Connect with us

Health and Wellness

Victoria will begin testing the pills this summer. Evidence shows it reduces harm (and does not increase drug use)

Published

on

This week, Victorian Prime Minister Hyacinth Allan announced the state will test a drug-checking service starting this summer festival season, describing it as a “simple and common-sense way to save lives.”

Allan has since confirmed the service will turn into everlasting in Victoria after an 18-month trial.

The Australian Capital Territory government announced this last week addition successful drug screening pilot project, You can TEST, for the next three years. And at the starting of this yr Queensland Government financed everlasting website AND drug control services at festivals for 2 years.

We’re delighted that drug checking is becoming increasingly popular in Australia. This reflects evidence from Australia and internationally showing that these services reduce harm to individuals who use illicit drugs.

What is drug screening?

Drug checking (sometimes called pill testing in Australia) is predicated on harm reduction principles. The primary goal is to cut back individual and social harm related to the use of psychoactive substances, no verdict about drug use itself.

There are different testing techniques using various kinds of equipment, but all drug testing services in Australia test drugs by chemically analyzing a small sample of the drug.

Part of a typical drug testing service involves speaking on to the test taker to offer their opinion on the contents of the sample. Trained drug screening staff, who are often health care professionals or educators, will discuss the risks of consuming the identified drugs and every other concerns or questions the person can have.

Drug checking in Australia is carried out at a stationary or mobile facility. An inpatient service is permanently situated inside a healthcare organization. Mobile services, sometimes called festival services, are being developed in places where we all know individuals are more prone to use drugs.

Why is drug screening necessary?

While no psychoactive drug, including alcohol, is totally secure, some drugs turn into more dangerous because they’re illegal and lack control over who could make them, how they’re made and what they may contain.

This means that folks who use illicit drugs cannot make certain of what they’re taking and are unable to moderate their dosage to cut back risk. There is due to this fact a greater risk of unwanted side effects and overdose than if these medicines were produced as pharmaceuticals under controlled conditions.

Data from Australia found that as many as 43% of medication tested by drug testing services were not what people thought they’d bought.

CanTEST, a pilot drug testing service in Canberra, has yielded positive results.
Connor Ashleigh/HRI/AAP

Most individuals who use illegal drugs only use them several times a yr and so they are not depending on them.

Whether you think that folks take these medications or not, the reality is that they do. Some 47% of adults in Australia has tried an illegal drug a minimum of once of their life. Thousands of years of history has taught us that this is unlikely to vary.

With this in mind, drug control services currently operate in over 20 countries including well-established services in New Zealand, United States, Canada, Great Britain AND Netherlands.

Does drug screening reduce harm?

Some opponents of drug control fear that it will increase drug use. But the evidence is obvious that this is not the case.

Several studies have shown that drug control does not encourage those that do not already use drugs to begin using them. Study of long running service in Netherlands found that lower than 1% of individuals tested for drugs had never used drugs before, so these services are almost exclusively aimed toward individuals who already use drugs.

What’s more, tests found that folks often reduce their drug use after receiving drug test results and discussing them with staff. Lots of research have shown that a big proportion of individuals eliminate or intend to offer up their drugs or use less in the event that they contain unexpected substances.

Data from WORK AND Queensland services found that 18% and seven% of individuals, respectively, decided not to make use of the drug after the tests.

Drug inspections can even play a significant role in stopping drug-related hospitalizations and deaths. Tests from The Loop UK drug checking service 95% reduction. in cases of transports to hospital attributable to drugs, when drug control was introduced at the festival, in comparison with the previous yr, when the festival was held without drug control.

One person hands another person a bag of small white pills.
Providing drug checking services does not mean more people will use drugs.
Half-point/Shutterstock

Additionally, these services provide necessary harm reduction information to individuals who may not otherwise receive this information. In rating CanTEST research shows that 70% of people that used the service had never previously contacted a healthcare skilled for information or advice about drug use.

Drug screening also affects quality medicines on the market. Drug manufacturers and dealers are less prone to distribute highly dangerous substances when customers have the opportunity to ascertain their drugs.

What do Australians take into consideration drug testing?

There is important support in the Australian community for harm reduction measures, including drug control. Surveys Australian community has consistently shown that the majority of Australians support drug control.

In recent government survey households across Australia almost 65% of individuals supported drug checking, a big increase on the previous yr. Younger people, women and other people with higher education were more prone to support drug control.

So this is an ideal move by Victoria to maintain people secure.

This article was originally published on : theconversation.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Health and Wellness

How to drastically reduce the risk of dementia after 55 years of age

Published

on

By

About 1,000,000 Americans are expected to develop dementia a yr until 2060, about twice today, they announced on Monday.

This estimation is predicated on a brand new study, which showed a better risk of life than previously thought: after 55 years of age people have up to 4 out of 10 opportunities to develop dementia – in the event that they live long enough.

This is a sobering number, but there are steps that folks can take to reduce this risk, similar to controlling hypertension and other bad health problems. And it isn’t too late to try even in middle -aged.

“All our research suggests what you do in the middle age, it really matters,” said Dr. Josef Coresh from Nyu Langone Health, who co -author of the research in Nature Medicine.

Dementia is just not only Alzheimer

Taking more to remember the name or place where you place the keys is typical in old age. But dementia It is just not a standard part of aging – it’s a progressive loss of memory, language and other cognitive functions. The aging is just the biggest risk, and the population is getting old quickly.

Alzheimer is the commonest form, and the quiet changes of the brain that ultimately lead to it might begin 20 years before the appearance of symptoms. Other types include vascular dementia, when heart disease or small impacts impair blood flow to the brain. Many people have mixed causes, which suggests that vascular problems can exacerbate Alzheimer’s symptoms.

Measuring risk from a certain age compared to the potential remaining period of life can lead to public health and medical examinations.

“This is not a guarantee that someone will develop dementia,” warned Dr. James Galvin, a specialist in Miami Alzheimer’s University. He was not involved in a brand new study, but said that the findings match other tests.

The risk of dementia differs from age

Earlier studies were estimated that about 14% of men and 23% of women would develop a form of dementia during their lives. The Coresh team analyzed newer data from the American study, which has been following heart health and cognitive functions of about 15,000 elderly for several many years.

Importantly, they found risk changes over many years.

Only 4% of people developed dementia aged 55 to 75, which Coresh calls a key 20-year-old window to protect brain health.

In the case of individuals who experience common health threats to 75, the risk of dementia then increased – to 20% at the age of 85 and 42% from the age of 85 to 95.

In general, the risk of dementia after 55 was 35% for men and 48% for ladies, summed up scientists. Cash noticed that girls normally live longer than men, the most important reason for this difference. Black Americans had a rather higher risk, 44%than white people at 41%.

Yes, there are methods to reduce the risk of dementia

There are some risk aspects that folks cannot control, including age and whether you’ve got inherited a gene variant called Apoe4, which increases the possibilities of Alzheimer’s late life.

But people can try to avoid or no less than delay health problems that contribute to later dementia. For example, Coresh wears a helmet while cycling, because repetitive or severe brain injuries from failure or falls increase the risk of dementia later in life.

Particularly essential: “What is good for your heart is good for your brain,” added Galvin with Miami. He calls people to exercise, avoid obesity and control blood pressure, diabetes and cholesterol.

13 influential women Delta Sigma Theta Borority, Inc., which inspired us all

For example, hypertension can disturb the blood flow to the brain, the risk not only in the case of vascular dementia, but additionally related to some of the Alzheimer’s disease. Similarly high levels of blood sugar, poorly controlled diabetes, is related to a cognitive decline and destruction of inflammation in the brain.

Galvin also said that be socially and cognitively energetic. He calls people to try hearing aids if age brings hearing loss, which might stimulate social insulation.

“There are things that we control over, and those things that in my opinion would be very important to build a better brain as aging,” he said.

___

The Associated Press Department of Health and Science receives support from the Science and Educational Group of the Medical Institute Howard Hughes and the (*55*) Wood Johnson Foundation. AP bears the sole responsibility for all content.

(Tagstranslate) @Ap

This article was originally published on : thegrio.com
Continue Reading

Health and Wellness

Jury awarded $310 million to parents of teenager who died after falling on a ride at Florida amusement park – Essence

Published

on

By

Sun Sentinel/Getty Images

The family of Tire Sampson, the 14-yr-old who tragically died on an amusement park ride in Orlando, Florida, in 2022, has been awarded $310 million in a civil lawsuit.

Tire, who was visiting ICON Park along with his family on March 24, 2022, fell from the FreeFall drop tower. Although he was taken to a nearby hospital, he didn’t survive his injuries.

Now, greater than two years later, a jury has held the vehicle manufacturer, Austria-based Funtime Handels, responsible for the accident and awarded the Tire family $310 million. According to reports from local news stations WFTV AND KSDKthe jury reached its verdict after about an hour of deliberation.

Tyre’s parents will each receive $155 million, according to attorney spokesman Michael Haggard.

Attorneys Ben Crump and Natalie Jackson, who represented Tyre’s family, shared their thoughts on this landmark decision via X (formerly Twitter). “This ruling is a step forward in holding corporations accountable for the safety of their products,” they said in a statement.

Lawyers stressed that Tyre’s death was attributable to “gross negligence and a failure to put safety before profits.” They added that the ride’s manufacturer had “neglected its duty to protect passengers” and that the substantial award ensured it could “face the consequences of its decisions.”

Crump and Jackson said they hope the result will encourage change throughout the theme park industry. “We hope this will spur the entire industry to enforce more stringent safety measures,” they said. “Tire heritage will provide a safer future for drivers around the world.”

An investigation previously found that Tyre’s harness was locked through the descent, but he dislodged from his seat through the 430-foot fall when the magnets engaged. Tire’s death was ruled the result of “multiple injuries and trauma.”

ICON Park said at the time that it could “fully cooperate” with the authorities.

This article was originally published on : www.essence.com
Continue Reading

Health and Wellness

Tireless HIV/AIDS advocate A. Cornelius Baker dies

Published

on

By

HIV/AIDS Advocate, A. Cornelius Baker


A. Cornelius Baker, a tireless advocate of HIV and AIDS testing, research and vaccination, died Nov. 8 at his home in Washington, D.C., of hypertensive, atherosclerotic heart problems, in response to his partner, Gregory Nevins.

As previously reported, Baker was an early supporter for people living with HIV and AIDS within the Nineteen Eighties, when misinformation and fear-mongering in regards to the disease were rampant.

According to Douglas M. Brooks, director of the Office of National AIDS Policy under President Obama, it was Baker’s Christian faith that guided him toward compassion for others.

“He was very kind, very warm and inclusive – his circles, both professional and personal, were the most diverse I have ever seen, and he was guided by his Christian values,” Brooks told the outlet. “His ferocity was on display when people were marginalized, rejected or forgotten.”

In 1995, when he was executive director of the National AIDS Association, Baker pushed for June 27 to be designated National HIV Testing Day.

In 2012, he later wrote on the web site of the Global Health Advisor for which he was a technical advisor that: “These efforts were intended to help reduce the stigma associated with HIV testing and normalize it as part of regular screening.”

https://twitter.com/NBJContheMove/status/1856725113967632663?s=19

Baker also feared that men like himself, black gay men, and other men from marginalized communities were disproportionately affected by HIV and AIDS.

Baker pressured the Clinton administration to incorporate black and Latino people in clinical drug trials, and in 1994 he pointedly told the Clinton administration that he was bored with hearing guarantees but seeing no motion.

According to Lambda Legal CEO Kevin Jennings, yes that daring attitude that defines Baker’s legacy in the world of ​​HIV/AIDS promotion.

“Cornelius was a legendary leader in the fight for equality for LGBTQ+ people and all people living with HIV,” Jennings said in a press release. “In the more than twenty years that I knew him, I was continually impressed not only by how effective he was as a leader, but also by how he managed to strike the balance between being fierce and kind at the same time. His loss is devastating.”

Jennings continued: “Cornelius’ leadership can’t be overstated. For many years, he was one in all the nation’s leading HIV/AIDS warriors, working locally, nationally and internationally. No matter where he went, he proudly supported the HIV/AIDS community from the Nineteen Eighties until his death, serving in various positions including the Department of Health and Human Services, the National Association of Persons with Disabilities AIDS, and the Whitman-Walker Clinic . Jennings explained.

Jennings concluded: “His career also included several honors, including being the first recipient of the American Foundation for AIDS Research Foundation’s organization-building Courage Award. Our communities have lost a pillar in Cornelius, and as we mourn his death, we will be forever grateful for his decades of service to the community.”

Kaye Hayes, deputy assistant secretary for communicable diseases and director of the Office of Infectious Diseases and HIV/AIDS Policy, in her comment about his legacy, she called Baker “the North Star.”.

“It is difficult to overstate the impact his loss had on public health, the HIV/AIDS community or the place he held in my heart personally,” Hayes told Hiv.gov. “He was pushing us, charging us, pulling us, pushing us. With his unwavering commitment to the HIV movement, he represented the north star, constructing coalitions across sectors and dealing with leaders across the political spectrum to deal with health disparities and advocate for access to HIV treatment and look after all. He said, “The work isn’t done, the charge is still there, move on – you know what you have to do.” It’s in my ear and in my heart in the case of this job.

Hayes added: “His death is a significant loss to the public health community and to the many others who benefited from Cornelius’ vigilance. His legacy will continue to inspire and motivate us all.”

Baker is survived by his mother, Shirley Baker; his partner Nevins, who can be senior counsel at Lambda Legal; his sisters Chandrika Baker, Nadine Wallace and Yavodka Bishop; in addition to his two brothers, Kareem and Roosevelt Dowdell; along with the larger HIV/AIDS advocacy community.


This article was originally published on : www.blackenterprise.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending