail, and Morgan Stanley expects market leaders to realize contribution margins of 7-8% and adjusted EBITDA margins to greater than 5% by 2030. (Zepto currently spends about 35 million dollars monthly).

An investor presentation reviewed by TechCrunch shows that Zepto, which handles greater than 7 million total orders every day in greater than 17 cities, is heading in the right direction to realize annual sales of $2 billion. It anticipates 150% growth over the following 12 months, CEO Aadit Palicha told investors in August. The startup plans to go public in India next yr.

However, the rapid growth of high-speed trading has had a devastating impact on the mom-and-pop stores that dot hundreds of Indian cities, towns and villages.

According to the All India Federation of Consumer Products Distributors, about 200,000 local stores closed last yr, with 90,000 in major cities where high-speed trading is more prevalent.

The federation has warned that without regulatory intervention, more local shops shall be vulnerable to closure as fast trading platforms prioritize growth over sustainable practices.

Zepto said it has created job opportunities for tons of of hundreds of gig employees. “From day one, our vision has been to play a small role in nation building, create millions of jobs and offer better services to Indian consumers,” Palicha said in an announcement.

Regulatory challenges arise. Unless an e-commerce company is a majority shareholder of an Indian company or person, current regulations prevent it from operating on a listing model. Fast trading corporations don’t currently follow these rules.

This article was originally published on : techcrunch.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending