Connect with us

Lifestyle

This law is a lifesaver for pregnant employees, even if the abortion dispute complicates its enforcement

Published

on

NEW YORK (AP) – Victoria Cornejo Barrera thought an worker legal hotline sounded too good to be true and wondered if it was a scam.

A month earlier, Cornejo Barrera was forced to resign from her job as a highschool principal in South Carolina after she submitted a doctor’s note asking to be excused from tasks akin to climbing ladders and lifting greater than 20 kilos because she was pregnant. .

For a month she cried and blamed herself for considering she would find a way to maintain her job while pregnant. She used up all of her gathered paid time without work because she couldn’t afford to go without a paycheck. She then received a notice from Human Resources that she would have to begin paying $600 a month to be eligible for medical health insurance while on unpaid leave.

“I felt very guilty. I felt the problem was my pregnancy,” Cornejo Barrera said.

While looking for help online, she got here across a website run by the legal organization A Better Balance that explained about a federal law called the Pregnant Worker Fairness Act that made her eligible for the kind of accommodation she was looking for. It took effect in June 2023, a month before she was fired from her job.

Was the law really on her side? Cornejo Barrera called the hotline.

The first yr of the latest law is complicated

Nearly 500 employees in similar circumstances have contacted A Better Balance’s legal hotline in the yr since the passage of the Pregnant Worker Fairness Act, which strengthens employees’ rights to hunt accommodations for pregnancy-related needs. The experiences of those employees tell a complicated story about the effects of the latest law, which is still unknown to many employers when it finally passed in December 2022, in line with a report released Tuesday by A Better Balance, the organization that led the decade-long campaign for the bill that Congress introduced. .

Most of those employees, mostly women in low-wage jobs, quickly obtained accommodations after learning about their rights and invoking them to employers, said Dina Bakst, co-founder and co-president of A Better Balance. However, the report found that many ladies still faced employers who didn’t know the law, misunderstood its scope or just refused to comply with it.

Charlotte Burrows, chairwoman of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, which enforces the law and reaches out to employers and worker groups, said raising awareness was a significant challenge.

“I don’t think we’re where we need to be yet,” Burrows said. “We will work very hard to make sure we close this information gap for everyone.”

But a fierce legal battle over whether the law covers abortion complicates its enforcement.

The dispute centers on EEOC rules that went into effect Tuesday that detail how employers should comply with the law and include abortion amongst the pregnancy-related conditions that entitle employees to time without work and other accommodations.

A federal judge in Louisiana on Tuesday temporarily barred the EEOC from enforcing its abortion law against employers in Louisiana and Mississippi or against the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and three other religious groups that filed a consolidated lawsuit against the EEOC, arguing that the abortion rule was an illegal interpretation of the act about the honesty of pregnant employees.

Last week, one other judge in Arkansas dismissed a similar lawsuit filed by GOP attorneys general from 17 states, but Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin, who is prosecuting the case, said he was considering legal options to proceed the suit.

That lawsuit asks a judge to suspend the entirety of the EEOC’s regulations, which the amicus temporary says could thwart the successful implementation of the American Civil Liberties Union and the National Women’s Law Center, together with greater than 20 labor and girls’s groups. laws.

For example, EEOC rules clarify that employers cannot delay filing claims by asking pregnant employees for burdensome documents to support claims about common pregnancy-related limitations, akin to morning sickness or back pain. They also cannot force pregnant employees to take time without work if reasonable accommodations can be found.

The rules set high requirements for employers to prove that granting accommodations would impose an “undue hardship” on their organization.

While the pregnant employee law would remain in effect even without the EEOC’s regulations, supporters say it is a much-needed tool for resolving disputes and training employers to comply with the law. According to A Better Balance, one in seven employees who contacted the hotline since the law went into effect said their employer ordered them to take time without work reasonably than provide them with reasonable accommodations.

Cornejo Barrera was amongst them, but her employer modified its decision after she sent a letter to the human resources department invoking her rights. Within two days, she shared the words of the Pregnant Worker Fairness Act along with her manager, who then told her she could return to work immediately.

When she returned, she saw that there have been posters hanging around the highschool informing employees about the law.

Featured Stories

“It was extremely satisfying to realize that I was right, I wasn’t wrong,” said Cornejo Barerra, who worked until the day before her daughter was born, February 2.

Raquel Robinson, a telecommunications specialist from Ohio, also ultimately prevailed in a similar confrontation along with her company where she has worked for 23 years.

After giving birth to her daughter in October 2022, Robinson was diagnosed with postpartum depression. She took a shower with difficulty and left the house. “Mentally, I just wasn’t in a place where I felt like I was good enough to be my daughter’s mom,” she said. “I couldn’t get her to stop crying.”

After her disability leave led to July 2023, her therapist really useful that she earn a living from home to ease her transition and told her that she was entitled to such accommodation under the latest law. However, her company resisted her request for over a month. During one painful meeting, she realized that the company had shared her personal information, including details about her hygiene struggles, along with her manager-husband, only to insist that nothing she described would interfere along with her ability to do her job in the office .

“I literally burst into tears when I think about it,” she said. “I’m very embarrassed.”

Robinson turned to A Better Balance for help, and the company relented. He’s on the point of return to the office this week after several months of working from home.

Other employees proceed to fight for legal protection.

Earlier this month, A Better Balance filed charges with the EEOC on behalf of two women, alleging violations of the Pregnant Employee Fairness Act. One of them was an worker of a Chick-fil-A franchise in Indiana who said she had points taken away from her punitive attendance system after she sought time to get better from a near miscarriage that sent her to the emergency room. Another involves an Amtrak engineer who said the railroad company marked the first few days of labor as unauthorized absences, putting her liable to being fired, after which refused to accommodate her need to specific milk when she returned to work.

Amtrak declined to comment on the pending litigation. Chick-fil-A referred inquiries to representatives of the franchise, whose owner Jeff Hoffman declined to comment.

The EEOC says it has received 1,869 charges to this point for violations of the Pregnant Employee Fairness Act and has resolved greater than 450, even though it didn’t provide details of those cases.

The issue of abortion complicates the law

The bill was passed in 2022 after years of campaigning by interest groups and girls in low-wage jobs who shared stories of being denied even basic housing. Their experiences helped show that the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978, while prohibiting employers from firing women just because they became pregnant, did little to offer accommodation in the workplace.

But Republican lawmakers and conservative religious leaders, who overwhelmingly supported the Pregnant Worker Fairness Act, became furious when the EEOC’s rules explicitly covered abortion. Both Republican commissioners on the five-member EEOC voted against the rule.

Citing quite a few court decisions, the EEOC said in its regulations that it follows many years of legal precedent stating that pregnancy-related discrimination laws cover abortion.

Mylissa Farmer, a woman under federal investigation into two hospitals that refused to perform emergency abortions, said her ordeal shows why the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act must cover abortion.

Farmer sought emergency help after her water broke in August 2022 at the starting of the seventeenth week of her pregnancy. Doctors at hospitals in Missouri and Kansas told Farmer that her fetus wouldn’t survive, that her amniotic fluid had depleted and that she was liable to serious infection or fetal loss. her uterus, but they refused to abort her.

While giving birth, she and her husband traveled for hours before a clinic in Illinois provided her with an abortion.

Farmer, who worked as a sales representative in a low-paid job, stated that her supervisor repeatedly contacted her during difficult times to pressure her to return to work. She said the doctor advised her to take two weeks off to get better, but she returned to work after two days because she was afraid of being fired. But after her absences, she needed to face discipline to deal with the physical and mental trauma of losing her pregnancy, including an occasional breakdown on the strategy to meeting clients.

“I was simply unable to provide myself with the care I needed at the time, and it was very difficult for me to even cope with the emotional loss of what we were going through,” said Farmer, represented by the National Women’s Law Center, in her criticism to the Centers for Medicare Services and Medicaid.

Eventually, she and her husband left their jobs and moved to Oregon along with her sister to try to begin over. However, it didn’t work and so they became homeless for a while.

The couple have since rebuilt their lives with latest jobs, but live in an undisclosed location because of the backlash they faced.

“I don’t think a lot of people in these low-paid positions realize that in these types of situations, you can replace someone very easily,” Farmer said.

This article was originally published on : thegrio.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Lifestyle

What’s Behind Kevin Hart’s Abrupt Closing of His Hart House Vegan Restaurant Chain

Published

on

By

Kevin Hart, Hart House, Black-owned vegan restaurant, Black vegans, vegan food business, Black-owned business, celerity business, theGrio.com

The sudden closure of all 4 Los Angeles locations of Kevin Hart’s vegan fast-food chain Hart House has industry experts wondering concerning the sustainability of vegan food businesses.

When Hart teamed up with Andy Hooper, former CEO of &pizza, to launch Hart House in 2022, the plan was to open 100 locations over five years. Menu offerings included plant-based “burgers” and “chick’n” sandwiches, consistent with Hart’s transition to a mostly plant-based weight loss program in 2020. Hooper also had an interest in entering the patron packaged goods industry.

Hart House initially opened to widespread acclaim and support. TikTok food sensation Keith Lee gave Hart House a glowing review when he visited in 2023. He praised the place for its reasonably priced prices, with sandwiches priced under $8 and combos under $15, and called a sandwich he tried “amazing.”

Now that the corporate has closed all of its locations, some experts are calling the plan “ambitious.”

According to Food InstituteHart House was faced with a rise within the California minimum wage from $15.50 to $20 (as the corporate already offered higher wages, extensive health care, and worker advantages) and a saturated market.

“Consumers may have viewed Hart House as a novelty rather than a serious player in the fast-food industry,” Bassem Mostafa, chief market analyst and owner of Globemonitor Market Research Agency, told The Food Institute.

He added: “While Kevin Hart’s star power has given him name recognition, it has not necessarily translated into consistent customer traffic and retention, both of which are key to surviving in a competitive restaurant market.”

Hart House isn’t the one vegan food business to recently close shop. The Food Institute also reports a “wave” of closures across the country, including the closure of 40% of its locations by the Veggie Grill chain, Stalk & Speed ​​​​in Minneapolis, Wild Thing in Oregon and VegeNation in Las Vegas.

Featured Stories

“The response to the product has been incredible. We thank our dedicated team, customers and community partners for helping us make the transition we wanted and for their unwavering support of Hart House,” Hooper noted in a press release confirming the closure of Hart House, The Food Institute reported.

High and rising operating costs in an already saturated market may mean that Hart House simply won’t give you the chance to compete in its previous form. Instead of using Beyond or Impossible patties like many other establishments offering vegan options, Hart House has provide you with its own. While Lee appeared to like them, others have recently expressed the alternative opinion.

According to Daily mailsome have even gone thus far as to match Hart House to other black-owned vegan brands, corresponding to the wildly successful Slutty Vegan. It’s hard to inform whether the reviews were written in good faith or not, but we do know that Hart likely doesn’t care.

In a recent episode of his podcast,Golden Minds with Kevin Hart,” he told his “Fright Night” co-star Chloe Bailey that he “never” reads reviews for “any” of his material — good or bad.

“I don’t get caught up in the good or bad version of it, because I get caught up in the idea and then I tell myself I’m going to do it, I work with people to do it, I finish it, and then I see that idea on the big screen or the small screen or in script form,” he said, adding, “I said, ‘Man, great. I set my mind to something and I finished it.’ So I’m happy with the fact that I get to do the things that I say I’m going to do. What other people think about it doesn’t affect my joy in my goal of finishing it.”

It stays a mystery what the longer term holds for Hart House, although the corporate’s farewell statement Instagram suggests “next chapter.”


This article was originally published on : thegrio.com
Continue Reading

Lifestyle

Houston’s Trills On Wheels Expands With Brunch Tour

Published

on

By

Houston, Trill on wheels, hip hop


A well-liked interactive Houston attraction that continues to attract visitors and showcase the town’s wealthy history and black business scene has expanded its offerings.

Trill On Wheels is a national prime minister a hip-hop bike experience that celebrates Houston culture and contributions to hip-hop. Launched in 2021, the party bike offers a two-hour cruise around Houston with stops at various black-owned businesses while guests enjoy cocktails and shisha.

Designed to rejoice the Houston lifestyle, each bike is designed to spotlight the town’s automobile culture with a “Candy Paint” mural featuring hip-hop heroes and the neighborhoods they represent. The bikes also feature Swang’s rims wrapped in trendy tires and Houston’s signature bass pumping out of the speakers.

The exuberant experience has made Trill On Wheels a tourist attraction that visitors put at the highest of their lists. Now, the brand new EADO Hip-Hop Brunch Tour offers guests a fun-filled approach to experience popular brunch stops in Houston.

Trill On Wheels is currently based in Houston’s historic Third Ward neighborhood, EADO, and plans to expand to the Fourth Ward. The tour experience combines the talent of Houston-born artists with a splash of sunshine fitness. Featuring Beatking, Slim Thug, and Lil Keke.

What began as a single bike delivered in a shipping container to the resort “is a testament to our team’s commitment to meeting high expectations and delivering a world-class experience to our riders,” he said. business stated on its website.

“Team Trill” is run by a married couple with two babies.

“As true fans of hip-hop culture, hosting epic game nights and being ‘out there,’ we wanted to create an experience that we could enjoy ourselves and one day pass on to our son,” the couple said. “After a year of prayer, research and pure, unfiltered hustle, Trill On Wheels was born and we couldn’t be more proud!”

Trill On Wheels has served over 30,000 tourists who’ve donated over $700,000 to local black-owned businesses, helping to spice up Houston’s economy. Be sure to examine out Trill On Wheels in your next visit to Houston, and don’t forget to bring your personal booze!


This article was originally published on : www.blackenterprise.com
Continue Reading

Lifestyle

Fear of sitting in crowded, black spaces

Published

on

By

There are two types of black people in the world: 1.) those that can walk right into a church on Easter Sunday, “sit” the highest five seats, and take a look at the ushers to just accept that those seats are taken; or 2.) me.

I’m the kind of person, and I represent the kind of black people, who hate being asked to sit down anywhere. I almost never feel anxious in public and I’m rarely nervous or concerned about who’s around me. But after I am in a public place and someone who just isn’t there and is not going to be there for some time asks me to sit down, I get anxious. I sweat. I stress. I fade quickly after which hand over. I don’t like to sit down for other people and I don’t ask people to sit down for me. I don’t prefer to put my burdens on the riverbank of the one who was on time.

But unfortunately, in the black community, “holding seats” is a thing—a sport, even. I’ve seen (and I mean this with dead seriousness; “without a hat,” as the children would say) an elderly black woman tell an usher in church that she was holding seats, and get mad on the ushers who suggested she couldn’t do it. She couldn’t consider they thought she couldn’t hold a row of seats, and so they couldn’t consider she couldn’t consider she couldn’t do it. Oh, what a tangled web we weave. My wife is one of those individuals who will hold all of the requested seats and risk a public demonstration of “Who’s going to break first, loudly?” over said seats. She’ll even be very mad at me after I can’t do it. Marriage, right?

If I’ll, I would really like to share with you all a recent experience I had attempting to get a seat that not only threw me out of the constructing, but threw me into an overcrowded room where I could now not see anything on account of the stress of attempting to get a seat for somebody. Also, as you may see, I failed this task with flying colours.

Just a few weeks ago, a famous friend of mine was giving a speak about books at a famous Washington landmark. I had been to that bookstore before—persistently—and had attended many of that friend’s talks. A math problem was about to pop into my head; there was absolutely no way that store could accommodate the number of individuals who would show up for that talk. Spoiler alert: I used to be right.

Lifestyle

Since I consider myself a forward-thinking person, I anticipated this math problem and got to the shop early enough to get a seat, but late enough to get one of, for example, three remaining seats. Many people should have been pondering the identical thing I used to be occupied with math, not math, given the space constraints of the shop. Anyway, I went in and sat down on a stool, then watched the parade of people, mostly black, who got here in after me, attempting to determine where to sit down. As an increasing number of people, especially older blacks, entered, I prepared to present up my seat and use my younger legs to face for your entire show.

And then I got a text from a friend asking me to avoid wasting a spot for her. Now that friend cannot stand for long, I had to avoid wasting her a spot (which I used to be already willing to present up) or we’d have to depart together; that wasn’t an option; we were there to see our friend be amazing and do her own thing.

But here’s the issue: My friend who asked for a seat was a minimum of quarter-hour away, and the stream of people coming in was growing. On top of that, my seat was in the aisle where people were coming in, which meant that everybody, including women who looked like my grandmother, could see that I used to be NOT giving up my seat. I looked like a young kid on a subway automotive not giving up her seat to seniors or pregnant women. The thing is, I knew why I wasn’t getting up, but they didn’t, and I couldn’t look my grandmother in the face and say, “Hey, I would give up my seat for you, but I would save it for a woman younger than you but older than me who potentially has a leg problem and wouldn’t care if you didn’t get it.” No one asked, they simply watched.

I used to be sweating an increasing number of with every passing minute and an increasing number of people were observing me. I do not know if that truly happened or not but that is the way it felt and I felt uncomfortable and judged. I used to be texting my mate with my ETA and he kept saying “I’ll be there in 5 minutes” for over 5 minutes. I let her know I didn’t think I could sit any longer because I used to be beginning to seem like I hadn’t been raised properly.

Then the book event organizer took the microphone and identified that there have been issues with the seating and that those of us who could should hand over our seats to those that were older than us or might need to sit down down, and I felt like she was talking on to me when she said that. She mentioned the overflow situation outside on the back patio instead for all of us who either needed a seat or had to present up our seats. At this point, my stress and anxiety were at their peak; my heart was beating fast and my palms were sweaty. I could not take it anymore. I stood up from my seat and without anyone, said, “The seat is free,” and quickly ran to the overflow spot while texting my friend that I could not hold on to my seat any longer.

It’s been weeks since that night and I still remember how I felt attempting to keep the place going. I felt really uncomfortable and I knew my wife could be high quality. Oh, and concerning the overbooking situation – it was awful. The place had no idea what they were doing and arrange a projector TV during sunset so nobody could see what was happening. Cool idea, terrible execution, but a minimum of I wasn’t stressed anymore. I used to be briefly annoyed that the place hadn’t thought to order a bigger space for the lecture considering who that they had brought, but that is in the past now.

Now it’s OK; thanks for asking. But one thing is obviously, and two things are obviously: next time I’m going right into a place that I do know can be crowded, I’ll just skip the entire sitting thing and prepare to face in the front, back, or side. Sure, my back might hurt and my legs might ache, but a minimum of I won’t feel stressed or judged.

If you’ve gotten a friend who cannot hold seats, please don’t force them to. It’s an excessive amount of.

Thank you for coming to my talk in Panama.


This article was originally published on : thegrio.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending