Connect with us

Technology

UK-based Wayve secures strategic investment from Uber to further develop autonomous driving technology

Published

on

UK’s Wayve secures strategic investment from Uber to further develop self-driving tech

Uber is making a strategic investment in Wayve as an extension of the British startup’s previously announced $1.05 billion Series C funding round. The partnership will even see each firms work with automakers to integrate Wayve’s AI into consumer vehicles that can at some point run on the ride-hailing giant’s platform.

The tie-up comes per week after Uber announced that Cruise’s robot taxi would join the Uber app in 2025. It is the newest in a series of self-driving technology partnerships that Uber has secured over the past few years.

Details about Uber’s partnership with Wayve are scarce, however the startup has made a splash since its founding in Cambridge in 2017. Over the past two years, Wayve has raised greater than $1.3 billion from investors including SoftBank Group, Nvidia and Microsoft.

Advertisement

The startup is developing a self-learning, quite than rule-based, autonomous driving system—similar to Tesla’s AI. Like Tesla, Wayve doesn’t depend on lidar sensors. It uses cameras and radar to help its AI perceive the world around it. Unlike Tesla, Wayve is constructing its AI in order that other automakers can equip consumer vehicles with Level 2+ advanced driver assistance systems, in addition to Level 3 and Level 4 automated driving features.

SAE defines Level 3 and Level 4 autonomous driving systems are those who can operate autonomously under certain conditions. A driver still needs to be ready to take control of a Level 3 system, but not a Level 4 system. Wayve is currently still testing its L2+ technology in Jaguar I-Paces and Ford E-Transits with safety drivers behind the wheel, and has not begun testing L3 and L4, according to a Wayve spokesperson.

Wayve didn’t provide further details on the character of its agreement with Uber. In a press release, the corporate said the partnership “envisages future Wayve-powered autonomous vehicles being available on the Uber network.”

Neither Wayve nor Uber have provided a timeline for when Wayve-powered vehicles will likely be included in Uber’s app. They haven’t disclosed whether the vehicles will likely be fully autonomous or equipped only with advanced driver-assist technology. They haven’t said how much Uber is investing.

Advertisement

In a press release, Alex Kendall, CEO and co-founder of Wayve, said the partnership will help “significantly increase the AI ​​learning capacity of our fleet, ensuring our AV technology is safe and ready for global deployment across the Uber network.”

Kendall also noted that Wayve and Uber will jointly “work with automotive OEMs to bring autonomous driving technologies to consumers faster.”

Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi said in a press release that Wayve’s approach to AI “holds enormous promise” as the corporate strives for “a world where modern vehicles are shared, electric, and autonomous.”

“We are excited to have Wayve as our partner to help us build Uber into the premier network for autonomous vehicles,” Khosrowshahi said.

Advertisement

In recent weeks, Uber has positioned itself as a super partner for self-driving startups looking to enter the market. A Waymo robotaxi joined Uber’s platform in Phoenix last yr. Uber has also partnered with firms which can be making autonomous sidewalk delivery robots, including Serve Robotics, Cartken and Coco – and autonomous freight startups like Waabi and Aurora, which aim to bring autonomous driving capabilities to Uber Eats and Uber Freight.

This article was originally published on : techcrunch.com

Technology

Anysphere, which makes the cursor supposedly collect USD 900 million with a valuation of USD 9 billion

Published

on

By

AI robot face and programming code on a black background.

Anysphere, producer of coding cursor with AI drive, attracted $ 900 million in the recent financing round by Thrive Capital, Financial Times He informed, citing anonymous sources familiar with the contract.

The report said that Andreessen Horowitz (A16Z) and ACCEL also participate in the round, which values ​​about $ 9 billion.

The cursor collected $ 105 million from Thrive, and A16Z with a valuation of $ 2.5 billion, as TechCrunch said in December. Capital Thrive also led this round and in addition participated in A16Z. According to Crunchbase data, the startup has collected over $ 173 million thus far.

Advertisement

It is alleged that investors, including index ventures and a reference point, attempt to support the company, but plainly existing investors don’t want to miss the opportunity to support it.

Other coding start-ups powered by artificial intelligence also attract the interest of investors. Techcrunch announced in February that Windsurf, a rival for Aklesphere, talked about collecting funds at a valuation of $ 3 billion. Openai, an investor in Anysphere, was supposedly I’m attempting to get windsurf for about the same value.

(Tagstransate) A16Z

(*9*)This article was originally published on : techcrunch.com

Continue Reading

Technology

This is the shipping of products from China to the USA

Published

on

By

Shein and Temu icons are seen displayed on a phone screen in this illustration photo

The Chinese retailer has modified the strategy in the face of American tariffs.

Thanks to the executive ordinance, President Donald Trump ended the so -called de minimis principle, which allowed goods value 800 USD or less entering the country without tariffs. It also increases tariffs to Chinese goods by over 100%, forcing each Chinese firms and Shein, in addition to American giants, similar to Amazon to adapt plans and price increases.

CNBC reports that this was also affected, and American buyers see “import fees” from 130% to 150% added to their accounts. Now, nevertheless, the company is not sending the goods directly from China to the United States. Instead, it only displays the offers of products available in American warehouses, while goods sent from China are listed as outside the warehouse.

Advertisement

“He actively recruits American sellers to join the platform,” said the spokesman ago. “The transfer is to help local sellers reach more customers and develop their companies.”

(tagstotransate) tariffs

This article was originally published on : techcrunch.com
Continue Reading

Technology

One of the last AI Google models is worse in terms of safety

Published

on

By

The Google Gemini generative AI logo on a smartphone.

The recently released Google AI model is worse in some security tests than its predecessor, in line with the company’s internal comparative test.

IN Technical report Google, published this week, reveals that his Flash Gemini 2.5 model is more likely that he generates a text that violates its security guidelines than Gemini 2.0 Flash. In two indicators “text security for text” and “image security to the text”, Flash Gemini 2.5 will withdraw 4.1% and 9.6% respectively.

Text safety for the text measures how often the model violates Google guidelines, making an allowance for the prompt, while image security to the text assesses how close the model adheres to those boundaries after displaying the monitors using the image. Both tests are automated, not supervised by man.

Advertisement

In an e-mail, Google spokesman confirmed that Gemini 2.5 Flash “performs worse in terms of text safety for text and image.”

These surprising comparative results appear when AI is passing in order that their models are more acceptable – in other words, less often refuse to answer controversial or sensitive. In the case of the latest Llam Meta models, he said that he fought models in order to not support “some views on others” and answers to more “debated” political hints. Opeli said at the starting of this yr that he would improve future models, in order to not adopt an editorial attitude and offers many prospects on controversial topics.

Sometimes these efforts were refundable. TechCrunch announced on Monday that the default CHATGPT OPENAI power supply model allowed juvenile to generate erotic conversations. Opeli blamed his behavior for a “mistake”.

According to Google Technical Report, Gemini 2.5 Flash, which is still in view, follows instructions more faithfully than Gemini 2.0 Flash, including instructions exceeding problematic lines. The company claims that regression might be partially attributed to false positives, but in addition admits that Gemini 2.5 Flash sometimes generates “content of violation” when it is clearly asked.

Advertisement

TechCrunch event

Berkeley, California
|.
June 5

Book now

Advertisement

“Of course, there is a tension between (after instructions) on sensitive topics and violations of security policy, which is reflected in our assessment,” we read in the report.

The results from Meepmap, reference, which can examine how models react to sensitive and controversial hints, also suggest that Flash Gemini 2.5 is much less willing to refuse to reply controversial questions than Flash Gemini 2.0. Testing the TechCrunch model through the AI ​​OpenRoutter platform has shown that he unsuccessfully writes essays to support human artificial intelligence judges, weakening the protection of due protection in the US and the implementation of universal government supervisory programs.

Thomas Woodside, co -founder of the Secure AI Project, said that the limited details given by Google in their technical report show the need for greater transparency in testing models.

“There is a compromise between the instruction support and the observation of politics, because some users may ask for content that would violate the rules,” said Woodside Techcrunch. “In this case, the latest Flash model Google warns the instructions more, while breaking more. Google does not present many details about specific cases in which the rules have been violated, although they claim that they are not serious. Not knowing more, independent analysts are difficult to know if there is a problem.”

Advertisement

Google was already under fire for his models of security reporting practices.

The company took weeks to publish a technical report for the most talented model, Gemini 2.5 Pro. When the report was finally published, it initially omitted the key details of the security tests.

On Monday, Google published a more detailed report with additional security information.

(Tagstotransate) Gemini

Advertisement
This article was originally published on : techcrunch.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending