Technology
Microsoft and A16Z are putting aside their differences and joining hands in protest against artificial intelligence regulations

The two biggest forces in two deeply intertwined tech ecosystems – large incumbents and startups – have taken a break from counting money and together they demand this from the federal government to stop even considering regulations that might affect their financial interests or, as they prefer to call it, innovation.
“Our two companies may not agree on everything, but it’s not about our differences,” writes this group with very different perspectives and interests: A16Z founders, partners Marc Andreessen and Ben Horowitz, and Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and president/director legal affairs Brad Kowal. A very cross-sectional gathering, representing each big business and big money.
But they are supposedly taking care of little boys. That is, all the businesses that may be impacted by this latest try to abuse the regulations: SB 1047.
Imagine being charged a fee for improperly disclosing an open model! A16Z General Partner Anjney Midha he called it a “regressive tax” on startups and a “blatant regulatory capture” by Big Tech firms that, unlike Midha and his impoverished colleagues, could afford the lawyers needed to comply with the regulations.
Except that was all disinformation spread by Andreessen Horowitz and other wealthy interests who actually stood to suffer as supporters of billion-dollar enterprises. In fact, small models and startups would only be barely affected since the proposed law specifically protected them.
It’s strange that the identical form of targeted carve-out for “Little Tech” that Horowitz and Andreessen routinely advocate for was distorted and minimized by the lobbying campaign they and others waged against SB 1047. (In an interview with the bill’s sponsor , California State Senator Scott Wiener talked about this whole thing recently on Disrupt.)
This bill had its problems, but its opposition greatly exaggerated compliance costs and didn’t significantly substantiate claims that it will chill or burden startups.
It’s a part of a longtime pattern in which Big Tech – to which, despite their stance, Andreessen and Horowitz are closely related – operates on the state level, where it could possibly win (as with SB 1047), while asking for federal solutions that it knows will won’t ever come, or which can have no teeth because of partisan bickering and congressional ineptitude on technical issues.
This joint statement of “political opportunity” is the second a part of the sport: After torpedoing SB 1047, they will say they did it solely to support federal policy. Never mind that we’re still waiting for a federal privacy law that tech firms have been pushing for a decade while fighting state laws.
What policies do they support? “A different responsible market approach”, in other words: down with our money, Uncle Sam.
Regulations needs to be based on a “science-based and standards-based approach, recognizing regulatory frameworks that focus on the use and misuse of technology” and should “focus on the risk of bad actors exploiting artificial intelligence.” This signifies that we must always not introduce proactive regulation, but quite reactive penalties when criminals use unregulated products for criminal purposes. This approach has worked great in this whole FTX situation, so I understand why they support it.
“The regulation should only be implemented if the benefits outweigh the costs.” It would take 1000’s of words to clarify all of the ways this idea expressed in this context is funny. But they are principally suggesting that the fox needs to be included on the henhouse planning committee.
Regulators should “allow developers and startups the flexibility to choose AI models to use wherever they build solutions, and not tilt the playing field in favor of any one platform.” This suggests that there may be some agenda requiring permission to make use of one model or one other. Since this is just not the case, it’s a straw man.
Here is a lengthy quote that I have to quote in full:
The right to education: Copyright goals to advertise the progress of science and the applied arts by extending protection to publishers and authors to encourage them to make recent works and knowledge available to the general public, but not on the expense of society’s right to learn from those works. Copyright law mustn’t be co-opted to suggest that machines needs to be prevented from using data – the premise of artificial intelligence – to learn in the identical way as humans. Unprotected knowledge and facts, whether or not contained in protected subject material, should remain free and accessible.
To be clear, the clear statement here is that software operated by billion-dollar corporations has the “right” to access any data since it should give you the chance to learn from it “in the same way as humans.”
First of all, no. These systems are not like people; they generate data in their training data that mimics human activity. These are complex statistical projection programs with a natural language interface. They haven’t any more “right” to any document or fact than Excel.
Second, the concept that “facts” – by which they mean “intellectual property” – are the one thing these systems are interested in, and that some type of fact-gathering cabal is working to forestall them, is an artificial narrative we have seen before. Perplexity made the “facts belong to everyone” argument in its public response to a lawsuit alleging systematic content theft, and its CEO Aravind Srinivas repeated that mistake to me on stage at Disrupt, as in the event that they were being sued for knowing tidbits just like the Earth’s distance from the Moon.
While this is just not the place to totally discuss this particular straw man argument, let me simply indicate that while facts are indeed free agents, there are real costs to how they are created – say, through original reporting and scientific research. This is why copyright and patent systems exist: not to forestall the wide sharing and use of mental property, but to encourage its creation by ensuring that it could possibly be assigned real value.
Copyright law is much from perfect and is more likely to be abused as often as used. However, this is just not “co-opted to suggest that machines should be prevented from using data” – it’s used to be sure that bad actors don’t bypass the worth systems we’ve got built around mental property.
This is a fairly clear query: let’s allow the systems we own, operate and take advantage of to freely use the worthwhile work of others without compensation. To be fair, this part is “in the same way as people” because people design, run and implement these systems, and these people don’t desire to pay for something they do not have to, and they don’t desire to. I don’t desire regulations to alter that .
There are many other recommendations in this small policy document, which were little question covered in greater detail in the versions sent on to lawmakers and regulators through official lobbying channels.
Some of the ideas are undoubtedly good, if slightly selfish: “fund digital literacy programs that help people understand how to use artificial intelligence tools to create and access information.” Good! Of course, the authors invest heavily in these tools. Support “Open Data Commons – collections of accessible data managed in the public interest.” Great! “Examine procurement practices to enable more startups to sell technology to the government.” Excellent!
But these more general, positive recommendations are something the industry sees yearly: invest in public resources and speed up government processes. These tasty but irrelevant suggestions are merely tools for the more vital ones I described above.
Ben Horowitz, Brad Smith, Marc Andreessen and Satya Nadella want the federal government to step back from regulating this lucrative recent development, let industry resolve which regulations are value compromising, and invalidate copyright laws in a way that kind of acts as a blanket reprieve for illegal or unethical practices that many imagine have enabled the rapid development of artificial intelligence. These are principles that are vital to them, whether children are acquiring digital skills or not.
Technology
The signal is the number one application in the Netherlands. But why?

The application signal for sending a privacy -oriented message flew high in Dutch application stores last month, often sitting at the top as the most steadily downloaded free application for iOS and Android in all categories, for data from many application tracking platforms akin to the sensor tower.
The application has experienced popularity over the years, often in response to Changes in politics in rivals akin to WhatsApp Or Geopolitical events. This is because Signal has set a reputation as a more friendly privacy option-it is served by the non-profit foundation (though based in the USA), not a personal company focused on data earning data. In addition, the signal tracks minimal metadata.
In 2025, along with the recent US president, who strengthened the warm Big Tech hug, it is not surprising that digital privacy tools have a moment – especially in Europe, which attracted the anger of President Trump.
But this time, the meaning of the signal in one very specific place-Holandia is particularly eye-catching.
IN Interview with Dutch newspaper de Telelegraaf last week, President signal Meredith Whittaker He noticed that the number of “new registrations” in the Netherlands was 25 this 12 months, even though it is not clear what the exact comparative period for this data is.
Asked why the Netherlands recorded such development, Whittaker pointed to the combination of things: “growing awareness of privacy, distrust of large technology and political reality in which people realize how sensitive digital communication can be,” said Whittaker.
Data provided to TechCrunch from the application intelligence company Appfigures Increase in Signal Signal in the Netherlands. According to its data, the signal was 365. Among the applications apart from the iPhone in the Netherlands on January 1 and didn’t appear on the list of the most significant general applications. Then, from around January 5, he began to climb the rankings, reaching the highest position until February 2.
The signal immersed and comes out of the lead during weeks, spending around mid -February at the top – including every single day from February 22. By digging deeper into the data, the AppFigures estimates that the total download in Apple and Google Applets in total in December 2024 jumped to 99,000 in January and increased to 233,000 to February – 958%.
While a part of this height could be assigned to a lower saturation signal than other markets, a continuing application position at the top in comparison with neighboring markets of comparable size.
“No other markets are approaching the Netherlands in terms of growth between December and February,” said AppFigures Techcrunch.
For comparison, from December in Belgium, download increased by over 250%, Sweden by 153%and dishes by 95%.
So why the signal can experience what one redditor called “The moment of mass adoption“In the Netherlands?
Clear signal
Give ZengerSenior Policy Advisor at Dutch Digital Rights Foundation Fragments of freedomHe said that even though it is difficult to point one specific reason, he is not surprised.
The last changes in the US have seen Large platform suppliers Adapt with the recent Trump administration, and this has retained a major public and media debate. Relying Europe from the technology of big private American corporations has turn out to be the point of interest of this debate.
“The Dutch are, like many others, very dependent on the infrastructure provided by extremely dominant technology companies, mainly from the USA,” said Zenger. “What does this mean, and the risk that results from it has been nicely demonstrated in the last few weeks. As a result, the public debate in the Netherlands was relatively sharp. Where in the past this problem was discussed only at the level “:” I feel that we are now conducting a debate at the higher levels: “.
In this context, society can mix dominance with data protection abuse. Since corporations akin to meta are frequently studied and fined in the field of information privacy practices, the signal could appear to be less evil: it is based on the US, but supported by a non-profit organization, which ensures encryption of each the content of the message and around it.
Vincent BöhreDirector of the Dutch Organization of Privacy Privacy firstHe also pointed to increased media relationships and a wider change of public opinion.
“Since a few months ago he was re-elected in the United States, in the Dutch-and European media, which seem to support Trump, there were many” Elon) Muska. “Articles criticizing X (previously Twitter) and Meta appear everywhere in the Dutch media, which leads to a change in Dutch public opinion: even people who have never really known or cared for privacy and security in social media, suddenly became interested in” friendly privacy “alternative, in particular the signal.”
Signal of intentions

While the Netherlands is only one market of 18 million people in the European population over 700 million, its increase in adoption can signal a wider trend throughout the continent, especially when governments try to cut back privacy barriers.
For example, Apple has recently pulled out comprehensive encryption from iCloud in Great Britain to counteract government efforts to put in a backdoor.
Speech Fr. Rightcon 25 In Taiwan, this week, Whittaker confirmed the unwavering Signal attitude regarding privacy.
“Signal position on this subject is very clear- we will not walk, falsify or otherwise disturb the solid guarantees of privacy and security that people rely on” Said Whittaker. “Regardless of whether this disturbance or backdoor is called scanning on the client’s side or removing the protection of encryption against one or the other, the features similar to what Apple has been forced to do in Great Britain”
Separately, in Interview with Swedish public broadcaster, Whittaker said that Signal wouldn’t follow the proposed Swedish law requiring application to send messages for storage.
“In practice, this means asking us to break encryption, which is the basis of our entire activity,” said Whittaker. “Asking us to store data would undermine all our architecture and we would never do it. We would prefer to completely leave the Swedish market. “
TechCrunch contacted to signal a comment, but he didn’t hear during the publication.
(Tagstotranslat) signal of the Netherlands
Technology
Gayle King announces participation in the space mission of all women

Gayle King will join the thirty first Blue Origin civil flight into space.
Gayle King announced that he was going to space. The host of the talk show during the day provided messages CBS MORNINGS.
King revealed Her participation in the thirty first Blue Origin flights, NS-31. Before discussing the details of the mission, she and her co -lecturers presented the video editing, which described her long -term fascination with travel travel.
In one clip, King said: “I am excited to watch the premiere at home in my pajamas.”
Her enthusiasm led to an invite with Blue Origin. The television personality will disappear from Crew from the whole familyIncluding an award -winning journalist Lauren Sánchez, award -winning Grammy singer Katy Perry and astronaut Aish Bowe.
Soon the explorer of the space admitted that she was hesitating at first.
“I don’t know how to explain at the same time terrified and excited,” said King.
To make a choice, King turned to a gaggle of family members, including her children and a detailed friend, Oprah Winfrey. She said that when her most trusted confidants approved, she was ready.
“When Kirby, Will and Oprah were fine, I was fine,” said King. “I thought Oprah would say no. She said: “I feel that when you don’t do it, if you all come back and also you had the opportunity to do it, you’ll kick.” She is right. “
King is not going to be the first television host who wandered into space with blue origin. In 2021, then-Good morning America Coheat Michael Strahan took part in the third civil flight Blue Origin. The former NFL star and the sender was delighted after returning, expressing how this experience gave him a brand new “perspective” in the world.
“I want to come back,” said Strahan.
Blue origin, Founded by Amazon Billionaire Jeff Bezos in 2000 is a non-public aviation company that focuses on sharing space travels for civilians and developing technology to explore the space long.
The upcoming flight of the king New Shepard It will probably be part of Blue Origin’s constant efforts to normalize civil space travel.
Technology
Instagram can turn the rollers in a separate application

Meta is occupied with an independent application for brief movies, Information He informed, citing an anonymous source, which he heard the boss on Instagram Adam Mosseri talked about the personnel project.
The project is reportedly called RAY code, which goals to enhance recommendations for brand new users and existing users in the US and to conclude one other three minutes of movies, the report quoted the source.
The finish line didn’t answer immediately at the request for comment.
Last month, the company announced a video editing application called Edyta to compete with Capcut (belonging to Tiktok Matter Company Bytedance) since it was geared toward using the uncertain future Tiktok and Bytedance in the USA
Currently, the Instagram channel is a mixture of photos, movies (drums) and stories. However, many users imagine that the application has been cluttered since it incorporates movies and not persist with the roots as an application for sharing photos. If the company rotates in an independent application for brief movies, it can create a possibility for Instagram to emphasise other functions.
Instagram began at the starting of this yr paying creators To promote Instagram on other platforms, resembling Tiktok, Snapchat and YouTube. Apparently he also began to supply Big money for the creators Present only on roller skates.
(Tagstranslate) Instagram
-
Press Release11 months ago
CEO of 360WiSE Launches Mentorship Program in Overtown Miami FL
-
Press Release11 months ago
U.S.-Africa Chamber of Commerce Appoints Robert Alexander of 360WiseMedia as Board Director
-
Business and Finance9 months ago
The Importance of Owning Your Distribution Media Platform
-
Business and Finance11 months ago
360Wise Media and McDonald’s NY Tri-State Owner Operators Celebrate Success of “Faces of Black History” Campaign with Over 2 Million Event Visits
-
Ben Crump11 months ago
Another lawsuit accuses Google of bias against Black minority employees
-
Theater11 months ago
Telling the story of the Apollo Theater
-
Ben Crump12 months ago
Henrietta Lacks’ family members reach an agreement after her cells undergo advanced medical tests
-
Ben Crump12 months ago
The families of George Floyd and Daunte Wright hold an emotional press conference in Minneapolis
-
Theater11 months ago
Applications open for the 2020-2021 Soul Producing National Black Theater residency – Black Theater Matters
-
Theater9 months ago
Cultural icon Apollo Theater sets new goals on the occasion of its 85th anniversary