Connect with us

Politics and Current

When the United States uses blackface to make problematic foreign policy decisions

Published

on

When the United States Uses a Black Face to Deliver Problematic Foreign Policy Decisions

On October 18, the United States was the only member of the UN Security Council to vote against condemning civilian violence in Gaza resulting from Israel’s response to Hamas. The face of this veto was the US ambassador to the UN, Linda Thomas-Greenfield.

On December 9, the United States was the only member of the UN Security Council to vote against a ceasefire in Gaza. The face of this veto was the deputy US ambassador to the UN, Robert Wood.

The last ceasefire vote in the UN Security Council took place on February 20: 13 countries voted in favor of the ceasefire, the United Kingdom abstained, the United States voted against, and Ambassador Thomas-Greenfield voted “no” to the country.

When the United States uses blackface to make problematic foreign policy decisions
United States Representative to the United Nations Ambassador Linda Thomas-Greenfield speaks during a press conference at the United Nations on January 30, 2024 in New York. Thomas-Greenfield, France’s Deputy Permanent Representative to the United Nations Nathalie Broadhurst and Gaza Senior Coordinator for Humanitarian Assistance and Reconstruction Sigrid Kaag held a press conference after the Security Council was briefed on Kaag’s first twenty days in her latest role and efforts to providing humanitarian aid to people in Gaza. Kaag, a Dutch politician and UN veteran, was appointed to the position created in December by a resolution of the UN Security Council. (Photo: Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images)

Both Thomas-Greenfield and Wood are faces standing between the genocide in occupied Palestine and the ceasefire. Both Thomas-Greenfield and Wood are black. These are the Blackfaces that America wears as Blackface to rationalize its support for the settler colonial state that’s Israel.

As a majority in the world, Black and brown people rebuke Israel for committing genocide in Gaza, and the United States for its complicity. And the world’s majority is represented on the Security Council and amongst the many countries which have condemned the actions of the Israeli government and military.

When blackface is liable to becoming blackface

The US has black representation at the UN. Maybe it is a coincidence that on this case the ambassadors are black. However, these officials have the same shade of “reason” towards the global majority that white people don’t have.

But what will not be a coincidence is America’s use of diplomatic Blackface as political cover for supporting white settler colonialism. The definition of Blackface as we comprehend it is when a non-Black (often white) person paints their face black (traditionally using burnt cork) and engages in stereotypical behavior to mock, demean, and make fun of Black people. The US employs a type of diplomatic blackface. This means using Black people in government to explain and/or explain racist foreign policy goals, a face familiar to most of the world.

It appears that African American ambassadors to the United Nations voted against ending the killing of oppressed people, providing political cover for supporting white settler colonialism. He also looks like a president promoting the white settler narrative from the pulpit in a black church. At the same time, it puts black faces against oppressed people like them. Collateral damage, I suppose.

Understanding the impact of white settler colonialism

White settler colonialism is a system of power from the fifteenth century to the present day that perpetuates genocide and repression by white people against indigenous peoples and their cultures.

America’s white settler roots explain the motivations for manifest destiny, Columbus Day celebrations, and alliance with white settler states corresponding to apartheid South Africa and Israel. These roots are integral to understanding American history in addition to American foreign policy.

Thrown into the white settler colonial state was an African whose labor was the basis for revitalizing, if not constructing, the U.S. economy during the period of enslavement. African Americans then sought to live under the freedoms and protections of the Reconstruction Amendments, and in addition showed white folks that Black people were honorary residents.

For some, the adventure began with joining the military after the Civil War. The federal government used this to secure its white settler program.

In 1866, Congress created peacetime Black Army regiments – the ninth and tenth Cavalry and the twenty fourth and twenty fifth Infantry – which became generally known as the “Buffalo Soldiers.” These soldiers faced racism inside the army. They even had to serve west of the Mississippi River in order not to offend white individuals with their presence. Despite this, they showed bravery and courage in service. But their service was not without spreading white settler colonialism.

These soldiers served in the military to gain equal rights in exchange for participating in the government’s wars to take over the Native Americans of the Southwest and Great Plains. At the turn of the twentieth century, Buffalo Soldiers were used during the Spanish-American War.

After the war, Buffalo Soldiers were sent to quell resistance from Filipinos who believed the war signaled their liberation relatively than their introduction to a brand new colonizer.

Given the position of blacks joining the military – recently emancipated, in need of (honorable) work, and eager to prove their price as American residents – this made sense. They were expected by a government that wanted to profit from their work, but otherwise.

Likewise, Black people proceed to pursue government employment for honorable work, stability, and a desire to give back to their people and nation.

And waiting for them, like the Buffalo Soldiers, was a government eager to use their Black faces to promote the goals of the settler colony.

A have a look at black diplomats throughout history

When you’re thinking that of black government officials who’ve supported problematic political agendas over the years, Ben Carson immediately comes to mind. He was the distinguished black person in the previous White House administration to accomplish that to talk that Donald Trump was not a racist.

Then there was former Secretary of State Colin Powell, sent to the United Nations to announce that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction although it didn’t. And twenty years earlier, when Powell was senior military assistant to the secretary of defense in the Reagan administration, he helped organize the U.S. invasion of Grenada – a military act condemned by the Congressional Black Caucus.

There can be former US ambassador to South Africa, Edward Perkins, who was sent by the Reagan administration to further support apartheid through support for PW Botha. Botha was the white (Afrikaans) leader of the apartheid government in South Africa before FW de Klerk.

There can be former Atlanta mayor and U.S. ambassador to the United Nations Andrew Young, who met with a PLO representative to protect the Carter administration from a U.N. report announcing the demand for a Palestinian state. Young was forced to resign from his position for meeting with a PLO member.

Thomas-Greenfield and Wood are safely on the improper side of history. As mentioned, the United States will use blackface to promote its goals. However, Black people cannot proceed to allow themselves to be used as the face of an oppressive foreign policy, on this case white settler colonialism.

Israel, like the United States, is a white settler colonial state created by Europeans (British) for European (Ashkenazi) Jews. And while all people deserve a homeland for themselves – as a people kidnapped from their homeland, black people know this – settler colonialism will not be the way to achieve this.

While the United States’ position and the votes of Thomas-Greenfield and Wood constitute their support for the ongoing genocide of the Palestinian people – a individuals who have lived on this land for over 2,000 years compared to 75 years in Israel, in the event that they didn’t agree, they’d resign. Several Biden administration officials have already done so, including campaign staffers and a member of the Department of Education.

Bunche represented the United States in the Arab-Israeli conflict after the 1948 war. He was the chief negotiator between opposing groups. Unfortunately, he waited until the matter was resolved to express his dissatisfaction with the Truman administration’s prejudice against Israelis as compared to Palestinians and Egyptians, and did so privately.

This is a lesson for anyone who takes a government position for sound reasons only to be confronted with being burned by a cork stuck to Uncle Sam’s face. For example, despite all the controversy surrounding the use of the Buffalo Soldiers for white settler colonial purposes, the Buffalo Soldiers resisted. David Fagan comes to mind.

Instead of allowing himself to be used to spread white settler colonialism, he resisted, defecting to the Filipino side to fight the resistance. I’m on no account suggesting that black diplomats will take up arms on either side in Gaza. However, I suggest that Black people mustn’t fall into the trap of being Blackface in the name of serving their country. The only thing that may remain for many who do that is regret.

This article was originally published on : atlantablackstar.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics and Current

Alabama Grandma Beaten and Killed by Cops – New FBI Documents Revealed Proposing Closure for Black Family After Decades

Published

on

By

Cold Case Records Describe Horrific Murder of Black Woman by Law Enforcement Officers Over Alleged Untaxed Whiskey in 1945, Providing Family with Closure

It was March 23, 1945, when 4 white cops entered Hattie DeBardelaben’s estate in Alabama, accusing her of manufacturing and selling untaxed whiskey.

The 46-12 months-old black mother of seven denied the allegations and consented to police searching her property.

However, law enforcement officials killed her by punching her repeatedly and breaking her neck in front of her 15-12 months-old son, who was arrested for attempting to defend his mother.

Court records describe the horrific murder of a black woman by law enforcement officers over alleged untaxed whiskey in 1945, leading to family closure
Mary and Dan DeBardelaben (left and right), whose grandmother Hattie DeBardelaben (center) was murdered by law enforcement officers in 1945, were ultimately locked up after the federal government released documents referring to the murder and cover-up about their grandmother. (Photos: Facebook and National Archives and Records Administration)

However, an FBI investigation conducted on the request of the NAACP concluded that she died of a heart attack and closed the case several months later. One of the cops involved in her death, Clyde Smith, later became sheriff of Autauga County.

The case remained secret for many years until last month, when the National Archives and Records Administration released 69 pages of documents from a Cold Case Civil Rights Records Act investigation signed by President Donald Trump in 2019.

The pending case of Hattie DeBardelaben was the primary set of records released under the act, providing closure for the victim’s grandchildren, whose parents never told how their grandmother died.

“I cried for days because I couldn’t believe what happened to my grandmother,” said 74-12 months-old Mary DeBardelaben AL.com.

“It was a cover-up,” said her brother, Dan DeBardelaben CNN. “That is exactly what happened – these documents clearly show that.”

The documents, which may be read here, here and here, make clear the horrific law enforcement murder case and the resulting government cover-up that, unfortunately, still continues.

“Hattie DeBardelaben’s name may not be familiar to most people, but her death at the hands of law enforcement officers in 1945 was sadly typical of the violence – and even death – that many black Americans experienced in the Jim Crow South.” – Margaret Burnham, co-chair of the National Security Review Board Civil Rights in preparatory proceedings, said the statement.

“Although federal agents investigated her death on the time, the perpetrators were never dropped at justice. “We hope, however, that the release of these recordings after so many years will provide some answers for her descendants, and at the same time shed light on a dark chapter in our nation’s history.”

Murder

Clyde White, who was an Autauga County sheriff’s deputy on the time, told the FBI that he had received complaints that DeBardelaben was selling illegal whiskey, so he contacted agents of the federal Alcohol Tax Unit, which was the forerunner of today’s Alcohol, Tobacco, and Federal Drug Enforcement Administration. firearms and explosives.

White said he drove as much as the DeBardelaben farm with three ATU agents: John H. Barrenbrugge, J.C. Moseley and L.O. Smith.

White said they only found a quart of whiskey and a couple of empty jugs of stinking whiskey, and decided to arrest her for the whiskey and Edward for interfering with arrest, although he didn’t describe exactly how the boy interfered beyond saying “these white sons of bitches don’t they’ll search this house.

White told FBI agents that they never hit DeBardelaben or her son and nephew and that DeBardelaben walked to the automotive without limping or complaining.

He also claimed that DeBardelaben died suddenly within the backseat of a automotive as they were driving to the Platville County Jail.

However, DeBardelaben’s 15-12 months-old son, Edward Lewis Underwood, gave a really different version of events to the FBI, telling investigators that he had just returned home from school when law enforcement officers stopped on the family farm within the countryside near Selma and asked his mother if she had some whiskey for sale.

He said his mother told officers she did not have the whiskey and that they may search the home although they did not have a warrant.

But then her 16-12 months-old nephew, James Callier, got here home from school and the officers ordered him to sit down on the bottom, but he didn’t seem to listen to them, so considered one of the officers walked as much as him and punched him, prompting Callier to take the seat next to Underwood.

“Leave him alone. She’s going to come back home,” DeBardelaben told police in defense of her nephew, which led to her beating and death.

Edward described a terrifying scene by which the identical policeman who had punched his cousin walked as much as his mother and punched her, knocking her down and causing her to fall onto a pot of boiling water she was using for laundry.

She tried to stand up, but then two ATU agents hit her again, causing her to fall onto a pot of boiling water.

“She stood up again and they each hit her again. This time she fell to her knees, keeping each hands on the bottom.

The agents then lifted her off the bottom and placed her in a chair, where she remained speechless, “panting and grunting like a person whose breath had been cut off.”

Edward said he called his two older brothers who were working within the fields to come back to the home, Johnnie and Bennie DeBardelaban, but after they approached the home, two cops pulled out their guns and ordered them to the bottom while the opposite two cops dragged them mother to the automotive, placing her within the backseat with Edward.

As they drove, Hattie begged the boys to stop and let her drink water from a close-by stream, but they ignored her request and continued driving.

She then began vomiting, so that they stopped the automotive and let her vomit on the side of the road. When she finished vomiting, Edward pulled her back into the automotive and they continued driving, but then she passed out.

They stopped the automotive again and White went to the stream, filled a bottle with water and let her son wipe her face and let her drink, but she was already dying.

“He’s my baby,” were her last words in reference to Edward, her youngest son, who was trying his hardest to assist his mother.

When they arrived at Plattville Jail, she was already dead, so that they locked Edward in a cell and contacted local undertakers to take his mother’s body to the funeral home.

Concealment

Dan Albright, a black undertaker at a neighborhood funeral home in Platville, told the FBI that the sheriff contacted him about collecting the body from the jail around 6:30 p.m. that evening. Albright said her body was still within the back seat of the police automotive and that she was “foaming from her mouth and nose, just like a boar’s foaming.”

He also said the sheriff contacted Dr. James Tankersley, who examined her body while it was still within the squad automotive and determined she had died of a heart attack despite signs of a broken neck.

“The only thing I noticed that was different from the other bodies was that every time we lifted the body, the head fell back,” Albright told investigators. “I didn’t tell the doctor anything in regards to the neck. After examination, the doctor concluded that she died of heart problems.

That evening, at Edward’s request, one other black undertaker, Fred Williams, picked up the body from the unique funeral home in Plattville and transported it to his funeral home in Selma, where the subsequent morning he examined it and determined that she had not died from a broken neck, but he reached this conclusion without performing a neck dissection.

He also emphasized that greater than 12 hours had passed since she was killed and rigor mortis had occurred, which might make it inconceivable to make a full determination.

According to A Medical examination from 2016it’s inconceivable to totally determine whether a neck fracture has occurred without performing a neck autopsy, concluding the next:

According to 1 researcher, rigor mortis, or the stiffening of muscles after death, affects the neck inside hours of death, peaking after 12 hours. Medical examination 2023.

The FBI also interviewed DeBardelaben’s doctor, a white man named J. S. Chisholm, who had treated her for 10 years, and told investigators that her health had all the time been high quality until a few month earlier, when she began complaining of shortness of breath and swollen feet.

He said he diagnosed her with a heart murmur and said she could probably live a standard life, “but it was not unusual for a person in her condition to die suddenly, especially if subjected to any unusual strain or excitement.”

This was enough for investigators to shut the case on June 30, 1945, concluding that the cops had done nothing mistaken, and of their report they stated the next.

After reading the documents of Dan and Mary DeBardelaban, whose father was Bennie DeBardelaban, considered one of the young men working within the fields when their mother died, they finally understood why the family never told them how their grandmother died, even when she visited her growing up within the grave . All seven of her children have since died.

“You know, my dad and his brothers and cousins ​​witnessed what really happened,” Dan told AL.com.

“I’m sure this example was extremely traumatic for my father and was considered one of the the reason why he never said a word nor did he or his other six sisters and brothers seek advice from us about what happened. “

This article was originally published on : atlantablackstar.com
Continue Reading

Politics and Current

Washington’s power has modified. Here’s how the ACA could change

Published

on

By

ACA, Trump ACA, Republicans ACA, Trump Obamacare, Republicans Obamacare, Medicare, Republicans Medicare, Medicare and Medicaid, Republicans Medicaid, Republican Congress, theGrio.com

Trump teased ACA overhaul; other Republican lawmakers have said changing the laws referred to as Obamacare can be a priority.

President-elect Donald Trump’s return to the White House could embolden Republicans who need to weaken or repeal the Affordable Care Act, but implementing such sweeping changes would still require overcoming procedural and political hurdles.

Trump, a longtime opponent of the ACA, expressed interest in changing the health law during the campaign. Additionally, some senior Republican lawmakers – who will now control each the House and Senate – have said changing the landmark 2010 laws referred to as Obamacare can be a priority. They argue that the law is simply too expensive and an overreach of the government’s powers.

The ruling trio is setting the stage for potentially seismic changes that could limit the expansion of Medicaid laws, raise uninsured rates, weaken patient protections and increase premium costs for hundreds of thousands of individuals.

“The Republicans’ plans — they don’t say they’re going to repeal the ACA, but their set of policies could amount to the same goal or worse,” said Sarah Lueck, vice chairman for health policy at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities , a research and policy institute. “This can happen through legislation and regulation. We are ready for anything. It can take many forms.”

Over the years, Republicans in Congress have solid dozens of votes in an try and repeal the law. They didn’t accomplish that in 2017, when Trump became president, despite serving in each chambers and the White House, largely because some GOP lawmakers wouldn’t support laws they believed would cause such a marked increase in the uninsured rate .

Similar opposition to the amendment to the law may appear again, especially as polls show ACA protections are popular.

While neither Trump nor his GOP allies have detailed what they’d change, House Speaker Mike Johnson said last month that the A.C.A. needs “massive reform” and can be included in the party program if Trump wins.

Congress could theoretically amend the ACA and not using a single Democratic vote, using a process referred to as “reconciliation.” But the narrow margins by which Republicans control the House and Senate mean that only a handful of “no” votes could derail the effort.

Many of the more ambitious goals would require Congress. Some conservatives have called for changing the funding formula for Medicaid, the federal government’s medical health insurance program for low-income people and other people with disabilities. The idea could be to make use of budget reconciliation to get lawmakers to agree to cut back the share the federal government pays to the growing population. The group that will be most affected could be mostly higher-income adults and adults who do not need children, moderately than “traditional” Medicaid beneficiaries similar to pregnant women, children and other people with disabilities.

A conservative idea that will allow individuals to make use of ACA subsidies for exchange-traded plans that violate the health law would likely require Congress. This could encourage healthier people to make use of subsidies to purchase cheaper and stingier plans, raising premiums for older and sicker consumers who need more comprehensive coverage.

“This is like a plan to repeal the ACA,” said Cynthia Cox, vice chairman and director of the Affordable Care Act program at KFF, the nonprofit health information organization that owns KFF Health News. “It’s repeal by another name.”

Congress would likely be needed to pass a proposal to transfer a few of consumers’ ACA subsidies to health savings accounts to cover qualified medical expenses.

Trump could also decide to bypass Congress. He did so during his last term, when the Department of Health and Human Services invited states to use for waivers to change how they pay for Medicaid programs – limiting federal funds in exchange for greater state flexibility in running the program. Waivers are popular in each blue and red states as other changes to Medicaid are made.

“Trump will do whatever he thinks he can,” said Chris Edelson, an assistant professor of presidency at American University. “If he wants to do something, he’ll just do it.”

Republicans have an alternative choice to weaken the ACA: They simply cannot do anything. Temporary, increased subsidies that reduce the cost of premiums — and have contributed to the nation’s lowest-ever uninsured rate — will expire at the end of next 12 months without congressional motion. Then there could be contributions double or moreon average, for subsidized consumers from 12 states which have signed up for the federal ACA exchange – in accordance with KFF data.

This would mean fewer people could afford the costs of the ACA exchanges. And while the number of individuals covered by employer plans is prone to increase, it’s estimated that between 2024 and 2033 there can be a further 1.7 million uninsured people annually, in accordance with federal estimates.

Many of the states that will be hardest hit, including Texas and Florida, are represented in Congress by Republicans, which could prompt some lawmakers to think about ending the subsidies.

The Trump administration may determine to stop defending the law against lawsuits in search of to overturn parts of it. One of the most characteristic cases questions the ACA requirement for insurers to cover some preventive services totally free, similar to cancer screenings and alcohol use counseling. About 150 million people now profit from the coverage requirement.

If the Justice Department withdrew its petition after Trump took office, plaintiffs wouldn’t need to comply with the coverage requirement — which could trigger similar challenges with broader consequences. A recent Supreme Court ruling left the door open to legal challenges from other employers and insurers in search of the same relief, said Zachary Baron, director of Georgetown University’s Center for Health Policy and Law.

Meanwhile, Trump could initiate changes from his first day in the Oval Office through executive orders, i.e. directives which have the force of law.

“Early executive orders will give us an idea of ​​the policies the administration plans to pursue,” said Allison Orris, a senior fellow at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. “Early signaling through executive orders will send a message about what guidance, regulations and policies may follow.”

In fact, Trump relied heavily on these orders during his previous term: An October 2017 order directed federal agencies to start modifying the ACA and ultimately increased consumer access to health plans that were illegal. He could issue similar orders early in his latest term, using them to start the strategy of forcing changes in the law, similar to increased oversight of potential fraud.

The administration could take other steps early on that will conflict with the ACA, similar to limiting federal aid funding and helping people enroll in ACA plans. Both actions depressed registration during the previous Trump administration.

Trump could also use regulation to implement other conservative proposals, similar to expanding access to medical health insurance plans which can be inconsistent with ACA consumer protections.

The Biden administration has held back Trump’s efforts to expand so-called short-term health plans, disparaging the plans as “junk” insurance because they could not cover certain advantages and will refuse to cover individuals with pre-existing health problems.

The Trump administration is anticipated to make use of regulations to reverse Biden’s decision, allowing consumers to maintain and extend their plans for much longer.

But drafting the rules became rather more complicated after a Supreme Court ruling that said federal courts not needed to defer to federal agencies facing legal challenges to their authority. As a result, any Trump-era HHS rules may require greater efforts to dam them in the courts.

Some individuals with ACA plans say they’re concerned. Dylan Reed, a 43-year-old small business owner from Loveland, Colorado, remembers the pre-ACA days and doesn’t need to return to the days when insurance was difficult to get and he couldn’t afford.

In addition to attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and anxiety, he suffers from scleroderma, an autoimmune disease related to: joint pain and numbness in the limbs. Even on the ACA plan, he estimates he pays about $1,000 a month for medications alone.

He worries that without the ACA’s protections, it can be difficult to seek out coverage for his pre-existing conditions.

“It’s definitely a scary thought,” Reed said. “I probably would have survived. I would just be in so much pain.”

KFF Health News is a national newsroom dedicated to publishing in-depth journalism on health issues and is one among the predominant operating programs of KFF – an independent source of research, polls and journalism on health policy. Find out more about KFF.

!function(){var g=window;g.googletag=g.googletag||{},g.googletag.cmd=g.googletag.cmd||(),g.googletag.cmd.push(function(){ g.googletag.pubads().setTargeting(“film-recommended-film”,”true”)})}(); ( () => { ( ( cb ) => { window.tpd = window.tpd || {}; if ( true === tpd.cmpReady ) { console.log( ‘(TPD)(Brid) CMP was already ready, working player.’ ); cb(); } let tpdCmpReadyListener = () => { console.log( ‘(TPD)(Brid) Event ready for CMP began, running player.’ ); window.removeEventListener( ‘tpd:cmpCb’, tpdCmpReadyListener( ‘script’ ); s.src=”https://player.target-video.com/player/build/targetvideo.min.js”; s.async = true; let goal = document.getElementById( ‘Brid_21904’ ); goal ); window._bp = window._bp ||. {“div”:”Brid_21904″,”obj”:{“id”:”41122″,”width”:”1280″,”height”:”720″,”stickyDirection”:”below”,”playlist”: “21904”}} );

This article was originally published on : thegrio.com
Continue Reading

Politics and Current

Distraught mother of 13-year-old Texas boy who died on gymnasium floor – questions why school didn’t immediately get him help when he had trouble breathing

Published

on

By

A grieving family is questioning the actions of administrators at a Texas middle school where their son died after falling during basketball practice.

According to KTRKXavier Thompson died at Thornton Middle School in Katy on November 15. His mother said he suffered an asthma attack that day, and immediately after her son’s fall, they immediately received calls from concerned teammates.

“I had to call a panicked student who kept asking me what to do,” said 13-year-old Xavier’s mother, Brittany Thompson. “It saddens me that no one called 911 when they saw my baby was having trouble breathing.”

According to his family, 13-year-old Xavier Thompson died at Thornton Middle School in Katy, Texas, after an asthma attack. His parents said the school called them immediately, but not 911. (Photos: KTRK screenshot, Cypress Fairbanks Independent School District)

Xavier coaches also quickly contacted Thompson and her husband, and the couple insisted that they call emergency services to the school. The family also noticed that there was a hearth station right round the corner.

When Xavier’s father arrived at school, his son was not breathing. Family members claim that he was the one who resuscitated their son, however the actions taken didn’t bring him back to life.

Xavier’s mother said that just the day before his asthma attack, her son was dancing within the lounge, thrilled to make the school’s basketball team. The next day he died.

“I don’t understand,” said the Thompsons’ lawyer, George Powell. “Without medical personnel present, calling parents will not help anyone who has been injured or has some form of respiratory distress.”

The family told KTRK that Xavier had suffered from asthma his entire life, but his condition was well controlled. They established an motion plan regarding his condition with the Cypress Fairbanks Independent School District. The middle school also had two inhalers reserved for the teenager in case he needed medication.

“They have medical exams, we have medical insurance on file and they have all their emergency contacts,” Thompson said. “What’s the point if kids have to name it and say, ‘What do we do?’”

Thornton Middle School officials sent a letter to oldsters of all students notifying them of Xavier’s death and offering students counseling.

“I just want my son back. I’d give my life for him in a heartbeat. I’d go and breathe for him if I could,” Xavier’s mother said with tears in her eyes.

Xavier’s family said an autopsy was performed to find out the precise cause of death and is currently awaiting the outcomes.

A district spokesperson told KHOU 11 that Xavier’s death was asthma-related and there was no information on the medical treatment he received.

Another Houston-area family also experienced the same tragedy to the Thompsons three months ago when a student died at the center school.

Landon Payton collapsed and lost consciousness Aug. 14 at Marshall Middle School. Unlike young Xavier, the 14-12 months-old didn’t suffer from any breathing problems and was in good health, in response to his father, Alexis Payton.

Payton raised questions concerning the school’s response to Landon’s fall within the school gym after learning that the school nurse didn’t know how one can perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation or use the school’s automated external defibrillator (AED), a tool that emits an electrical shock to revive normal function. heart rhythm when someone suffers sudden cardiac arrest.

Two teachers’ unions later said the school’s defibrillator was defective or outdated.

A Southern California family can be questioning the moments surrounding the death of their 12-12 months-old son at middle school last 12 months. Yahshua Robinson collapsed during gymnastics practice at Canyon Lake Middle School during a heat wave when temperatures reached 107 degrees. Robinson’s parents learned that a teacher had told him to run away as punishment for wearing inappropriate clothes to class. His family says he collapsed at school and died of cardiac arrest.

This article was originally published on : atlantablackstar.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending