AND battle between private hospitals and private health insurers plays out in society.

The bottom line is how much insurers pay hospitals for his or her services and whether that’s enough for private hospitals to remain profitable.

Concerns about the viability of the private health care system caught the attention of the federal government, which launched the program review to private hospitals which have not yet been made public.

But are private hospitals really in trouble? And if that’s the case, will more public funding be the solution?

Private hospitals vs private health insurers

Many private hospital operators have reported significant pressure since the start of the Covid-19 pandemic, including: staff shortages.

Inflationary pressures have increased the costs of supplies and equipment, raising costs providing hospital care.

Now private hospitals have publicized their difficult contract negotiations with private insurers in an attempt to gain support and help in their case.

Healthscope, which operates 38 for-profit private hospitals in Australia dangerous end contracts with private health insurers.

St Vincent’s, which operates ten private not-for-profit hospitals, announced this might terminate the contract with Nib (certainly one of Australia’s largest for-profit health insurers), but then reached an agreement.

UnitingCare Queensland, which runs 4 private hospitals, announced it might terminate its contract with the Australian Health Service Alliance, which represents greater than 20 small and medium-sized, not-for-profit private health insurers. Since then, each side have been doing in order well I kissed and made up.

Why should we care?

There are three explanation why the profitability of the private health sector affects all of us, whether we’ve got private medical health insurance or use private hospitals.

1. Taxpayers subsidize private health care

Australian taxpayers contributed to private medical health insurance premiums, including: AUD 6.3 billion
(in premium rebates) in 2021-22. Most of them go to private hospitals. Medicare also subsidized fees for medical services provided to private patients in private and public hospitals in the amount of approx $3.81 billion in 2023–24.

But when the going gets tough, the private healthcare sector (each hospitals and health insurers) turns to the government for more information materials.

That’s why we must always worry about value what we’re currently getting from our public investment in the private healthcare system and whether further public investment is justified.

2. The closure of private hospitals may affect public hospitals

Calls for greater government support for private healthcare have long argued that a bigger private hospital sector would help reduce pressure on the public system.

Indeed, this was the justification for the series incentives introduced in the late Nineties to support private medical health insurance in Australia.

However, the extent of this phenomenon is hotly debated. Last evidence shows that higher levels of private medical health insurance lead to only a really small reduction in waiting times in public hospitals.

While it’s possible that the closure of a couple of private hospitals could prompt some patients to seek care in public hospitals, the change might not be that big and won’t increase wait times much.

3. Fewer private beds, but is that a nasty thing?

If unprofitable private hospitals are closed or merged, we expect the total variety of beds in private hospitals to decrease.

Fewer beds in private hospitals doesn’t necessarily mean bad news. In particular, mergers of small private day hospitals could increase their efficiency and reduce costs, which in turn would lower medical health insurance premiums.

We might have fewer private beds. This is due to policies attempting to move health care from hospitals to the community or the use of hospital-at-home programs (in which patients receive hospital-type care at home with the support of visiting medical staff and/or telehealth). ). Private health insurers support each.

The closure of several small private hospitals will mean the market adapts to the lower demand for hospital care. Some of the closures were in maternity wards, but with falling birth ratethis also looks like an appropriate market correction.

What will we know?

There is all objective data on what is going on in the private hospital sector scarce. This is principally because the Australian Bureau of Statistics suspended the mandatory examination all private hospitals. The most up-to-date data we’ve got is from 2016–2017.

Health insurers are the largest payer of private hospitals and subsequently have considerable bargaining power. In 2016–17, almost 80% Private hospitals’ revenues got here from private health insurers. Health insurers are also increasingly becoming “active” purchasers of health care – they don’t just passively pay insurance claims, but want to strike a great cope with private hospitals in order that their members can keep premiums (and costs) low and profits high.

Hospital reports close ignore hospitals which can be open at the same time. However, as of 2016–2017, there isn’t any publicly available data on the total variety of private hospitals in Australia or changes over time.

The latest data we’re talking about half All hospitals in Australia are private hospitals, including: 62% are for-profit and the rest are run by non-profit organizations (reminiscent of St Vincent’s).

The predominant for-profit providers are Ramsay Health Care and Healthscope. They each operate overseas and have been there troubles before the Covid pandemic.

Fast forward to 2024 and up to date contract negotiation problems suggest that the financial health of private for-profit hospitals may not have improved. This may subsequently reflect a long-term problem with the sustainability of the private hospital sector.

What are the options?

The private healthcare system already receives large public subsidies. So the crux of the current debate is whether or not the government should intervene to support the private sector. Here are some options:

• do nothing and let it play out Closing and merging private hospitals could also be a great solution if smaller hospitals and wards are not any longer needed and patients produce other alternatives

• introduce more regulations Negotiations between small private hospital groups and really large, dominant private health insurers might not be effective. If insurers have significant market power, they’ll force small private hospital groups into submission. Some private hospital groups could also be negotiating with many various health insurers at the same time, which may be expensive. Regulating exactly how these negotiations are conducted could increase the efficiency of the process and create a more level playing field

• change the way private hospitals are paid Public hospitals receive essentially the same national price for every procedure they perform. This provides incentives for efficiency because the price is fixed, so if costs are lower than price, they’ll generate a surplus. Private hospitals may be financed in this fashion, which could eliminate much of the cost of contract negotiations with private hospitals. Instead, private hospitals could deal with other issues, reminiscent of the number and quality of procedures and the provision of high-quality health care.

What’s next?

A revisit of price regulation and contract negotiations between private hospitals and private health insurers could potentially help the private hospital sector turn into more efficient.

Private health insurers are rightly trying to encourage such efficiency, but the tools at their disposal to achieve this through contract negotiations are quite blunt.

While waiting for the results of the review of the private hospital sector, the most significant thing is value for money for taxpayers. We all subsidize the private hospital sector.

A 3rd of former NFL players surveyed said so they believe they have chronic traumatic encephalopathyor CTE.

According to NPR, Harvard University conducted a survey of 1,980 former NFL players who played between 1960 and 2020, and 681 of them said they believed they had developed a brain disease. More than 230 players said they had experienced suicidal thoughts, and one other 176 reported being diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease or one other form of dementia.

Even after researchers controlled for predictors of suicidal thoughts or ideations, retired players who believed they had CTE were still twice as likely as others to report that they had experienced frequent suicidal thoughts or self-harm. Currently, nonetheless, the one sure solution to diagnose the disease is post-mortem brain testing, which is problematic since it is difficult to find out what symptoms are brought on by the event of CTE in living former NFL players.

According to Rachel Grashow, a neuroscientist at Harvard University and lead writer of the study, the secret is to discover and treat any symptoms before players begin to believe they have CTE, which may result in depression or thoughts of self-harm.

“The key finding from this study is that many of the conditions common to former NFL players, such as sleep apnea, low testosterone, high blood pressure and chronic pain, can cause problems with thinking, memory and concentration,” Grashow said.

Grashow continued: “While we wait for advances in CTE research to better explore the experiences of living gamers, it is imperative that we identify conditions that can be treated. These efforts may reduce the risk of players prematurely attributing symptoms to CTE, which can lead to feelings of hopelessness and thoughts of self-harm.”

More than 300 former NFL players have been posthumously diagnosed with CTE, and lots of of them allegedly developed symptoms of cognitive decline akin to memory loss and mood swings.

Junior Seau, a former University of Southern California and San Diego Chargers Hall of Famer who shot himself within the chest and committed suicide in 2012, was declared he had CTE after a brain scan by the National Institutes of Health.

According to ABC 10, Seau spoke with The Athletic’s Jim Trotter while still working for ESPN, and Seau warned that football needs a greater deal with player safety. Trotter now believes Seau’s comments about former players were actually about him.

“Those who say the game has changed for the worst; they don’t have a father who wouldn’t remember his name because of the game. If everyone had to wake up to a dad who didn’t know his name, didn’t know his child’s name, and wasn’t able to function normally. I mean, they will understand that the game has to change,” Seau told Trotter in an interview.

While the link between CTE and suicidal thoughts continues to be unclear, Dr. Ross Zafonte, one of the study’s authors and a professor of physical medicine and rehabilitation at Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard University, told NPR that suicidal thoughts experienced by gamers could also be resulting from: other symptoms and never necessarily CTE.

“It could also be related to aspects akin to isolation, chronic pain, depression, cognitive impairment, even heart problems – all of these aspects are related to former players, and all of these can contribute to the worsening of any pathology, and all this may actually cause problems, Zafonte said.

Zafonte continued: “The assumption that everybody will understand that is the issue. People are, rightly, obsessive about their concerns about CTE. We should not attempting to invalidate this in any way. But treating people for extraordinary things that may only worsen this pathology can alleviate the symptoms.

Post views: 7

On the approach to Paris Fashion Week shows, all invitees have the chance to present a typical look. Despite the rain that has not stopped for 3 days, there are also beautiful views that we noticed along the best way. On the third day we saw, for instance red lips in Vaquera, Cardi B’s powdered eyes in Balmain and of course stunning beauty on every street corner.

Several off-duty models were spotted outside with fresh faces: laminated eyebrows and clean skin paired with short afros. Meanwhile, one showgoer arrived in braided Bantu knots, false eyelashes, round blush and etched pencil-thin eyebrows – much like last week’s Marni look.

Another had blonde waves on her toes that reached right down to a mid-length bow-tied rat tail, which she connected to a nude lip. Next, Goku-style spikes were probably the most experimental look we caught, bringing the Parisian punk scene to the forefront of the season.

Below, take a take a look at the highest 10 street style looks from Day 3 of PFW SS25.