Let the electoral blame game begin.

ESPN host Stephen A. Smith has he solid his vote within the post-election ritual of pointing to someone or something as the explanation a candidate lost, pointing to Oprah Winfrey and Michelle Obama.

On Wednesday on his podcast “The Stephen A. Smith Show,” Smith said the media mogul and former first lady set an exclusionary tone that turned off men (Trump’s most credible voting bloc).

“If we don’t agree with you, are we against you?” Smith said, referencing the media mogul and former first lady’s speeches. “What do you think the men thought about this? So we must do what you tell us; otherwise we are against you? Did you think it worked? Do you know anything about most men? Do you think this will work?”

Oprah and Michelle O. are among the many long list of celebrities who’ve endorsed Democrat Kamala Harris. She had on her side the most well-liked artists within the country (Beyonce and Taylor Swift), essentially the most famous athlete (LeBron James) and two of essentially the most famous actors (George Clooney and Harrison Ford). Stars from the past (Madonna and Bruce Springsteen) and current (Charli xcx and Lizzo) declared their support for Harris.

But together they were all fair sermon for the choirsaid Seth Abramovitch, senior author at the Hollywood Reporter.

“Oprah, Katy Perry, Beyoncé, Lady Gaga, Madonna, Ariana Grande – these are artists whose audiences (black, female, liberal, queer) were already willing to vote for Kamala,” he told The Guardian.

Swift, popular with each country and pop fans, appears to be an outlier, Abramovich said, but her influence was negligible amongst two demographic groups which have shifted significantly toward Trump.

Of course, the identical may be said about famous Trump supporters. Women of color, part of the demographic most proof against the previous and future commander-in-chief, weren’t about to be influenced by the likes of Hulk Hogan, Kid Rock and Lee Greenwood.

Left or right, famously, they rarely, if ever, move the counter together with voters.

“In the academic literature,” said Professor Margaretha Bentley of Arizona State University, who has studied Swift’s cultural impact, “research has shown that while celebrity endorsements can increase civic engagement and voter registration, it has not been proven to have a direct impact on the way people make voting decisions.”

When Swift endorsed Harris, she directed followers to this page voting.gov. The website was visited by 405,999 people in 24 hours. However, not everyone was convinced to vote for the previous prosecutor and current vice chairman.

In fact, Swift can have hurt Harris greater than helped. A poll conducted by YouGov shortly after her endorsement found that only 8 percent of voters can be “somewhat” or “much more” more likely to vote for Harris, well below the 20 percent of respondents who said supporting Swift would make them less more likely to vote for a Democrat.

Ashley Spillane of Harvard, who writer a study titled “Celebrities Strengthen Our Culture of Democracy” found that it’s unattainable to quantify whether a celeb endorsement translates into more votes for a candidate.

This is a change from the past. A 2008 poll conducted by Northwestern University found that Oprah’s endorsement of Barack Obama added roughly a million votes to his final tally.

But that was in less divisive times.

Smith argued that it was Oprah’s message, not Oprah herself, that turned off male voters. Her warning on the eve of the election was that a second Trump term would herald an antidemocratic takeover of the United States

“This is something that alienates the electorate, alienates the voter,” Smith said. “Because the freedom you tell them you have, you’re trying to morally confiscate it by letting them know you’re worth nothing if you don’t vote the way we think you should vote.”

“Who will decide on this in the general election?” Smith asked. “In an economy full of inflation, with over 12 million people crossing the border?”

Stephen A Smith destroys Democrats and Oprah. Listen. pic.twitter.com/PWf14XxpPw

— The Godfather (@facts215_) November 7, 2024

The high-power recommendations also served to substantiate Republicans’ findings that Democrats were an elite party.

“Ultimately, stars price lots of of tens of millions, if not billions, who most American residents imagine are incredibly out of touch with their lifestyle and the standard of it, weren’t going to run away and blame them for doing something different than what their experience says and what they should do with it do,” Smith said.

The people almost certainly to learn from a celeb’s endorsement are the celebrity themselves, says Laurence F. Maslon, an art professor at New York University.

“I think sometimes it’s a way of tying your star to someone who seems to be good for you, and maybe there’s some kind of reflected glory in that,” Maslon said.

British comedian Ricky Gervais probably said it best video – he posted in June wherein he ridiculed overly serious stars who imagine that their political beliefs really matter.

“As a celebrity, I know everything about science and politics, so trust me when I tell you who you should vote for,” Gervais said. “If you don’t vote the right way it will be like a hate crime and it makes me sad and angry so I will leave the country and you don’t want that.”

Kamala Harris selected not to address her supporters in Washington on Tuesday night after former President Donald Trump secured victories in Georgia and North Carolina, the primary two battleground states within the 2024 presidential race. according to NBC News.

Disappointed supporters at a rally at Howard University heard from Harris’ campaign co-chairman, Cedric Richmond, who announced that Harris wouldn’t speak on election night. “We still need to count the votes. We still have states that haven’t been called,” Richmond said. “You’ll hear from her tomorrow.”

Initially, Harris campaign officials were optimistic about her probabilities, but their confidence wavered because the night wore on and the outcomes got here in. “It’s quite disturbing,” a Democratic lawmaker told NBC News. “I just remember eight years ago, all of the trends in the primary few hours were that Hillary won, after which she didn’t. But obviously it isn’t the comeback we were searching for.”

Harris campaign manager Jennifer O’Malley Dillon assured campaign staff and supporters of a possible path to victory, stating: “While we proceed to see an influx of knowledge from Sun Belt states, we’ve got known all along that our clearest path to 270 electoral votes, according to NBC News falls on the Blue Wall states,” referring to Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin.

She added: “Those of you who were around in 2020 know this well: it takes time to count all of the votes – and all votes shall be counted. This is how our system works. But we all know this race won’t be decided until the early hours of the morning. “

NBC News also reported that Republicans were able to take back the Senate with victories in Democratic-held seats in West Virginia and Ohio. According to NBC’s exit poll, the proportion of voters identifying as Democrats dropped to 32%, the bottom level this century.

Beyond the presidential race, control of the House remained uncertain. With tight margins within the chamber, close races on the West Coast and a potentially slow vote count, it is going to take longer to get a transparent result.

As of this writing, Harris has 194 electoral votes to Trump’s 246. There are five battleground states remaining to be called.