Connect with us

Technology

Al Gore criticizes corporations and politicians, comparing their climate crisis promises to ‘New Year’s resolutions’

Published

on

Al Gore has enjoyed a highly successful profession, including as a U.S. senator, U.S. vice chairman, U.S. presidential candidate, and even the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize winner for “telling the world about the dangers of climate change.” In May of this yr, he was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom for his lifetime of service.

But what still eludes him is how much progress he expected to see on the climate crisis by now, some 45 years after he attended the primary congressional hearing on fusion. What infuriates him most, he says, is that the world already has the mandate to fix what’s broken—if only there have been the financial and political will to accomplish that.

It’s not without hope. This editor spoke with Gore and his business partner Lila Preston Tuesday morning in regards to the recent, annual climate report that their investment management firm, focused on sustainability, Generational investment managementreleased. The report is definitely pretty convincing; it is also less promising than last yr’s release, and Gore sounded a bit more frustrated than once I spoke to him last yr.

We can have podcast from that interview from later this week. In the meantime, listed below are a number of excerpts from that conversation, flippantly edited for length.

TC: I read the report last night and I actually have to say that in some ways it seems gloomier and less optimistic than it did a yr ago.

AG: It’s a deliberate approach on our part. We still imagine that the world will solve this crisis, however the query is how quickly we will do it, because every single day more damage is being done and more risk is being placed on humanity. After the ultimate document was written at (the 2023 United Nations Climate Change Conference), all of us tried to understand the true meaning of “transition” away from fossil fuels and (that goal was then written into international law). But within the immediate aftermath, a few of the most important fossil fuel corporations resumed a large expansion of exploration and development of much more fossil fuels, despite the International Energy Agency saying that it was unnecessary and contrary to the energy transition that was so mandatory. Since then, we’ve seen some financial services corporations backtrack on their commitments as well… so those commitments sometimes start to feel like New Year’s resolutions: easy to make and hard to achieve.

So it is the “law” but there aren’t any penalties for these fossil fuel corporations for further expansion?

One of the extremely dangerous risks that they needs to be making an allowance for far more is the danger of stranded assets. Fatih Birol (head of the International Energy Agency) has highlighted this risk, but old habits die hard, especially after they are old, profitable habits.

As you said, it isn’t just industry, it is also governments. The report addresses the growing opposition to climate policy in several parts of the world, including opposition to wind farms and solar farms. How can governments overcome that? How can they higher engage the general public in supporting this energy transition?

The effectiveness of self-government is itself one in all the problems that needs to be addressed. The fossil fuel industry is the richest, strongest lobby within the history of the world. They are significantly better at catching politicians than they’re at catching emissions, and they’re deliberately slowing down this transition, and governments are slow to respond.

There’s some excellent news. The passage of the Inflation Reduction Act was a milestone, and it took some time to get the cash out and the assorted programs that it authorized, but now we’re starting to see them have a big impact. Europe continues to paved the way. China continues to construct out an excessive amount of fossil fuel infrastructure. But between January 1 and the tip of July of this yr, China deployed as much recent solar capability as could be provided by about 18 recent 1-gigawatt nuclear plants. That’s pretty incredible. And even after factoring in capability aspects and every thing else, that is still greater than five recent nuclear plants every month.

So we have now excellent news, but we’re still moving too slowly because we’re still using the sky as an open sewer. We’re still trapping as much extra heat every single day as 750,000 Hiroshima-class nuclear bombs exploding on Earth every single day. It’s really crazy that we’re still allowing this to occur, and all of us need to get entangled—all sectors, all industries.

I’m sure you’ve been asked so much about fusion energy, which promises to harness the nuclear force that powers the sun to generate nearly limitless energy here on Earth. Without much evidence, VCs have poured $7.1 billion right into a handful of startups in recent times. Are they being overly optimistic, or do you’re thinking that there’s some truth to it?

Generation has innovated the concept of the time value of coal, and while it’s incredibly priceless that these early investors are attempting to speed up the event of fusion and also (small modular reactors), even probably the most optimistic of those investors will inform you in their honest moments that it’s going to be an extended time before fusion reactors play any significant role. I hope that we will speed up that point. I attended my first congressional hearing on fusion 45 years ago this yr, and the experts on the table told our subcommittee that it’s 50 years away, so now I’m getting excited. But jokes aside, while there’s real progress there, let’s be realistic; it’s going to take time and we have now an instantaneous challenge, and the time value of coal tells us that we actually need to reduce emissions… We need to give attention to the immediate solutions which might be available now to address this dire climate crisis by accelerating all efforts to reduce emissions from burning fossil fuels.

Many individuals are grateful that you simply, Bill Gates, and others like you’re putting climate change and climate solutions on the forefront. At the identical time, you’ve already enjoyed incredibly successful careers; you possibly can afford the hardships and challenges of advocating for major political and financial changes to address climate change. Who are the business and political leaders who will stand behind you to carry the torch? Do you’re feeling like we’re being embraced on this front? Are you concerned?

The people we cope with every single day, especially (at Generation), are incredible. One of the lesser-seen aspects on this transformation is that the businesses which might be leading the best way are pulling the most effective and brightest young people out of university and engineering schools, and people of all ages are changing careers to be a part of it. We meet probably the most extraordinary entrepreneurs who’re simply burning with passion to play a major role in solving this crisis. There are so many examples. One UK business leader who we have now supported very strongly, Greg Jackson from Octopus Energyis really making a major difference to the electricity retail sector. CEO H2 Green Steel is one other… business leader of the longer term who’s already doing great work.

LP: We call this basket of leaders systemic positive thinkers. They’re really changing the entire system. They’re excited about: How will we redesign supply chains? Companies like (advanced supply chain planning corporations) Solutions o9 AND Altana.ai have this huge ambition, (with) the popularity that these solutions need to be higher and cheaper and have a smaller carbon footprint and be greener and more sustainable. And that is exciting. That’s a possibility.

I wish we had more well-known, positive thinkers in regards to the system. Some of the richest people on this planet have the world’s attention and (could make a major impact by being) more visibly focused on the identical issues.

AG: We have TechCrunch!

This article was originally published on : techcrunch.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Technology

India Considers Easing Market Share Caps for UPI Payments Operators

Published

on

By

phonepe UPI being used to accept payments at a road-side sunglasses stall.

The regulator that oversees India’s popular UPI rail payments is considering relaxing a proposed market share cap for operators like Google Pay, PhonePe and Paytm because it grapples with enforcing the restrictions, two people accustomed to the matter told TechCrunch.

The National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI), which is regulated by the Indian central bank, is considering increasing the market share that UPI operators can hold to greater than 40%, said two of the people, requesting anonymity because the knowledge is confidential. The regulator had earlier proposed a 30% market share limit to encourage competition within the space.

UPI has change into the most well-liked option to send and receive money in India, with the mechanism processing over 12 billion transactions monthly. Walmart-backed PhonePe has about 48% market share by volume and 50% by value, while Google Pay has 37.3% share by volume.

Once an industry heavyweight, Paytm’s market share has fallen to 7.2% from 11% late last yr amid regulatory challenges.

According to several industry executives, the NPCI’s increase in market share limits is more likely to be a controversial move as many UPI providers were counting on regulatory motion to curb the dominance of PhonePe and Google Pay.

NPCI, which has previously declined to comment on market share, didn’t reply to a request for comment on Thursday.

The regulator originally planned to implement the market share caps in January 2021 but prolonged the deadline to January 1, 2025. The regulator has struggled to seek out a workable option to implement its proposed market share caps.

The stakes are high, especially for PhonePe, India’s Most worthy fintech startup, valued at $12 billion.

Sameer Nigam, co-founder and CEO of PhonePe, said last month that the startup cannot go public “if there is uncertainty on regulatory issues.”

“If you buy a share at Rs 100 and value it assuming we have 48-49% market share, there is uncertainty whether it will come down to 30% and when,” Nigam told a fintech conference last month. “We are reaching out to them (the regulator) whether they can find another way to at least address any concerns they have or tell us what the list of concerns is,” he added.

This article was originally published on : techcrunch.com
Continue Reading

Technology

Bluesky addresses trust and security issues related to abuse, spam and more

Published

on

By

Bluesky butterfly logo and Jay Graber

Social media startup Bluesky, which is constructing a decentralized alternative to X (formerly Twitter), provided an update Wednesday on the way it’s approaching various trust and security issues on its platform. The company is in various stages of developing and piloting a variety of initiatives focused on coping with bad actors, harassment, spam, fake accounts, video security and more.

To address malicious users or those that harass others, Bluesky says it’s developing recent tools that can have the option to detect when multiple recent accounts are created and managed by the identical person. This could help curb harassment when a foul actor creates several different personas to attack their victims.

Another recent experiment will help detect “rude” replies and forward them to server moderators. Like Mastodon, Bluesky will support a network where self-hosters and other developers can run their very own servers that connect to Bluesky’s server and others on the network. This federation capability is still in early access. But in the long term, server moderators will have the option to resolve how they need to take care of individuals who post rude responses. In the meantime, Bluesky will eventually reduce the visibility of those responses on its app. Repeated rude labels on content will even lead to account-level labels and suspensions, it says.

To curb using lists to harass others, Bluesky will remove individual users from the list in the event that they block the list creator. Similar functionality was recently introduced to Starter Packs, a sort of shared list that will help recent users find people to follow on the platform (check TechCrunch Starter Pack).

Bluesky will even scan lists with offensive names or descriptions to limit the potential of harassing others by adding them to a public list with a toxic or offensive name or description. Those who violate Bluesky’s Community Guidelines might be hidden from the app until the list owner makes changes that align with Bluesky’s policies. Users who proceed to create offensive lists will even face further motion, though the corporate didn’t provide details, adding that the lists are still an area of ​​energetic discussion and development.

In the approaching months, Bluesky also intends to move to handling moderation reports through its app, using notifications relatively than counting on email reports.

To combat spam and other fake accounts, Bluesky is launching a pilot that can attempt to routinely detect when an account is fake, scamming or sending spam to users. Combined with moderation, the goal is to have the option to take motion on accounts inside “seconds of receiving a report,” the corporate said.

One of the more interesting developments is how Bluesky will comply with local laws while still allowing free speech. It will use geotags that allow it to hide some content from users in a particular area to comply with the law.

“This allows Bluesky’s moderation service to maintain flexibility in creating spaces for free expression while also ensuring legal compliance so that Bluesky can continue to operate as a service in these geographic regions,” the corporate shared in a blog post. “This feature will be rolled out on a country-by-country basis, and we will endeavor to inform users of the source of legal requests when legally possible.”

To address potential trust and safety issues with videos which have recently been added, the team is adding features like the flexibility to disable autoplay, ensuring videos are labeled, and providing the flexibility to report videos. They are still evaluating what else might need to be added, which might be prioritized based on user feedback.

When it comes to abuse, the corporate says its general framework is “a question of how often something happens versus how harmful it is.” The company focuses on addressing high-impact, high-frequency issues, in addition to “tracking edge cases that could result in significant harm to a few users.” The latter, while only affecting a small number of individuals, causes enough “ongoing harm” that Bluesky will take motion to prevent abuse, it says.

User concerns will be reported via reports, emails and mentions @safety.bsky.app account.

This article was originally published on : techcrunch.com
Continue Reading

Technology

Apple Airpods Now With FDA-Approved Hearing Aid Feature

Published

on

By

The newest AirPods are a part of a growing group of hearing aids available over-the-counter.


Apple’s latest Airpods could help those with hearing impairments. The tech company’s software update has been approved by the FDA to be used as hearing aids.

The FDA approved Apple’s hearing aid feature on September 12. The free update, available on AirPods Pro 2, will amplify sounds for the hearing impaired. However, the feature is simply available to adults 18 and older with an iPhone or iPad compatible with iOS 18.

“Today’s approval of over-the-counter hearing aid software for a commonly used consumer audio product is another step that will increase the availability, affordability, and acceptability of hearing support for adults with mild to moderate hearing loss,” said Dr. Michelle Tarver, acting director of the FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health, in a press release. obtained by .

They confirmed the feature’s use after a clinical trial with 118 participants. The results showed that users “achieved similar perceived benefits to those who received a professional fit on the same device.” Apple also announced the brand new development just days before the agency’s approval.

“Hearing health is an essential part of our overall well-being, yet it is often overlooked — in fact, according to Apple’s Hearing Study, as many as 75 percent of people diagnosed with hearing loss go untreated,” said Sumbul Desai, MD, vice chairman of Health at Apple. press release“We’re excited to deliver breakthrough software features in AirPods Pro that put users’ hearing health first, offering new ways to test and get help for hearing loss.”

What’s more, Apple intends its recent AirPods to supply a “world-first” hearing health experience. Noting that 1.5 billion people suffer from hearing loss, the device also goals to forestall and detect hearing problems.

“Your AirPods Pro will transform into your own personalized hearing aid, amplifying the specific sounds you need in real time, such as parts of speech or elements of your environment,” Desai added in a video announcing the event.

The latest AirPods are a part of a growing variety of over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids. They usually are not only more accessible, but additionally significantly cheaper than prescription medical devices. While they’re designed for individuals with mild to moderate hearing loss, they’ll initially treat those with limited abilities.

AirPods Pro 2 is available now for $249.


This article was originally published on : www.blackenterprise.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending