Connect with us

Health and Wellness

Are plant-based burgers really bad for your heart? Here’s what’s behind the scary headlines

Published

on

We hear quite a bit about ultra-processed foods and the health effects of eating an excessive amount of of them. We also know that plant-based foods are popular for health or other reasons.

So this shouldn’t be surprising recent research This week’s information on the health effects of ultra-processed plant-based foods will attract global attention.

The headlines could be scary when the research and publicity surrounding them suggests that eating these foods increases your risk of heart disease, stroke or premature death.

Here’s how some media outlets interpreted the study. Daily Mail. ran with: :

Study Suggests Vegan Fake Meats Are Linked to Rise in Heart Disease Deaths: Experts Say Plant-Based Diets Can Improve Health – But NOT If They’re Ultra-Processed

New York Post. heading was:

Vegan fake meats linked to heart disease and premature death: study

However, after we have a look at the study itself, it seems that the media reports concentrate on a small aspect of the study and are misleading.

So does eating plant-based burgers and other ultra-processed plant-based foods from the supermarket really increase your risk of heart disease, stroke and premature death?

Here’s what led us to conduct the study and what it actually found.

Remind me what ultra-processed food is?

Ultra-processed food processed and reformulated with additives to enhance taste, durability and attractiveness. These include every thing from packaged pasta cheeses and pork sausages to supermarket cakes and plant-based mince.

There is now strong and extensive evidence showing that ultra-processed foods are linked to: increased risk many chronic physical and mental illnesses.

Though researchers the query is what food products needs to be counted as ultra-processed or in the event that they are all linked to poorer health, the consensus is that we should always eat less of them overall.

We also know that plant-based diets are very talked-about. They are related to reduced risk chronic conditions resembling heart disease and stroke, cancer and diabetes. Supermarkets offer more plant-based, ultra-processed foods.

What about the recent study?

The test looked for any health differences between eating ultra-processed plant foods versus eating ultra-processed non-plant foods. Scientists focused on the risk of heart problems (resembling heart disease and stroke) and death from it.

In this study, ultra-processed plant-based foods included mass-produced packaged bread, cookies, rolls, cakes, pastries, cereals, and meat alternatives (fake meat). Ultra-processed foods that weren’t plant-based included milk-based drinks and desserts, sausages, nuggets and other reconstituted meat products.

The researchers used data from the British Biobank. This is a big biomedical database containing unidentified genetic, lifestyle (weight loss program and exercise) and health information, in addition to biological samples from half one million UK participants. This database allows researchers to find out links between this data and a big selection of diseases, including heart disease and stroke.

They used data from almost 127,000 individuals who detailed their diets between 2009 and 2012. The researchers linked this to their hospital records and death records. The researchers monitored each participant’s weight loss program and health for a mean of nine years.

The plant-based, ultra-processed foods included on this study included packaged supermarket bread.
Doublelee/Shutterstock

What did the study show?

Every 10% increase in total energy from ultra-processed plant-based foods was related to a 5% increased risk of heart problems (resembling heart disease or stroke) and a 12% greater risk of death from heart problems.

However, each 10% increase in consumption of unprocessed plant-based foods was related to a 7% lower risk of heart problems and a 13% lower risk of death from heart problems.

Scientists found no evidence of an association between whole plant-based foods (no matter whether or not they were ultra-processed or not) and an increased or decreased risk of heart problems or death from them.

It was an observational study wherein people used questionnaires to recall their weight loss program. When combined with other data, this could only tell us whether someone’s weight loss program is at particular risk of health effects. So we won’t say that on this case ultra-processed food caused heart disease and heart disease deaths.

Why is the media focused on fake meat?

Most media reports have focused on the obvious health risks related to eating fake meats resembling sausages, hamburgers, nuggets and even steaks.

They are considered ultra-processed foods. They are made by breaking down whole plant foods resembling peas, soy, wheat protein, nuts and mushrooms and extracting the protein. They are then reformulated with additives to make the products look, taste and feel like traditional red and white meats.

However, on this study, it was only one variety of ultra-processed plant-based food. This represented only a mean of 0.2% of the dietary energy intake of all participants.

Compare this to bread, cookies, rolls, cakes and biscuits, that are other sorts of ultra-processed plant-based foods. They accounted for 20.7% of the total energy intake in the study.

Plant-based foods such as hamburgers and sausages on trays
This photo was at the top of the press release.
Screenshot/Imperial

It’s hard to say why the media focused on fake meat. But there’s one clue in Press Release issued to advertise research.

While the press release didn’t mention the phrase “fake meat,” images of plant-based burgers, sausages, and meatballs or rissoles were prominently featured.

The introduction to the study itself also mentioned plant-based, ultra-processed foods resembling sausages, nuggets and burgers.

So it’s no wonder people can get confused.

Does this mean fake meat is okay?

Not necessarily. This study analyzed total consumption of plant-based, ultra-processed foods, including fake meats, although they make up a really small percentage of individuals’s diets.

Based on this study alone, we cannot tell whether someone would have eaten large amounts of faux meat if the final result had been different.

In fact, a last review of the fake meats found, there was insufficient evidence to find out their health effects.

We also need more moderen data to reflect current patterns of eating fake meat. The study used dietary data collected between 2009 and 2012, and since then fake meat has turn out to be increasingly popular.

What if I really like fake meat?

We have known for an extended time that ultra-processed food could be harmful to our health. This study shows that whether ultra-processed foods are plant-based or not, they could be harmful.

We know that fake meat may contain large amounts of saturated fat (from coconut or palm oil), salt and sugar.

Like other ultra-processed foods, they needs to be eaten rarely. The Australian Dietary Guidelines now recommends that individuals eat a majority of these foods only occasionally and in small amounts.

Are some fake meats healthier than others?

Check labels and nutrition facts panels. Look for products with the lowest fat and salt content. Hamburgers and sausages which can be “pressed dough” from ground ingredients resembling nuts, beans and vegetables can be higher than reformulated products that look similar to meat.

You can even eat healthful protein products of plant origin, resembling legumes. These include beans, lentils, chickpeas and soy. In addition to being wealthy in protein and fiber, additionally they provide essential nutrients resembling iron and zinc. Using spices and mushrooms in your recipes can recreate the umami flavor related to meat.

This article was originally published on : theconversation.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Health and Wellness

Women are less likely to undergo cardiopulmonary resuscitation than men. Training on breast mannequins could be helpful

Published

on

By

If someone’s heart suddenly stops beating, this may increasingly have happened minutes of life. Performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation may increase their probabilities of survival. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation keeps blood pumping, delivering oxygen to the brain and vital organs until specialized treatment arrives.

However, research shows that bystanders are less likely to intervene to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation if the person is a girl. AND latest Australian study analyzed 4,491 cardiac arrest cases between 2017 and 2019 and located that bystanders were more likely to perform CPR on men (74%) than on women (65%).

Could this be partly because CPR training mannequins (so-called dummies) shouldn’t have breasts? Our recent research we checked out mannequins available all over the world to train people to perform CPR and located that 95% of them were flat-chested.

Anatomically, breasts don’t change the cardiopulmonary resuscitation technique. However, they’ll influence whether people try to accomplish that – and hesitation at these key moments could mean the difference between life and death.

Differences in heart health

Cardiovascular diseases – including heart disease, stroke and cardiac arrest – are probably the most common diseases important reason behind death for ladies all over the world.

But if a girl goes into cardiac arrest outside the hospital (meaning her heart stops pumping air properly), that is actually what happens. 10% less likely receive cardiopulmonary resuscitation than a person. Women too less likely survive cardiopulmonary resuscitation and are at greater risk of brain damage following cardiac arrest.

Bystanders are less likely to intervene if a girl needs cardiopulmonary resuscitation compared to a person.
Doublelee/Shutterstock

These are just among the many health inequalities experienced by women, in addition to transgender and non-binary people. Compared to men, their symptoms they are more likely to be rejected or misdiagnosed, or it could take longer to receive a diagnosis.

Reluctance of the witness

There can also be growth evidence women are less likely to start cardiopulmonary resuscitation compared to men.

This may be partly due to the concerns of those being accused of sexual harassmentworry may cause damage (in some cases based on the assumption that ladies are more “fragile”) and discomfort related to touching women’s breasts.

Bystanders may also get into trouble recognition the lady has a cardiac arrest.

Even in simulated scenarios, researchers found that interveners were less likely to remove women’s clothing prepare for resuscitationcompared to men. And there have been women less likely to receive Cardiopulmonary resuscitation or defibrillation (an electrical charge to restart the center) – even when the training was in the shape of a web based game that didn’t require touching anyone.

There is evidence of how people behave in resuscitation training scenarios reflects what they do in real emergency situations. This means it is amazingly vital to train people to recognize cardiac arrest and prepare for intervention, no matter gender or body type.

Attached to men’s bodies

Very Cardiopulmonary resuscitation training resources depict male bodies or don’t specify gender. If bodies shouldn’t have breasts, it’s a male default.

For example, the 12 months 2022 test taking a look at CPR training in North, Central, and South America, it was found that nearly all of available mannequins were white (88%), male (94%), and slim (99%).

The woman's hands press the torso of a mannequin wearing a blue jacket.
It is amazingly rare for a mannequin to have breasts or a bigger body.
M Isolation photo/Shutterstock

This research reflects what we see in our work once we train other healthcare professionals to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation. We noticed that every one the mannequins available for training are flat chested. One of us (Rebecca) had difficulty finding training mannequins with breasts.

Single mannequin with breasts

Our recent research we checked what cardiopulmonary resuscitation mannequins are available and the way diverse they are. In 2023, we identified 20 cardiopulmonary resuscitation mannequins in the worldwide market. Mannequins are often torsos with no head and without arms.

Of the 20 available, five (25%) were sold as “female”, but only considered one of them had breasts. This implies that 95% of obtainable CPR training mannequins were flat-chested.

We also checked out other diversity characteristics, including skin tone and bigger bodies. We found that 65% had more than one skin tone available, but just one had a bigger body. Further research is required on the impact of those elements on bystanders when performing CPR.

Breasts don’t change cardiopulmonary resuscitation technique

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation technique doesn’t change when someone has breasts. The barriers are cultural. And although you could feel uncomfortable, starting cardiopulmonary resuscitation as soon as possible can save your life.

Signs that somebody may have cardiopulmonary resuscitation include not respiration properly or completely or not responding to you.

Perform effective cardiopulmonary resuscitationit’s best to:

  • place the heel of your hand in the middle of your chest

  • place your second hand on top of the primary and interlace your fingers (keep your arms straight)

  • press firmly to a depth of about 5 cm before releasing

  • press your chest with a frequency of 100-120 beats per minute (you may sing a song) in your head to show you how to keep time!)

An example of performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation – using a flat-chest manikin.

What a couple of defibrillator?

You haven’t got to remove someone’s bra to perform CPR. But you could need to accomplish that if a defibrillator is required.

AND defibrillator is a tool that uses an electrical charge to restart the center. An underwired bra may cause minor skin burns when the debrillator pads apply an electrical charge. However, in case you cannot take your bra off, don’t let it delay your care.

What should change?

Our research highlights the necessity for a big selection of breast CPR training mannequins, in addition to a wide range of body sizes.

Training resources need to higher prepare people to intervene and perform CPR on individuals with breasts. We also need greater education on the chance of developing and dying from heart disease in women.

This article was originally published on : theconversation.com
Continue Reading

Health and Wellness

Ant stings can be painful. Here’s how to avoid getting stung this summer (and what to do if it happens)

Published

on

By

The starting of summer is just a couple of days away, and plenty of of us will be looking forward to long, sunny days spent on the beach, by the pool, camping or having a picnic within the park.

Insects love summer too. Most of them right then grow and feed. However, this shared appreciation of the season can sometimes lead to conflict.

Insects have long been preyed upon by many species, including birds, mammals, amphibians, and other insects. Accordingly, quite a lot of defense mechanisms have evolved – perhaps none more familiar to humans than the sting.

Many ants have a stinger on their rear end which they use to deliver venom. It will not be the sting itself that causes pain, but relatively venom. Ant venom accommodates a mix of various chemicals, a few of which have evolved specifically to manipulate the nerve endings in our skin to cause pain.

Let’s take a have a look at the several ant stings chances are you’ll experience this summer in Australia and how to respond.

Bull ants

Bull ants (also often called bulldog ants, jumper ants, or jumper ants) are large for an ant. Some species can grow to length 4 centimeters. They are easily identified by their large eyes, long mandibles (jaws), and aggressive nature.

Their sting is immediate, hot, sharp and unambiguous, similar to that of a honey bee. The intense pain will only last a couple of minutes before being replaced by redness and swelling across the sting site.

There are many differing kinds of bull ants in Australia.
Sam Robinson

Green-headed ants

Green-headed ants are also called green ants (but not to be confused with green ants). green tree ants northern Australia, which do not sting). Green-headed ants are common and love our lawns.

About Length 6 millimetersthey’re much smaller than bull ants. They can be recognized by their shiny green-purple exoskeleton.

Green-headed ants are frequently less aggressive than bull ants, but they can still deliver a big sting. The pain from a green ant sting can construct up step by step and cause intense, sticky pain.

Green-headed ant.
Green-headed ants can be identified by their color.
Sam Robinson

Fire ants

Fire ants (or imported red fire ants) are native to South America. They were detected first in Brisbane in 2001it probably moved in containers and has since spread across south-east Queensland.

Fire ants are reddish brown and black and range in size from Length 2–6 millimeters.

You will almost certainly encounter fire ants of their nests, which appear like a pile of loose dirt. A hearth ant nest has no obvious entrance, which is way to distinguish it from other similar ant nests.

Disturbing a hearth ant nest will awaken an offended mass of a whole bunch of ants and expose you to being stung.

The initial pain from a single sting seems like an intense, hot itch, although it can be controlled. However, fire ant stings rarely occur in the only digits. One ant can sting multiple times, and plenty of ants can sting one person, which can lead to a whole bunch of stings. A hearth ant sting can cause pus-filled ulcers and scarring in the next days.

If you reside in an area where fire ants are present, it’s price taking a couple of minutes to learn how to do this recognize and report their.

Electric ants

Electric ants is one other nasty random import, coming from Central and South America. Currently limited to Cairns and surroundingsthese are tiny (1.5 millimeters long) yellow ants.

Like fire ants, these ants are frequently defensive, so lots of them will sting without delay. Their sting is more painful than you’ll expect from such a tiny creature. I compare it to being showered with red, hot sparks.

If you think that you see electric ants, please report it Biosecurity in Queensland.

Australian ants should not the worst

You may be surprised to hear that Australian ants don’t even make it to the rostrum when it comes to essentially the most painful ant stings. The winners include: harvester ants (North and South America), which cause severe, sticky pain, comparable to a drill slowly rotating in a muscle – for up to 12 hours.

The gold medal goes to the sting of the South and Central American bullet ant, which has been described How:

Pure, intense, sensible pain. It’s like walking on burning charcoal with a 3-inch nail stuck in your heel.

How to avoid getting stung (and what to do if you do)

Fortunately, the answer is frequently quite simple. Look around before you sit on the bottom or unfolded a picnic blanket, avoiding places where you see ant nests or a lot of foraging ants.

The selection of footwear might also be necessary. In my experience, most stings occur on the feet of those wearing thongs.

If you get stung, generally the situation will improve by itself. The pain often subsides after a couple of minutes (sometimes slightly longer within the case of a green ant sting). The redness, swelling and itching that sometimes follows may last for several days.

In the meantime, if mandatory, ice pack it will help with the pain. If it’s particularly bad, a topical numbing cream containing lidocaine may provide temporary relief. You can get it over-the-counter at a pharmacy.

A small proportion of individuals may experience an allergic response to ant stings. In very severe cases this may include respiratory problems or ingestion. If you or a loved one experiences these symptoms after an ant sting, you need to seek urgent medical attention.

This article was originally published on : theconversation.com
Continue Reading

Health and Wellness

Health matters: WNBA star Napheesa Collier on her commitment to women’s reproductive health

Published

on

By

Minnesota lynx

Napheesa Collier will not be only a WNBA superstar for the Minnesota Lynx and a two-time Olympic gold medalist, but additionally the mother of her daughter Mila and an advocate for women’s reproductive health rights.

It recently decided to partner with Opill®, the primary and only every day contraceptive pill available over-the-counter within the United States. This breakthrough represents a major step forward in women’s health care by providing a convenient and accessible contraceptive option. With Opill, women not need to visit health care facilities for prescriptions, making it easier than ever to take control of their reproductive health.

The collaboration relies on Opill®’s long-standing partnership with the Women’s National Basketball Association (WNBA). “One of the reasons Opill® partnered with the WNBA is the great passion of players who use their platform to support causes they believe in,” said Leila Bahbah, leading women’s health brand at Perrigo within the US. “Napheesa exudes this passion, and together we plan to educate and empower people to take control of their reproductive health.”

Collier advocates for girls and says she is willing to have conversations, even in the event that they are difficult. “I just truly believe in everything they do at Opill®. I believe it’s important to talk to people who may become pregnant and to women about the reproductive health and contraceptive options available to them,” Collier tells ESSENCE.

He continues: “I want people to know that if they want contraception, Opill® is a great option. It is the first over-the-counter drug approved by the FDA. It is inexpensive, available. You don’t need a prescription to get it. I think that’s a key thing in today’s climate.”

Collier notes that within the off-season, he tries to travel to various colleges to talk to students about their reproductive freedoms. “Talking about this topic is essential to remove the stigma as it should not be considered a shameful topic or something that should not be discussed openly. My mother was a nurse, so it was casual to talk about it in our house, and I want to pass it on to other people too, so I’m very excited about it,” she says.

In the present political climate, many ladies with daughters are concerned about their future and reproductive health. Collier, included. “Especially because I am the mother of a young girl, it is very important to me to be able to raise her in an atmosphere where she knows her reproductive rights and health, that she has access to affordable health care and contraception if she wants it and that she can ask me these questions and have open conversations.”

Collier continues: “It’s back to education. Again, I think it’s harmful that we can’t have open conversations about birth control and other issues that are usually taboo. I think it’s harmful. I think this does a lot of harm to women. It hurts. This is harmful to our society. Being able to talk about these issues and empowering women to learn about their rights and bodies creates a safer and healthier society.”

This article was originally published on : www.essence.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending