He is a spoiled brat of the inner circle of the magician, opening the thumb with Donald Trump’s “Tatus”, seemingly remaining a privileged son.

A jealous older brother Steve Bannon, a former adviser to Trump, who once enjoyed the same close president, declared war with the younger, richer Nemesis a couple of months ago, swearing that he banished him on January 20.

But this date has passed, and Elon is still standing, often alongside the president.

However, this week, the General Director of Tesla could go too far. Musk undermined Trump’s announcement on Tuesday about an investment price $ 500 billion in the infrastructure of artificial intelligence, claiming that supporters of the “Stargate project” only a fraction of the proposed investments price $ 500 billion.

He even published a joke This suggested that the directors were burning Crack “to come up with the number of $ 500 billion for Stargate.”

Bannon saw, telling Musk journalists, “he should not reverse what the president was already talking about. This is unacceptable and unsatisfactory. You see how he is out of control.”

Trump, when asked about the number of Musk’s failures at a press conference on Friday, seemed to move his arms.

“I mean that Elon does not like one of these people,” Trump replied, referring to musk contempt for the general director of OPENAI Altman itself, one of the primary investors of the Stargate project.

That’s all? No pink slip? Even insult? What does the President’s Musk have?

“It is obvious that he abused the proximity of the president,” Trump’s ally he said Politico. “The problem is that the president has no levers over him, and Elon gives zero f – s.”

As Politico noted: “It is very unusual for the senior adviser-Muska-in public to criticize the president’s initiatives, and his broadly favorable speculation in GOP circles about whether he and Trump will finally seem.”

But there are no signs of the upcoming breakup. Trump is unable to hide his feelings and although there have been reports that he has enough musk, the general director of Starlink retains almost unusual access to the president.

Musk even has an office in West Wing, during which he pilots the “Department of Government”, an advisory commission created by Trump to eliminate waste in the federal government.

“We are now working with him to understand his ideas – the ideas are innovative. Make done not so much,” said a political official of the White House.

Bannon called on the chief of staff of Susie Wiles to “sit (musk) down” and “immediate sorting”.

He should already know: no person puts Elon in the corner.

One of the latest executive orders of President Trump is to arouse serious slack and for a reason. New order entitled “Restoring truth and mental health to the history of America” He follows the Smithsonian institution particularly the National Museum of History and Culture of African American-conquering it consisting in pushing “a divisible, focused ideology on the race.”

But about this: the executive order ignores key facts about the history of America, akin to the founders’ fathers wrote slavery in the structure and announced enslaved people as three fifth people.

As Essence informed earlier, the order is about by JD Vance Vice President liable for reviewing the museum content and gives the internal secretary Doug Burgum the right to examine whether any monuments have been removed or modified “to consolidate a false reconstruction of America’s history.” In other words, direct effort is to rewrite history to match the president’s narrative – one which removes the influence of racism and black contribution to the nation.

In 2017, at the starting of his first term, Trump actually praised the African American Museum and culture, saying that “he was deeply proud, that there is now a museum that honors millions of African Americans and women who built our national heritage.” Now he conducts the effort to undermine the institution itself, which he once called the treasure. But historians and black leaders don’t withdraw. As Clarke put it: “Let’s be a bright, black story is America’s story. Every rhetoric that opposes this concept is not only incorrect, but grossly racist.”

Historians, supporters of civil rights and black political leaders shouldn’t have this. Here’s what that they had to say about the latest attempt to whiten history.

01

Advertisement

01
“A literal attack on Black America” ​​- Dr. Ibram X. Kendi

“Black Smithsonian, what his name is, is indeed one of the bits of the hearts of Black America. Also one of the bits of the heart in the whole nation.” Kendi, a well -known historian and creator, called Trump’s order “A literal attack on Black America itself” And he warned that this was part of a bigger strategy for starvation of black resource institutions. “For me it is part of the plan to starve those institutions that are already starving resources so that the only institutions that tell the story of America in fact tell political propaganda,” said Kendi for the Associated Press.

Advertisement

Advertisement

02

02
We don’t run or remove our history ” – Congress Chairman Black Caucus Yvette Clarke

“There is nothing brave or inappropriate in telling the truth. We reject the constant efforts of this administration to whiten the history of our nation.” Clarke and the Congress Black Club issued a powerful statement, condemning Trump’s order as “clearly funny”, emphasizing that it was Trump’s administration – not historians – that is distorting history, falsely accusing others of it. “We do not run or remove our history just because it makes us feel uncomfortable. We fully accept good, evil and ugly.”

Advertisement

Advertisement

03

03
“They want to deny slavery even existed” -morehouse College Professor, Clarissa Myrick-Harris

“It seems that we are heading in a direction in which there is even an attempt to deny that the institution of slavery existed at all, or that Jim Crow’s rights and racial violence against black communities, black families, black individuals.” Myrick-Harris, a professor of Morehouse College, warned that this movement concerns something greater than just museums-this is an attempt to erase the truth about the past of America.

Advertisement

Advertisement

04

Advertisement

04
“You can’t erase our past”- Rep. Jasmine Crockett

Rep. Jasmine Crockett condemned this movement, calling him a broader effort to erase marginalized voices from each the present and the past. “The first Trump removes all reference about the diversity from the present – now he is trying to remove it from our history,” wrote Crockett on X. “Let me be completely clear – you can’t remove our past and you can’t stop us from fulfilling our future.”

Advertisement

Advertisement

05

05
“Museums exist to tell the whole story” – former president of Naacp Ben Ben Jezechny

“Attempts to tell the country’s general history always omit … and the place where we came to the possession of these museums so that we can better tell the full history of this country.” Jealous, he pushed himself to the concept that the recognition of the black history is dividing, arguing that museums dedicated to marginalized groups exist precisely because the mainstream history ignored them so long.

Advertisement

Advertisement

The United States of the Secretary for Health and Social Welfare, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., reversed the tenth anniversary CDC guidelines to recommend water fluoridation. The position applies to public health experts who claim that practice has reduced the occurrence of oral disease.

Kennedy, who has long been a skeptic of fluoride safety in the water, announced on Monday that he would order CDC (Center for Disease Control and Prevention) to stop the advisory advice for countries about water fluoridation, fulfilling the promise he made after the election of President Donald Trump in November last yr. On the identical day, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced that it will start reviewing “new scientific information” on the potential health threats of fluoride in drinking water, in keeping with the Associated Press. The Federal Agency is responsible for determining the utmost allowed fluoride level in public water systems.

As the perfect health secretary in the country, Kennedy doesn’t have the best to force states to stop the fluorisation of drinking water, but taking a step to order CDC reversal in this matter could have a major impact. . CDC Earlier he said that fluorine in drinking water strengthens tooth health and reduces the niches, replacing minerals lost over time for normal consumption.

The federal government has supported Water fluorization from 1950 and started to find out the rules on how much fluoride needs to be added to drinking water in 1962.

Public health experts questioned that there’s a threat to the health of fluoride in drinking water, especially considering the fluoride level allowed for 0.7 milligrams of fluoride per liter of water. Revelation of recommendations and potentially reduction or elimination of water fluoridation concerns a very negative impact on health supporters who’re afraid of black and brown communities.

King said that eliminating the usage of fluoride in drinking water, combined with a disproportionate lack of access to healthcare, may prove harmful to black and brown American children and adults.

“These populations are particularly threatened due to the limitation of dental insurance, and the lack of available dental suppliers. The increased incidence of the dental recess and the occurrence of expensive conditions that can be prevented can be the result,” he explained.

Scientific data show that the differences in the health of the oral cavity amongst black children have existed for years, despite the intervention of public fluoridation of drinking water in their communities. According to Study from the National Institutes of Health“Although the availability of insurance has increased, research indicates that it remains unused by the African American community.”

There are also other aspects that could be available apart from access to insurance and care. “Socio-cultural factors also affect the way African Americans experience oral health, from the patient’s relationship with the value determined on the health of the oral cavity,” notes the NIH study. “African Americans have a fragile history with the medical community, and sometimes they show evidence of distrust for doctors. This distrust can lead to the avoidance of African Americans.”

Without the intervention of fluoridation, public health experts are afraid that the health of the Black Americans may worsen.

Administrator EPA Lee Zeldin praised Kennedy’s move about water fluoridation and said that the brand new review of the agency would inform her “future steps”.

“Secretary Kennedy has long been at the forefront of this problem. His spokeswoman played a key role in our decision to review the threats associated with exposure to fluorine, and we are involved in cooperation with him, using solid sciences when we develop our mission of human health and the environment,” he said.