In September, California Governor Gavin Newsom considered 38 AI-related bills, including the highly controversial SB 1047, which the state Legislature sent to his desk for final approval. On Sunday, he vetoed SB 1047, marking the tip of the road for California’s controversial AI bill that was intended to forestall AI-related disasters, but he signed greater than a dozen other AI-related bills into law this month. These bills seek to deal with probably the most pressing issues surrounding AI: every part from Al risks to fake nudes created by AI image generators to Hollywood studios creating AI clones of deceased performers.

“California, home to most of the world’s leading artificial intelligence companies, is working to leverage these revolutionary technologies to help address pressing challenges while examining their risks,” Governor Newsom’s office said in a press release. press release.

So far, Governor Newsom has signed 18 AI-related bills, a few of that are probably the most far-reaching U.S. generative AI bills up to now. Here’s what they do.

AI Risk

On Sunday, Governor Newsom signed SB 896 into law, which requires the California Office of Emergency Services to conduct risk analyzes of potential threats posed by generative artificial intelligence. CalOES will work with pioneering model corporations resembling OpenAI and Anthropic to research the potential threats posed by AI to critical government infrastructure, in addition to threats that may lead to mass casualty incidents.

Training data

Another bill signed by Newsom this month requires generative AI providers to reveal data used to coach their AI systems in documentation posted on their website. AB 2013 enters into force in 2026 and requires artificial intelligence providers to publish: the sources of knowledge sets, an outline of how the information is used, the number of knowledge points within the set, whether copyrighted or licensed data is included, the period wherein the information was collected m .amongst others standards.

Privacy and artificial intelligence systems

Newsom also signed AB 1008 on Sunday, which makes it clear that California’s privacy laws also cover generative artificial intelligence systems. This signifies that if an AI system like ChatGPT reveals someone’s personal information (name, address, biometrics), California’s privacy laws will limit how corporations can use and cash in on that data.

Education

Newsom signed AB 2876 this month, which requires the California State Board of Education to incorporate “artificial intelligence skills” in math, science and history curricula and instructional materials. This means California schools can start teaching students the fundamentals of how artificial intelligence works, in addition to the restrictions, impacts and ethical considerations of using the technology.

Another new law SB 1288requires California superintendents to create working groups to check how artificial intelligence is utilized in public school education.

Definition of artificial intelligence

This month, Newsom signed laws establishing a uniform definition of artificial intelligence in California law. AB 2885 states that artificial intelligence is defined as “an engineered or machine-based system that varies in level of autonomy and which, for explicit or implicit purposes, can infer from the inputs it receives how to generate outputs that can influence environments physical or virtual.” “

Healthcare

Another act signed in September is the so-called AB 3030which requires healthcare providers to reveal once they use generative artificial intelligence to speak with a patient, particularly when those communications include the patient’s clinical information.

Meanwhile, Newsom recently signed the contract SB1120which puts limits on how healthcare providers and health insurers can automate their services. The law ensures that licensed physicians oversee the usage of artificial intelligence tools in these facilities.

Automatic AI connections

Last Friday, Governor Newsom signed a bill requiring robocallers to reveal whether or not they use AI-generated voices. AB 2905 is meant to forestall one other occurrence of a fake robocall resembling Joe Biden’s voice, which misled many citizens in New Hampshire earlier this yr.

Deeply fake pornography

On Sunday, Newsom signed it AB 1831 A law has entered into force that extends the scope of existing regulations on child pornography to incorporate content generated by artificial intelligence systems.

Last week, Newsom signed two bills targeting the creation and spread of false nudes. SB926 criminalizes this act by making it illegal to blackmail someone with AI-generated nude photos that resemble them.

SB981which also took effect on Thursday, requires social media platforms to establish channels where users can report false acts that resemble them. The content must then be temporarily blocked while it’s investigated by the platform and permanently removed if confirmed.

Watermarks

Also on Thursday, Newsom signed a bill to assist the general public discover content generated by artificial intelligence. SB942 requires commonly used generative AI systems to reveal of their content provenance data that it was generated by AI. For example, all images created by Dall-E with OpenAI now require a small tag of their metadata indicating that they were generated by AI.

Many AI corporations are already doing this, and there are several free tools that might help people read origination data and detect AI-generated content.

Deep election fraud

Earlier this week, California’s governor signed three bills aimed toward combating AI deepfakes that might influence elections.

One of California’s new laws AB 2655requires large online platforms like Facebook and X to remove or label election-related artificial intelligence misinformation and create channels for reporting such content. Candidates and elected officials can seek an injunction if a big online platform fails to comply with the bill.

Another law, AB 2839is aimed toward social media users who post or repost artificial intelligence misinformation that might mislead voters in regards to the upcoming election. The law went into effect immediately on Tuesday, and Newsom suggested that Elon Musk could possibly be liable to violating it.

Under a new California law, AI-generated political ads now require direct disclosure. AB 2355. This means Trump may not find a way to post artificial intelligence falsehoods featuring Taylor Swift supporting him on Truth Social (she endorsed Kamala Harris). The FCC has proposed the same national disclosure requirement and has already ruled that robocalls using AI-generated voices are illegal.

Actors and artificial intelligence

The two bills Newsom signed into law earlier this month — pushed by SAG-AFTRA, the nation’s largest film and tv actors’ union — create new standards for California’s media industry. AB 2602 requires studios to acquire permission from an actor before creating an AI-generated replica of his or her voice or likeness.

Meanwhile, AB 1836 prohibits studios from creating digital replicas of deceased performers without the consent of their estates (e.g., the recent “Alien” and “Star Wars” movies, in addition to other movies, used legally approved replicas).

SB 1047 is vetoed

Governor Newsom still has several AI-related bills to take up by the tip of September. However, SB 1047 isn’t one among them – the bill was vetoed on Sunday.

In a letter explaining your decisionNewsom said SB 1047 focused too narrowly on large artificial intelligence systems that might “give the public a false sense of security.” California’s governor noted that small AI models could possibly be as dangerous because the models targeted by SB 1047, and said a more flexible regulatory approach was needed.

During a conversation with Salesforce CEO Mark Benioff earlier this month on the Dreamforce 2024 conference, Newsom was in a position to tip his hat about SB 1047 and the way he thinks about broader regulation of the unreal intelligence industry.

“There is one bill that is kind of too big in terms of public discourse and awareness; that’s SB 1047,” Newsom said on stage this month. “What are the demonstrable risks associated with AI and what are the hypothetical risks? I can’t solve everything. What can we solve? That’s why we’re taking this approach across the spectrum on this issue.”

Check back to this text for updates on which AI laws the California governor is and is not signing.

As of Saturday, many YouTube videos containing music by artists similar to Adele, Green Day, Bob Dylan, Nirvana and REM have been banned from streaming in the United States.

For example, when you attempt to play Dylan’s “Like A Rolling Stone” (whether or not classic album recording Or live performance), you’ll as an alternative see the message: “This video contains content from SESAC. It is not available in your country.” Sometimes you may even watch a pre-roll ad before receiving the message.

However, not all videos featuring these artists are blocked; it’s unclear whether playable videos are excluded from the present dispute or have simply been missed.

In statements to press AND on social mediaYouTube blames the situation on failed negotiations with SESAC, a performing rights group that claims to represent greater than 35,000 artists and music publishers.

“Unfortunately, despite our best efforts, we were unable to reach a fair settlement before it expired,” YouTube said. “We take copyright very seriously and content represented by SESAC is no longer available on YouTube in the US. We are in active discussions with SESAC and hope to reach a new agreement as soon as possible.”

The situation is reminiscent of the dispute between Universal Music Group and TikTok earlier this yr, which resulted in UMG pulling songs from artists including Taylor Swift, Billie Eilish and Ariana Grande from the short-video platform while negotiating royalties.

Unlike UMG, SESAC is just not a record label, but relatively a corporation that collects royalties for songwriters and publishers, much like ASCAP and BMI. In addition to the above-mentioned artists, he also represents Burna Boy, George Clinton, Kenny Rogers, Kings of Leon and many others.

All credit goes to Samsung for inventing and popularizing the foldable device. As for the form, I had loads of doubts – I admit I used to be skeptical – when the primary Galaxy Fold hit the market in 2019. It was the primary Galaxy Flip, released a 12 months later, that taught me to actually appreciate foldable devices.

When the unique Pixel Fold debuted in 2023, it quickly became my favorite foldable. Google has shown how just a few tweaks to the proportions could make a foldable phone much less bulky. But despite all of the impressive technology on this device, I discovered that it also worked as a fantastic e-reader.

The Pixel Fold was a formidable competitor that, for my part, only the OnePlus Open could compete with. The addition of those products, in addition to other products from firms like Oppo, has opened up the sphere in a pleasant way. Instead of letting Samsung rest on its laurels, the competition pushed innovation.

By the time Google was able to announce a successor to the Fold, Google had enough confidence within the product to totally integrate it into its flagship product line. There won’t ever be Pixels 2 to eight. Instead, Google gave the world the Pixel 9 Pro Fold, positioning the device as a type of ultra-premium sibling to the Pixel 9 and Pixel 9 Pro. It’s, truthfully, just branding. Ultimately, it doesn’t matter to consumers.

What matters is that Fold is back, bigger and better than before. I admit that the “larger” part initially made me think. One of the things I liked most in regards to the original Pixel Fold was that it was easier to make use of than Samsung’s versions. I suppose it’s inevitable that foldable devices will join the remainder of the smartphone space in the nice screen expansion.

Fortunately, Google has managed to make progress on screen size without constructing a bulky phone around it. The front screen has increased from 5.8 to six.3 inches and is consistently getting closer to the sting. This will likely be good enough screen space for many of the stuff you do each day.

More impressive is the jump in the inner display from 7.6 to a full 8 inches AMOLED 120 Hz. For comparison, the iPad mini’s screen is barely 0.3 inches larger. When unfolded, it’s actually a tablet. Google also selected nice proportions. When you are done replying to emails on the front display, you’ll be able to open it and watch a video.

The Pixel 9 Fold has grown and grown while reducing weight from 283 to 257 grams. Unfortunately, shedding about 100 extra grams comes with a smaller battery, all the way down to 4,605 ​​from 4,821 mAh. Google largely bypasses any issues there through the use of a more power-efficient SoC, skipping the generation from the Pixel Tensor G2 to the G4. It’s value noting that despite the striking $1,000 price difference between the Pixel 9 and 9 Fold, Google has opted to make use of the identical chip across the whole line.

One of the most important upgrades you’ll be able to get from the foldable standard Pixel is the wonderful three-camera system. Don’t tell Connie, but I exploit the 9 Fold to take product photos for the web site. It’s so good. For example, all of the photos within the Snap Spectacles story were taken with a foldable camera.

The numbers have not modified much from the Fold’s original configuration, going from 48MP wide, 10.8 ultrawide, 10.8 telephoto, 8MP to 48MP wide, 10.5 ultrawide, and 10.8MP telephoto. However, Google is consistently improving its computational image processing, so the standard is consistently improving.

The Pixel 9 Fold had quite a bit to supply when the primary Pixel Fold entered the world fully formed. The recent phone is a worthy successor and among the finest foldable phones in the marketplace.