Connect with us

Health and Wellness

Experts want Albanese to lead on indoor air quality as pandemic planning continues

Published

on

Last month, a delegation led by Brendan Crabb, head of the Burnet Institute, a prestigious medical research institution, met with Anthony Albanese on the Prime Minister’s office in Parliament.

Its members, including Lidia Morawska of Queensland University of Technology, a world expert on air quality and health, also attacked ministers and staff, urging the federal government to lead a comprehensive policy on clean indoor air and for the problem to be placed on the national cabinet agenda.

They identified to Albanese that indoor air is an exception in our otherwise comprehensive public health system. Despite people spending most of their time indoors, indoor air quality is basically unregulated, unlike standards that apply to things like food and water.

There are many health and economic reasons to be concerned about air quality, and one of the crucial essential is to reduce the spread of airborne diseases like COVID.

For lots of us, COVID has change into a foul memory, despite its enduring and mixed legacy. For example, if it weren’t for the pandemic, fewer people could be working from home now. More small businesses could be thriving in our CBDs. You could argue that fewer children could be trying to catch up on under-education.

Even though the media has largely lost interest in COVID-19 and individuals are relatively indifferent to it, the disease continues to take its toll.

There will likely be around 4,600 deaths attributed to COVID-19 in 2023, and in point of fact the number is probably going higher, on condition that Australia has had 8,400 “excess deaths” (defined as the variety of deaths exceeding the variety of expected deaths) this yr.

As of July this yr, 2,503 deaths have been recorded due to COVID-19.

In nursing homes, while COVID survival rates have improved significantly thanks to vaccinations and antiviral drugs, there are 117 energetic outbreaks as of September 19, with 59 latest cases up to now week. There have been 900 deaths this yr.

Long COVID has change into a significant issue, with a wide range of respiratory, cardiac, cognitive and immunological symptoms. It is estimated that there are between 200,000 and 900,000 people in Australia I currently have long COVID.

Albanian authorities are currently awaiting a commissioned report on their handling of the COVID pandemic.

Bronwyn King (Burnet Institute), Anna-Maria Arabia (Australian Academy of Science), Lidia Morawska (QUT) and Brendan Crabb (Burnet Institute) pressed the Prime Minister on indoor air quality last month.

The study checked out the Morrison government’s performance, but its scope didn’t include the states. This limits its usefulness, but there was politics involved, given Labor’s influential state governments.

Not that the state and territory leaders from those days are still alive (aside from Andrew Barr within the ACT). The faces that had change into so familiar from their day by day press conferences had vanished into oblivion: Dan Andrews in Victoria, Mark McGowan in Western Australia, Gladys Berejiklian in New South Wales, Annastacia Palaszczuk in Queensland.

COVID has had a wide range of effects on or damaging the reputations of leaders. McGowan, specifically, has reached stratospheric heights of recognition. Andrews has deeply divided people.

Overall, COVID has strengthened support for leaders and increased public trust in them and in the federal government. In times of uncertainty, the general public turned to established institutions and authorities. Trust has since declined again.

The experts found one another throughout the pandemic, but then found themselves in the midst of political arguments. In retrospect, a few of them were improper.

Pandemic leaders at Council of Australian Governments (COAG) meeting.
Marc McCormack/AAP

Overall, especially when it comes to mortality and the economy, Australia has weathered the crisis well. But in the event you look closer, the story is more complex, as documented by two leading economists, Steven Hamilton (based in Washington and affiliated with the Australian National University) and Richard Holden (of UNSW).

In their recent book Australia’s Pandemic Exceptionalism, the authors concluded that Australia had been largely successful in its (very costly) economic response, but that health outcomes were mixed.

While Australia quickly emerged from the blocks, closing the border and introducing other measures, it suffered a dramatic setback on two fronts: the Morrison government failed to order a wide selection of vaccines and failed to buy enough rapid antigen tests (RATs).

“The vaccine acquisition strategy was an irreversible disaster,” Hamilton and Holden write. It was not only “the biggest failure of the pandemic – it was probably the biggest public policy failure in Australian history.”

“We put all our vaccine eggs in two baskets,” each of which failed to various degrees. That was “a terrible risk. Pandemics are times of insurance, not gambling,” they write.

“And while our tax and statistics agencies mobilized to move much faster and more efficiently to meet the desperate needs of a government facing a once-in-a-century crisis, our medical regulatory complex repeatedly ignored international evidence and experience, and our political leaders deferred to their advice. And then the Prime Minister told us that when it comes to vaccinating Australians, ‘this is not a race.’”

The inability to order every vaccine that was expected meant that when there have been problems with production or delivery of vaccines that we were counting on or had already ordered, their rollout was delayed.

After that mistake, “to our bewilderment, we turned around and made the same mistakes all over again,” failing to obtain and freely distribute an enormous variety of RATs. In that failure, “our federal government demonstrated the same lack of foresight, the same thrifty but foolish attitude, that it has shown in the vaccine rollout.”

The authors blame Scott Morrison, then Health Minister Greg Hunt, then Chief Medical Officer Brendan Murphy, the Therapeutic Goods Agency (TGA) and the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation (ATAGI) for health failures that prolonged the lockdown, cost lives and delayed the reopening.

In calling for higher preparation for the subsequent pandemic, Hamilton and Holden have an inventory of suggestions. They emphasize that we want to be certain that we’ve got the capability to manufacture an mRNA vaccine (which has made quite a variety of progress). We need to get the vaccine “right off the bat,” no matter cost. Massive quantities of RATs must be acquired as soon as they change into available, ready for immediate use.

The medical-regulatory complex needs to be completely overhauled. Australia also needs to proceed to spend money on its “economic infrastructure.” Economic strain has been made easier throughout the pandemic by the single-touch payroll system. “The first obvious candidate for improvement is the ability to report GST turnover in real time.”

Perhaps a comprehensive indoor clean air policy may very well be added to the list of infrastructure elements.

The government review may have its own recommendations. Crabb and his colleagues hope they are going to include attention to indoor air quality, the next suggestions from the Chief Scientist and the National Council for Science and Technology.

The delegation members say the Prime Minister listened to them rigorously.

Anna-Maria Arabia, chief executive of the Australian Academy of Science and a member of the delegation, says Albanese “understood that improving indoor air quality was a fundamental requirement for preparing for future pandemics and (he) was aware of the practical implications of having good indoor air quality systems, including the ability to keep schools and workplaces open and functional, reduce absenteeism and increase productivity”.

But beyond awareness, timely political motion is required. Pandemics don’t give many signals about their arrival.

This article was originally published on : theconversation.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Health and Wellness

Private health insurers now offer telehealth services for primary care physicians. Does this pose a risk to Medicare?

Published

on

By

Australia’s second largest private health insurer, Bupa, recently did so he began offering its members receive three free telehealth consultations with a primary care physician per yr. It mimics other insurers similar to nib offers its members digital GP consultations, including prescriptions and medical certificates, for a fee.

But if you happen to search the govt. Compare the web site with the principles which helps people pick from a variety of personal health plans, you will not find any plans that officially cover visits to your GP.

This is since it is so currently illegal that insurers cover the prices of out-of-hospital services which can be also funded by Medicare, which incorporates visits to primary care physicians and specialist visits.

Insurers can get around this problem by running their digital health platforms as a separate company fairly than as part of personal health plans which can be highly regulated by the federal government. Another strategy is to pay the clinic’s overhead costs which then offer “free” consultations to members.

So why might private health insurers move into primary care? Why wasn’t it allowed? Is this a risk to Medicare?

Keeping people out of the hospital saves money

Better access to (primary) healthcare can improve people’s health and reduce the risk of hospitalization, especially for individuals with chronic diseases similar to heart disease, diabetes and asthma.

Sometimes people use emergency services for minor problems which might be solved by your loved ones doctor.

So offering members free or low-cost and simply accessible primary care may end up in lower hospital costs and save insurers money in the long term.

There are other the reason why private insurers want to cover primary care costs.

The first is the potential for “cherry picking.” In Australia, private health insurance operates under a community rating a system through which contributions don’t rely on a person’s health or age.

This implies that insurers cannot exclude or charge higher rates for people at higher risk of needing surgery or other hospital treatment (except Loading Lifetime Health Coveragewhich applies to the primary private health insurance after the age of 31).

However, insurance firms often have strategies to attract healthier members. For example, they might offer free trainers to appeal to avid runners or age-based discounts for latest members under 30 years of age.

The target market for free or easily accessible GP telehealth services is probably going to be working professionals who’re short on time or younger people. These groups are generally healthier and are less likely to be hospitalized every year.

Insurers want to attract healthy, young members who’re less likely to need expensive health care.
Geber86/Shutterstock

Another reason insurers might want to cover primary care is to help retain members who feel they’re receiving tangible advantages and a sense of value from their insurance coverage.

When Medibank tried to offer free GP visits in 2014, members using the service reported that fairly stick with the insurer.

Across the health system, the Australian Government is moving forward telehealth and multidisciplinary teams (for example, GPs, nurses, dieticians, physiotherapists and specialists) to treat long-term conditions.

In response to these changes, insurance firms are preparing for the longer term of health care delivery through developments in digital health and the creation of huge clinics housing multidisciplinary teams. Offering free GP services via telehealth is a small step towards this big strategic change.

Why have not insurers offered primary care previously?

When Medicare was introduced in 1984, doctors opposed allowing private health care funds to cover the “gap” between Medicare advantages (what the federal government pays the doctor) and wages (what the doctor collects).

Following lobbying from the Australian Medical Association, then Minister for Health Neal Blewett, he stated allowing insurers to cover the gap would simply increase the price of services, especially for those without insurance – with no profit to patients.

Therefore, a ban on primary health care insurance was introduced legally regulated.

Medicare card and money
Currently, insurers cannot cover out-of-hospital services, that are also funded by Medicare.
Robyn Mackenzie/Shutterstock

Over time, each time the query of allowing private insurers to cover primary care arose, the foremost argument against this option was that it could create two-tier system. In such a system, people without private insurance would have worse access to primary health care.

ABOUT 45% population has private insurance. And with insurers footing the bill, it’s likely that prices for a GP consultation will increase would increase.

Additionally, private funds would likely pay greater than Medicare to encourage primary care physicians to participate. This would drawback individuals who would not have private health insurance.

This situation is currently happening within the hospital sector. Surgeons earn far more for operations in private hospitals compared to doctors public hospitals. This makes them prioritize working in private hospitals.

Thanks to this, patients with private health insurance can immediately proceed to planned procedures. Meanwhile, individuals who would not have private insurance must take into consideration longer waiting times.

Should the federal government allow private insurers to cover primary care?

Current evidence doesn’t provide much support for the federal government supporting the private health insurance industry by subsidizing insurance premiums for individuals.

Our research found that despite the federal government spending billions of dollars every year to subsidize private health insurance, the sector has barely made a dent in the general public hospital system.

Currently, the power of personal insurers to offer primary care is restricted by law and may proceed to be so.

Allowing private insurers to proceed to expand into primary care would undermine the universality of Medicare. This risks creating a two-tier primary care system, replicating the disparities we’ve got already seen in hospital care.

Insurer-funded primary care would also involve high administrative costs, as seen within the healthcare system United Stateswhich relies heavily on private financing and supplies.

However, the federal government should take other steps to make primary care more cost-effective, which is able to save on the prices of downstream hospitals and emergency departments. This includes:

  • increasing Medicare rebates to keep primary health care free for the poor and kids, no matter where they live
  • making free primary health care available to rural and distant areas
  • making primary health care cheaper for others.

The Australian Government has the financial capability to make primary care more cost-effective and may prioritize its implementation. Even private insurance firms recognize its benefits. However, this couldn’t be achieved through private health insurance, which might make primary care more unequal and dearer.

This article was originally published on : theconversation.com
Continue Reading

Health and Wellness

Health matters: Here are 18 tips for dealing with election anxiety

Published

on

By

Getty

Today is the day. After months of listening to speeches, hearing policy experts passionately debate civic issues, and deciphering each candidate’s position, we finally discover who the general public thinks our next president will likely be – well, not less than we hope so.

Experts suggest that within the face of an increasing variety of postal ballots, we must always not postpone the president’s decision today, but expect to receive it at the top of the week. So what are you able to do to ease your anxiety while waiting for your results? Simple solution: concentrate on being present and realize that you just did every part you would and things are out of your control. Given the potential for backlash or concern, there can even be comprehensible anxiety following the election of a presidential candidate. Unfortunately, there’s nothing you possibly can do to repair this problem; you possibly can only control your individual actions, not anyone else’s.

As we all know, election day anxiety is normal, but given what’s at stake, it seems more likely to be even greater this yr. The emotional burden this carries for many is overwhelming on this election cycle. Here are some tips from 4 distinguished therapists to provide help to cope with election day stress. Check out their tips below and stay calm through the waiting period and after you see your results.

Brittany Phillips:

Limit your news consumption: Staying up to this point is crucial, but constant updates can easily develop into overwhelming, so set limits on when and the way much news you may view. Schedule check-ins only at specific times or using trusted sources. Also limit your contact with social media.

Focus on what you possibly can control: The election results can’t be influenced by any single person, but you possibly can take steps comparable to voting or helping on the polls. Channel your energy into positive actions, whether it’s taking good care of yourself or supporting your community in a small way. Accepting the uncertainty of the day is usually a challenge, but it surely is empowering.

Stay in the current: Election results may encourage catastrophic fascinated about the long run. Practicing mindfulness or writing down in a journal what’s going well helps counteract this tendency and prevents you from spiraling into “what if” scenarios.

Implement grounding techniques: Use respiratory, mindfulness, or grounding exercises to remain within the moment and focus your mind. A straightforward method is the “5-4-3-2-1” technique: discover five stuff you see, 4 things you’re feeling, three stuff you hear, two things you’re feeling, and one thing you taste. This will help bring you back to the current when you are feeling overwhelmed.

Plan distraction activities: Engage in some enjoyable activities to take your mind off the alternatives. Immerse yourself in book, watch a comforting movie, pursue a hobby, and even cook your favorite meal. Breaking away from constant election thoughts can bring great relief.

Get ready for a calming routine: Plan the way you will rest at the top of the day, even when the outcomes are not what you expected. Disconnecting, practicing gratitude, and spending time with family members will help reduce post-election stress.

Set boundaries in political discussions: If certain conversations are causing more stress than support, it’s idea to set boundaries around them. Let family and friends know when you need a break from political conversations, or conform to a “safe” topic if the conversation gets tense.

Meghan Watson:

Listen to what fear is telling you

Fear often reveals what we care deeply about. Take a moment to know the messages your fear could also be sending. Are you anxious about specific outcomes because they go against your values ​​or beliefs? Use this reflection to reconnect with these values ​​and permit them to guide you toward actions or practices that honor what is very important to you, even when those actions are small.

See fear as a signal to search out safety

Fear is the body’s natural alarm system. In times of heightened anxiety, ask yourself: What makes me feel protected and grounded? It might be spending time with a pet or loved one, taking a moment to step away out of your creative passions, mindful respiratory/meditation, or preparing a delicious meal. Prioritize practices that soothe and nourish your nervous system and well-being in times of uncertainty.

Realize that closure may not occur immediately

Election results can sometimes leave us feeling unresolved or incomplete. Realizing that closure is not at all times immediate could be liberating – it permits you to feel what you’re feeling without forcing a resolution. You may not feel the best way you expected, or you might feel sad after the outcomes. Being prepared to simply accept this permits you to have more room in your body to process what comes up without judgment.

Kobe Campbell:

Meet your needs as a substitute of moralizing them

It’s easy to get right into a spiral of questioning whether we must always or shouldn’t feel a certain way or have particular needs. Statements like “I shouldn’t worry” or “I should just deal with it” are phrases we regularly repeat, but they encourage us to spread the word concerning the need reasonably than meet it. Identify what you’re feeling, accept what you’re feeling, and make decisions that provide help to feel safer on this experience.

Prioritize your social connection

Isolation can reinforce fear. Consider meeting virtually with friends, family or community members on Election Day. Schedule a session with your therapist upfront and begin a bunch chat to share thoughts on developments, express emotions, and supply comfort. Sharing your thoughts and support with individuals who understand your experiences could be grounding and empowering.

Make a plan for the day

Knowing where to go and what to do can provide you with a way of control. Plan to vote early and, if possible, arrange protected transportation to the polls. After casting your vote, spend the remainder of the day engaging in activities that may keep you calm and distracted. This might mean shopping for groceries early, deciding to eat out, or planning to exit on Election Day or the day after a bank holiday.

Post-election self-care plan

Regardless of the outcomes, the strain of election season doesn’t just disappear after Election Day. Establish post-election rest and recovery plans. Taking time to decompress and process by seeing a therapist, having a private day, attending a social event, or having fun with a quiet evening with book can ease constant tension.

Rely in your faith

The power of religion is most evident once we cannot control the outcomes. Stand on what you think in and reflect on the values ​​that anchor you. Take time to wish and remind yourself that you just are not alone in facing uncertainty. Faith is usually a powerful source of peace and hope.

Żaneta Dove:

Rely in your support system

Staying connected with family members will help relieve stress and supply comfort during these uncertain times. Surround yourself with individuals who make you’re feeling protected and grounded. Spending Election Day with an in depth friend or watching coverage from a trusted support group could make it easier to deal with the emotional ups and downs which will arise throughout the day.

Increase physical activity

Give your emotions an outlet by going for a brisk walk in nature, participating in a calming yoga class, or doing an energizing workout. This will provide help to direct nervous energy and increase the production of key neurotransmitters comparable to serotonin and dopamine, needed to control your mood. Physical activity also helps release stress-relieving endorphins and lower cortisol levels.

Limit your use of social media

Limit your social media use by setting clear boundaries. Set specific limits in your activity and treat your content consciously. Stay informed without letting election coverage overwhelm you.


This article was originally published on : www.essence.com
Continue Reading

Health and Wellness

Ron Norsworthy brings his version of black glitter to Fifth Avenue – Essence

Published

on

By

Courtesy of Ron Norsworthy

There is not any nonsense in Ron Norsworthy’s look and tone. I noticed this immediately during our conversation. The interdisciplinary artist it has owl-like eyes, black, wide and glossy. With as much emphasis as the good Reverend, Norsworthy tilts his head, bobbing like a corkscrew, and declares that each single one of us who walks this earth is “f… beautiful.” In the era we live in, full of mental distortions, plasticized aesthetics and distorted self-image, his balanced words and sermons seem particularly energizing. Many times I resist the urge to arise and shout, “Amen!” Ready to release one of those long and loose church “.”

We sit within the Edwynn Houk Gallery on Fifth Avenue, curled up in lavish chairs surrounding Norsworthy’s upcoming exhibition. He is dressed simply in an olive green motorcycle jacket, thin jeans and a dove gray turtleneck, with the identical authority as his royal subjects. The revision of the tragic Greek myth goals to overthrow not only the exclusionary cliques of beauty and history, but in addition to hold a mirror up to a nation eternally erased. As frivolous because the word “beauty” may sound, beauty as a system is commonly an insidious concept.

“Who can be beautiful? Who are the arbiters of beauty?” These are the questions Norsworthy asks and explores through his exhibition. “Whom does culture favor, allow and support? We cannot think about beauty without thinking about gender, class, or ethnicity, and these are all narratives that have shaped us. They are, and often classical notions of beauty have been shaped by white models of power. I wanted to bring these narratives to life and make them more relevant to people like me,” Norsworthy says at one point in our conversation.

Ron Norsworthy brings his version of black glitter to Fifth Avenue
Courtesy of Ron Norsworthy

Born and raised in South Bend, Indiana, Norsworthy’s path to becoming an influential figure within the art world was shaped by the ladies in his family. She tells me the story about her grandmother’s jewelry box, its light, each set, and all of the pendants. “I remember her sewing, us both looking at the illustrations, and then I ran over to try and sketch the dresses,” he said. His mother was one other figure he admired growing up. She remembers how sensually she tied the scarves. Here he mentions what he calls “her amazing fur”, which he loved immensely. “I know too many beautiful black women who just knew how to carry themselves – it was never about the physical marks, it was about how they radiated the whole package.”

These impressions shaped by black women left an indelible mark on his stylistic edicts. Like his grandmother, he doesn’t mix fashion with style, preferring high-quality wardrobe staples over low-cost and poorly produced fabrics. “Fashion is a moment,” declares Norsworthy. “Style is eternal and I have never been interested in that kind of impermanence.” He is currently experiencing a “tailored moment” by designing and embroidering his suits and jackets. Also favorites are designers resembling Emily Adams Bode Aujla and Thom Browne, whom she praises for his or her level of tailoring. Like his works of art, Norsworthy’s style just isn’t only a way to honor the depths of our inner life, but in addition an energetic way to empower our change.

“I grew up in a time where so many restrictions were placed on me. It was a form of perpetual anxiety because I knew I’d never meet them,” Norsworthy recalled. He tells stories about his upbringing that made it difficult for him to build a world in which he felt comfortable or that made sense. “I believe it’s extremely necessary that we are able to look within the mirror and say, ‘I’m not ashamed of who I’m,’ and that every of us can live strongly in our identity.”

Ron Norsworthy brings his version of black glitter to Fifth Avenue
Courtesy of Ron Norsworthy

Norsworthy’s profession began in the sector of set design, where he created visually stunning sets or “site-specific installations” for artists resembling Britney Spears, Lisa Marie Presley, Notorious BIG and plenty of others. The visionary behind movies resembling Erykah Badu’s “Bag Lady” and Foxy Brown’s “I’ll Be” has collaborated with such luminaries as costume designer June Ambrose and director Hype Williams. Missy Elliott’s “The Rain (Supa Dupa Fly)” is one other feat he is amazingly proud of achieving. “Set design and creative direction were my first canvases,” he admits. “It was a way for me to express myself and challenge the limits of our dreams.”

For nearly thirty years, his designs, characterised by baroque mise-en-scenes and ornate reality, have made him one of probably the most sought-after names within the industry. But Norsworthy’s ambitions at all times prolonged beyond the world of stage design. “I never wanted to limit myself to one medium,” he explains. He claims that art is about exploration and experimentation – it’s a way of crossing boundaries.

He soon began to explore other forms of artistic expression, from photography to installation. After starting his own brand, he became one of the primary black men to offer sold-out collections. “I have a very wide practice. I’m not afraid of materials.” He says he loves sculptures, collages and assemblages. Here, Norsworthy mentions that he can even create beyond his expectations. “If I decided I wanted to design sneakers or a wedding dress, I could and would do it using the same methodology.”

Ron Norsworthy brings his version of black glitter to Fifth Avenue
Courtesy of Ron Norsworthy

Among eleven offerings, swirling photographs mined from the Internet and transferred to picket panels, Norsworthy offers the type of narrative that almost all movies refuse to take into consideration, let alone imagine. Instead of black lives mutilated, stripped of dignity and degraded, each portrait that comes together is a study in delicious splendor. In Norsworthy’s universe, black men stare upon their reflections in cozy, warmly lit homes or wear tailored suits adorned with cabochon brooches and diamond flowers.

In one portrait, titled “Narcissus in Fleetwood Chapel,” a Renaissance figure resembling the enduring artist Prince, with a petulant expression and a lavish coat, lounges affectionately in a Cadillac Coupe DeVille. Although Norsworthy insists that they’re all his favorites, this one remains to be electrifying.” It challenges what we mean by gender. She is wearing tights, no top, no shirt, fur, and her hair is curly. I really like all these elements combined with his pose and reflection.”

In one other peculiar photo, a person elegantly dressed looks on the exquisite beauty of a portrait of Laura Wheeler Waring. In others, vases, roses and tulips are decorated with sparkling diamonds that might be found at a Sotheby’s auction.

My favorite from the exhibition is named) A young man seems to be searching through the frame. His skin, a greedy shade of brown, seems to absorb all the sunshine. He is hunched over, half-dressed, and his thighs are decorated with tulips. His hair is flooded Soul Head that may destroy the couch. A necklace of pearls and diamonds hangs around his collarbones and chest. The suit hangs on the wall. At his feet lie a suitcase and a pair of women’s shoes. The room he’s in is empty and full of luxuries: a stool, an antique mirror, a still life portrait, and an unopened package draped over a pink chair. Refracted rainbows dance on the wallpaper and floor. But what intrigues me most is the person’s face.

Ron Norsworthy brings his version of black glitter to Fifth Avenue

His lips are pursed and his gaze is nearly confrontational, although his posture seems gentle, gentle, and his shoulders are hunched. Is he nervous? Is this an invasion of his privacy? Is he sad? Has he lost a friend? Am I studying it an excessive amount of? Wanting deeply to be soaked in what I imagine? Is that just his face? Or perhaps he’s bored, tired of being elegant, tired of being seen in any respect, tired of the ridiculous binaries of the world.

Of all my habits, probably the most crucial to my survival was the knowledge that there was no diamond as brilliant as mine. I grew up in a house full of a mother’s sublime love. A love that insisted that I believe highly of myself, hold my head high, value my feelings, and spend hours respecting myself within the mirror.

There were, of course, just a few years once I confused self-confidence with self-love, and two years once I lost strength under the load of the world. But still, my mother’s love for me surpassed any form of hatred. I need everyone to know this sense of mastery. I wish everyone knew how to stay calm in a world that’s betting on us destroying our self-awareness. One of probably the most stunning effects of the commodification of beauty is its subtlety and normalization. This concept only offers a refracted mirror that may put you at war with yourself and devour your imagination.

These ideals indicate why Norsworthy’s work raises a crucial and urgent query. What would the world be like if we softened our minds and dared to love our reflections? His latest exhibition goals to answer this query in a novel way.

This article was originally published on : www.essence.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending