Connect with us

Politics and Current

RFK Jr. heavily criticized for continuing to accuse black men of murder

Published

on

 

While presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. starts the race for… platform advocating for criminal justice reform in his efforts to bring black voters to justice, critics indicate that the independent candidate spent years accusing two black and brown men of committing the murder for which his white cousin was convicted, despite the lawsuits being dismissed by court.

“He is very much like many other racist white people who have decided it is more convenient to choose defenseless people as a scapegoat for their crimes,” said activist Tamika Mallory, founder of the nonprofit Until Freedom. “The easiest targets are black and brown men because in most cases the system will automatically assume these people are guilty until proven innocent.”

In 2016, Kennedy published a book titled “Framed” during which he explains why he believed his cousin Michael Skakel was innocent after being convicted of the October 30, 1975 murder of 15-year-old Martha Moxley in Greenwich. Connecticut. Moxley was bludgeoned to death with a golf club that traced back to the house of Skakel, then a neighbor who was also an adolescent. Skakel was convicted of murder in 2002 and released from prison in 2013 after a Connecticut judge ruled he didn’t receive an adequate defense from his original lawyer.

In his book, Kennedy repeats the accusations of Skakel’s friend Gitano “Tony” Bryant, the cousin of NBA star Kobe Bryant, who taken over two of his friends from the Bronx, Adolph Hasbrouck and Burton Tinsley, were responsible for Moxley’s murder. Hasbrouck is black and Tinsley is described in news reports as mixed race and of Asian descent.

“I’m sure they did it” – Kennedy he said New York Times in 2016 Despite the claims in his book, there are holes in Kennedy’s theory that Hasbrouck and Tinsley were responsible for Moxley’s murder.

Kennedy claimed to know “facts that were not part of the trial and … were not part of the public debate,” based on conversations he had with neighbors of the Moxley family. He used his roles as a contributor at publications similar to the Atlantic Monthly to push his claims, and later within the 2000s he launched a media onslaught in an attempt to clear his cousin’s name.

In 2007, a Stamford Superior Court judge found Bryant’s claims about Hasbrouck and Tinsley to have little credibility and said they’d not have produced a unique end in the case. Meanwhile, no evidence or other eyewitnesses placed Hasbrouck or Tinsley in the world on the night of Moxley’s murder.

Presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (center) hosted a “fireside chat” with rapper and producer Eric B. (right) on the Gentleman’s Factory in New York in February. (Photo: John Nacion/Getty Images)

“No one saw anyone black in this all-white neighborhood,” said Schoenbach, who noted that the private, gated community had “extra security” on the night of the murder since it was the night before Halloween.

According to a court document containing his 2007 testimony, Kennedy stated that Hasbrouck and Tinsley would “probably have short lives” and find yourself in prison.

Schoenbach said Hasbrouck was “not at all the typical kid from the South Bronx that Kennedy thought he was,” declaring that he earned a bachelor’s degree, joined the military, was honorably discharged and worked for ABC for 30 years. He also emphasized that Bryant, the person on whose claims Kennedy relied to accuse Hasbrouck and Tinsley of Moxley’s murder, was convicted fraud and sentenced to federal prison.

While promoting his book “Framed,” Kennedy, who earned his law degree from the University of Virginia School of Law, dismissed concerns that Hasbrouck or Tinsley might sue him for defamation. He emboldened them eloquent radio station: “I hope they file a lawsuit… if they’re innocent, they’ll file a lawsuit against me.”

Schoenbach said Kennedy “desperately wanted” Hasbrouck, referred to as Al, “to say something so that Al would be forced to testify.” He advised Hasbrouck to exercise his Fifth Amendment right to avoid being subpoenaed.

He also falsely claimed that Skakel was “released from prison as a result of this investigation,” when the truth is he was released on a separate appeal during which he claimed that his defense attorney in the primary trial was “incompetent

Until Freedom’s Mallory stated that Kennedy’s continued accusations should “disqualify” him from gaining support from the Black community.

Featured Stories

“It’s not an ideological difference. “This is a false accusation of a Black man and a mixed-race gentleman of a very serious crime that they did not commit,” she said. “I do not know what’s worse than someone running for president trying to appeal to the frustrations of our community, and on this case actually directly hurting Black people. It could be very dangerous.”

“When we talk about the criminal justice system, when we talk about black Americans, when we talk about Trump and black men, we must continue to remind people who Trump has always been,” she maintained.

Williams said Trump similarly falsely accused five black teenagers, referred to as the Central Park Five, of a brutal crime against a white woman.

She added: “They were innocent Black men and now they are the Exonerated Five. And yet he said they should be shot, and people act as if they forgot about it.”

 

This article was originally published on : thegrio.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics and Current

Barack and Michelle Obama understand Kamala Harris’ loss to Trump

Published

on

By

Barack Obama, Michelle Obama, theGrio.com

Former President Barack Obama and first lady Michelle Obama broke their silence Wednesday night after their friend Kamala Harris was defeated by Donald Trump within the 2024 presidential election.

“Clearly, this is not the outcome we had hoped for, given our deep disagreements with the Republican ticket on many issues,” Obama said in a joint statement. statement with wife Michelle Obama.

The powerful political couple, who campaigned vigorously against Trump in the ultimate weeks of the election cycle, added: “But living in a democracy is about recognizing that not every point of view will always prevail and being willing to accept a peaceful solution.” transfer of power.”

In an act of courtesy, America’s first Black president and first lady congratulated President-elect Trump and Vice President-elect J.D. Vance, just because the Obamas welcomed Donald Trump and Melania Trump to the White House when he was elected in 2016.

Despite the Democrats’ defeat, the Obamas said they “could not be more proud” of Vice President Harris and his running mate, Gov. Tim Walz, whom they called “two extraordinary servants” to “run an extraordinary campaign.”

“We will always be grateful to the employees and volunteers who poured their hearts and souls into electing public officials they truly believed in,” they continued.

Democratic presidential candidate U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris campaigns with former President Barack Obama at James R. Hallford Stadium on October 24, 2024 in Clarkston, Georgia. (Photo: Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

The Obamas were extremely vocal throughout the campaign in support of Harris and Walz. The historically politically reserved pair have been particularly critical of Trump’s character, warning voters about his embrace of racist ideologies, penchant for authoritarianism and economic policies that can profit him and his wealthy allies.

However, voters overwhelmingly selected Donald Trump because the forty seventh president of the United States. Not only has Trump surpassed the 270 electoral votes needed to win the White House, but he may additionally win the favored vote after a full count of all votes nationwide.

Former President Obama sought to provide global context for Harris’ loss, acknowledging the results of the 2020 pandemic that included “price increases” and “rapid changes” that left residents feeling as in the event that they were “treading water” economically “no matter how hard they work.”

“These conditions make it difficult for Democratic officials around the world, and last night showed that America is not immune,” Obama said.

According to A report from Vox: “2024 was the biggest election year in world history; More people voted this year than ever before. “Across the world, voters have told the party in power – regardless of its ideology or history – that it is time for change.”

The Obamas said: “The good news is that these problems can be solved.” But they added that solving them would come down to Americans listening to one another and upholding “the fundamental constitutional principles and democratic norms that have made this country great.”

“In a country as large and diverse as ours, we will not always be able to see everything. However, progress requires us to show good faith – even to people with whom we deeply disagree,” they explained. “That’s how we’ve come this far, and that’s how we will continue to build a country that is fairer, more equal and more free.”

Featured Stories

This article was originally published on : thegrio.com
Continue Reading

Politics and Current

Karine Jean-Pierre catches the eye of a Fox reporter who tests her with numerous questions after Donald Trump’s victory

Published

on

By

Karine Jean-Pierre Pops Off on Fox Reporter Who Tests Her with Loaded Questions After Donald Trump’s Victory

Two days after Donald Trump’s resounding election victory, White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre’s body language spoke for just about all Democrats. She looks like she’d slightly attend a full-day insurance seminar with no bathroom breaks than one other day of answering reporters’ questions.

But it’s her job, and in two months it can be another person’s job (assuming the Trump administration allows the press to enter the White House). Until then, Jean-Pierre’s cheerful and nice demeanor will likely be put to the test.

She became visibly emotional Thursday in an interview with Fox News reporter Jacqui Heinrich after a seemingly benign query asked at her each day news conference about the Biden administration’s pre-election rhetoric.

Karine Jean-Pierre catches the eye of a Fox reporter who tests her with numerous questions after Donald Trump's victory
Left: Fox News reporter Jacqui Heinrich; Right: White House Press Secretary Karine Jean Pierre (Photos: Fox News screenshot, Getty Images)

“This administration has given millions of Americans the message that when they wake up the day after the election, if Trump wins and takes away their rights, democracy will fall apart. And the president said today: “Everything will be fine.” Heinrich he asked“So how do we even it out?”

From there, things got touchy.

“I can fix it. “I will explain this in a way that I hope makes sense because I have answered this question many times,” he replied Jean-Pierre.

In interview for PBS two weeks before the election, President Joe Biden was putting pressure on the Republican Party candidate, just as Heinrich summarized. Biden said world leaders fear a second term for Trump, sharply criticized his close relationship with Russian President Vladimir Putin and joked that his predecessor (and now successor) “believes in a free press like I consider I can climb Mt. Everest.”

Jean-Pierre said the comments were made before the election. This is a different reality.

“The American people have made their decision,” the press secretary continued. “The elections were held two days ago. Was! This was a free and fair election and we respect the electoral process. We do. And the Americans have spoken.”

“So the president’s job is to make sure that we respect that,” she concluded. “The president’s job is to ensure the peaceful transfer of power. This is what Americans deserve. …It’s not complicated. It’s really, really that simple.”

Heinrich’s further actions irritated the press secretary.

“What is the message to people who are afraid, given the content of (Trump’s) message?” – Heinrich asked before being interrupted by Jean-Pierre.

“Well, now you’re just twisting everything, and it’s really unfair,” she said, clearly upset. “Jackie, it is not fair because I’m standing here attempting to be respectful of what happened the last two nights, two nights ago. Showing respect. “I stand here and say we respect the decision made by the American people.”

“I stand here and say the president will put the American people first,” she continued. “I’m standing here talking about how the president will be sure they get what they deserve, which is a peaceful transition of power. I don’t love my words being twisted. I mean, I’m being very clear, very, very clear about what the president and the vp need to do. We need to be sure we deliver products for Americans. They deserve, they deserve, a peaceful transfer of power. And that is what you will see.”

And that is it for Thursday’s White House press release.

This article was originally published on : atlantablackstar.com
Continue Reading

Politics and Current

8 voter suppression tactics to watch out for on Election Day [site:name]

Published

on

By

Mario Tama/Getty Images

Today is Election Day 2024, and candidates all over the place – from president to congress, and on the state and native levels – are making their final push to get your vote.

Unfortunately, voter suppression tactics could also be among the many strategies used to influence the end result. As a reminder, voter suppression includes any motion that makes it difficult or discourages people from voting.

As you head to the polls today, check out these 8 common voter suppression tactics that can help make sure you and others in your community can exercise their right to vote freely and fairly.

1. Discouragement within the face of long lines

No matter when or where you vote, there’s all the time a risk of encountering a line that is simply too long. Pay special attention to individuals who suggest you “leave and come back later” when lines are shorter, and even try to discourage you from voting altogether. Be sure to plan your visit to the polling place when you’ve some free time in order not to be distracted by potentially long lines.

2. Strict identification requirements

If you might be a registered voter, generally a government-issued ID card might be enough to vote. In some cases, chances are you’ll be required to show your voter registration card, but should you notice that other voters are receiving different instructions than you or anyone in your group, don’t hesitate to ask questions for clarification.

3. Unofficial “Observers” survey

While polling places in lots of states have been a comparatively hassle-free environment previously, the changing nature of this election 12 months may lead to people trying to query you or do other things to deliberately annoy you until you allow or are asked to leave. Remember to remain consistent and never give in to anyone who tries to stop you from doing what you got here to do, which is vote.

4. Last minute changes to the voting site

Try to check where your polling station is often. In some states, there’s a high likelihood that there might be changes to your voting location, and if this happens, chances are you’ll not be notified upfront.

5. Inconsistent information in regards to the opening hours of the polling station

Polling stations will open at 6:00 a.m. and shut at 9:00 p.m. on election day. Hours of operation vary by state, so make sure to check ahead of time what the hours are in your state. On the day you intend to vote, check again before you go to be sure there have been no changes that can cause you to lose your ability to vote.

6. Review of defamatory campaign ads

Read up on the candidates and where they stand on the problems that matter most to you, so you do not get easily swayed by an influx of negative campaign ads that can undoubtedly come across as a last-ditch effort to get your vote by painting the opposite candidate in a foul light. Know your candidate’s history, but additionally keep in mind that the motion plans he has outlined for the current and future will prove most vital if he’s elected president.

7. Random voter purges

If you might be faraway from the ballot for questioning, reassignment, and even being prevented from voting by an election official, stay calm and ask questions to find out what is going on fairly than leaving without voting. It’s also helpful to familiarize yourself together with your voting rights upfront, or to bring someone with you who’s at the very least minimally informed in regards to the basics.

8. Blatant bullying

Whether it’s subtle comments from other voters, offended words from protesters, or an irate election official having a foul day, don’t let anyone intimidate you to the purpose of abstaining from voting by not doing all the things you’ll be able to all the things possible to be sure your vote is counted.

The undeniable fact that these tactics are used on their very own should let you know how beneficial and powerful your voice is. Otherwise why would they struggle to suppress it, right?

This article was originally published on : www.essence.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending