Connect with us

Crime

A year later, the sprawling Georgia election interference case against Donald Trump has stalled

Published

on

ATLANTA (AP) — A year after a Georgia grand jury indicted Donald Trump and others for illegally attempting to overturn the state’s 2020 presidential election, the case has stalled and has no likelihood of being tried before the end of the year.

When Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis obtained the indictment a year ago Thursday, it was the fourth and most sweeping criminal case against the former president. Trump narrowly lost in Georgia to Democrat Joe Biden, and Willis used Georgia’s anti-bribery law to allege that he and 18 others participated in a wide-ranging conspiracy to subvert the will of the state’s voters.

Advertisement

Willis’ team has scored some early victories in the case, but controversial allegations made by one in every of Trump’s co-defendants earlier this year have delayed the proceedings and will even derail the prosecution.

Here are some facts you need to find out about this case.

A long indictment that casts a large net

The nearly 100-page indictment contained 41 criminal charges against Trump and 18 others. In addition to the former president, his White House chief of staff Mark Meadows, former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani and conservative lawyer Sidney Powell were also charged.

All three defendants have been charged with violating state anti-corruption laws, and the indictment accommodates 161 alleged counts to back that up. The narrative presented by prosecutors is that multiple individuals committed separate crimes to attain a standard goal — difficult Trump’s election defeat.

Advertisement

The indictment includes charges stemming from a Jan. 2, 2021, phone call between Trump and Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger through which Trump urged the state’s top elections official to assist him “find” the votes he needed to win. Other charges include inducing a slate of Republican electors to falsely state that Trump had won the state, allegations of harassing an election employee in Georgia and tampering with election equipment in a rural south Georgia county.

The judge overseeing the case in March dismissed six counts in the indictment, including three of the 13 charges against Trump. Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee wrote that prosecutors didn’t provide sufficient detail about the alleged crime in those charges. Willis’ team has appealed that ruling.

First of its kind mugshot

When Trump arrived in Atlanta last August to be arrested on the charges, he was quickly released on bail. But his transient stay in Fulton County Jail marked the first time the former president needed to pose for a mugshot.

While Trump and the other defendants needed to be taken to jail, they waived their first court appearances. While his lawyers have been present and presented arguments at quite a few hearings over the past year, Trump has yet to set foot in a Georgia court.

Advertisement

Early victories for prosecutors

Four of the 18 people charged with Trump in Georgia pleaded guilty to lesser charges after reaching deals with prosecutors inside months of the indictment.

Featured Stories

Bail bondsman Scott Hall pleaded guilty to misdemeanor charges in September. Prosecutors accused him of participating in an election equipment breach in rural Coffee County.

The following month, Powell and attorney Kenneth Chesebro pleaded guilty. Powell was also charged with violating Coffee County, while Chesebro helped organize the Republicans’ election plan. Both reached plea deals with prosecutors just before their scheduled trial, citing their rights to a speedy trial.

Days later, attorney Jenna Ellis, who actively supported Trump’s 2020 re-election campaign, tearfully pleaded guilty.

Advertisement

Lecherous accusations turn the case the other way up

In early January, a lawyer for co-defendant Michael Roman, a Trump campaign staffer and former White House aide, alleged in court papers that Willis had engaged in a bootleg romantic relationship with attorney Nathan Wade, whom she had appointed to guide the prosecution of Trump and others.

The lawsuit alleged that Willis benefited financially from the case because Wade used his earnings to take her on trips. It said this created a conflict of interest and that Willis and her office needs to be faraway from the case. Willis and Wade admitted to the relationship but said they split travel and other expenses.

In a unprecedented hearing, intimate details of Willis and Wade’s personal lives were aired in court and broadcast continue to exist television. Judge McAfee chastised Willis for a “gross lapse in judgment” but found no conflict of interest that may justify her removal if Wade left the case. Wade resigned hours later.

Trump and other defendants have appealed McAfee’s ruling. That appeal is currently before the Georgia Court of Appeals, which plans to listen to arguments in December after which must issue a ruling by mid-March. In the meantime, the appeals court has barred McAfee from taking further motion in the case against Trump or the other defendants in the appeal while it’s pending.

Advertisement

What’s next?

It’s not entirely clear.

Regardless of how the Court of Appeals rules, the losing side will likely ask the Georgia Supreme Court to weigh in. That would cause further delay if the high court were to conform to hear the case.

The November general election, through which Trump is the Republican presidential candidate, brings more uncertainty. Even if appeals courts ultimately determine Willis can stay in the case, it seems unlikely she would have the opportunity to proceed prosecuting Trump while he’s president if he wins the election.

Complicating matters further, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled last month that former presidents have absolute immunity from prosecution for official actions that fall inside their “exclusive sphere of constitutional authority” and are presumptively entitled to immunity for all official actions. They will not be protected for unofficial or private actions.

Advertisement

Trump’s lawyers in Georgia filed a motion for presidential immunity earlier this year. If Willis is allowed to proceed her criminal case sooner or later, his lawyers are certain to make use of the Supreme Court ruling to argue it needs to be dismissed.

This article was originally published on : thegrio.com
Advertisement

Crime

Family of Texas Teen, accused of a deadly stab of another teenager on the track, collected over $ 150,000 via the online fundraiser

Published

on

By

The collection of money for a teenager accused of a deadly stabbing of another teenager during a meeting at the Texas track last week has almost USD 200,000.

Launched by the family of Carmelo Anthony, a 17-year-old from Texas, who’s accused of stabbing Austin Metcalf, also 17, during an intensive meeting between them, Dajndo Fundraiser reached USD 160,000 from Monday morning.

According to Anthony’s lawyer, Deric Walpole, his client demands self -defense on this matter. Talking with NBC Dallas-Fort Worth On Friday, other than the prison, wherein Anthony was detained, Walpole said: “I know that my client said it was a self -defense. I have no reason not to believe it, but I have to develop facts, talk to people and find out what is happening before I made some statements about what I think.”

Advertisement

He added: “I have no reason to think that it was not a self -defense at the moment.”

On Wednesday, April 2, around 10 am local time, it’s claimed that Anthony stabbed Metcalf after Metcalf asked to depart a specific area during the rain delay at a sports event at the Kuykeyndall stadium in Frisco, in accordance with the NBC Dalls-Fort value. Anthony, a competitor in a competitive team, apparently sat under the tent of the Metcalf team to avoid rainfall when Metcalf asked him to depart. When Anthony didn’t follow Metcalf in order that he wouldn’t touch him, allegedly Metcalf caught Anthony’s arm, leaning Anthony, using a knife from a backpack to stab Metcalf in his chest from escaping.

Metcalf suffered a stinging wound in his heart and was recognized as deceased at the scene of the incident, despite the attempts to save lots of his twin brother.

“I put my hand on (his chest), tried to stop (bleeding), grabbed his head and looked into his eyes. I just saw his soul. And this also took my soul,” said Twin Hunter Metcalfa Fox News.

Advertisement
Harriet Tubman removed from the National Park Service website to

Anthony was arrested and accused of killing the first degree, and is currently being detained in the Collin County prison for a bond of USD 1,000,000, which his lawyer is trying to cut back. He hopes to interrogate bonds this week.

Teenager Apparently he said the police“It is not alleged, I did it” that he was lively in self -defense and asked if Metcalf can be tremendous. Anthony’s father said The New York Post That his son was “provoked”.

“He was not an aggressor. He was not the one who started him,” said Andrew Anthony, adding: “Everyone has already adopted their assumptions about my son, but he is not what they make him.”

He explained that his son was a “good child” who works two works and maintains 3.7 GPs.

“I feel sorry for other parents and family, and words cannot explain how both (families) affected this tragedy,” he noted.

Advertisement

The online collection of money causes “false” narratives circulating after the consequence.

“The widespread narrative is false, unfair and harmful. As a family of faith, we are deeply grateful for all your support in this difficult period. Your prayers and help mean more for us than ever,” we read a fundraiser.

Collecting money on Gofundme In the case of family costs and Metcalf’s funeral, they brought 95% of their goal.

NY Public Schools inform Trump's administration that they will not comply with the DEI order

(Tagstransate) news

Advertisement
This article was originally published on : thegrio.com
Continue Reading

Crime

New research: Demlitization police departments do not increase crime

Published

on

By

New studies say that demilitarization police departments do not increase crime

Richmond, Virginia – June 12: photo of George Floyd expected to the statue of confederate general Robert Lee on June 12, 2020 in Richmond, Virginia. Last week, the governor of Virginia Ralph Northam ordered the removal of Lee’s general statue as soon as possible, but court proceedings temporarily stopped these plans. Protests proceed in cities across the country after the death of George Floyd, who died in police detention in Minneapolis on May 25. (Photo eze amos/getty images)

Advertisement

Giving police departments equipment to military class does not reduce crime or increase safety based on two independent research. Studies appear in the course of the ongoing conversation concerning the importance of “rejecting the police” as a method.

IN “Police demilitarization and brutal crime“, Kenneth Lwande, a professor on the University of Michigan, questioned the claim that the military weapon exchange program reduced the crime rate, assaulting police officers and the variety of complaints towards police officers.

Finding problems in previously published data Lwande focused on the information available after ordering the Obama administration from 2015, required to demlate local police agencies. Answering public indignation after exposing the militarized police in Ferguson, Obama’s administration Forbade some Sales of military equipment to the police as a part of the controversial program 1033. Trump’s administration reversed this policy in 2017.

Advertisement

IN interview In the case of ABC, Lwande explained that earlier research found that the transfer of military equipment to police plots served as deterrent. But from his evaluation, evidence does not confirm such conclusions. “It’s just not an accurate record,” said Lwande. “[Prior studies] They clearly suggested that by transferring military police equipment, he would stop criminals from committing crimes. “

Published in the character of human behavior, London magazine, research emphasizes the reaper of Trump’s administration on potentially “unbelievable” data when making decisions about withdrawing restrictions from Obama’s time. After assessing previous research, Lipowde found that publicly published data utilized in previous studies were filled with inaccuracies. Earlier evaluation did not control the equipment that was transferred between agencies, unused or otherwise inoperable. In addition, Lwande did not find any evidence that the demilitarizing law enforcement authorities led to an increase in crime.

Program 1033, managed by the Defense Logistics Agency, is one in every of several ways through which law enforcement authorities acquire military assessment equipment. Established in 1997 as a part of the Act on authorization for national defense, is estimated Program 1033 has transferred over $ 7 billion in military equipment into $ 8,000 across the country. The program was originally created for the forces of “counteracting terrorism”, but later prolonged to cover all of the activities of law enforcement agencies.

Covering with the national uprisings this summer, several members of the Chamber introduced laws to eliminate the 1033 program in June. The Black Lives movement also published Act Breathe Act, a comprehensive legislative proposal, including financing specific politicians and the abolition of the police. Section I of the proposed respiratory act requires the opening of the 1033 program in its entirety.

Advertisement

This article was originally published on : www.essence.com
Continue Reading

Crime

Article archive – essence Being

Published

on

By

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement


This article was originally published on : www.essence.com
Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending