Technology
Will people really pay $200 a month for a new OpenAI chatbot?
On Thursday, OpenAI released a $200-a-month chatbot — and the AI community wasn’t quite sure what to make of it.
The company’s new ChatGPT Pro plan gives you access to “o1 pro mode,” which OpenAI says “uses more processing power to get the best answers to your toughest questions.” An improved version of OpenAI’s o1 reasoning model, o1 pro mode, should answer questions related to science, math and coding in a more “robust” and “comprehensive” way, OpenAI says.
Almost immediately, people began asking him to attract unicorns:
I asked ChatGPT mode o1 Pro to create a unicorn SVG.
(This is the model you’ve access to for $200 per month) pic.twitter.com/h9HwY3aYwU
— Rammy (@rammydev) December 5, 2024
And design a “crab-based” computer:
Finally introducing o1-pro for final use. pic.twitter.com/nX4JAjx71m
— Ethan Mollick (@emollick) December 6, 2024
And wax poetry concerning the meaning of life:
I just signed up for an OpenAI subscription for $200/month.
Please reply with inquiries to ask and I’ll re-post them on this thread. pic.twitter.com/oTQxbPxnoP— Garrett Scott
(@thegarrettscott) December 5, 2024
But many people on X didn’t seem convinced that o1 pro replies were within the $200 range.
“Has OpenAI provided any specific examples of hints that failed in regular o1 but succeeded in o1-pro?” he asked British computer scientist Simon Willison. “I want to see a single specific example that shows his advantage.”
It’s a reasonable query; in spite of everything, it’s the most costly chatbot subscription on the planet. The service comes with other advantages, reminiscent of removal of rate limits and unlimited access to other OpenAI models. But $2,400 a 12 months is not bullshit, and the worth proposition of the o1 pro mode specifically stays unclear.
It didn’t take long to search out the failure cases. O1 pro mode has problems with Sudoku and is interrupted by an optical illusion joke that is clear to any human being.
Both o1 and o1-pro failed here, probably still as a consequence of vision limitations (same with Sudoku puzzles)https://t.co/mAVK7WxBrq pic.twitter.com/O9boSv7ZGt
— Tibor Blaho (@btibor91) December 5, 2024
OpenAI’s internal tests show that o1 pro mode performs only barely higher than standard o1 for coding and math problems:
OpenAI conducted a “more stringent” evaluation in the identical tests to reveal the consistency of o1 pro mode: a model was only considered to have solved a query if it answered accurately in 4 out of 4 cases. But even in these tests the development was not dramatic:
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman once wrote that OpenAI is on the correct track path “towards an intelligence too cheap to measure” – he was forced to achieve this explain many times on Thursday that ChatGPT Pro is not for most people.
“Most users will be very happy with o1 at (ChatGPT) Plus!” – he said in X. “Almost everyone will be best served by our free tier or Plus tier.”
So who is that this for? Are there really people who’re willing to pay $200 a month to ask questions on toys like “Write a 3-paragraph essay about strawberries without using the letter “e”” Or “solve this Mathematical Olympiad task“? Will they happily part with their hard-earned money, with little guarantee that the usual o1 won’t have the option to satisfactorily answer the identical questions?
I asked Ameet Talwalkar, associate professor of machine learning at Carnegie Mellon and enterprise partner at Amplify Partners, for his opinion. “I think it’s a big risk to raise the price tenfold,” he told TechCrunch by email. “I think in just a few weeks we’ll have a much better sense of the appetite for this functionality.”
UCLA computer scientist Guy Van den Broeck was more candid in his assessment. “I don’t know if this price makes sense,” he told TechCrunch, “and whether expensive reasoning models will be the norm.”
o1 is “better than most people at most tasks” because, yes, humans only exist in disembodied, amnestic, multi-spin chat interfaces https://t.co/zbLY2BG5pQ
— Aidan McLau (@aidan_mclau) December 6, 2024
The generous view is that that is a marketing mistake. Describing o1 pro mode as one of the best at solving “toughest problems” doesn’t say much to potential customers. Neither unclear statements about how the model can “think longer” and reveal “intelligence”. As Willison points out, without concrete examples of the supposedly improved capabilities, it’s hard to justify paying more in any respect, much less ten times the value.
is such a fun, really helpful prompt for an AI model that costs $2,400 per 12 months
I hope Openai keeps these template tooltips until asi pic.twitter.com/JQ5vLKxWWR
— Dean W. Ball (@deanwball) December 6, 2024
As far as I do know, the target market is experts in specialized fields. OpenAI says it plans to supply a handful of medical researchers from “leading institutions” with free access to ChatGPT Pro, which is able to include o1 pro mode. Errors are of paramount importance in healthcare and, as Bob McGrew, former research director of OpenAI, stated: excellent on X, greater reliability might be the important unlock of o1 pro mode.
I play a bit with o1 and o1-pro.
They are excellent and a little weird. They are also not intended for most people more often than not. You really must have particularly difficult problems to unravel to get value from it. But if you’ve such problems, it’s a very serious matter.
— Ethan Mollick (@emollick) December 5, 2024
McGrew too he thought o1 pro mode is an example of what he calls “intelligence overhang”: users (and maybe modelers) do not know learn how to extract value from “additional intelligence” as a consequence of the basic limitations of a easy, text-based interface. As with other OpenAI models, the one strategy to interact with o1 pro mode is thru ChatGPT, and – in response to McGrew – ChatGPT just isn’t perfect.
However, it’s also true that $200 sets high expectations. Judging by its early reception on social media, ChatGPT Pro is not exactly a hit.
It grows “open” AI Google, Gemma, grows.
While Google I/O 2025 On Tuesday, Google removed Gemma 3N compresses, a model designed for “liquid” on phones, laptops and tablets. According to Google, available in a preview starting on Tuesday, Gemma 3N can support sound, text, paintings and flicks.
Models efficient enough to operate in offline mode and without the necessity to calculate within the cloud have gained popularity within the AI community lately. They will not be only cheaper to make use of than large models, but they keep privacy, eliminating the necessity to send data to a distant data center.
During the speech to I/O product manager, Gemma Gus Martins said that GEMMA 3N can work on devices with lower than 2 GB of RAM. “Gemma 3N shares the same architecture as Gemini Nano, and is also designed for incredible performance,” he added.
In addition to Gemma 3N, Google releases Medgemma through the AI developer foundation program. According to Medgemma, it’s essentially the most talented model to research text and health -related images.
“Medgemma (IS) OUR (…) A collection of open models to understand the text and multimodal image (health),” said Martins. “Medgemma works great in various imaging and text applications, thanks to which developers (…) could adapt the models to their own health applications.”
Also on the horizon there may be SignGEMMA, an open model for signaling sign language right into a spoken language. Google claims that Signgemma will allow programmers to create recent applications and integration for users of deaf and hard.
“SIGNGEMMA is a new family of models trained to translate sign language into a spoken text, but preferably in the American sign and English,” said Martins. “This is the most talented model of understanding sign language in history and we are looking forward to you-programmers, deaf and hard communities-to take this base and build with it.”
It is value noting that Gemma has been criticized for non -standard, non -standard license conditions, which in accordance with some developers adopted models with a dangerous proposal. However, this didn’t discourage programmers from downloading Gemma models tens of tens of millions of times.
.
(Tagstransate) gemma
President Donald Trump is predicted to sign the act on Take It Down, a bilateral law that introduces more severe punishments for distributing clear images, including deep wardrobes and pornography of revenge.
The Act criminalizes the publication of such photos, regardless of whether or not they are authentic or generated AI. Whoever publishes photos or videos can face penalty, including a advantageous, deprivation of liberty and restitution.
According to the brand new law, media firms and web platforms must remove such materials inside 48 hours of termination of the victim. Platforms must also take steps to remove the duplicate content.
Many states have already banned clear sexual desems and pornography of revenge, but for the primary time federal regulatory authorities will enter to impose restrictions on web firms.
The first lady Melania Trump lobbyed for the law, which was sponsored by the senators Ted Cruz (R-TEXAS) and Amy Klobuchar (d-minn.). Cruz said he inspired him to act after hearing that Snapchat for nearly a 12 months refused to remove a deep displacement of a 14-year-old girl.
Proponents of freedom of speech and a group of digital rights aroused concerns, saying that the law is Too wide And it will probably lead to censorship of legal photos, similar to legal pornography, in addition to government critics.
(Tagstransate) AI
While the general director of Microsoft, Satya Nadella, says that he likes podcasts, perhaps he didn’t take heed to them anymore.
That the treat is approaching at the end longer profile Bloomberg NadellaFocusing on the strategy of artificial intelligence Microsoft and its complicated relations with Opeli. To illustrate how much she uses Copilot’s AI assistant in her day by day life, Nadella said that as a substitute of listening to podcasts, she now sends transcription to Copilot, after which talks to Copilot with the content when driving to the office.
In addition, Nadella – who jokingly described her work as a “E -Mail driver” – said that it consists of a minimum of 10 custom agents developed in Copilot Studio to sum up E -Mailes and news, preparing for meetings and performing other tasks in the office.
It seems that AI is already transforming Microsoft in a more significant way, and programmers supposedly the most difficult hit in the company’s last dismissals, shortly after Nadella stated that the 30% of the company’s code was written by AI.
(Tagstotransate) microsoft
Is the key to increased makeup less powder? Sir John says yes – essence
“Protection of his public image was very important”: a psychologist, former assistant to testimony at the Diddy trial
Xbox just added 50+ classic activity games to Game Pass
Ebonie Ward has an official opening of 550 RMG in Atlanta
Salt-N-Pępa accuse UMG of minor retaliation in the fight for the property of “push it” a few months after Angie Stone claims against the same label
-
Press Release1 year agoU.S.-Africa Chamber of Commerce Appoints Robert Alexander of 360WiseMedia as Board Director
-
Press Release1 year agoCEO of 360WiSE Launches Mentorship Program in Overtown Miami FL
-
Business and Finance12 months agoThe Importance of Owning Your Distribution Media Platform
-
Business and Finance1 year ago360Wise Media and McDonald’s NY Tri-State Owner Operators Celebrate Success of “Faces of Black History” Campaign with Over 2 Million Event Visits
-
Ben Crump1 year agoAnother lawsuit accuses Google of bias against Black minority employees
-
Theater1 year agoTelling the story of the Apollo Theater
-
Ben Crump1 year agoHenrietta Lacks’ family members reach an agreement after her cells undergo advanced medical tests
-
Ben Crump1 year agoThe families of George Floyd and Daunte Wright hold an emotional press conference in Minneapolis
-
Theater1 year agoApplications open for the 2020-2021 Soul Producing National Black Theater residency – Black Theater Matters
-
Theater12 months agoCultural icon Apollo Theater sets new goals on the occasion of its 85th anniversary