Connect with us

Technology

Even the “Godmother of AI” has no idea what AGI is

Published

on

Are you confused about artificial general intelligence or AGI? This is the thing that OpenAI is obsessive about, ultimately creating in a way that “benefits all of humanity.” They may be price taking seriously because they only raised $6.6 billion to catch up with to that goal.

But should you’re still wondering what the heck AGI is, you are not alone.

During a wide-ranging discussion at the Credo AI Leadership Summit on Thursday, Fei-Fei Li, a world-renowned researcher often called the “godmother of artificial intelligence,” said she too doesn’t know what AGI is. In other moments, Li discussed her role in the birth of modern artificial intelligence, how society should protect itself from advanced artificial intelligence models, and why she thinks her latest unicorn startup World Labs will change every part.

Advertisement

But when asked what she considered the “AI singularity,” Li was as confused as the rest of us.

“I come from an artificial intelligence academic background and was educated in more rigorous and evidence-based methods, so I don’t really know what all these words mean,” Li told a packed room in San Francisco, next to a big window with overlooking the river. Golden Gate Bridge. “Honestly, I do not even know what AGI stands for. Like people say you recognize it whenever you see it, I do not think I’ve seen it. The truth is that I do not spend quite a bit of time fascinated by these words because I believe there are far more essential things to do…

If anyone were to know what AGI is, it’s probably Fei-Fei Li. In 2006, she created ImageNet, the world’s first large AI training and benchmarking dataset, which has been instrumental in catalyzing the current AI boom. In 2017–2018, she served as Chief Scientist for Artificial Intelligence/ML at Google Cloud. Today, Li directs Stanford’s Human-Centered AI Institute (HAI), and her startup World Labs builds “large models of the world.” (This term is almost as confusing as AGI, should you ask me.)

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman attempted to define AGI in a profile “New Yorker”. last 12 months. Altman described AGI as “the equivalent of the average person you might hire as an associate.”

Advertisement

Meanwhile, OpenAI statute defines AGI as “highly autonomous systems that outperform humans in the most economically valuable work.”

Apparently these definitions weren’t adequate to work for a $157 billion company. This is how OpenAI was created five levels uses internally to measure its progress towards AGI. The first tier is chatbots (like ChatGPT), then thinkers (apparently OpenAI o1 was that tier), agents (which supposedly shall be next), innovators (AI that might help invent things), and the last organizational tier (AI that may do work of the entire organization).

Still confused? Me too, Li too. Plus, it looks as if quite a bit greater than the average co-worker could do.

Earlier in the conversation, Li said she was fascinated by the idea of ​​intelligence from a young age. This led her to review artificial intelligence long before it became profitable. Li says she and several other others were quietly laying the foundations for the field in the early 2000s.

Advertisement

“In 2012, my ImageNet merged with AlexNet and GPUs – many individuals call it the birth of modern AI. They were based on three key ingredients: big data, neural networks and modern computations using graphics processors. I believe that when this moment got here, life in the entire field of artificial intelligence, and in our world, was never the same again.

When asked about California’s controversial artificial intelligence bill SB 1047, Li spoke fastidiously in order to not repeat the controversy that Governor Newsom had just put to rest by vetoing the bill last week. (We recently spoke with the writer of SB 1047 and he was more serious about reopening his argument with Li.)

“Some of you may know that I have been very vocal about my concerns about this bill (SB 1047) being vetoed, but at this moment I am thinking deeply and with great excitement about looking to the future,” Li said. “I was very honored, indeed honored, that Governor Newsom invited me to participate in the next steps after SB 1047.”

California’s governor recently tapped Li and other AI experts to form a task force to assist the state develop guardrails for AI deployment. Li said she takes an evidence-based approach on this role and can make every effort to support academic research and funding. But he also desires to be sure that California won’t punish technologists.

Advertisement

“We need to actually have a look at the potential impact on people and our communities, fairly than putting the blame on the technology itself… It would not make sense for us to penalize an automotive engineer – say Ford or GM – if a automotive is misused intentionally or unintentionally and harms a human being. Just punishing a automotive engineer won’t make cars safer. We must proceed to innovate for safer measures, but additionally improve the regulatory framework – whether it’s seat belts or speed limits – the same goes for artificial intelligence.”

This is one of the higher arguments I’ve heard against SB 1047, which might penalize tech firms for unsafe artificial intelligence models.

While Li advises California on artificial intelligence regulation, he also runs his startup World Labs in San Francisco. This is Li’s first time founding a startup, and she or he is one of the few women running a state-of-the-art artificial intelligence lab.

“We are far from a very diverse artificial intelligence ecosystem,” Li said. “I believe that diverse human intelligence will lead to diverse artificial intelligence and simply give us better technology.”

Advertisement

She is excited to bring “spatial intelligence” closer to reality in the next few years. Li argues that the development of human language, on which today’s large language models are based, probably took 1,000,000 years, while vision and perception probably took 540 million years. This implies that creating large models of the world is a far more complex task.

“It’s not just about enabling computers to see, but actually understanding the entire 3D world, which I call spatial intelligence,” Li said. “We don’t just see naming things… What we actually see is how to do things, how to move through the world, how to interact with each other, and closing the gap between seeing and doing requires spatial knowledge. As a technologist, I’m very excited about this.”

This article was originally published on : techcrunch.com
Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Technology

The Legal Defense Fund withdraws from the META civil law advisory group over Dei Rolback

Published

on

By

Legal Defense Fund,, Meta, dei,


On April 11, the Legal Defense Fund announced that he was leaving the external advisory council for civil rights regarding the fear that the changes in technology company introduced diversity, own capital, inclusion and availability in January.

According to those changes that some perceived as the capitulation of meta against the upcoming Trump administration, contributed to their decision To leave the advisory council of the technology company.

In January, LDF, along with several other organizations of civil rights, which were a part of the board, sent a letter to Marek Zuckerberg, CEO of Meta, outlining their fears As for a way changes would negatively affect users.

Advertisement

“We are shocked and disappointed that the finish has not consulted with this group or its members, considering these significant changes in its content policy. Non -compliance with even its own advisory group of experts on external civil rights shows a cynical disregard for its diverse users base and undermines the commitment of the meta in the field of freedom of speech with which he claims to” return “.

They closed the letter, hoping that the finish would recommend the ideals of freedom of speech: “If the finish really wants to recommend freedom of speech, he must commit to freedom of speech for all his services. As an advisory group from external civil rights, we offer our advice and knowledge in creating a better path.”

These fears increased only in the next months, culminating in one other list, which from the LDF director, Todd A. Cox, who indicated that the organization withdraws its membership from the META civil law advisory council.

“I am deeply disturbed and disappointed with the announcement of Medical on January 7, 2025, with irresponsible changes in content moderation policies on platforms, which are a serious risk for the health and safety of black communities and risk that they destabilize our republic,” Cox wrote.

Advertisement

He continued: “For almost a decade, the NACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF) has invested a lot of time and resources, working with META as part of the informal committee advising the company in matters of civil rights. However, the finish introduced these changes in the policy of the content modification without consulting this group, and many changes directly with the guidelines from the guidelines from LDF and partners. LD can no longer participate in the scope. ” Advisory Committee for Rights “

In a separate but related LDF list, it clearly resembled a finish about the actual obligations of the Citizens’ Rights Act of 1964 and other provisions regarding discrimination in the workplace, versus the false statements of the Trump administration, that diversity, justice and initiative to incorporate discriminates against white Americans.

“While the finish has modified its policy, its obligations arising from federal regulations regarding civil rights remain unchanged. The title of VII of the Act on civic rights of 1964 and other regulations on civil rights prohibit discrimination in the workplace, including disconnecting treatment, principles in the workplace which have unfair disproportionate effects, and the hostile work environment. Also when it comes to inclusion, and access programs.

In the LDF press release, announcing each letters, Cox He called attention Metal insert into growing violence and division in the country’s social climate.

Advertisement

“LDF worked hard and in good faith with meta leadership and its consulting group for civil rights to ensure that the company’s workforce reflects the values ​​and racial warehouses of the United States and to increase the security priorities of many different communities that use meta platforms,” ​​said Cox. “Now we cannot support a company in good conscience that consciously takes steps in order to introduce changes in politics that supply further division and violence in the United States. We call the meta to reverse the course with these dangerous changes.”

(Tagstranslate) TODD A. COX (T) Legal Defense Fund (T) META (T) Diversity (T) Equality (T) inclusion

This article was originally published on : www.blackenterprise.com
Advertisement
Continue Reading

Technology

Students of young, talented and black yale collect $ 3 million on a new application

Published

on

By


Nathaneo Johnson and Sean Hargrow, juniors from Yale University, collected $ 3 million in only 14 days to finance their startup, series, social application powered by AI, designed to support significant connections and challenge platforms, similar to LinkedIn and Instagram.

A duo that’s a co -host of the podcast A series of foundersHe created the application after recognizing the gap in the way in which digital platforms help people connect. SEries focuses moderately on facilitating authentic introductions than gathering likes, observing or involvement indicators.

“Social media is great for broadcasting, but it does not necessarily help you meet the right people at the right time,” said Johnson in an interview with Entrepreneur warehouse.

Advertisement

The series connects users through AI “friends” who communicate via IMessage and help to introduce. Users introduce specific needs-are on the lookout for co-founders, mentors, colleagues or investors-AI makes it easier to introduce based on mutual value. The concept attracts comparisons to LinkedIn, but with more personal experience.

“You publish photos on Instagram, publish movies on Tiktok and publish work posts on LinkedIn … And that’s where you have this microinfluuncer band,” Johnson added.

The application goals to avoid the superficial character of typical social platforms. Hargrow emphasized that although aesthetics often dominates on Instagram and the content virus drives tabktok, Number It is intentional, deliberate contacts.

“We are not trying to replace relationships in the real world-we are going to make it easier for people to find the right relationships,” said Hargrow.

Advertisement

Parable projects carried out before the seeded (*3*)Funding roundwhich included participation with Pear VC, DGB, VC, forty seventh Street, Radicle Impact, UNCASMON Projects and several famous Angels Investors, including the General Director of Reddit Steve Huffman and the founder of GPTZERO Edward Tian. Johnson called one meeting of investors “dinner for a million dollars”, reflecting how their pitch resonated with early supporters.

Although not the principal corporations, Johnson and Hargrow based pre-coreneuring through their podcast, through which they interviews the founders and leaders of C-Suite about less known elements of constructing the company-as accounting, business law and team formation.

Since the beginning of the series, over 32,000 messages between “friends” have been mentioned within the test phases. The initial goal of the application is the entrepreneurs market. Despite this, the founders hope to develop in finance, dating, education and health – ultimately striving to construct probably the most available warm network on the earth.

Advertisement

(Tagstranslate) VC (T) Yale (T) Venture Capital (T) Technology (T) APP

This article was originally published on : www.blackenterprise.com
Continue Reading

Technology

Tesla used cars offers rapidly increased in March

Published

on

By

Tesla cars sit in a dealership lot

The growing variety of Tesla owners puts their used vehicles on the market, because consumers react to the political activities of Elon Musk and the worldwide protests they were driven.

In March, the variety of used Tesla vehicles listed on the market at autotrader.com increased rapidly, Sherwood News announcedCiting data from the house company Autotrader Cox Automotive. The numbers were particularly high in the last week of March, when on average over 13,000 used Teslas was replaced. It was not only a record – a rise of 67% in comparison with the identical week of the yr earlier.

At the identical time, the sale of latest Tesla vehicles slowed down even when EV sales from other brands increases. In the primary quarter of 2025, almost 300,000 latest EVs were sold in the USA According to the most recent Kelley Blue Book reporta rise of 10.6% yr on yr. Meanwhile, Tesla sales fell in the primary quarter, which is nearly 9% in comparison with the identical period in 2024.

Advertisement

Automaks resembling GM and Hyundai are still behind Tesla. But they see growth growth. For example, GM brands sold over 30,000 EV in the primary quarter, almost double the amount of a yr ago, in line with Kelley Blue Book.

(Tagstranslat) electric vehicles

This article was originally published on : techcrunch.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending