Connect with us

Politics and Current

Trump’s first-term tariffs did little to impact the economy, but this time may be different

Published

on

Donald Trump, Donald Trump tariffs, Immigration and tariffs, tariffs on Canada and Mexico, Donald Trump and immigration, migrant crisis, Trump administration, theGrio.com

WASHINGTON (AP) — Donald Trump loved to impose tariffs on foreign goods during his first presidency. However, their impact was barely noticeable across the economy, even when the aftershocks were pronounced in individual industries.

Records show they never fully delivered on the factory work they promised him. They did not trigger the avalanche of inflation that critics feared.

But this time it was his customs risks may be different.

Advertisement

The president-elect is talking about taking much greater motion — on a possible scale that creates greater uncertainty about whether he’ll do what he says and what the consequences might be.

“I mean, there will be a lot more tariffs, that’s pretty clear,” said Michael Stumo, CEO of the Coalition for a Prosperous America, a gaggle that supports import taxes to help domestic production.

The president-elect posted on social media on Monday that he would impose a 25% tariff on all goods imported from Mexico and Canada on his first day in office until those countries satisfactorily stop illegal immigration and the flow of illegal drugs comparable to fentanyl into the United States . States.

These tariffs could essentially blow up the North American trade pact negotiated by Trump’s team during his first term.

Advertisement

Chinese imports will be subject to additional tariffs of 10% until Beijing stops producing materials used to produce fentanyl, Trump wrote.

Democrats and business groups warn of dangers from Trump’s tariff threat

Business groups were quick to warn rapidly growing inflationone sec President of Mexico Claudia Sheinbaum said it might oppose the move by imposing tariffs on U.S. products. House Democrats have advanced laws to strip the president of the ability to unilaterally apply tariffs in such a drastic manner, warning that they might likely lead to higher prices for cars, shoes, housing and groceries.

Sheinbaum said Wednesday that her administration was already working on an inventory of possible retaliatory tariffs “if it comes to that.”

“The economics department is already preparing it,” Sheinbaum said. “If tariffs are introduced, Mexico will raise them. “This is a technical exercise that will also benefit Mexico,” she said, suggesting that her country impose targeted import tariffs on U.S. goods in sensitive areas.

Advertisement

Similarly, Canadian government has also begun to consider retaliatory tariffs if Trump takes motion.

House Democrats introduced a bill Tuesday that will require congressional approval from the president to impose tariffs over claims of a national emergency, a largely symbolic motion given Republicans have taken control of each the House and Senate.

“This legislation would enable Congress to limit this sweeping, emergency power and impose necessary congressional oversight before any president – ​​Democrat or Republican – could indiscriminately raise costs for the American people through tariffs,” said Rep. Suzan DelBene, D-Wash.

But for Trump, tariffs are actually a proven tool that seems less politically controversial, even when the mandate he received in November’s election largely included curbing inflation.

Advertisement

The tariffs he imposed on China during his first term were continued by President Joe Biden, a Democrat, who even expanded tariffs and restrictions on the world’s second-largest economy. Biden administration officials have considered removing Trump’s tariffs to reduce inflationary pressures, but have found that unlikely to help significantly.

The tariffs were “so new and unique that they freaked everyone out in 2017,” Stumo said, but the U.S. and other countries now see them as a part of a policy toolkit.

Trump’s first-term tariffs had a moderate impact on the economy

Trump imposed tariffs on solar panels and washing machines in early 2018, moves that may have pushed up prices in these sectors, although additionally they coincided with plans to open washer plants in Tennessee and South Carolina.

His administration also imposed tariffs on steel and aluminum, including on allies. He then raised tariffs on China, leading to a trade conflict and a limited 2020 deal that failed to materialize generate promised Chinese purchases of American goods.

Advertisement

However, the dispute modified relations with China as more American firms searched for alternative suppliers in other countries. Economic research additionally they found that the United States may have sacrificed a few of its “soft power” as the Chinese population began watching fewer American movies.

The Federal Reserve has kept inflation roughly on the right track, but factory construction spending has never increased in a way that will suggest sustained manufacturing job growth. Separate economic research found that the tariff war with China had no economic effect on communities harmed by offshoring, but it helped Trump and Republicans in those communities politically.

When Trump first became president in 2017, the federal government collected $34.6 billion in tariffs, duties and charges. That total greater than doubled under Trump to $70.8 billion in 2019, according to data from the Office of Management and Budget.

While this sum may seem significant, it was relatively small compared to the overall economy. According to the Bureau of Economic Analysis, America’s gross domestic product is currently $29.3 trillion. Total tariffs collected in the United States would amount to just below 0.3% of GDP.

Advertisement
Did Zendaya's viral moment at the 2015 Oscars start the CROWN Act? Law Roach thinks so

Trump wants way more far-reaching tariffs in the future

Trump’s latest tariffs are much higher and will have a way more significant impact.

If Mexico, Canada and China faced additional tariffs proposed by Trump on all goods imported into the United States, this could amount to roughly $266 billion in taxes collected, and this figure doesn’t assume any trade disruptions or retaliation from other countries . countries. The cost of those taxes would likely be borne by American families, importers, and domestic and foreign firms in the form of upper prices or lower profits.

Former Biden administration officials have expressed concerns that firms could use Trump’s tariffs – if imposed – as a reason to raise prices. This would reflect price increases by many firms in 2022, made possible by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, which raised food and energy prices and gave firms the opportunity to further raise their very own prices.

“I’m very concerned about complete, massive tariffs on more than just China that give companies cover to raise prices,” said Jen Harris, a former Biden White House official who’s now director of the Economic and Society Initiative at the Department of Economics and Society at the William and Society Foundation Hewlett Flora.

But Trump hasn’t really explained what might prompt him to roll back the tariffs and declare victory. Instead, its threats create a way of uncertainty as firms and countries wait for details to work out what all of it might mean.

Advertisement

“We know the key economic policy priorities of the new Trump administration, but we don’t know how or when they will be implemented,” said Greg Daco, chief U.S. economist at EY-Parthenon.

This article was originally published on : thegrio.com
Advertisement

Politics and Current

Trump removes truck drivers who don’t speak English

Published

on

By

Truck Driver, Arrest, Crime, Decapitating Woman


Truck drivers can have to pass the CDL exam and test that they will speak English. According to the Secretary for Transport, Sean Duffy signed a directive enabling the American Department of Transport To remove truck drivers who are usually not fluent in English. The transfer of Duffya directly responds to the ordinance of President Donald Trump on April 28.

According to the order, Trump directed a seek for testing of proficiency in English and law enforcement policy. In 2016, under the rule of former President Barack Obama, the Federal Safety Administration of a motor carrier (FMCS) removed the penalty for putting drivers for serving for violation of federal proficiency in English. Obama’s administration softened punishment for a quote.

However, Trump’s executive order changes him back to forcing drivers from the road.

Advertisement

“The policy of my administration is the support of American trucks and protecting our roads by enforcing the joint English language requirement in English and removing unnecessary regulatory loads that undermine the working conditions of American truck drivers.” Trump states in his executive orderadding that “it will help to provide a safe, safe and efficient car carrier industry.”

Fears of truck drivers who speak English because the second language

American Truck Association He praised Trump for a brand new punishment In accordance with the order within the statement.

“Thank you to Trump’s administration for the response to our fears regarding the uneven application of this existing regulation, and we are waiting for cooperation with FMCS and the law enforcement authorities at the objective, coherent and effective standard of enforcement.”

However, others are afraid that the brand new guidelines will result in discrimination on the road, because law enforcement agencies resolve who to stop to perform an proficiency test in English.

Advertisement

According to data from the Transport Department, almost 4% of CDL owners are limited in English proficiency. It is estimated that 16% discover as immigrants.

“Is it someone who has an accent, or maybe someone who wears a turban?” Mannirmal Kur, senior federal policy manager at Sikh Coalition, said: “An order outside the service may be potentially unemployment for a truck driver … With a potentially limited appeal.”

(Tagstranslate) Trump Administration

Advertisement
This article was originally published on : www.blackenterprise.com
Continue Reading

Politics and Current

The mayor of Newark Ras Baraka released after arrest in protests at the Immigration Center: “I did nothing bad” – essence

Published

on

By

The mayor of Newark Ras Baraka dismissed after the arrest in the protest at the Immigration Center:

Photo of Ken Betancur/AFP by Getty Images

Advertisement

The mayor of Newark, New Jersey, Barak Ras, passed free on Friday evening after spending hours in federal detention after arrest in a controversial immigration detention in Delaney Hall – an object that fought to refrain from opening in his city.

Barak was arrested during the protest in the newly opened ice retention site, which, as with other critics, has no appropriate permits and inspections, According to CNN. Standing in front of the crowd of fans after releasing it, he simplified: “In fact I did nothing wrong.”

Although he did not take details about the arrest – legal advice – the mayor clearly stated that he was standing in Solidarity with the community, including immigrants, which, he claims, are unfairly targeted.

Advertisement

“Everyone here, each of us, does not care what origin you come from, what nationality, what language you speak,” he said. “At some point we have to stop these people from causing the division between us.”

The barrack, which in 2025 is applying after the replacing the governor Phil Murphy, was open in his opposition to the private penal complex of 1000 led by the Geo Group. He claims that he should never open, pointing to unsolved fears regarding security and the lack of appropriate permits to the city.

The mayor’s wife, Linda Barak, accused the federal government of aiming at her husband. “They didn’t arrest anyone else. They didn’t ask anyone to leave. They wanted to make an example from the mayor,” she said.

According to ABC News, there was a barrack accused of entering– Depot, which results in 30 days in prison and a advantageous of USD 500. He was released without Bond after a brief speech before judge Andre Espinos.

Advertisement

Federal officials claim that the mayor ignored the repetitive warnings about leaving the rooms. USE temporary lawyer Alina Habba published on X this barrack “He decided to ignore the law.” But the video from the stage shows that the barraka was arrested after returning to public property outside the gate.

He wasn’t alone. It was joined by members of the Congress Delegation in New Jersey – including representatives of Bonnie Watson Coleman, Lamonica Mciver and Rob Menendez Jr. – who said they were “pushed”, “pushed” and “managed” by federal agents who tried to accompany the mayor.

“They just caught and took him,” said Watson Coleman, adding ABC News, adding that there was no clear explanation at that point.

Mciver, who said that she and others were physically treated during the try to de -escallion, called the unacceptable situation.

Advertisement

“We were simply rough handling-doses,” she said. “Nobody raised his fists to hit us, but they pushed us, pushed us and removed us to get to the mayor.”

The Internal Security Department adopted a unique view by accusing the members of the Congress of “storming” the object. Deputy Secretary Tric McLaughlin said in an announcement that if a visit was asked, it might be awarded.

Governor Phil Murphy called the arrest of the barracks “unfair”, noting that the state has already banned private immigration centers – and that the Murphy administration is fighting to take care of this right in court.

“The mayor of Barak is an exemplary official who has always defended our most sensitive neighbors,” said Murphy. “I call on his immediate release by federal law enforcement agencies.”

Advertisement

US Senator Cory Booker, who once took place as a mayor, called the arrest “a disturbing, unnecessary and indicating tactics undermining the safety and safety of our communities.”

Regardless of whether the case is moving forward in court, critics say that it was not about an immigration plant – it was about sending a message. And they consider that the mayor was directed to stand up.

Advertisement
This article was originally published on : www.essence.com
Continue Reading

Politics and Current

Donald Trump issued a warning after threatening the “serious investigation” in the case of Bruce Springsteen, Beyoncé and Oprah Winfrey

Published

on

By

Donald Trump Issued Warning After Threatening to Launch

President Donald Trump demands a “serious investigation” on celebrities corresponding to Bruce Springsteen, Beyoncé, Oprah Winfrey and Bono, allegedly that they received illegally for the support of the former vice chairman of Kamali Harris during her presidential campaign in 2024.

In late night, Trugsocial Trump thought that these primary artists personally received Harris support and that their payments were crowded as entertainment fees for his or her performances during her events in the campaign. He didn’t publish any evidence to support these allegations.

“How much Kamala Harris paid Bruce Springsteen for her bad performance during her president’s campaign? Why did he accept this money, if she is such a fan? Is it not a serious and illegal contribution to the campaign? What about Beyoncé? wrote.

Advertisement
Donald Trump issued a warning after threatening the
Oprah Winfrey, Donald Trump and Beyoncè (photos: Getty Images)

“I intend to call for a serious investigation in this matter. Candidates cannot pay for support, what Kamala did in terms of paying for entertainment. In addition, it was a very expensive and desperate effort to artificially build her rare crowds. It is not legal! For these non -patriotic artists,” it was only a corruption and unforgettable technique to accept the decided.

Just a few hours after this post, Trump distinguished Beyoncé, citing “News”, which accused her of paying $ 11 million for entering the stage and “quick support” of Kamali.

“According to press reports, Beyoncé received a salary of $ 11,000,000 for entering the stage, quickly supported Kamala and go to a loud boy of the fact that she never performed, even one song! Remember that democrats and Kamala illegally paid their millions of dollars for not giving Kamala fully abandoned support. This is illegal election teaching at the highest level! Illegal contribution to the campaign! To read.

Beyoncé rarely reacts on to criticism or online controversy, maintaining a distance that maintains it greater than most public feations. This lack of engagement makes her fans take a defense coat, often with even greater intensity.

Beyoncé fans, often known as Beyhive, is known and protective. They historically mobilized massively to defend it against perceived lessons, often flooding the social media of Emoji bee critics and strict reactions.

Advertisement

“Beyhive will not be happy !!!! it’s a fight, I think Trump won’t win!”, One person he said on X.

Mother Beyoncé, Tina Knowles, condemned these allegations a few months ago, statement Her daughter “did not receive a penny for a speech in the rally of the vice president of the presidential Kamalis candidate in Houston. In fact, she paid for her own flights for her team and her team and the total glam.”

Campaign financial records show Harris’s campaign was paid by the Beyoncé production company, Parkwood Production Media LLC, USD 165,000 monthly after the event in Houston.

Oprah Winfrey and her team also previously stated that Winfrey received “no personal fees” after Harris’s campaign paid her a production company, Harpo Productions, $ 1 million in October last 12 months to cover the costs of the production company in the Winfrey town hall helped collect in Michigan.

Advertisement

“The campaign has paid for the production costs of” Unite for America “, a live event that took place on September 19 outside Detroit, Mich.”, Spokesman for Harpo he said In a statement for diversity. “Oprah Winfrey was not at any time during the campaign, did not receive a personal fee or received Harpo fee.”

Trump’s accusations appear shortly after intensive criticism of Springsteen at a concert on the European leg of his “Land, Hope, Dreams Tour”. Springsteen he said Members of the audience in Manchester in England that America “is currently in the hands of corrupt, incompetent and treacherous administration.”

The president went after Springsteen a day later, vocation him “intrusive, disgusting jerk” and “dried” plum “of Rocker”.

“I see that the very overrated Bruce Springsteen goes to a foreign country to speak badly about the President of the United States. I never liked him, he never liked his music or radical leftist policy and, what is important, he is not a talented guy – simply a intrusive, shocking jerk, who zealously supported the cross, Joe Biden, in incompetent stupid, and ours The worst thing that was to destroy our country. Then we will all see how it goes for him! “

Advertisement

But the difficult Springsteen didn’t surrender his slack. According to Los Angeles, Times only doubled for termination at the second concert in Manchester on May 17.

“In my house they persecute people for the right to freedom of speech and express their opposition. This is happening now,” Springsteen he said. “In America, the richest men satisfy, abandoning the poorest children in the world to illness and death. This is happening. In my country they derive sadistic pleasure from the pain that they do to loyal American workers.”

After the election in 2024, the Harris campaign refused to pay personal fees to artists or performers. Campaign advisers told Deadline that the provisions regarding campaign financing required them to cover certain costs of results related to travel or production, but emphasized that the campaign warned all regulations regarding the financing of the “religious” campaign.

“We don’t pay. We’ve never paid any artist and contractor. We never paid fees to this person,” Adrienne Elrod, senior adviser and senior spokesman for Harris, It was found. “There are regulations that must be observed that we have religiously followed this campaign.”

Advertisement

(Tagstotransate) beyonc u00e9

This article was originally published on : atlantablackstar.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending