Kim Kardashian has once more found herself at the center of a social media storm after stepping out in a rare, iconic piece from the British royal collection: Princess Diana’s Attallah cross necklace.

Fans claim the billionaire mother of 4 is “obsessed” with famous deceased celebrities and feels she just isn’t honoring their legacy by wearing their items.

Known for her love of statement and historic fashion pieces, Kardashian recently wore a surprising amethyst and diamond pendant to the Art+Film Gala at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art (LACMA) on November 2.

Wearing a white Gucci gown with a plunging neckline to her navel, Kardashian let the cross rest between her neckline – a glance that immediately caught the Internet’s attention.

The Attallah Cross, product of gold, silver, amethyst and diamonds, became one among Princess Diana’s signature pieces. Diana famously wore it in 1987 with a Catherine Walker dress at a charity event.

The necklace was named after the original owner, Naim Attallah, who often lent it to Diana but kept it in the family until Kardashian won the bidding war and added the historic item to her collection.

Although she obtained the cross almost two years ago, in January 2023, she didn’t wear it in public until her forty fourth birthday, and has now worn it twice outside the home. It was first shared by Lexy Roche, image director at Maison Margiela, who posted a video on her Instagram Story of Kardashian wearing a black and purple tulle gown with an identical accessory: According to to the city and the countryside.

A recent public appearance at the gala has reignited conversations about Kardashian’s fascination with items associated with deceased celebrity icons, prompting criticism from fans who consider her approach lacks sensitivity.

Everyday fashion bomb sent clip from the SKIMS owner’s Saturday appearance on Instagram, where the comments section quickly filled with opinions.

“I don’t know why, but something about it just doesn’t sit right with me,” one person wrote, expressing an opinion that touched many individuals.

Another comment read: “What is her obsession with dead people cases?” and yet one more added: “I don’t like the fact that this family has so many personal things from deceased people.”

One person called Kardashian’s attachment to the late princess “very strange,” while one other said: “You look good Kim, but you know Diana won’t like you.”

These reactions reflect growing concern amongst fans who feel that Kardashian’s decision to wear historical items, especially those belonging to deceased celebrities, is exploitative somewhat than respectful.

Interestingly, not everyone condemned Kardashian’s style decisions. Some social media users defended her, saying that she looked great, and others identified that collecting memorabilia from iconic characters is nothing latest in the world of stars.

“Drake does the same thing, buying items from dead legends,” one user commented, while one other noted, “Michael Jackson did the same thing – nothing new there.”

The necklace is really unique. According to Attallah’s son, Ramsay Attallah, Princess Diana was the only person to wear such an outfit before Kardashian.

“When I was growing up, we always had it on the table at Christmas lunch, but it was never worn by anyone other than Diana, and it hasn’t been seen in public since she died,” he said last yr.

This is not the first time Kardashian has faced criticism for wearing clothes with a wealthy history associated with iconic figures.

At the 2022 Met Gala, she wore a Marilyn Monroe gown that read “Happy Birthday, Mr. President,” a sheer, rhinestone-encrusted gown that Monroe wore to serenade President John F. Kennedy on his forty fifth birthday. birthday in 1962. At that point, the dress scandalized the then conservative America with the illusion of nudity because its fabric was encrusted with over 2,500 crystals.

After Kardashian appeared in the dress, the dress was allegedly destroyed. Owners reported that the fabric had stretched, latest holes had formed, and plenty of of the rhinestones were either barely attached or had fallen off completely.

“The dress is definitely not the same – it has been destroyed” – Molly Elizabeth Agnew of Eternal Goddess.com he stated.

Despite essentially destroying the historic garment, Kardashian wore one other of Monroe’s green sequin Norman Norell gowns at the 1962 Golden Globes – illustrating her determination to make a press release, even when it means pushing the boundaries of preserving historic fashion .

She posted a photograph of her dress on social media, writing partially: “While searching for the hand-beaded Jean Louis gown I wore to the gala, I discovered that @heritageauctions had Marilyn’s iconic green sequin gown. During my research, I discovered that the owner of the Golden Globe Award she received that evening was none aside from my friend @jeffleatham“

She continued: “I saw it all as a sign of the alignment of all the stars. “Being able to tap into my inner Marilyn in this way on such a special night will forever be one of the greatest privileges of my life.”

In addition to Marilyn Monroe, Kardashian’s collection also includes jade and diamond bracelets that after belonged to Elizabeth Taylor, an actress whom she openly admires and considers her personal muse. According to to Hello! Warehouse.

Kardashian purchased Taylor’s bracelets at auction in 2011, signaling her longtime interest in acquiring jewelry from beloved Hollywood legends.

Each of those acquisitions reflects Kardashian’s ambition to attach with – and maybe embody – fashion icons of the past. But as her collection of deceased celebrity memorabilia grows, so does public opinion, leaving people wondering whether it’s obsession, exploitation, a high-end collector’s love, or, as someone said, “weird.”

It’s been a few weeks since Denzel Washington fans saw the actor running away from paparazzi in New York City. The shocking incident was captured on video and bears little resemblance to his demeanor in one other interview through which Washington appeared exasperated.

The same moment through which the seemingly hot-tempered artist was interviewed in 2010 resurfaced and caused more shock.

A fan reposted an ungainly interview through which Washington sits across from a reporter and asks him about the upcoming film “Unstoppable,” to which he responds tersely.

“How did it feel to climb on a moving train?” she asked, to which he replied, “Eh, you know… you get used to it.”

He then says, “You have had some amazing co-workers who stand out. When you look back at some of the most amazing talents, who do you think stands out?” and Washington replies, “I do not look back. What for?

The interviewer continued speaking, maintaining a skilled calm. “So what do you do – is there someone you want to work on, something you still want to achieve?” she asked. “You know I want to have a good day today,” he said. “I want to achieve it and I strive for it every day.”

She then asked Washington if winning two Oscars was the highlight of his profession. He replied, “We’re back in the past again.” Giggling, she said, “because I want to show all these wonderful things.”

At this point, while talking to herself, Washington was the primary to interrupt her, saying, “You have a specific plan. Okay, just tell me what you want and maybe I can help you with it. Yes, I won two Oscars.”

He softens a bit when he starts talking about the talent that Angelina Jolie and Dakota Fanning have. However, Washington later points out that the interviewer desires to proceed dwelling on his previous works, which seems to annoy him.

She asks him about Alonzo Harris and dealing with him on “Training Day,” the film that won Washington his second Academy Award.

“Training day!? Yes, yes, it was good,” he said, then smiled sarcastically and added: “You keep going back to the past. Have you cracked your case?

Before hanging up, the interviewer shakes his hand to rise up and leave, and he replies, “Now you’ve gotten to send me this clip. I need to see what you connected. It’s pressure.

Fans were shocked by Washington’s behavior within the video, with some saying he was a bit rough. One person said: “There is not any must treat someone this fashion. It doesn’t matter how big you might be…”

Someone else wrote: “He has a nasty streak. No wonder he can play such characters with surprising intensity.”

Some fans offered other perspectives. One said: “The interviewer desired to do a profession retrospective, probably because she really admired his body of labor. Denzel was there to hype up his movie, it was business and I feel that is why he was frustrated. Talking about Training Day won’t make you go see a movie about his runaway train.

Another wrote: “Actors and their studios comply with a majority of these interviews to advertise a newly or recently released movie. Don’t let the interviewer, talk show host or anyone else sit and reflect on the actors’ past work.”

The interviewer Leila McKinnonhe detailed what happened during the awkward interview during the press release. She was flown into the town for an eight-minute interview she thought would almost never occur.

“I’m sitting in a hotel corridor with dozens of reporters from all over the world. And wait for hours,” she said within the article Australian outlet, baby.

She continued: “Crowds of young publicists are flying up and down, barely concealing their panic. “He came,” I hear considered one of them whisper, “But he doesn’t want to leave the room.” An hour later, as one other runs past, I hear a breathless, “I want more tea.”

As she waited patiently, Washington finally appeared: “Huge, graceful, gorgeous, and full of attitude (and probably tea).”

The same awkward interaction occurred between Washington and a group of photographers from the Museum of Modern Art in New York. While posing for photos, someone in the gang shouts, “Show us some love.”

The “Fences” actor walks as much as the guy and says, “Yo, yo, yo… put it down. You’re talking to a man now, he said. “I heard you. You talk about “showing love” and this and that. How about… respect me?

One of the paparazzi guests continued: “We always do this.” Washington replied with an annoyed look on his face, “I said I’d see you when I get out. What part of this don’t you understand?”

He added: “Or not. We can do it one other way. I can do that in additional ways than one, y’all. Can you’re feeling me?

Jordan’s Chiles will likely always remember the 2024 Summer Olympics in Paris. While Chiles’ profession reached latest heights this summer, the gymnast suffered a “significant blow” when Romania’s team challenged her bronze medal, arguing that it must have been awarded to her competitor, Ana Barbosu.

Forced to return her medal, the Team USA gymnast is still working to maneuver forward after a heartbreaking title change. In a recent interview with CNNChiles explained how this example taught her the importance of “standing your ground.”

“Things can be really difficult in your life and they can be taken away from you and you’re going to have to deal with that and understand that you have to fight for what you’re fighting for,” she told the publication. “And I’ve learned the same thing over the last three or four months that I’ve been leaving Paris.”

As theGrio previously reported, Chiles and her lawyers filed an appeal in September regarding the reallocation of the bronze medal. At the 2024 Olympics, the gymnast won a bronze medal after her coach Cecile Landi made an on-floor appeal. However, shortly thereafter, the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) overturned her coach’s initial appeal, saying it was received 4 seconds after the one-minute cut-off date for submitting scoring queries.

Featured Stories

“CAS violated Chiles’ fundamental ‘right to be heard’ by refusing to consider video evidence showing that her inquiry was timely submitted – which is in direct contradiction to the findings in the CAS decision,” her lawyers said in a press release. in response to People magazine.

“We are not going to give up that easily and we will continue to look for video footage and other things,” her coach added on the time of the ruling.

Describing the choice as “unfair”, Chiles explained how the CAS ruling affected not only her but “everyone who supported (her) journey”. The situation left the Team USA star the victim of “unsolicited racial attacks on social media,” which, while hurtful, wasn’t the worst of it.

“The biggest thing that was taken away from me was the popularity of who I used to be. Not only my sport, but additionally who I’m. For me, all the things that happened was not in regards to the medal, but in regards to the color of my skin,” she said during her speech at this yr’s Forbes Power Women’s Summit. “I made history and I’ll at all times make history by doing something I rightly did. I followed the foundations, my coach followed the foundations.

Chiles says that with the support of her community and friends like Simone Biles, she has learned to just accept each step of her journey.