Connect with us

Politics and Current

White students sent messages fantasizing about killing African Americans while school principals ‘turned a blind eye’ and ignored rampant racism, lawsuit says

Published

on

White Students Sent Messages Fantasizing About Killing African-Americans While School Leaders ‘Turned a Blind Eye’ and Ignored Rampant Racism, Lawsuit Says

A U.S. District Judge has dismissed an attempt by a Colorado high school principal to exonerate himself from a civil rights lawsuit that alleges he was answerable for racially discriminating against black and mixed-race students at his school.

Castle Rock Middle School Principal John Veit argued that as a public official he was entitled to qualified immunity from legal charges that he “failed to prevent a conspiracy” amongst white students on the school to disclaim black students equal protection and access to an education under federal civil rights laws.

The 2023 lawsuit, filed by three families against Veit and the Douglas County School District, detailed horrific incidents of harassment, racial slurs and threats against their children. They alleged that there was a widespread pattern of racism and bullying within the district’s schools, and that school and district staff were aware of the discrimination and harm students were experiencing but didn’t do enough to stop it.

White students sent messages fantasizing about killing African Americans while school principals 'turned a blind eye' and ignored rampant racism, lawsuit says
The Ganzys are one among three families who’ve filed a lawsuit alleging that Colorado’s Douglas County School District has done nothing to guard black and biracial students from racial harassment and discrimination. (Photo: YouTube screenshot/CBS Colorado)

The criticism describes how black and biracial students, including 4 plaintiffs (identified as JG, NG, CM, and DC) at Douglas County High School and Castle Rock Middle School “were routinely called the N-word, threatened with violence such as lynching and shooting, subjected to various jokes about racial and ethnic cleansing, repeatedly called monkeys and similar derogatory epithets, subjected to taunts and other forms of harassment by peers, and forced by teachers to argue the benefits of Jim Crow laws.”

In his ruling last week, U.S. District Judge John Kane found that a federal conspiracy amongst students who were the plaintiffs’ peers was convincingly established by the allegations within the criticism, which “demonstrate a coordinated effort by students to humiliate, terrorize, and alienate” black and mixed-race students.

The judge noted among the allegations, including:

“One woman told four other students in front of CM that she hoped another black student would not join the class because ‘we already have one black guy in this class.’”

“One student called DC ‘monkey boy,’ and other students started laughing.”

“Students asked JG if he had chosen the cotton that his shirt was made of. Another student threw cotton balls at JG, laughing at him.”

“Students took photos of CM using the toilet without his knowledge and shared them widely on the internet.”

“At the end of Black History Month, one of the students approached JG and told him his month was over and he could go back to where he came from.”

The criticism also alleged that three students were racially harassed via a Snapchat group of greater than 100 students, where “racially offensive comments and threats of murder were common” and that students often tagged black students “to ensure they saw the disgusting messages.”

In one such message, Kane noted, “Two students were talking about eliminating African-Americans from the planet, with one of them stating that we should just remove black people from the planet” and bring back (the Holocaust).

The judge found that “without a doubt the complaint sufficiently proves the existence of … a conspiracy and Mr. Veit’s knowledge of that conspiracy.”

He cited the plaintiffs’ claims that a student had sent Veit an email about racist behavior by students and that after receiving the e-mail, “Mr. Veit admitted that he was aware that students of color experienced such discrimination.”

“I find Mr. Veit’s motion (to dismiss the case) to be without merit and accordingly I deny it,” Kane wrote.

Attorney Iris Halpern, who represents the families, said the court’s decision “should serve as a warning to other school officials across the country: If you know about systematic racist bullying and harassment and have the authority to stop it, and you don’t do it, you are violating our federal civil rights laws and you can be held individually liable,” CPR News reported. “Turning a blind eye or burying your head in the sand is not enough.”

“We are happy that the judge ruled that anyone who played a major role in the horrific racist bullying my children experienced can be held accountable,” said Lacey Ganzy, mother of Jeramiah Ganzy (JG within the lawsuit), who was 14 when he faced racism and bullying at Castle Rock Middle School. “We look forward to the continued development of this case and our final day in court.”

Ganzy said she filed the lawsuit last 12 months after the school district seemed indifferent to complaints from her son, in addition to her daughter Nevaeh, who was attending Douglas County High School on the time. Nevaeh testified at an April 2023 school board meeting that she was often called racial slurs and that a teacher asked her to argue in favor of Jim Crow laws during class. the Douglas County News-Press reported.

Ganza’s family has since moved to a different, “more diverse” school district. Two other student plaintiffs switched to online learning last 12 months but have since returned.

In the spring of 2023, the Douglas County School District was faced with the necessity to reply to the outcomes of the school climate survey.vey, which found wide racial disparities between student groups, CPR News reported.

The study found that 71 percent of white students felt they belonged at their school, while only 56 percent of black students did. Fourteen percent of white students said they’d been bullied on school grounds up to now 12 months, while 24 percent of black students did. And most significantly, 41 percent of black students had been punished, while 16 percent of white students did.

When asked Erin Kane, the school district’s superintendent, what training is being conducted to forestall the occurrence of racism and mitigate the results of systemic racism, she responded that the district is working on training as a part of a multi-year implementation plan.

At a May 2023 school board meeting, Kane said, “I want to reiterate how deeply sorry I am and the entire district is that we had a family experience with racist remarks from another student. Racism in any form is unacceptable in DCSD and is a direct violation of policy,” adding that multiple students have been suspended.

Other officials said students at Castle Rock High School attended presentations on bullying and harassment, and district leaders are working with the school on other strategies for next 12 months.

Ganzy was not impressed.

“I want them to be taught about black history,” she said. “I want them to not tolerate any discrimination. I want teachers to actively seek out this type of discrimination and know how to better deal with it.”

According to the criticism filed in August 2023, every student reported incidents of mistreatment to teachers and school staff, but school district staff either didn’t respond in any respect or didn’t take the reports seriously.

Only one student involved within the group chat was disciplined, and staff did not keep their word and create safety plans for students to return to in-person learning. The criticism also noted that the district did not implement anti-discrimination training for workers or students.

The lawsuit seeks “an injunction enjoining Defendants from engaging in unlawful practices that deprive themselves and other students of color of access to equal educational opportunities” and a jury trial to find out economic, compensatory and punitive damages.

This spring, Ganzy and her teenage children campaigned on the Colorado State Capitol for a recent law that might prevent bullying and discrimination in Colorado schools by improving reporting systems and training staff. CBS News reported.

Bill, SB 23-296that passed in June, “is basically everything we stood for,” Ganzy said. “It just makes sense. It just says, ‘Hey, if you do this, there are consequences for your actions, and there’s education behind it.’”

Ganzy said the bill clearly distinguishes between hate crimes and the bullying she sought. Schools have until July to start implementing the training.

The Douglas County School District said in a June statement that while its anti-discrimination and anti-harassment policies “largely align with the requirements” in the brand new laws, it’s “revising the board’s policies in light of the new law to further enhance the safety and well-being of all students.”

In reference to the continued lawsuit, the district stated, “DCSD disputes that administrators either facilitated or permitted harassment and discrimination against African-American students in order to continue attending school, or otherwise tolerated a racially hostile educational environment. Numerous reasonable actions were taken within the scope of the school administrator’s authority.”

Last week, Judge Kane ordered each side within the case to contact his office on August 13 to schedule a hearing date.

This article was originally published on : atlantablackstar.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics and Current

Trump says he cannot guarantee that tariffs will not raise prices in the US and does not rule out retaliation

Published

on

By

Donald Trump, Donald Trump Meet The Press, Trump tariffs, Will tariffs raise prices, Trump immigration policy, Trump abortion, Trump health care, Trump revenge prosecutions, theGrio.com

WASHINGTON (AP) – Donald Trump he said he couldn’t guarantee that his promised rates regarding key US foreign trade partners there will be no raise prices for American consumers and again suggested that some political rivals and federal officials who handled court cases against him must be imprisoned.

The president-elect also touched on monetary policy, immigration, abortion and health care, and U.S. involvement in Ukraine, Israel and elsewhere in a wide-ranging interview on NBC’s “Meet the Press” that aired Sunday.

Trump often mixed declarations with reservations, at one point warning that “everything is changing.”

Take a have a look at a few of the issues covered:

Trump wonders whether trade penalties could raise prices

Trump threatened widespread trade penalties but said he didn’t imagine it economists’ predictions that the additional costs of imported goods for U.S. businesses would result in higher domestic prices for consumers. He broke his promise that American households would not pay more for purchases.

“I can not guarantee anything. “I can’t guarantee tomorrow,” Trump said, apparently opening the door to accepting the reality that import fees typically operate once goods reach the retail market.

That’s a special approach from Trump’s typical speeches during the 2024 campaign, when he presented his decisions as a surefire approach to curb inflation.

In the interview, Trump defended the tariffs in general, saying the tariffs “make us rich.”

He announced that on the first day of his term in January he would impose a 25% tariff on all goods imported from Mexico and Canada unless those countries satisfactorily stop illegal immigration and the flow of illegal drugs equivalent to fentanyl into the United States. He also threatened to impose tariffs on China to force the country to limit fentanyl production.

“I just want to have a level, fast but fair playing field,” Trump said.

Trump suggests revenge against his opponents without claiming to have an interest in revenge

He has made conflicting statements about how he would approach justice after winning the election, although he was convicted of 34 felonies in a New York state court and charged in other cases with handling national security secrets and efforts to overturn his loss to a Democrat in 2020 Joe Biden.

“Frankly, they should go to jail,” Trump said of members of Congress who investigated the Capitol riot by his supporters who wanted him to remain in power.

The president-elect has emphasized his case that he could use the justice system against others, including special counsel Jack Smith, who prosecuted the case involving Trump’s role in the siege on January 6, 2021. Trump confirmed his plan to pardon convicted supporters for the role they played in the riot, saying that he will take these actions on his first day in office.

As for the idea of ​​revenge triggering potential criminal prosecutions, Trump said: “I actually have every right to accomplish that. I’m a top law enforcement officer, you recognize that. I’m the president. But that doesn’t interest me.”

At the same time, Trump named lawmakers on the House special committee that investigated the rebel, citing Rep. Bennie Thompson, R-Mississippi, and former Rep. Liz Cheney, R-Wyo.

“Cheney was behind this… as was Bennie Thompson and everyone on this committee,” Trump said.

Asked specifically whether he would direct his administration to pursue the cases, he replied “No” and suggested he did not expect the FBI to quickly investigate his political enemies.

But at one other point, Trump said he would go away the issue to Pam Bondi, his pick for attorney general. “I want her to do whatever she wants,” he said.

Many leading Democrats have taken such threats, no matter Trump’s inconsistencies, seriously enough that Biden is considering issuing a blanket, preventive pardon to guard key members of his outgoing administration.

Trump appeared to backtrack on his campaign rhetoric calling for an investigation into Biden, saying, “I have no intention of going back to the past.”

Swift motion is coming on immigration

Trump has repeatedly mentioned his guarantees to seal the U.S.-Mexico border and deport tens of millions of people who find themselves in the U.S. illegally as a part of a mass deportation program.

“I think you have to do this,” he said.

He has suggested that he would try to make use of executive motion to finish “birthright” citizenship, under which individuals born in the U.S. are considered residents – although such protections are provided for in the Constitution.

Asked specifically about the future of people that were delivered to the country illegally as children and have been protected against deportation in recent years, Trump said: “I want to work something out,” indicating he may look to Congress for an answer.

But Trump also said he “don’t want to break up families” with mixed legal status, “so the only way not to break up the family is to keep them together and send them all away.”

Sweet news: Dark chocolate may be the secret to reducing your risk of developing type 2 diabetes

Trump commits to NATO, setting conditions, but criticizes Putin and Ukraine

Trump, long a critic of NATO members for not spending more on their very own defense, said he would “absolutely” remain in the alliance “if they pay their bills.”

Pressed on whether he would withdraw if he was dissatisfied with allies’ commitments, Trump said he wanted the United States to be treated “fairly” on trade and defense issues.

He wavered on NATO’s priority of containing Russia and President Vladimir Putin.

Trump suggested that Ukraine should prepare for less U.S. help to defend against Putin’s invasion. “Probably. Yeah, probably. Sure,” Trump said about Washington cutting aid to Ukraine. Separately, Trump did called for a right away ceasefire.

Asked about Putin, Trump initially said he had not spoken to the Russian leader since last month’s election, but then insisted: “I haven’t spoken to him lately.” Trump said under pressure, adding that he didn’t need to “impede negotiations.”

Trump says Powell is protected at the Fed, but Wray is not at the FBI

The president-elect has said he has no intention, at the least for now, of asking Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell to step down before the end of Powell’s term in 2028. Trump said during the campaign that presidents must have more to say on Fed policyincluding rates of interest.

Trump has not provided any job guarantees to FBI Director Christopher Wray, whose term ends in 2027.

Asked about Wray, Trump said, “Well, it seems pretty obvious” that if the Senate confirms Kash Patel as Trump’s nominee select the head of the FBI, then “he’s going to take another person’s place, right? Someone is that this person you’re talking about.

Trump is absolute on Social Security, not abortion and medical insurance

Trump promised that the government’s efficiency efforts under Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy would not threaten Social Security. “We do not affect social safety, except that we make it more effective,” he said. He added that “we’re not raising the age or anything like that.”

He didn’t speak in much detail about abortion or the long-promised amendment to the Affordable Care Act.

On abortion, Trump continued its inconsistencies and said he “probably” won’t try to limit access to abortion pills, which currently cause most abortions, in keeping with the Guttmacher Institute, which supports abortion rights. But when pressed on whether he would commit to the position, Trump replied: “Well, I agree. That is, do things change. I think they are changing.”

A repetition of his line Debate on September 10 v. Vice President Kamala Harris, Trump again stated that he had “concepts” for a plan to switch the 2010 Affordable Care Act, which he called “lousy health care.”

He added that any version of Trump would supply insurance coverage for Americans with pre-existing health conditions. He did not explain how such a project would differ from the establishment or the way it could fulfill his desire for “better health care for less money.”

This article was originally published on : thegrio.com
Continue Reading

Politics and Current

St. Day Louis Marks Wesley Bell in honor of the first black prosecutor

Published

on

By

Wesley Bell, St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney


December 6 in St. Louis has officially been declared Wesley Bell Day to honor the county’s first black prosecutor.

According to Local leaders held a celebratory event at the St. County Department of Justice. Louis, after which County Executive Sam Page made a press release. Bell made history along with his appointment to this position, which he has held since 2019.

He called the recognition “a great honor” that belongs to the community he serves.

“For me, this is a testament to the men and women of the St. County Prosecutor’s Office. Louis, who wake up every day with the idea of ​​public safety, with the idea of ​​treating our victims with the dignity and respect they deserve, and keeping this region safe. In this way, it is a great honor for us,” he said.

Bell took over as St. County prosecutor. Louis after defeating longtime Democratic incumbent Bob McCulloch in the primary. After McCulloch’s controversial decision to not prosecute the officer who fatally shot Black teenager Michael Brown in 2014, Bell ran a campaign that prioritized criminal justice reform. His platform included community policing and progressive marijuana policies that were passed shortly after taking office.

During his tenure, Bell established the Diversion Commission and the Incident Review Unit. The unit enables people wrongly convicted to submit a request to the prosecutor to reconsider their case. Bell sees the measure, a first in the nation, as a step toward criminal justice reform.

But Bell will transcend local politics to assist his St. Louis on a national scale. He was recently elected to the United States House of Representatives, representing Missouri’s 1st District.

“This job, and my future job, is about work,” he added. “It’s about representing the interests of my constituents. People here in this region.

Although Bell will proceed to serve St. Louis in a distinct capability, the race to appoint his successor continues, and the escalating dispute between Page and Missouri Gov. Mike Parson continues. Page has already announced his selection of the next prosecutor, but the GOP leader said he plans to make the nomination.


This article was originally published on : www.blackenterprise.com
Continue Reading

Politics and Current

68-year-old black Georgia man knocked to the ground and brutally arrested at a red light fights for justice after three-year legal nightmare

Published

on

By

Black Man Thrown to Ground and Arrested during Minor Traffic Stop is Finally Going to Trial – Three Years After His Arrest

It’s taken greater than three years, but Jeffrey Lemon finally got his day in court.

A 68-year-old Black man was arrested in Georgia under questionable circumstances in 2021 after Clayton County sheriff’s deputies threw him to the ground and put a knee on his back after he was accused of running a red light in suburban Atlanta County.

He was charged with obstruction and red light violations, in addition to possession of a small amount of marijuana, which police present in a pipe in the trunk of his automobile after his arrest. He ended up spending two nights in jail.

A Black man thrown to the ground and arrested during a minor traffic stop will finally face justice - three years after his arrest
Jeffrey Lemon (left) was brutally arrested in 2021 by Georgia State Sheriff’s Deputy Jon House (right) after stating that he was falsely accused of running a red light. It was over three years before he was given the likelihood to prove his innocence in court, and only because his lawyer filed a motion for a speedy trial. (Photo: Jeffrey Lemon and Facebook)

But the case dragged on for greater than three years until his attorney filed a motion for a speedy trial last month. The trial is scheduled to start Monday, and Lemon hopes prosecutors will drop the case without forcing a trial.

“I hope they throw everything away, but it’s a corrupt system, so I don’t know what to expect,” Lemon told Atlanta Black Star in a phone interview.

Lemon also said he was offered a plea deal late Thursday wherein prosecutors would drop the marijuana and red light charges if he pleaded guilty to the obstruction charge, but he declined to take the deal because he plans to file a lawsuit if he’s cleared of all charges. .

Arresting deputies Jon House and Demetrius Valentine each resigned after the incident, but House, who initiated the traffic stop, was rehired three months later.

“The arrogance I experienced from Officer J. House and Sgt. Valentine… completely disregarded me as a human being,” he wrote in a letter wherein he presented his version of the arrest.

Lemon’s arrest got here a month after the death of Clayton County Sheriff Victor Hill was accused faces federal charges after he was accused of tying pretrial detainees to a restraint chair for hours in violation of their civil rights. Hill was convicted and sentenced to 18 months in prison in March 2023, but he was released after serving lower than a 12 months.

Throughout this time, nonetheless, Lemon’s case has remained pending, which he believes is because the officers try to cover up their illegal behavior and prevent him from filing a lawsuit.

Arrest

The incident occurred on May 27, 2021, when Lemon was driving his Camaro on Valley Hill Road and noticed a Clayton County sheriff’s deputy behind him, who turned out to be House.

He stated that he was in the left inside lane and needed to enter the right outside lane to make a right turn in front of him, nonetheless, when he stopped his automobile at a red light, the deputy pulled the patrol automobile next to him into the right lane.

He said the deputy then refused to move forward when the light turned green, stopping Lemon from entering the lane.

Lemon said he waited a few seconds, hoping the deputy would move, but then moved to the next intersection when it became clear the deputy was not going to move.

He testified that when he turned right at the next intersection, the light turned green, but the deputy stopped him and accused him of running a red light.

Lemon told the deputy that he didn’t run the red light, but gave him his license, but the deputy began accusing him of trying to avoid him, and that is when he realized the deputy was trying to escalate the interaction, and as he tried to call his daughter and friend, but he didn’t. they replied.

He then called 911 because he feared for his life when the deputy began accusing him of things he didn’t do, and that is when House called for backup.

Valentine arrived and threatened to taser him if he didn’t get out of the automobile, so he complied under duress, which occurred when Valentine tackled him to the ground and House put his knee on his neck.

“I felt humiliated,” he said. “For the guy to come up and not try to have any dialogue. He just immediately walked up and said, “Get your ass on the ground before I kick you.”

He said that when he was arrested, he was on his way to rent a latest house, so he had $1,800 in money with him, but authorities didn’t allow him to use the money to bail, forcing him to stay in jail for two days.

“They didn’t want to take the money, so I had to carry it in my shoe throughout my stay in prison,” he said.

He said the aggressive arrest put him in a state of so-called cervical stenosis, where he’s currently in constant pain and has already spent hundreds of dollars on medical bills.

Report

The House deputy describes the arrest in a very different light, stating in his report that he became suspicious when Lemon failed to stop at the intersection after the light turned green, believing he was doing all the pieces in his power to avoid being stopped.

He further claimed that as Lemon moved forward, turning right, he ran a red light and that is when House stopped him.

However, this claim contradicts his initial claim because if Lemon was truly trying to avoid being stopped, he would never have run a red light knowing the deputy was behind him.

House also claimed that he began to fear for his life after he noticed a knife in the center console of Lemon’s vehicle and then called for backup and ordered him out of the automobile, but Lemon stated that the knife was never there.

“There was no knife,” Lemon said. “I would like to see their list of things they faraway from my automobile. This will show there was no knife.

House stated in his report that he found pot in the trunk while taking a listing of things in the automobile, which he ordered confiscated. He also claimed that “evidence was dropped in the sheriff’s office room,” but didn’t specifically mention the alleged knife placed in the room.

Valentine resigned two weeks later without explanation, according to personnel records obtained by Atlanta Black Star. He was then hired by the nearby Fairburn, Georgia Police Department the following month.

Personnel records obtained from the Clayton County Sheriff’s Office show House resigned in November 2021 because he was dissatisfied with “a change in the mission of this agency that does not align with my personal goals.”

House was then hired by the nearby Riverdale Police Department, only to resign from the job three months later because “the city-provided health insurance is expensive and does not provide adequate health care for my family,” according to a resignation letter obtained by Atlanta. Black Star.

He was then rehired by the Clayton County Sheriff’s Office in March 2022 and stays employed.

Lemon believes there may be body camera and dash cam video that might prove his innocence, but when Atlanta Black Star asked public authorities for any available footage of the arrest, the Clayton County Sheriff’s Office said “no records exist” ” regarding arrest.

“That sounds like another lie,” Lemon said.

This article was originally published on : atlantablackstar.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending