In May, NBA Hall of Famer Michael Jordan (owner of 23XI Racing) warned NASCAR that the way in which they were running the corporate was unfair to automotive owners and that “the sport would die” unless it modified its business practices and had a “good partnership.” ” Jordan has now filed an antitrust lawsuit with one other automotive owner, Front Row Motorsports, against NASCAR and CEO Jim France, stating that he used anti-competitive practices to stop fair competition in the game.

According to the lawsuit claims that NASCAR and France operate without transparency and in a way that doesn’t profit team owners, drivers, sponsors, partners and fans.

“Together, we brought this antitrust case so that racing can thrive and become a more competitive and fair sport in a way that benefits teams, drivers, sponsors and, most importantly, fans,” 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports said in an announcement in a joint report.

Jordan’s team was founded and joined NASCAR in 2020 with race driver Denny Hamlin and Jordan’s business partner, Curtis Polk. Bob Jenkins is the owner of Front Row Motorsports and has been involved in the game since 2005. Jenkins said he has been within the industry for 20 years and has yet to show a profit.

“We need a more competitive and fair system where teams, drivers and sponsors can be rewarded for our collective investments by building long-term enterprise value, just like any other successful professional sports league,” he said.

The lawsuit mentions that of the 19 team owners who were originally awarded charters in 2016, only eight of them remain in the game.

According to , a recent change in revenue sharing and recent charter rules placed NASCAR on a path that does not make profits for automotive owners. Media reported that the league was negotiating with 36 team owners to renew the charter system introduced in 2016. All teams are guaranteed a spot in each Cup Series race. The owners want the present charter agreement to be everlasting, because the contract expires at the tip of the 2024 season on November 10.

Former NBA player Dwight Howard’s interest in purchasing a stake in the WNBA’s Atlanta Dream has became a nightmare. A businessman was found guilty of defrauding an NBA star in a deal gone bad.

According to the Associated Press jury returned conviction against Calvin Darden Jr. released on October 4 after Howard admitted at a trial in New York that he gave Darden $7 million considering it was an investment in a WNBA team.

Darden could face 11 to 14 years in prison when sentenced next 12 months.

The prosecutor said the fraudster spent most of the $7 million, no less than $6.1 million received from the previous Los Angeles Lakers player. He bought two cars for $500,000; spent $110,000 on a piano; placed $765,000 as a down payment on a $3.7 million home; and purchased $90,000 value of luxury watches while spending one other $500,000 to upgrade his home. He also purchased a whole bunch of 1000’s of dollars value of art.

Prosecutors plan to seize all of Darden’s assets, including the home where he lives in Atlanta, in addition to the above-mentioned items.

The alleged investment offered by Darden got here as Dream’s then-owner, former Republican U.S. Sen. Kelly Loeffler of Atlanta, was selling the team. In 2021, the team was sold to a three-person investor group that included former player Renee Montgomery.

Darden has been convicted before after one other scheme he was involved in got him into trouble. Prosecutors revealed that Darden worked with a sports agent to defraud former NBA forward Chandler. Darden managed to influence Chandler to send $1 million. The ruse involved using the cash to assist develop current NBA player James Wiseman.

Howard realized his dream of owning knowledgeable basketball team when it was reported earlier this 12 months that Howard had announced that he had develop into part owner of the Taiwan Basketball League, in addition to one of its teams.

The WNBA must have seen this coming.

Eighteen months ago, forward Angel Reese and the LSU Tigers defeated Caitlin Clark and the Iowa Hawkeyes within the NCAA Championship. Reese celebrated by walking across the court, pointing to her ring finger and imitating Clark The “can’t you see me” celebration. From that moment on, a rivalry between each phenomena arose. And while Clark and Reese have had a fierce rivalry on the court within the WNBA, mainly within the race for the once-hot Rookie of the Year race, the true battle takes place off the court and rarely involves anything that the 2 stars actually are. act.

They became the brand new socio-political and racial battleground, transforming into an eyesore that harmed them and the WNBA. The noise overshadowed their great statistical seasons.

Clark entered the WNBA as one of the vital popular athletes within the country, and for good reason. She was among the best college basketball players we have ever seen. She entered the league equipped with a dynamic game and deep three-point shooting that reminded fans of Golden State Warriors guard Stephen Curry. That’s enough to make her considered one of the largest latest stars the league has seen in a protracted time. But add to that the undeniable fact that she’s a straight white woman, and she becomes something more: a central figure to parts of the country that despise the queer black women they stand for. So every thing Clark did – the triple-double, the 30-point game, the record-setting – wasn’t just an incredible basketball performance. Her achievements have been used to forged aspersions on women, who make up nearly all of WNBA players.

Many Clark fans also had Reese, a black villainess anyone could tackle. For a certain segment of fans, whatever praise she received – and there was loads of it – wasn’t nearly Clark. The idea was to embarrass Reese, who also had a record-setting season WNBA record for many consecutive double-doubles AND nearly setting a league rebounding record – and women like her.

The Reese-Clark rivalry was not about basketball. It was about every thing else. Black. Strangeness. Approaching selection. A divided country. Racism. White supremacy. Alliance. Grades. And too few people actually showed compassion for the ladies themselves.

Reese would turn out to be the victim of truly brutal attacks on the Internet, including AI rendering a photograph of her body spread on social media. Even though Reese took on the villainous role that was already thrust upon her, she didn’t ask for the racist attacks that got here with it – all for allegedly supporting Clark.

However, the attacks on Reese weren’t really about Clark. They talked about hating Reese as a confident, outspoken black woman. The Clark phenomenon involved two distinct groups of individuals. One group is stuffed with true Clark fans. People who’re delighted together with her vision of the manor, photos and contact with the general public. A WNBA fan who knows a reworking athlete when he sees one. Little girls who look as much as the league’s stars and who, after they grow up, wish to throw 30-footers like Clark.

Then there may be the second group. This group is stuffed with individuals who see Clark as a solution to express their deepest, hateful thoughts about black and queer women within the WNBA. As soon as Clark joined the league, any resistance she encountered – a tough foul, a comment in regards to the way she was covered, ridicule for her slip-up – became a referendum on what black queer women considered straight white women and a solution to they repeat harmful stereotypes about women within the WNBA.

Clark’s campaign through the WNBA left a trail of harmed black women in her wake, although she maintained her neutrality and never harmed women herself. There was Reese who continued encounter harmful messages throughout the season, at the same time as she and Clark demonstrated teamwork and camaraderie in the course of the All-Star Game. Chennedy Carter, Reese’s Chicago Sky teammate who fouled Clark, was showered with online vitriol and harassed by a ‘fan’ in front of the team hotel. Sun guard DiJonai Carrington was killed threats and was called racist slurs after she unintentionally hit Clark in the attention during a playoff game, which left her with a swollen eye. There was Sheryl Swoopes, an all-time great who is usually flawed misinformed Sports coverage of Clark was met with online harassment. Even Clark’s teammate Aliyah Boston needed to shut down her social media after fans blamed her for the team’s early troubles.

But this is not just a couple of group of black queer WNBA players who’ve been brutalized by misogynoir. Clark can be a victim here. Her debut season was tainted by the identical racism and misogyny that targeted women in her WNBA community. Instead of supporting her for her brilliance on the court, Clark is dehumanized and a caricature of hateful idolatry is erected in her name when all she desires to do is play basketball.

Many heterosexual white women have spoken out about their privilege and tried to quell the anger faced by their black peers. And how could they not? How can anyone wish to remain silent when their teammates, peers and friends are continually bombarded with hate speech? It’s just human decency to wish to get up for the people we share a locker room with. Guardian of the Las Vegas Aces Kelsey PlumUConn guard Paige Bueckers and others did it. It is affordable to expect everyone to share the responsibility for coming together.

Clark, to her credit, has lent her support to the Black women who’ve come before her in this manner ON before she even got into the league. And before she finally answered questions on fans at press conferences issuing full condemnation racism that WNBA players face. But here’s the issue: racism won’t stop. Anti-gay prejudice will proceed unabated. And the misogyny will only proceed. And so long as this continues in Clark’s name, she’s going to at all times be expected to be chargeable for them and watch them suppress a movement she didn’t create.

Imagine the pressure that’s placed on someone. Imagine the distraction out of your on-court achievements that comes when the individuals who claim to support you do not care in regards to the accolades, and the individuals who wish to support you, the player and the person, are the identical people who find themselves showered with harassment for each turn. Clark doesn’t experience the sort of brutal, radical hatred that comes from centuries of oppression, but she does experience what it’s prefer to be at the middle of a fight that’s a lot larger than herself, and her actions are lightning rods for reactions, including one from a fan who needed to be removed while playing against the Connecticut Sun within the playoffs.

Clark’s presence gave the WNBA a lift in rankings and revenue. Her natural popularity amongst fans has at all times confirmed this. For this reason, he’s a singular figure within the history of the league. However, the advantages of rankings and revenue mustn’t come on the expense of player well-being. That’s something WNBA commissioner Cathy Engelbert didn’t realize when she commented on player harassment just a few weeks ago: “But I know one thing about sports: You need competition,” she said. “That’s what keeps people watching. They want to watch important matches between rivals. They don’t want everyone to be nice to each other.”

It’s not nearly competition and revenue. This is a couple of league that has worked hard to create a secure space for a community that is commonly unsafe in too many places on this country. And that secure space has turn out to be unstable because far too many individuals have seen Clark and used him as an entrance to invade that space with bigotry.

Approximately eight months later, Clark and Reese will appear in WNBA court again. It is time for the league, fans, media and everyone in between to contemplate tips on how to support these women and not use them as targets of racism or symbolic reasons to interact in a hateful crusade.

Their greatness on the court demands more respect. Like their humanity.