People the American Way (PFAW) published an ad on YouTube this shows what the Pledge of Allegiance might seem like if Donald Trump were reelected.

The ad, titled “The Pledge,” features three images of members of the armed forces taking the oath of allegiance, but in several words since the United States is under the rule of former President Donald J. Trump. “We pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America. And to the republic I represent, one nation under Donald J. Trump,” the members begin.

“With freedom and fear for all.”

As the African-American man barely looks away, the commander and the lady dictate what the U.S. Armed Forces must do after taking the oath. “We will arrest, detain, imprison, deport and, if necessary, kill enemies of our movement at home and abroad,” they said.

The group then lists all of the individuals who may very well be affected by such a rule, including “treasonous judges and journalists, election workers and teachers deemed pornographers.” “Doctors performing abortions, protesting citizens and millions of illegal immigrants,” the group said, with tears streaming down one’s face.

The pledge ends with the words: “We do that within the name of our supreme leader, Donald J. Trump. Amen.” The American flag hanging on the wall is the other way up.

Since Trump became the Republican Party’s presidential nominee, Project 2025 and Agenda 47 have been the core of his campaign. They present policies that may disrupt the drafting of the United States Constitution and push narratives which can be more aligned with it.

In the wake of dangerous and offensive comments made at a New York rally on October 27 that attacked the Latino and Black communities, racial justice advocates are increasingly urging voters to refrain from voting for Trump. “Last weekend’s Trump rally at Madison Square Garden was telling. “More dangerous and divisive rhetoric at the event compared to a 1939 Nazi rally at the same location, where speakers blamed select groups for stoking resentment,” PFAW said in an announcement, in line with a press release shared

While the Trump camp released an announcement including a joke through which he referred to Puerto Rico as a “floating pile of garbage” that “does not reflect the views of President Trump or the campaign,” Democratic strategist Chuck Rocha, who’s mobilizing Latino voters, is working behind the scenes to to make certain that the words will likely be recorded after they go to the polls. He asked the PAC for $30,000 in small donations in order that a video recording of the comments will be sent to Puerto Rican voters in Pennsylvania, a critical battleground state.

Deontae Faison, a 35-year-old black father of two, was attempting to enjoy a picnic in an Oakland park with a friend when police confronted him about expired tags on the automobile they were driving.

The automobile belonged to his friend, a white woman, but East Bay Regional Parks Police Officer Jonathan Knea focused his attention on Faison, despite the fact that he never saw him drive it into the Martin Luther King Jr. Regional Shoreline on April 5. lawsuit filed earlier this month.

Believing he was being unfairly targeted, Faison gave police an alias. But when the cops couldn’t find the name of their system, they threatened to bring a fingerprint technician to the scene to properly ID him and check him for arrest warrants.

Meanwhile, the white woman who owned the automobile was never questioned as as to if she owned it, her name was never checked to acquire a warrant, and he or she was never threatened with fingerprinting.

After 20 minutes of being detained and questioned, more cops arrived and Faison panicked, especially after Knea pulled out a gun and threatened to shoot him, so he ran towards a body of water, prompting Knea to chase him and taser him within the back .

Faison fell but was in a position to rise up and knee-deep within the water, but Knea continued to scald him, causing him to fall face first into the water, which the lawsuit says is a violation of department policy.

Officers then spent the following 40 minutes watching Faison struggle to remain afloat within the icy 50-degree water, doing nothing to avoid wasting him.

“He will not survive” – ​​in response to the lawsuit, the policeman’s voice might be heard on the camera placed within the man’s body.

After 40 minutes of attempting to stay afloat, Faison sank underwater, but his unconscious body surfaced and started floating near the other bank of the river mouth.

Only then did the police pull his body from the water and call an ambulance, the lawsuit states. While waiting for rescuers to reach, in addition they left his unconscious body on the shore for quarter-hour without attempting to resuscitate him using cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

They also didn’t inform paramedics that they’d repeatedly shocked him with a Taser, which, in response to the lawsuit, prevented paramedics from providing vital medical attention. Six months later, Faison stays in hospital in a coma.

According to the lawsuit, which names the East Bay Regional Park District and the Alameda County Sheriff’s Office as defendants:

The lawsuit also states that Knea violated several department and state policies established by the Peace Officer Standards and Training Commission, which certifies law enforcement officers in California:

The lawsuit accuses police and deputies of violating Faison’s Fourth Amendment rights, in addition to battery, false imprisonment and negligence. Watch the video from the camera embedded below.

Alleged concealment

The lawsuit accuses the East Bay Regional Park District Police Department and the Alameda County Sheriff’s Office of concealing their wrongdoing by turning off body cameras and disposing of evidence, resembling Faison’s clothing with Tasers attached.

According to the lawsuit, in addition they didn’t take heed to the testimony of witnesses, including Faison’s friend, who also fled the scene. However, she only received a citation, which the criticism says is evidence of selective enforcement between blacks and whites:

Officers also claimed of their reports that they feared Faison may be armed, which put him in fear for his life, which the lawsuit claims is a lie.

The Alameda County District Attorney’s Office filed charges against Faison for resisting arrest and giving an officer a false name, despite the fact that Faison stays within the hospital in a coma and has no opportunity to defend himself against the costs.

“The level of disregard and callousness that the officers showed as they stood by and watched Deontae scream for help, flailing his arms in a desperate attempt to avoid drowning, is inexcusable,” civil rights attorney Jamir Davis of the J. Davis Law Firm said in a press release submitted by one of the attorneys representing the case.

Faison’s oldest son, also named Deontae, turned 18 over the summer and graduated from highschool, but his father was unable to attend the ceremony.

“It just derailed our whole life,” the younger Faison said through tears press conference. “I can’t go to the park. I can’t play basketball. … It’s very difficult for all of us.”

WASHINGTON (AP) – It presidential electionsfirst from January 6, 2021, insurrection at the Capitolwill be a stress test of the new systems and guardrails Congress has put in place to make sure America’s long tradition of peaceful transfers of presidential power.

As a Republican Donald Trump and Democrat Kamala Harris race to the finish line, pro-democracy supporters and elected officials are preparing for an uncertain period after Election Day as legal challenges are filed, bad actors spread disinformation and voters wait for Congress to certify the results.

“One of the remarkable things about this election is that so much of the potential threat and so much of the attack on the electoral system is focused on the post-election period,” said Wendy Weiser, vice chairman for democracy at the nonpartisan Brennan Center for Justice.

After the Jan. 6 attack, Congress moved to strengthen the process and stop a repeat of the unprecedented period when Trump, joined by some GOP allies in Congress, refused to concede defeat to the president Joe Biden. Trump spent months pushing through dozens of failed legal cases before sending his supporters to the Capitol, where they disrupted the vote count with a bloody riot. He is standing in front of A federal indictment for a program that included lists of faux electors from states falsely claiming he had won.

While new Vote Counting Reform Act approved by Congress clarified post-election processes — to resolve legal issues more quickly and to emphasise that the vice chairman has no power to alter the end result of the Jan. 6 election — the new law is on no account set in stone.

Much depends upon the people involved, from winning and losing presidents to elected congressional leaders and voters across America who put their trust in a democratic system that has existed for greater than 200 years.

Featured Stories

Voters are concerned about post-election conflicts

AND poll conducted by the Associated Press and NORC Center for Public Affairs Research showed that American voters are approaching the election with deep anxiety about what may come next.

Dick Gephardt, former Speaker of the House of Representatives, currently serves on the board of the nonpartisan organization Keep our Republic, which provides civic education about the process in the presidential battleground states of Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania.

“We are only concerned about one thing: Can Americans still have reasonable confidence in the elections, and can we achieve a coherent, peaceful transition of power in all offices, including the presidency?” Gephardt said at a briefing earlier this month.

“I think January 6, 2021 was really a wake-up call for all of us,” he said.

It’s not only the onslaught of legal challenges that Democratic groups are concerned about, as each Republicans and Democrats have already filed dozens of cases before Election Day. They say the sheer variety of cases could raise questions election result and cause disinformation, each at home and abroad, as happened in 2020 when Trump’s legal team advanced distant theories that turned out to be wildly inaccurate.

Trump is looking for to reclaim the White House, already setting the stage for challenges in an election he desires to be “too big to be rigged.” The Republican National Committee has made legal strategy a cornerstone of its activities Election Integrity Program.

Trump is supported by Republicans on Capitol Hill, including the Speaker of the House of Representatives Mike Johnsonwhich adopted similar language, saying it could only accept the results if the elections were free and fair.

“We will have a peaceful transition of power,” Johnson, who led one in every of Trump’s 2020 legal challenges, said on CBS. “I believe President Trump will win and this will be handled.”

House Republicans’ specific line of attack was to suggest that non-citizens would vote illegally, despite the fact that it’s offense to accomplish that, and state and federal reviews have shown this to be the case extremelyrare. To reinforce his concerns, Johnson pointed to previous House races, including one in Iowa in 2020 that he won by six votes.

Republican Joseph Morelle of New York, the top Democrat on the House Administration Committee, said Johnson was “saying the quiet part out loud,” signaling how Republicans could challenge the result.

This “disturbs me,” he said.

What happens between the election and the inauguration?

At the Brennan Center, they ran war game-like scenarios about what might occur after the election, while state election officials they’re facing a rebirth conspiracy theories and disinformation about voting.

The process features a series of deadlines between Election Day on November 5 and Inauguration Day on January 20, once routine steps which might be now necessary milestones that could be achieved – or missed.

States are required to certify their electors by December 11 upfront of the Electoral College meeting, which falls on December 17 this 12 months.

The new Congress meets on January 3 to elect the Speaker of the House and swear in lawmakers. Then on January 6, Congress meets in a joint session to approve the counting of votes from the states – a typically ceremonial session presided over by the vice chairman.

To strengthen the process in the wake of the January 6 attack, the Ballot Counting Reform Act made several changes intended to strengthen the process and ensure disputes are resolved by the time Congress meets. Legal questions over the results are expected to be resolved more quickly, under an accelerated timetable for judicial review, all the approach to the Supreme Court if needed. If the district refuses to issue the certificate their results, like some did in the 2022 midterm elections, the governor has greater authority to certify the state’s results.

As of Jan. 6, the law now requires 20% of the House and Senate to call on the state’s voters to force a vote to reject them, reasonably than a threshold of 1 member from each chamber.

Rep. Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif., who co-sponsored the new law with Republican Sen. Susan Collins, D-May., said she had done “the best she could” to guard the process.

“You know people have the right, if they have a problem with the election, to go to court and be heard,” Lofgren said. The thing is, once it’s over, it’s over.”