Technology
Will people really pay $200 a month for a new OpenAI chatbot?

On Thursday, OpenAI released a $200-a-month chatbot — and the AI community wasn’t quite sure what to make of it.
The company’s new ChatGPT Pro plan gives you access to “o1 pro mode,” which OpenAI says “uses more processing power to get the best answers to your toughest questions.” An improved version of OpenAI’s o1 reasoning model, o1 pro mode, should answer questions related to science, math and coding in a more “robust” and “comprehensive” way, OpenAI says.
Almost immediately, people began asking him to attract unicorns:
I asked ChatGPT mode o1 Pro to create a unicorn SVG.
(This is the model you’ve access to for $200 per month) pic.twitter.com/h9HwY3aYwU
— Rammy (@rammydev) December 5, 2024
And design a “crab-based” computer:
Finally introducing o1-pro for final use. pic.twitter.com/nX4JAjx71m
— Ethan Mollick (@emollick) December 6, 2024
And wax poetry concerning the meaning of life:
I just signed up for an OpenAI subscription for $200/month.
Please reply with inquiries to ask and I’ll re-post them on this thread. pic.twitter.com/oTQxbPxnoP— Garrett Scott
(@thegarrettscott) December 5, 2024
But many people on X didn’t seem convinced that o1 pro replies were within the $200 range.
“Has OpenAI provided any specific examples of hints that failed in regular o1 but succeeded in o1-pro?” he asked British computer scientist Simon Willison. “I want to see a single specific example that shows his advantage.”
It’s a reasonable query; in spite of everything, it’s the most costly chatbot subscription on the planet. The service comes with other advantages, reminiscent of removal of rate limits and unlimited access to other OpenAI models. But $2,400 a 12 months is not bullshit, and the worth proposition of the o1 pro mode specifically stays unclear.
It didn’t take long to search out the failure cases. O1 pro mode has problems with Sudoku and is interrupted by an optical illusion joke that is clear to any human being.
Both o1 and o1-pro failed here, probably still as a consequence of vision limitations (same with Sudoku puzzles)https://t.co/mAVK7WxBrq pic.twitter.com/O9boSv7ZGt
— Tibor Blaho (@btibor91) December 5, 2024
OpenAI’s internal tests show that o1 pro mode performs only barely higher than standard o1 for coding and math problems:
OpenAI conducted a “more stringent” evaluation in the identical tests to reveal the consistency of o1 pro mode: a model was only considered to have solved a query if it answered accurately in 4 out of 4 cases. But even in these tests the development was not dramatic:

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman once wrote that OpenAI is on the correct track path “towards an intelligence too cheap to measure” – he was forced to achieve this explain many times on Thursday that ChatGPT Pro is not for most people.
“Most users will be very happy with o1 at (ChatGPT) Plus!” – he said in X. “Almost everyone will be best served by our free tier or Plus tier.”
So who is that this for? Are there really people who’re willing to pay $200 a month to ask questions on toys like “Write a 3-paragraph essay about strawberries without using the letter “e”” Or “solve this Mathematical Olympiad task“? Will they happily part with their hard-earned money, with little guarantee that the usual o1 won’t have the option to satisfactorily answer the identical questions?
I asked Ameet Talwalkar, associate professor of machine learning at Carnegie Mellon and enterprise partner at Amplify Partners, for his opinion. “I think it’s a big risk to raise the price tenfold,” he told TechCrunch by email. “I think in just a few weeks we’ll have a much better sense of the appetite for this functionality.”
UCLA computer scientist Guy Van den Broeck was more candid in his assessment. “I don’t know if this price makes sense,” he told TechCrunch, “and whether expensive reasoning models will be the norm.”
o1 is “better than most people at most tasks” because, yes, humans only exist in disembodied, amnestic, multi-spin chat interfaces https://t.co/zbLY2BG5pQ
— Aidan McLau (@aidan_mclau) December 6, 2024
The generous view is that that is a marketing mistake. Describing o1 pro mode as one of the best at solving “toughest problems” doesn’t say much to potential customers. Neither unclear statements about how the model can “think longer” and reveal “intelligence”. As Willison points out, without concrete examples of the supposedly improved capabilities, it’s hard to justify paying more in any respect, much less ten times the value.
is such a fun, really helpful prompt for an AI model that costs $2,400 per 12 months
I hope Openai keeps these template tooltips until asi pic.twitter.com/JQ5vLKxWWR
— Dean W. Ball (@deanwball) December 6, 2024
As far as I do know, the target market is experts in specialized fields. OpenAI says it plans to supply a handful of medical researchers from “leading institutions” with free access to ChatGPT Pro, which is able to include o1 pro mode. Errors are of paramount importance in healthcare and, as Bob McGrew, former research director of OpenAI, stated: excellent on X, greater reliability might be the important unlock of o1 pro mode.
I play a bit with o1 and o1-pro.
They are excellent and a little weird. They are also not intended for most people more often than not. You really must have particularly difficult problems to unravel to get value from it. But if you’ve such problems, it’s a very serious matter.
— Ethan Mollick (@emollick) December 5, 2024
McGrew too he thought o1 pro mode is an example of what he calls “intelligence overhang”: users (and maybe modelers) do not know learn how to extract value from “additional intelligence” as a consequence of the basic limitations of a easy, text-based interface. As with other OpenAI models, the one strategy to interact with o1 pro mode is thru ChatGPT, and – in response to McGrew – ChatGPT just isn’t perfect.
However, it’s also true that $200 sets high expectations. Judging by its early reception on social media, ChatGPT Pro is not exactly a hit.
Technology
The Legal Defense Fund withdraws from the META civil law advisory group over Dei Rolback

On April 11, the Legal Defense Fund announced that he was leaving the external advisory council for civil rights regarding the fear that the changes in technology company introduced diversity, own capital, inclusion and availability in January.
According to those changes that some perceived as the capitulation of meta against the upcoming Trump administration, contributed to their decision To leave the advisory council of the technology company.
In January, LDF, along with several other organizations of civil rights, which were a part of the board, sent a letter to Marek Zuckerberg, CEO of Meta, outlining their fears As for a way changes would negatively affect users.
“We are shocked and disappointed that the finish has not consulted with this group or its members, considering these significant changes in its content policy. Non -compliance with even its own advisory group of experts on external civil rights shows a cynical disregard for its diverse users base and undermines the commitment of the meta in the field of freedom of speech with which he claims to” return “.
They closed the letter, hoping that the finish would recommend the ideals of freedom of speech: “If the finish really wants to recommend freedom of speech, he must commit to freedom of speech for all his services. As an advisory group from external civil rights, we offer our advice and knowledge in creating a better path.”
These fears increased only in the next months, culminating in one other list, which from the LDF director, Todd A. Cox, who indicated that the organization withdraws its membership from the META civil law advisory council.
“I am deeply disturbed and disappointed with the announcement of Medical on January 7, 2025, with irresponsible changes in content moderation policies on platforms, which are a serious risk for the health and safety of black communities and risk that they destabilize our republic,” Cox wrote.
He continued: “For almost a decade, the NACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF) has invested a lot of time and resources, working with META as part of the informal committee advising the company in matters of civil rights. However, the finish introduced these changes in the policy of the content modification without consulting this group, and many changes directly with the guidelines from the guidelines from LDF and partners. LD can no longer participate in the scope. ” Advisory Committee for Rights “
In a separate but related LDF list, it clearly resembled a finish about the actual obligations of the Citizens’ Rights Act of 1964 and other provisions regarding discrimination in the workplace, versus the false statements of the Trump administration, that diversity, justice and initiative to incorporate discriminates against white Americans.
“While the finish has modified its policy, its obligations arising from federal regulations regarding civil rights remain unchanged. The title of VII of the Act on civic rights of 1964 and other regulations on civil rights prohibit discrimination in the workplace, including disconnecting treatment, principles in the workplace which have unfair disproportionate effects, and the hostile work environment. Also when it comes to inclusion, and access programs.
In the LDF press release, announcing each letters, Cox He called attention Metal insert into growing violence and division in the country’s social climate.
“LDF worked hard and in good faith with meta leadership and its consulting group for civil rights to ensure that the company’s workforce reflects the values and racial warehouses of the United States and to increase the security priorities of many different communities that use meta platforms,” said Cox. “Now we cannot support a company in good conscience that consciously takes steps in order to introduce changes in politics that supply further division and violence in the United States. We call the meta to reverse the course with these dangerous changes.”
(Tagstranslate) TODD A. COX (T) Legal Defense Fund (T) META (T) Diversity (T) Equality (T) inclusion
Technology
Students of young, talented and black yale collect $ 3 million on a new application

Nathaneo Johnson and Sean Hargrow, juniors from Yale University, collected $ 3 million in only 14 days to finance their startup, series, social application powered by AI, designed to support significant connections and challenge platforms, similar to LinkedIn and Instagram.
A duo that’s a co -host of the podcast A series of foundersHe created the application after recognizing the gap in the way in which digital platforms help people connect. SEries focuses moderately on facilitating authentic introductions than gathering likes, observing or involvement indicators.
“Social media is great for broadcasting, but it does not necessarily help you meet the right people at the right time,” said Johnson in an interview with Entrepreneur warehouse.
The series connects users through AI “friends” who communicate via IMessage and help to introduce. Users introduce specific needs-are on the lookout for co-founders, mentors, colleagues or investors-AI makes it easier to introduce based on mutual value. The concept attracts comparisons to LinkedIn, but with more personal experience.
“You publish photos on Instagram, publish movies on Tiktok and publish work posts on LinkedIn … And that’s where you have this microinfluuncer band,” Johnson added.
The application goals to avoid the superficial character of typical social platforms. Hargrow emphasized that although aesthetics often dominates on Instagram and the content virus drives tabktok, Number It is intentional, deliberate contacts.
“We are not trying to replace relationships in the real world-we are going to make it easier for people to find the right relationships,” said Hargrow.
Parable projects carried out before the seeded (*3*)Funding roundwhich included participation with Pear VC, DGB, VC, forty seventh Street, Radicle Impact, UNCASMON Projects and several famous Angels Investors, including the General Director of Reddit Steve Huffman and the founder of GPTZERO Edward Tian. Johnson called one meeting of investors “dinner for a million dollars”, reflecting how their pitch resonated with early supporters.
Although not the principal corporations, Johnson and Hargrow based pre-coreneuring through their podcast, through which they interviews the founders and leaders of C-Suite about less known elements of constructing the company-as accounting, business law and team formation.
Since the beginning of the series, over 32,000 messages between “friends” have been mentioned within the test phases. The initial goal of the application is the entrepreneurs market. Despite this, the founders hope to develop in finance, dating, education and health – ultimately striving to construct probably the most available warm network on the earth.
(Tagstranslate) VC (T) Yale (T) Venture Capital (T) Technology (T) APP
Technology
Tesla used cars offers rapidly increased in March

The growing variety of Tesla owners puts their used vehicles on the market, because consumers react to the political activities of Elon Musk and the worldwide protests they were driven.
In March, the variety of used Tesla vehicles listed on the market at autotrader.com increased rapidly, Sherwood News announcedCiting data from the house company Autotrader Cox Automotive. The numbers were particularly high in the last week of March, when on average over 13,000 used Teslas was replaced. It was not only a record – a rise of 67% in comparison with the identical week of the yr earlier.
At the identical time, the sale of latest Tesla vehicles slowed down even when EV sales from other brands increases. In the primary quarter of 2025, almost 300,000 latest EVs were sold in the USA According to the most recent Kelley Blue Book reporta rise of 10.6% yr on yr. Meanwhile, Tesla sales fell in the primary quarter, which is nearly 9% in comparison with the identical period in 2024.
Automaks resembling GM and Hyundai are still behind Tesla. But they see growth growth. For example, GM brands sold over 30,000 EV in the primary quarter, almost double the amount of a yr ago, in line with Kelley Blue Book.
(Tagstranslat) electric vehicles
-
Press Release1 year ago
U.S.-Africa Chamber of Commerce Appoints Robert Alexander of 360WiseMedia as Board Director
-
Press Release1 year ago
CEO of 360WiSE Launches Mentorship Program in Overtown Miami FL
-
Business and Finance10 months ago
The Importance of Owning Your Distribution Media Platform
-
Business and Finance1 year ago
360Wise Media and McDonald’s NY Tri-State Owner Operators Celebrate Success of “Faces of Black History” Campaign with Over 2 Million Event Visits
-
Ben Crump12 months ago
Another lawsuit accuses Google of bias against Black minority employees
-
Theater1 year ago
Telling the story of the Apollo Theater
-
Ben Crump1 year ago
Henrietta Lacks’ family members reach an agreement after her cells undergo advanced medical tests
-
Ben Crump1 year ago
The families of George Floyd and Daunte Wright hold an emotional press conference in Minneapolis
-
Theater1 year ago
Applications open for the 2020-2021 Soul Producing National Black Theater residency – Black Theater Matters
-
Theater10 months ago
Cultural icon Apollo Theater sets new goals on the occasion of its 85th anniversary