Connect with us

Politics and Current

Outraged parents say Georgia cheerleaders were kicked off team for complaining about coach calling them the N-word, but no one was punished

Published

on

A Georgia school district has reached a civil rights settlement on find out how to reply to incidents of racial harassment after two former black students were called a derogatory name by their cheerleading coach, but their parents are concerned the district won’t implement the measures.

Antwishia Thomas and Cortese Walker filed two complaints against the Houston County School District on January 15, 2020, after they learned that Veterans High School coach Daniel Satterfield called their daughters the N-word twice during cheerleading practice in October 2019.

Perry, Georgia Veterans High School. (Photo: Houston County School District)

Thomas and Walker told The Macon Telegraph that the junior varsity coach notified them of the insult. The coach confronted Satterfield, who “apologized” and said he was “quoting lyrics,” in keeping with investigative documents from the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights.

Both parents reported the incident to high school administrators. However, during an internal investigation, all coaches told administrators that nothing “out of the ordinary” happened at practice, including the JV coach.

Advertisement

Thomas and Walker also told school officials that Satterfield had a habit of bringing up questionable and offensive topics related to race with their daughters, including making comments about dark skin and calling Walker’s daughter “ghetto.” Both girls were the only black cheerleaders on the team.

After the racial slur was reported to the school, Satterfield’s wife, head cheerleading coach Katie Satterfield, allegedly responded to each girls by refusing to permit them to help with stunts and ultimately deeming them “uncoachable.” The girls were kicked off the team shortly thereafter.

After the district learned that three cheerleading coaches who were initially approached about the racial slur had lied when officials questioned them, the girls were allowed to return to the team. The school ordered all of the team’s practices to be held on campus and coordinated administrator attendance at practices to observe the team.

Thomas also reported the harassment to the Houston County Board of Education, but VHS administrators were the only officials who made contact together with her and really helpful measures that ended with each girls being isolated and exposed to harassment from other students.

Advertisement

According to court documents, although the district issued a letter regarding the head coach’s professionalism and responsibility, the Office of Civil Rights found no evidence that officials implemented “any corrective actions or had any dialogue that focused on ensuring the head coach had a work environment free from discrimination.”

Before the federal office concluded its investigation, the Houston County School District contacted us expressing its desire to resolve the criticism.

On July 17, an agreement was reached to resolve the issue. It requires the school system to issue an announcement prohibiting racial harassment in the district, train all school personnel on racial discrimination and promptly address all reports of racial harassment, amongst other measures.

The agreement doesn’t require the district to confess any wrongdoing or liability.

Advertisement

Thomas and Walker said they feel the Satterfields were never fully held accountable for their actions and would have felt higher if the district had apologized to them when the situation occurred.

“They believe in protecting their employees and administrators,” Walker said. he stated“It’s not about protecting children. Children were portrayed as the villains, and they saw it. They saw it happen and they didn’t talk about it.”

Daniel Satterfield no longer works at Veterans High School. His wife, Katie, resigned as head cheerleading coach in December 2019 as a result of “health issues.”

“Their behavior was ignored” – Thomas he noticed“There were no punishments. If a child had done anything these adults did, they would have been immediately expelled from school.”

Advertisement

Thomas added that the resolution may look good on paper, but she worries the district won’t fairly implement the actions taken, which could lead on to potential future incidents of racial harassment going unchecked.

“Do I feel like they’re going to make and implement changes? I have no doubt they’re just going to put it on hold,” Thomas said.

The Houston County School District released an announcement after the agreement was reached.

“While the District cannot comment on staff or student matters, we are committed to providing our schools with a safe and caring environment for all students,” the District said. “We reinforce this value by providing training to all staff and students on bullying and harassment. If a student ever feels harassed, we encourage them to talk to a counselor or administrator. Our school district also uses Anonymous Alerts, which is a safe way to report any form of bullying in our schools. We will continue to focus on meeting the social, emotional, and academic needs of our students.”

Advertisement

This article was originally published on : atlantablackstar.com
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics and Current

Black Democrats who attended Harvard and Candace Owens agree to one thing: the repression of the Trump campus goes too far

Published

on

By

This is a rare moment in American policy, when the ultra-conservative personality of Candace Owens Democrats are on the opposite side of Donald Trump. The political brand of the bonfire publicly condemned the president’s crusade against Harvard University and other university campus; Trump threatened to annul the billions of federal subsidies if the institution disagrees with the list of demands that Harvard described as “going beyond the power of the federal government.”

As Owens put it, Trump’s fight with Harvard – which increased to the federal lawsuit filed by the very wealthy Ivy league – is a struggle for freedom of speech.

Advertisement

“We cannot allow us to violate our rights. And if you think it will stop at university campus, you have no head,” said Owens, who previously supported President Trump. “So it’s better in this fight Harvard University. You should hope that they will overcome the Trump administration and this absurd definition.”

In his lawsuit, Harvard claims that their rights to the first amendment as a non-public institution are violated by the administration of Trump, who tried to force the university to meet their requirements regarding policies related to the solution to anti -Semitism in campus, in addition to other policies and reforms, corresponding to eliminating diversity, own capital and inclusion in principles, scholarship and honesty.

Apart from the violations of the first amendment, Edwards, a democrat applying for Congress in the 18th Congress District in Texas, said that her attempt to dismantle the Harvard of federal financing, which is used for research to increase innovation in medicine and technology, is especially disturbed.

A former member of the Houston City Council said that aiming administration on Harvard and other university campuses is “effective” and “irresponsible”.

Advertisement

Everton Blair, a graduate of Harvard University and Harvard Graduate School of Education, who also candidates for Congress in the thirteenth Congress District in Georgia, said that he “enjoys” that the institution “will be in a state of himself”.

However, Blair said that he was and remains to be critical of his home parent, because the problem with how they handled campus tensions during the war in gas and other matters – even when he was a student.

“It is a bit interesting that only because it violates their ability to be independently conducted institution, that it recalled this resistance,” said Blair, former chairman of the board of Gwinnett County Board of Education. “They showed me once and again that they have very peculiar cash interests.”

Blair noticed that Harvard, who has over $ 50 billion equipment, has a “privileged position” to find a way to “work fully, even if he loses billions of dollars”, unlike other campuses. He said that he shows that “not all we are simply forced and forced to do things that are bad for people, bad for students (and) for the community.”

Advertisement
Obama praises Harvard University for the defense of Trump despite the threat of financing USD 2.2 billion

Edwards said that the attacks of the first correction of Trump’s administration on Harvard “cannot be normalized”.

“These are dangerous practices that do not intend to develop us. It must be more than revenge and political punishment. What is happening in our academic institutions affects how tomorrow may be clear tomorrow,” said the candidate for Congress in Texas.

In the future, attacking American universities and universities will affect the “position in the world”, said Edwards, including “what we produce, available talent and information to which we have access”.

She added: “The precedent, which is established along with the Trump administration attack on a higher ED and other institutions that were very significant and valuable in our society … This is something that we have to repel with, because our future depends on this.”

Advertisement

(Tagstotransate) candia o Owens

This article was originally published on : thegrio.com
Continue Reading

Politics and Current

The federal judge abandons the case of corruption against the mayor of New York Eric Adams – essence

Published

on

By

The federal judge abandons the corruption case against the mayor of New York Eric Adams

Swimming pool images/ ghetto

Advertisement

The federal judge dismissed the corruption case against the mayor of New York Eric Adams. The decision of the US District Judge Dale Ho takes place almost two months after the controversial Trump administration, tried to desert the allegations of a democratic mayor.

Judge Ho threw the case “with prejudices”, which permanently prevents Department of Justice From refusal against Adams in the American District Court in Manhattan. In his ruling, the judge criticized the request for dismissal of the case without prejudices, which might allow for future prosecution, CNBC reports.

He expressed concern that such an exemption might be seen as a political opportunity, stating: “Everything here strikes the opportunity: releasing the indictment in exchange for concessions regarding the immigration policy” by Adams.

Advertisement

He argued that continuing the case could make Adams’ ability to manipulate and cooperate with the immigration policy of President Donald Trump. This attitude led to internal fights inside the TO, which resigned from several prosecutors, including the function of prosecutor Manhattan Danielle Sassoon.

Judge Ho emphasized the unprecedented nature of the reasoning of the state, noting: “The state does not cite any examples, and the court is not able to find any government rejecting the allegations against the selected official, because it would allow an official to facilitate the goals of federal policy.” ​

Adams, who didn’t plead guilty for the allegations, including bribery and fraud, maintained his innocence in all proceedings. After the release, he said: “This matter should never be brought and I did not do anything bad.” ​

The release allows Adams to concentrate on his re -election campaign. He faces pretenders, including the former governor Andrew Cuomo, in its offer for the second term. On Thursday The mayor announced that now it’ll be Start for recurring as an independent candidate.

Advertisement

“I strongly believe that this city is better served by truly independent leadership, and not leaders pulled by extremists on the left or extreme right, but instead rooted in a common middle, a place where the vast majority of New Yorkers are very planted,” said Adams.

This article was originally published on : www.essence.com
Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics and Current

Susan Rice calls Pete HegeSeth “stupid as rock” in an interview with the podcast

Published

on

By

Susan Rice, Pete Hegseth


Susan Rice, a former national security advisor during the administration of President Barack Obama, was open, discussing what, in response to the Secretary of Defense Pete HegeSeth, as rumors, they spin about his future in Trump’s administration.

According to , During a conversation Thanks to the host “No Lie with BTC” Brian Taylor Cohen, Rice didn’t draw any blows when he described HegeSetha in unflattering categories, discussing some rainfall from the so -called signal controversy.

“Well, if you are a white Christian Cisgender Macho Maga, you can be as stupid as a rock and be considered a qualification to be the secretary of defense. We apparently learned this episode,” said Rice Cohen.

Advertisement

Rice continued, compiling the Trump’s concentration on combating diversity, equality and inclusion in how hegeSeth is just not eligible in her eyes.

“Dei was used as a suspension to suggest that anyone who is usually a woman is usually a color person, is usually a religious minority, might be disabled … he is usually a veteran of native origin, anyone who has used in any way, shapes or forms that we should always all treat and that we ought to be perceived on the basis of our substances, not discount, because we grow to be a lady or discount, That anyone should treat anyone.

According to Rice, he was a member of the Defense Policy Council until HegeSth allegedly removed the board members after a 45-day review On April 24, but time suggests that HegeSeth actually removed these members after indignant of right -wing influential in social media.

In an interview with Fox News, “Tucker Carlson, a dismissed adviser of HegeSeth, Dan Caldwell, mentioned that the management was currently involved in people who, according to Caldwell, were” extremely hostile “in the order of Donald Trump.

Caldwell called Rice specifically as a source of leaks in the HegeSetha Defense Department, for being blamed himself.

Advertisement

“She (Rice) and a group of other people who are extremely hostile to the president, and his worldview remain in the Defense Policy Council,” said Caldwell Carlson. “I would just say that if you want to look where the leaks come from, it would be a place where you can start.”

Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell suggested in a press release that the changes reflect the values ​​and direction of Trump’s administration.

“Secretary of HegeSeth appreciates the efforts of members on behalf of the Department and the United States of America, but it is necessary to change to support the new strategic direction and political priorities of the department and ensure effective use of departmental resources,” said Parnell.

Advertisement

(Tagstranslate) National security

This article was originally published on : www.blackenterprise.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending