Technology
Here’s what’s illegal under California’s 18 (and counting) new AI laws
In September, California Governor Gavin Newsom considered 38 AI-related bills, including the highly controversial SB 1047, which the state Legislature sent to his desk for final approval. On Sunday, he vetoed SB 1047, marking the tip of the road for California’s controversial AI bill that was intended to forestall AI-related disasters, but he signed greater than a dozen other AI-related bills into law this month. These bills seek to deal with probably the most pressing issues surrounding AI: every part from Al risks to fake nudes created by AI image generators to Hollywood studios creating AI clones of deceased performers.
“California, home to most of the world’s leading artificial intelligence companies, is working to leverage these revolutionary technologies to help address pressing challenges while examining their risks,” Governor Newsom’s office said in a press release. press release.
So far, Governor Newsom has signed 18 AI-related bills, a few of that are probably the most far-reaching U.S. generative AI bills up to now. Here’s what they do.
AI Risk
On Sunday, Governor Newsom signed SB 896 into law, which requires the California Office of Emergency Services to conduct risk analyzes of potential threats posed by generative artificial intelligence. CalOES will work with pioneering model corporations resembling OpenAI and Anthropic to research the potential threats posed by AI to critical government infrastructure, in addition to threats that may lead to mass casualty incidents.
Training data
Another bill signed by Newsom this month requires generative AI providers to reveal data used to coach their AI systems in documentation posted on their website. AB 2013 enters into force in 2026 and requires artificial intelligence providers to publish: the sources of knowledge sets, an outline of how the information is used, the number of knowledge points within the set, whether copyrighted or licensed data is included, the period wherein the information was collected m .amongst others standards.
Privacy and artificial intelligence systems
Newsom also signed AB 1008 on Sunday, which makes it clear that California’s privacy laws also cover generative artificial intelligence systems. This signifies that if an AI system like ChatGPT reveals someone’s personal information (name, address, biometrics), California’s privacy laws will limit how corporations can use and cash in on that data.
Education
Newsom signed AB 2876 this month, which requires the California State Board of Education to incorporate “artificial intelligence skills” in math, science and history curricula and instructional materials. This means California schools can start teaching students the fundamentals of how artificial intelligence works, in addition to the restrictions, impacts and ethical considerations of using the technology.
Another new law SB 1288requires California superintendents to create working groups to check how artificial intelligence is utilized in public school education.
Definition of artificial intelligence
This month, Newsom signed laws establishing a uniform definition of artificial intelligence in California law. AB 2885 states that artificial intelligence is defined as “an engineered or machine-based system that varies in level of autonomy and which, for explicit or implicit purposes, can infer from the inputs it receives how to generate outputs that can influence environments physical or virtual.” “
Healthcare
Another act signed in September is the so-called AB 3030which requires healthcare providers to reveal once they use generative artificial intelligence to speak with a patient, particularly when those communications include the patient’s clinical information.
Meanwhile, Newsom recently signed the contract SB1120which puts limits on how healthcare providers and health insurers can automate their services. The law ensures that licensed physicians oversee the usage of artificial intelligence tools in these facilities.
Automatic AI connections
Last Friday, Governor Newsom signed a bill requiring robocallers to reveal whether or not they use AI-generated voices. AB 2905 is meant to forestall one other occurrence of a fake robocall resembling Joe Biden’s voice, which misled many citizens in New Hampshire earlier this yr.
Deeply fake pornography
On Sunday, Newsom signed it AB 1831 A law has entered into force that extends the scope of existing regulations on child pornography to incorporate content generated by artificial intelligence systems.
Last week, Newsom signed two bills targeting the creation and spread of false nudes. SB926 criminalizes this act by making it illegal to blackmail someone with AI-generated nude photos that resemble them.
SB981which also took effect on Thursday, requires social media platforms to establish channels where users can report false acts that resemble them. The content must then be temporarily blocked while it’s investigated by the platform and permanently removed if confirmed.
Watermarks
Also on Thursday, Newsom signed a bill to assist the general public discover content generated by artificial intelligence. SB942 requires commonly used generative AI systems to reveal of their content provenance data that it was generated by AI. For example, all images created by Dall-E with OpenAI now require a small tag of their metadata indicating that they were generated by AI.
Many AI corporations are already doing this, and there are several free tools that might help people read origination data and detect AI-generated content.
Deep election fraud
Earlier this week, California’s governor signed three bills aimed toward combating AI deepfakes that might influence elections.
One of California’s new laws AB 2655requires large online platforms like Facebook and X to remove or label election-related artificial intelligence misinformation and create channels for reporting such content. Candidates and elected officials can seek an injunction if a big online platform fails to comply with the bill.
Another law, AB 2839is aimed toward social media users who post or repost artificial intelligence misinformation that might mislead voters in regards to the upcoming election. The law went into effect immediately on Tuesday, and Newsom suggested that Elon Musk could possibly be liable to violating it.
Under a new California law, AI-generated political ads now require direct disclosure. AB 2355. This means Trump may not find a way to post artificial intelligence falsehoods featuring Taylor Swift supporting him on Truth Social (she endorsed Kamala Harris). The FCC has proposed the same national disclosure requirement and has already ruled that robocalls using AI-generated voices are illegal.
Actors and artificial intelligence
The two bills Newsom signed into law earlier this month — pushed by SAG-AFTRA, the nation’s largest film and tv actors’ union — create new standards for California’s media industry. AB 2602 requires studios to acquire permission from an actor before creating an AI-generated replica of his or her voice or likeness.
Meanwhile, AB 1836 prohibits studios from creating digital replicas of deceased performers without the consent of their estates (e.g., the recent “Alien” and “Star Wars” movies, in addition to other movies, used legally approved replicas).
SB 1047 is vetoed
Governor Newsom still has several AI-related bills to take up by the tip of September. However, SB 1047 isn’t one among them – the bill was vetoed on Sunday.
In a letter explaining your decisionNewsom said SB 1047 focused too narrowly on large artificial intelligence systems that might “give the public a false sense of security.” California’s governor noted that small AI models could possibly be as dangerous because the models targeted by SB 1047, and said a more flexible regulatory approach was needed.
During a conversation with Salesforce CEO Mark Benioff earlier this month on the Dreamforce 2024 conference, Newsom was in a position to tip his hat about SB 1047 and the way he thinks about broader regulation of the unreal intelligence industry.
“There is one bill that is kind of too big in terms of public discourse and awareness; that’s SB 1047,” Newsom said on stage this month. “What are the demonstrable risks associated with AI and what are the hypothetical risks? I can’t solve everything. What can we solve? That’s why we’re taking this approach across the spectrum on this issue.”
Check back to this text for updates on which AI laws the California governor is and is not signing.
Elon Musk says his duty is to “make new people.” Now Investigation of WSJ He suggests that he could start greater than 14 known children, and the sources claim that the actual number will be much higher. The report also describes how Musk keeps these details within the package.
In the middle of all this, based on the report, there may be a longtime Fixer Jared Birchall, which runs the Muska’s family office, but additionally supports the logistics of the developing Muska family, including by developing Hush contracts and serving as a board for moms of some children.
For example, Musk reportedly asked the conservative influence of Ashley St. Clair for signing a restrictive agreement after she gave birth to their son last autumn. Agreement: $ 15 million plus an extra $ 100,000 per 30 days, so long as the kid is 21 in exchange for her silence. She refused; He says that the contract worsens with every treason perceived. (She told the journal that the Muska team sent her only $ 20,000 after they bowed to Musk to comment on his article).
As for Birchall, which can also be CEO Press-IMPLANTU-IMPLANTU VENTURE NEURALK IA partner In AI Venture XAI in Musk, Muska’s private life management can simply be the third full -time job. According to the journal, in a single two -hour conversation with St. Clair, Birchall told her that the transition “legal path” with musk “always, always leads to a worse result for this woman than otherwise.”
The joint company Micromobility Lime has reached an agreement on sending batteries utilized in scooters and electronic bikes to Sewoi materials that extract and recycle critical minerals, comparable to lithium, cobalt, nickel and copper.
The agreement announced on Monday makes Redwood Materials the only real battery recycling partner for common scooters and e-bike bikes situated in cities within the United States, Germany and the Netherlands. The contract doesn’t cover every region where lime worksAn inventory covering cities throughout Europe, Asia and Australia.
In Lime up to now he had other recycling partnerships, especially with Sprout through his suppliers. However, for the primary time, the joint company Micromobility had direct relations with battery recycling in North America, which might directly process the fabric for recovery and returns it to the availability chain.
Redwood Materials, The Carson City, Startup from Nevada founded by the previous CFO Tesla JB Straubel, will get better battery materials when they can’t be used. After recovering and recycling, the materials will be re -introduced within the battery production process. This production system of a closed loop-which can reduce the demand for extraction and refining of minerals-is on the Redwood Materials business center.
The effort can also be consistent with its own goals of limestone sustainable development. Lime is geared toward decarbonization of operations by 2030. The company has made progress in reducing the range 1, 2 and 3 of emissions by 59.5% in five years of basic years 2019. Wapno plans to report the outcomes of carbon dioxide emissions 2024 in May.
“This cooperation means significant progress in the establishment of a more round supply chain, helping our batteries not only to recycled responsibly after reaching the end of their lives, but that their materials are returned to the battery supply chain,” said Andrew Savage, vice chairman for balanced development in Lime.
Lime also has partnerships from Gomi in Great Britain and Voltr in France and other European countries to gather these live battery cells for “Second Life” applications, including, amongst others, in the sphere of consumer electronics, comparable to portable speakers and battery packages.
Redwood Materials has contracts with other micromobility corporations, including Lyft, RAD Power Bikes and bicycle batteries and scooters specialized in recycling. Redwood, which collected over $ 2 billion in private funds, announced at first of this month, opened the research and development center in San Francisco.
(Tagstranslat) ebikes
On April 11, the Legal Defense Fund announced that he was leaving the external advisory council for civil rights regarding the fear that the changes in technology company introduced diversity, own capital, inclusion and availability in January.
According to those changes that some perceived as the capitulation of meta against the upcoming Trump administration, contributed to their decision To leave the advisory council of the technology company.
In January, LDF, along with several other organizations of civil rights, which were a part of the board, sent a letter to Marek Zuckerberg, CEO of Meta, outlining their fears As for a way changes would negatively affect users.
“We are shocked and disappointed that the finish has not consulted with this group or its members, considering these significant changes in its content policy. Non -compliance with even its own advisory group of experts on external civil rights shows a cynical disregard for its diverse users base and undermines the commitment of the meta in the field of freedom of speech with which he claims to” return “.
They closed the letter, hoping that the finish would recommend the ideals of freedom of speech: “If the finish really wants to recommend freedom of speech, he must commit to freedom of speech for all his services. As an advisory group from external civil rights, we offer our advice and knowledge in creating a better path.”
These fears increased only in the next months, culminating in one other list, which from the LDF director, Todd A. Cox, who indicated that the organization withdraws its membership from the META civil law advisory council.
“I am deeply disturbed and disappointed with the announcement of Medical on January 7, 2025, with irresponsible changes in content moderation policies on platforms, which are a serious risk for the health and safety of black communities and risk that they destabilize our republic,” Cox wrote.
He continued: “For almost a decade, the NACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF) has invested a lot of time and resources, working with META as part of the informal committee advising the company in matters of civil rights. However, the finish introduced these changes in the policy of the content modification without consulting this group, and many changes directly with the guidelines from the guidelines from LDF and partners. LD can no longer participate in the scope. ” Advisory Committee for Rights “
In a separate but related LDF list, it clearly resembled a finish about the actual obligations of the Citizens’ Rights Act of 1964 and other provisions regarding discrimination in the workplace, versus the false statements of the Trump administration, that diversity, justice and initiative to incorporate discriminates against white Americans.
“While the finish has modified its policy, its obligations arising from federal regulations regarding civil rights remain unchanged. The title of VII of the Act on civic rights of 1964 and other regulations on civil rights prohibit discrimination in the workplace, including disconnecting treatment, principles in the workplace which have unfair disproportionate effects, and the hostile work environment. Also when it comes to inclusion, and access programs.
In the LDF press release, announcing each letters, Cox He called attention Metal insert into growing violence and division in the country’s social climate.
“LDF worked hard and in good faith with meta leadership and its consulting group for civil rights to ensure that the company’s workforce reflects the values and racial warehouses of the United States and to increase the security priorities of many different communities that use meta platforms,” said Cox. “Now we cannot support a company in good conscience that consciously takes steps in order to introduce changes in politics that supply further division and violence in the United States. We call the meta to reverse the course with these dangerous changes.”
(Tagstranslate) TODD A. COX (T) Legal Defense Fund (T) META (T) Diversity (T) Equality (T) inclusion
The new Xbox DOOM controller contains spikes and blood
Forum Pitchblack Black Public Media, which exceeded $ 2 million
The Spelman College competition is now the latest Tiktok madness
Own #syn son brings black mother to dating drama – literally – essence
Four ways to get out of bed in the morning – and defeat Groggread
-
Press Release1 year agoU.S.-Africa Chamber of Commerce Appoints Robert Alexander of 360WiseMedia as Board Director
-
Press Release1 year agoCEO of 360WiSE Launches Mentorship Program in Overtown Miami FL
-
Business and Finance11 months agoThe Importance of Owning Your Distribution Media Platform
-
Business and Finance1 year ago360Wise Media and McDonald’s NY Tri-State Owner Operators Celebrate Success of “Faces of Black History” Campaign with Over 2 Million Event Visits
-
Ben Crump1 year agoAnother lawsuit accuses Google of bias against Black minority employees
-
Theater1 year agoTelling the story of the Apollo Theater
-
Ben Crump1 year agoHenrietta Lacks’ family members reach an agreement after her cells undergo advanced medical tests
-
Ben Crump1 year agoThe families of George Floyd and Daunte Wright hold an emotional press conference in Minneapolis
-
Theater1 year agoApplications open for the 2020-2021 Soul Producing National Black Theater residency – Black Theater Matters
-
Theater11 months agoCultural icon Apollo Theater sets new goals on the occasion of its 85th anniversary