Connect with us

Business and Finance

Women play a key role in agriculture – so why are they often unable to own land?

Published

on

When we expect of a farmer, we often picture a man. But in reality, women contribute 49% to real farm income.

It isn’t nearly women working as farmers an increasing number of often. Maintaining agricultural activities normally also relies on women working off the farm, especially in times of drought.

Yet women often don’t own farmland. And when it comes to who gets the family farm in succession planning, daughters, moms and daughters-in-law are likely to be ignored.

There are established legal safeguards that girls can use to challenge this. But our latest research states that girls are often perceived as a threat to the continuity of the family farm and attempts are made to deliberately exclude them from it.

Australian agriculture is just suffering as a result. To solve this problem, some stubborn attitudes could have to change.

Passing the family farm from generation to generation

The means of deciding who will take over the family farm is generally known as farm transition and succession. Passing the land from one generation to the subsequent is highest importance for farming families.

Farmers see themselves as custodians of the land, constructing on the work of previous generations for the advantage of their descendants. Owning agricultural land is tied to identity, social standing, culture, and community.

Transferring a profitable farming business often means keeping it together quite than dividing it up between siblings. However, farmland prices shot upwhich suggests that for a lot of families, succession planning could be a multi-million dollar issue.

Farmland prices in Australia have increased dramatically in recent many years.
Author: RobynCharnley/Shutterstock

Aside from the plain emotional toll, this also makes it incredibly difficult for siblings who want to take over the farm to buy out the others. It may also mean that siblings who don’t take over the farm will find yourself freely giving an increasing number of money.

As you would possibly expect, this has made succession planning on the farm big business. Lawyers, accountants and business consultants are being tapped to help farm families negotiate a way forward.

So who gets the farm?

Sons, mostly. Latest data suggests that daughters take over the family farm only 10 percent of the time. But because these data are quite old, a large upcoming study will assess whether this remains to be the case.

The default position of most Australian farming families is that the farmer is equal to the person – their sons are seen as one of the best placed to take over the farm. They are often socialised into this role from birth.

Close-up of hands controlling a combine harvester, digital display
Agriculture has undergone an incredible technological change.
Igor Klyakhin/Shutterstock

But this view could be very outdated. As agriculture becomes more skilled, entrepreneurial and technology-orientedthe parable that this requires brutal male physical strength is losing its validity.

Fortunately, gender norms in agriculture are is slowly moving. Although we still have a good distance to go, daughters are increasingly being considered farmers and are less likely to be ignored when dividing family wealth.

The “terrible” daughter-in-law-a village girl

Few are as wary of farm succession politics because the daughter-in-law. Yet their work on and off the farm, and their roles as caregivers and community members, are crucial to the reproduction of farm families, the family farm, and rural communities.

Women have turn into less accepting deprivation of land ownership due to changes in education levels, family law and gender norms.

But for the generation of landowners they are still often perceived as a threat to the continuity of the family farm.

Attempts by a daughter-in-law to begin the succession planning process, to challenge allegations of underpaying her partner or herself, or to seek a profession outside of the agricultural areas can be seen as challenges to the standard farming family.

This is despite the indisputable fact that he’s often simply trying to provide reassurance to his immediate family.

Intentionally blocked

For a while now, Australian family law has covered each cohabiting and married couples.

In the event of a divorce or breakdown of a partnership, the court has the suitable to determine how property – for instance farms – is split between the partners.

In this fashion, an equitable division is sought, quite than assets being viewed as being held in a 50/50 split. It can take into consideration the needs of every partner and their financial and non-financial contributions, equivalent to childcare.

Despite this, our tests found that generations of landowners use farm inheritance processes to protect the continuity of the farm from claims by their daughters-in-law.

a man and a woman are writing on a document
Various tactics are sometimes used to exclude women from succession planning.
Bacho/Shutterstock

This includes delaying the transfer of the farm to their adult children so that the daughter-in-law cannot make a claim in the event of a divorce. Family business structures are also used that quarantine the farm’s assets, equivalent to binding financial agreements.

But the collective marginalization of the farmer’s daughter-in-law and the exclusion of daughters from succession only harms the industry. In their attempts to maintain the establishment of gender relations, many family farms are not preparing for the changing business and social environment.

Women have been graduating from agricultural colleges in equal numbers to men for over twenty years. Female farmers are found have a high level of entrepreneurship, innovation and powerful sustainable development values.

How can farming families higher plan for succession?

Food Security and the Agricultural Industry in Australia depend about how to do succession well. It has to be an ongoing conversation with the entire family, supported by professionals with different skills.

This signifies that women can now not be deliberately excluded. As one skilled in our study commented:

Plenty of these girls have sacrificed a lot and… they are incredibly intelligent and in fact could make a huge contribution to the success of those businesses if they (the older generation) would put their fear aside, be clear about what they are afraid of, take care of it and move on.

If the industry wants to thrive in the twenty first century, a change of approach shall be essential.

This article was originally published on : theconversation.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business and Finance

Workplace well-being declines as workers return to offices

Published

on

By

WORKPLACE, Bullying, return to office


As more workers are forced to return to the office and work remotely, research shows that workplace well-being is on the decline. The numbers are even lower for Black workers.

A brand new report from the Human Capital Development Lab at Johns Hopkins Carey Business School in partnership with Great Place to Work reveals that workplace well-being peaked in 2020. But the annual survey of greater than 1.5 million people at greater than 2,500 corporations measured the “climate of well-being” and found According to reports, this number has been systematically decreasing since 2020.

The decline varied by industry and a few demographics. Healthcare and retail/hospitality corporations had the bottom scores, while black, women and younger workers scored lower on well-being than white, men and older workers. Southern workers scored higher on well-being than their counterparts.

“The COVID pandemic has heightened employers’ awareness of the importance of wellness, and many top organizations have been working to create a positive work climate,” said Michelle Barton, Ph.D., assistant professor at Carey and co-author of the report. “The challenge now will be to integrate these practices into everyday work life, rather than simply as a response to the crisis.”

The researchers used five criteria to measure each company’s “climate of well-being”: financial health, meaningful connections, mental and emotional support, personal support, and a way of purpose. Employers who put money into their employees’ well-being, each financial and emotional, scored higher.

Male workers consistently reported higher workplace well-being scores than female workers, reflecting a gender pay gap that widened in 2023 for the primary time since 2020. Meanwhile, Black workers had the worst well-being between 2021 and 2023 compared with white workers, who ranked first, and Asian workers, who were the one group whose well-being matched or exceeded that of white workers over the five-year period.

Black women had the worst overall well-being compared to Asian men, who had the best well-being scores and the biggest gap compared to women.

“These significant differences underscore the continued need for organizations to address issues of equity, inclusion and belonging for all employees,” the report said.

The report found a transparent positive correlation between flexible working and improved worker well-being. Companies where 75% or more of their employees could work remotely part-time had the best well-being scores, while those where lower than 25% of employees had distant work options had the bottom scores.

“For employees, flexibility provides the means to effectively manage work-life balance while meeting personal and family needs, such as childcare and eldercare,” the report says. “For employers, it can support higher levels of employee engagement and productivity, while also fostering an atmosphere of well-being.”


This article was originally published on : www.blackenterprise.com
Continue Reading

Business and Finance

Tupperware Files for Bankruptcy – Is Multi-Level Marketing in Trouble?

Published

on

By

Tupperware is one in every of the few iconic brands that just about every Australian has encountered at the very least once.

Some, like me, grew up watching their mothers throw “Tupperware parties” for their friends on the weekends. Others used those unmistakably colourful containers to hold their lunches to work or make wonderful meals in the microwave.

So what could have gone so incorrect that the corporate is now… filed for bankruptcy in the United States?

Tupperware is one in every of the world’s most famous proponents of the business model referred to as “multi-level marketing.” However, its model has fallen under serious recent pressures in the digital age.

The company’s restructuring director summed it up best: writing in the event of filing an application with the bankruptcy court:

Almost everyone knows what Tupperware is, but even fewer know where to search out it.

So what exactly is multi-level marketing? And what lessons might Tupperware’s collapse hold for the broader sector?

What is multi-level marketing?

As a standard multi-level marketing entrepreneur, you don’t display your goods for sale on the shelves of supermarkets or malls.

You as an alternative recruit salespeople who sell your products to individuals, earning a commission on sales somewhat than a salary.

But that’s normally not the one way they will earn money. There are also financial incentives for recruiting recent salespeople, which may move them up in the corporate. Hence the term multi-level marketing, or MLM.

Tupperware quickly gained fame for its sale events.
Tupperware Corporation, public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

This marketing method had several benefits when it appeared.

People at the underside could see the incentives received by those above them, which helped keep each engagement and brand sentiment high. Many MLM brands still hold massive award shows to rejoice their biggest and best earners.

For customers, it was exciting to be invited to a celebration, to feel like part of somebody’s inner circle of friends. You could hang around, socialize, and possibly even spend somewhat money to assist a friend.

For the brand, this meant a ready-made customer base and product distribution network.

The MLM brand could also avoid a number of the larger overhead costs, like rent and salaries, that may cripple a standard retail model when times get tough. Sounds ideal, right?



Business model under pressure

In recent times, quite a lot of macroeconomic and cultural aspects have progressively been limiting the sales and profitability of a number of the largest players in the MLM sector.

Tupperware’s troubles were brewing for years. The company had I didn’t notice a rise in sales from the third quarter of 2021, and in 2023 it needed to urgently restructure its debt to stay solvent.

Before declaring bankruptcy, the corporate’s shares (listed on the New York Stock Exchange) were already dropped by about 75% only in 2024.

In August, one other major MLM, perfume and cosmetics giant Avon also filed for bankruptcy. While “flood“lawsuits” was a hot topic, Avon’s direct selling model had also been under pressure for years.

Tupperware container lids
Tupperware briefly experimented with retail.
Oleksiichik/Shutterstock

What happened?

Times, people and culture change. Many early MLMs, comparable to Tupperware and Avon settled in and thrived probably the most in an era that has long since passed.

Far fewer women worked full-time, in order that they were at home. Success stories offered hope and connections during what was effectively a difficult and lonely time of raising children in suburban Australia in the mid- to late twentieth century.

Since then, the speed of full-time employment for women has skyrocketed, meaning many brands have had to regulate their strategy.

Avon admitted as much in late 2023 when it announced plans to open its first brick-and-mortar stores in the UK. The company faced constantly falling sales during the last decade.

At that point, CEO Angela Cretu he said:

Women used to remain at home, but now they exit to work, and we have now to follow them wherever they spend their time and make the service as convenient as possible.

Failure to reposition the brand

The culture has modified, too. Asking your mates to make your life higher at their expense may now look like nothing much to anyone however the person receiving the cash.

Tupperware can have been a secure lunch box, nevertheless it was also your mom’s brand. It had a retro feel, nevertheless it wasn’t necessarily cool.

Perhaps he was a victim of his own success. warranty program for substitute covers freed from charge – for a product whose lids are easily lost or damaged – it’s one of the crucial consumer-friendly marketing programs I’ve ever heard of.

However, in the face of declining sales, this marketing strategy ensured that many individuals didn’t have to buy recent packaging and didn’t have to think about the brand’s newer products.

The flood of cheaper competitor products with very similar designs also had a negative impact on the brand.

In 2022, after a long time of direct selling, Tupperware made a radical change and placed its products on shelves at Target in the U.S. It can have been too little, too late.

New “extracurricular activities” for the digital age

Tupperware, like many MLMs, was not adapted to the digital changes we have now seen in the last decade. At the identical time, a brand new generation of “side hustles” has emerged and flourished – but importantly, online.

Unlike the MLM model, platforms like Amazon or Etsy allow someone to have their very own virtual storewhich can potentially provide them with higher earnings at an earlier stage.

They should still have tiers, but they’re more like franchises than a tier-based system. We now hear more words like “partner,” “associate,” and “partner” when describing people in online marketplaces.

Amazon seller page visible on phone screen
Digital platforms like Amazon at the moment are offering an entire range of latest “side hustles.”
Photos Tada/Shutterstock

However, many traditional MLMs still exist. The strong brand connection they’ve with a few of us is the envy of the fashionable marketer. Some will make that leap into the approaching generations. Some is not going to.

Why? Adaptation and market knowledge. Good marketing comes right down to knowing your people well. Who they are surely and what culture influences them.

In any case, Tupperware will likely at all times hold a special place in many individuals’s hearts. Or at the very least in their cupboards.

This article was originally published on : theconversation.com
Continue Reading

Business and Finance

DryMerge raises $2.2M in seed funding

Published

on

By


DryMerge is an organization founded by two friends who’ve known one another since elementary school, raised $2.2 million in seed funding. Yale University dropout Edward Frazer and University of Wisconsin graduate Samuel Brashears founded the corporate in 2023 and still run it today.

According to a press release, the corporate’s product streamlines user processes while saving time. “We founded DryMerge about a year ago with the idea that we could use AI to automate API integrations for developers. This year, our vision became much bigger—we realized we wanted to automate repetitive work for everyone, not just API integrations for developers,” Frazer wrote.

Frazer continued, “Work automation makes people’s jobs 10 times more enjoyable. Thousands of DryMerge users save hours every day by automating CRM data entry, support requests, targeted outbound calls, web research, and more. We think what our users do is amazing, and we spend almost all of our time helping them save more time.”

According to a press release, the corporate has received funding from Y Combinator, Garage Capital, Goodwater Capital, Ritual Capital, and Breakpoint Capital. It has also received angel investments from Umur Cubuku of Citus Data, JJ Fiegelman of Way Up, Kulveer Taggar of Zeus, and Nate Matherson of Positional, amongst others.

According to At first, the couple was unsure about their enterprisefuture. It took them a while to work out the best way to construct a product that may be useful to many users.

“…I’m a fairly young founder—I dropped out of Yale to build a company, and my co-founder Sam just graduated from the University of Wisconsin,” Frazer wrote on his LinkedIn page. His early confidence in what they were working on could border on arrogance, until he modified after receiving feedback.

Frazer continued: “I knew very little about how people worked, what problems they had, and how to solve them—and importantly, I didn’t care—I figured it was enough to build some cool technology and watch users come out of nowhere.”

Frazer concluded, “It wasn’t until halfway through that we realized that ‘cool tech’ was a useless value proposition—we had to talk to over 100 people from different segments like customer success, support, other founders, etc. before we had a solid picture of what people’s actual workflows looked like, and only then did we start building something valuable.”

The couple was also recent participants of the thirty eighth Demo Da Y Combinatory. In its blog post concerning the event, Y Combinator guarantees to speculate in each company it selects to participate in the YC Winter 2024 Batch for the corporate’s entire life. Out of greater than 27,000 applications, only 260 corporations were chosen, making its acceptance rate of lower than 1% one in every of the corporate’s most selective metrics. Y Combinator is increasingly specializing in corporations that leverage AI to facilitate practical applications of AI technologies and huge language models, which perfectly describes DryMerge’s mission and purpose.

According to , when their product works, users have a much easier time. While there are occasional mistakes, resembling the platform misunderstanding a user’s command or request, the platform still has potential. However, it’s one in every of the newest entries in an increasingly crowded platform-as-a-service integration market that’s currently expected to achieve $2.7 billion in market share by the tip of 2024.

However, Frazer is confident that he’ll have the option to realize a foothold in the market, regardless that his current user base is around 2,000.

“Our users range from online fashion retailers to school administrators to asset managers—the vast majority of whom have never touched a single line of code,” Frazer said. “They use us to save hours a day on tasks ranging from customer service automation to data entry to customer relationship management.”

Frazer continued, “We believe there is a huge opportunity for enterprise in simplifying automation and delivering easy-to-use tools that empower non-technical people.”


This article was originally published on : www.blackenterprise.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending