Connect with us

Business and Finance

A subsidy program for black women business owners is discriminatory, an appeals court has ruled

Published

on

NEW YORK (AP) – A U.S. federal appeals court panel has suspended a enterprise capital firm’s grant program for Black women business owners, ruling that a conservative group is prone to prevail in its lawsuit arguing that the program is discriminatory.

The ruling against the Atlanta-based Fearless Fund is one other victory for conservative groups waging a large-scale legal battle against corporate diversity programs that focus on dozens of firms and government institutions.

The case against the Fearless Fund was brought last yr by the American Alliance for Equal Rights, a gaggle led by Edward Blum, the conservative activist behind the Supreme Court case that ended affirmative motion in college admissions.

Blum praised the ruling, saying that “programs that exclude certain people based on race, such as those designed and implemented by the Fearless Fund, are unfair and polarizing.”

Fearless Fund CEO and founder Arian Simone said the ruling was “devastating” for the organizations and women through which he invested.

“The message these justices sent today is that diversity should not exist in corporate America, in education, or anywhere else,” she said in an announcement. “These judges bought what a small group of white men were selling.”

Alphonso David, general counsel of Fearless Fund, who serves as president and CEO of The Global Black Economic Forum, said all options are being considered to proceed fighting the lawsuit.

Legal efforts to dismantle workplace diversity programs have also suffered some setbacks, reflecting polarized opinions amongst liberal and conservative justices on the problem. Last week, for example, a federal district judge in Ohio dismissed a lawsuit against insurance company Progressive and fintech platform Hello Alice, difficult a program that offered grants to assist Black-owned small businesses purchase industrial vehicles. Similar lawsuits have been dismissed against Amazon, Pfizer and Starbucks.

The case against Fearless Fund has been closely watched by civil rights groups, philanthropic groups, employment lawyers and the enterprise capital industry as a guide to how courts view programs geared toward equalizing opportunities for racial minorities and other groups which have historically faced discrimination. in enterprises and workplaces.

In a 2-1 ruling, a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the eleventh Circuit in Miami said Blum was prone to prevail in her lawsuit, claiming the scholarship program violated Section 1981 of the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which prohibits sex discrimination. . the premise of race in enforcing contracts. Reconstruction-era laws were originally intended to guard formally enslaved people from economic exclusion, but anti-affirmative motion activists are using them to challenge programs designed to profit minority-owned businesses.

The court ordered the Fearless Fund to suspend its Strivers grant competition, which provides $20,000 to firms majority-owned by Black women, for the rest of the lawsuit pending in federal court in Atlanta. The ruling overturned a federal judge’s ruling last yr that the competition should proceed because Blum’s lawsuit would likely fail. However, the grant competition was suspended in October after a separate panel of a federal appeals court quickly granted Blum’s request for an emergency injunction while he was difficult the federal judge’s original order.

The appeals court panel, consisting of two judges appointed by former President Donald Trump and one appointed by former President Barack Obama, rejected Fearless Fund’s arguments that the grants weren’t contracts but charitable donations protected by First Amendment rights to free speech.

Featured Stories

“The fact remains, however, that Fearless simply — and categorically — refuses to consider applications from business owners who are not ‘black women,’” the court’s majority opinion said, adding that “any act of racial discrimination” could be considered expressive conduct, in response to the argument Fearless Fund.

The appeals board also rejected the Fearless Fund’s claim that Blum lacked standing since the lawsuit was filed on behalf of three anonymous women who had not demonstrated that they were “ready and able” to use for the grant or that that they had been harmed by the inappropriate motion. is to do it.

Judge Robin Rosenbaum, an Obama appointee, disagreed, expressing a fierce dissent, likening the plaintiffs’ claims of harm to football players attempting to win by “flapping on the field, faking injuries.” Rosenbaum found that neither plaintiff had demonstrated that that they had an actual intention to use for the grants in the shape of what she called “cookie-cutter declarations” that were “trivial and devoid of substance.”

The court’s ruling was not surprising given its conservative bias and former skepticism of the Fearless Fund’s arguments, said David Glasgow, executive director of the Meltzer Center for Diversity, Inclusion and Belonging on the New York University School of Law.

“We will see some pro-DEI results in liberal circles and anti-DEI results in conservative circles,” Glasgow said.

Glasgow said he expected one in all the lawsuits to go to the conservative-dominated Supreme Court. Still, he said it is unlikely that a single ruling could resolve the legal debate surrounding corporate DEI due to complexity and wide-ranging programs and policies that fall under this category.

The Strivers Grant Fund is one in all several programs run by the founding division of the Fearless Fund, which was created to handle the wide racial disparities in funding for businesses run by women of color. According to the nonprofit group digitalundivided, lower than 1% of enterprise capital funding goes to firms owned by Black and Latina women.

The National Venture Capital Association, an industry group with a whole lot of member VC firms, has filed an amicus temporary defending the Fearless Fund grant program as a “modest but important” step toward ensuring equal opportunity in an industry that has historically excluded Black women.

In 2022, only 2% of investment professionals at enterprise capital firms were Black women, in response to a biennial study by Deloitte and Venture Forward, the nonprofit National Venture Capital Association and consulting firm Deloitte. The study, which included 315 firms with 5,700 employees and $594.5 billion in assets under management, found that just 1% of investment partners were Black women.

However, in his statement, Blum said that “our nation’s civil rights do not allow for racial disparities because some groups are overrepresented in various endeavors, while others are underrepresented.”

Philanthropic groups are also watching the case due to its possible implications for charitable giving.

“If legal decisions limit people’s ability to give back in ways that are consistent with their values ​​or experiences, it will harm not only philanthropy and nonprofits, but our entire country,” said Kathleen Enright, president and CEO of the Council on Foundations. whose organizations have filed a friendly temporary in support of the Fearless Fund with the Independent Sector nonprofit.

This article was originally published on : thegrio.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business and Finance

Crypto surges after Trump’s election – but is it a good ethical investment?

Published

on

By

Estimated 18 million Americans are invested cryptocurrency– says the Federal Reserve. And the United States has just chosen pro-crypto-president.

Cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin have change into trendy digital resource. Supporters say crypto undermines capitalism because it bypasses traditional bankers. Crypto perhaps offer quick riches together with an environment of high-tech sophistication.

Early adopters reaped enormous advantages, and plenty of of them became millionaires and billionaires.

Currently, there are approx 100,000 cryptocurrency millionaires. Moreover, cryptocurrency wealth has been built Fairshake, the most important political lobbying group within the US During the last election, it helped elect 253 pro-crypto candidates.

But is cryptocurrency a good ethical investment?

as business professor who studies the technology and its implications, I even have identified three ethical harms related to cryptocurrency which will give investors pause.

Three wrongs

The first harm is excessive energy consumptionparticularly Bitcoin, the primary decentralized cryptocurrency.

Bitcoins are created or “mined” by tens of hundreds of computers in huge data centers, which contributes significantly to carbon emissions and environmental degradation. Bitcoin mining, which accounts for the lion’s share of cryptocurrency’s energy consumption, uses as much as 0.9% of worldwide electricity demand – near Australia’s annual energy demand.

Secondly, unregulated and anonymous cryptocurrencies are the payment system of alternative for criminals fraud, tax evasion, human trafficking AND ransomware – the latter cost victims an estimated $1 billion in fraudulent cryptocurrency payments.

Until about a decade ago, these bad actors generally moved and laundered money through money and shell corporations. However, around 2015, many individuals switched to cryptocurrency, which is a much less cumbersome type of service dirty money anonymously.

The bank cannot store or transfer money anonymously. By law it is a bank passively complicit in money laundering if not enforced get to know your customer measures to curb bad actors resembling money launderers.

However, within the case of cryptocurrency, legal and ethical responsibility can’t be transferred to the bank – the bank doesn’t exist. So who is complicit? Any member of the cryptocurrency ecosystem will be seen as ethically complicit in enabling illegal activities.

Enegix employees work at a data center in Ekibastus, Kazakhstan, certainly one of the world’s largest Bitcoin mines, January 3, 2023.
Meiramgul Kussainova/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images

I find these first two harms to be probably the most ethically troubling. The first harms the Earth, the second undermines global systems of trust – the interplay of institutions that underpin economic activity and social order.

The third problem of cryptocurrency is its predatory culture.

A predatory system, especially without regulatory oversight, exploits small investors. And some cryptocurrencies have enriched their founders by reaping the advantages lack of investor knowledge about virtual currency.

Some cryptocurrencies, especially smaller coins and initial coin offerings, do Characteristics of Ponzi schemes.

For example, the now defunct Bitconnect promised investors big profits who exchanged their Bitcoins for Bitconnect tokens. New investors’ money paid out “profits” to the primary layer of investors with later investors’ money.

Ultimately, Satish Kumbhani, founding father of Bitconnect, decided to achieve this indicted by a federal grand juryand from 2024 his whereabouts are unknown.

A pernicious myth

In addition to the ethical harms of cryptocurrency, there is a pernicious myth surrounding digital coin. The myth of inclusion is the idea that cryptocurrency has the facility to profit especially socially disadvantaged people without a checking account.

The world’s poor who wouldn’t have bank accounts and who could use cryptocurrency for international money transfers to family back home don’t necessarily enjoy the advantages of cryptocurrencies. It’s for this reason need pay conversion and transfer feessay, dollars to cryptocurrency, after which from cryptocurrency to the local currency of the person receiving the cash transfer.

In fact, the distribution of crypto assets is largely concentrated among the many wealthy. A 2021 study found that simply 0.01% of Bitcoin owners controls 27% of its value.

The democratization of finance is often presented as a move geared toward breaking the dominance of traditional financial institutions – private banks and government central banks. However, this narrative didn’t prove true.

Instead, a latest elite emerged: cryptocurrency creatorsearly supporters of i conservatorswho modify the cryptocurrency’s software code and influence its future direction. This group exercises disproportionate control, including over cryptocurrency management. All of this reflects the concentration of power that cryptocurrency was intended to dismantle.

Just a little more ethical?

To be fair, the cryptocurrency community has not ignored the criticism, including calls for greater environmental awareness.

In early 2021, community members founded Cryptocurrency Agreement. The group has recruited around 250 crypto corporations to cut back environmental damage.

The following 12 months, Ethereum took its most important step with its Ether coin. It has reduced its size energy consumption by over 99% by migrating to a coin mining mechanism called “proof of stake”, which doesn’t require miners to unravel complex, energy-intensive puzzles to validate transactions.

It was a daring move. However, Bitcoin, the most important cryptocurrency, has not followed in Ethereum’s footsteps. Bitcoin stands out in that its energy consumption exceeds that of another cryptocurrency.

A worker stands between two rows of bitcoin mining machines along a wall.
A employee installs a latest row of bitcoin mining machines on the Whinstone US bitcoin mining facility in Rockdale, Texas, October 9, 2021.
Mark Felix/AFP/AFP via Getty Images

To address other harms of cryptocurrency, some Regulatory authorities began to regulate the cryptocurrency market in 2023, the European Union, the United Kingdom and the United States have launched efforts to curb criminality and protect investors.

In January 2024, US regulators listed funds allowedthat are popular investment funds for investing in cryptocurrencies. The move was intended to assist small investors trade in a safer market.

However, normalizing cryptocurrency trading could have perverse ethical consequences.

For example, probably the most successful ‘ethical’ fund in 2023, Nikko Ark Positive Change Innovation Fundwas successful with a 68% return because he bet on cryptocurrencies. Its manager rationalized this investment by repeating the parable that cryptocurrency allows “providing financial services to underbanked people

Where does all this leave the ethical investor?

I consider that investors have two clear ethical options regarding cryptocurrencies: they will abandon Bitcoin or no less than put money into other cryptocurrencies that minimize harm, especially environmental harm.

However, even so-called ethical investments raise hidden ethical issues.

Many ethical investors put money into the so-called ESG funds that emphasize social or environmental impact. Some of those ESG funds may avoid holdings in oil corporations by investing directly or not directly in cryptocurrencies.

This doesn’t seem ethically coherent.

While cryptocurrency offers exciting opportunities and the potential for prime returns, its environmental impact, links to criminality and predatory nature pose significant ethical challenges.

This article was originally published on : theconversation.com
Continue Reading

Business and Finance

Daymond John celebrates the fifth annual Black Entrepreneurs Day

Published

on

By

shark tank, Black Entrepreneurs Day, Daymond, John, deal, stalker, grants, Black entrepreneurs


Daymond John will have a good time the fifth anniversary of Black Entrepreneurs Day in Atlanta for the first time.

November 22, John’s signature Black Entrepreneur Day (BED) will take over Atlanta’s historic Fox Theater to have a good time Black Excellence and Opportunity. This 12 months’s event is free for all to attend and includes brand activations that enable participants to reinforce their business and brand for the foreseeable future.

From insightful discussions with inspiring guests to the NAACP Small Business Powershift Grant Program, which can award over $1 million in grants to over 40 Black-owned businesses, Black Entrepreneurs Day offers the whole lot a Black business owner needs to raise take your corporation to the next level the next level. This 12 months’s event is special for John; In addition to hosting BED in Atlanta for the first time, the event shall be streamed live for all to enjoy.

“We’re doing it live this year and we’re always trying to improve what we have,” John says BLACK ENTERPRISES.

“I think we added another element to it called ‘Entrepreneur Square,’ where if you want to come early, you can come in and a company like Constant Contact takes photos. Hilton for Business, Chase, Chase Wealth Management is there, US Navy. You add a lot of different things to it.”

It shall be a star-studded event featuring Grammy-winning artist and philanthropist Kelly Rowland, iconic artist Flavor Flav, influential media personality Charlamagne tha God, Olympic gymnast Jordan Chiles (presented by JP Morgan Wealth Management), financial educators Rashad Bilal and Troy Millings with “Earn Your Leisure” and a live performance by multi-platinum Atlanta rapper 2Chainz presented by Raising Cane’s.

Through the NAACP small business Powershift grant program, entrepreneurs can do exactly that use to the Powershift Grant program and grow to be one in every of 40 firms awarded a share of grants value over $1 million. This 12 months, partners including JPMorgan Chase, Hilton, T-Mobile for Business and Constant Contact will contribute a complete of $100,000 in grants, with each grant valued at $25,000.

“We are very passionate about what we do,” John says of the Black community. “I think we can now gain more power by democratizing the retail space with solutions like artificial intelligence and social media. Let’s support each other and support each other.”

Given the strong sponsorship support for BED 2024, John sees it as clear evidence that giant corporations recognize the value of investing in the Black community, even in the face of opposition from anti-DEI efforts.

“There are many other cultures that love to support us as well. They love our music, they love our food, they love everything about us and they just want to know how they can support us,” notes John.

“I think if we look at it this way, it means we can never gain or thrive on our shortcomings, but we can always find those gems and ways to grow from what we are. We are a resilient nation loved by all.”

Launched in 2020 to handle the challenges facing the community in the wake of the events surrounding George Floyd, Black Entrepreneurs Day was established to shift the focus from hardship to empowerment. Designed to uplift Black entrepreneurs, the event goals to teach and encourage through conversations with iconic Black leaders and celebrity guests, features celebrity musical performances and offers key financial support through the NAACP Powershift Grant program.

Tickets for Black Entrepreneurs Day 2024 are free and may be purchased at: BlackEntrepreneursDay.com Now. Press play to learn more about this 12 months’s event.


This article was originally published on : www.blackenterprise.com
Continue Reading

Business and Finance

Black Girl Digital on a mission to empower diverse creators

Published

on

By

Black girl digital, LaToya bond, LaToya shambo


Meet Black Girl Digital (BGD Media), one among the fastest-growing multicultural, independent marketing agencies within the makerspace, is led by two dynamic Black women entrepreneurs.

Founded and led by CEO LaToya Shambo and CMO Latoya Bond, Digital black girl goals to deliver revolutionary, data-driven marketing solutions tailored to the brands and creators who’re shaping the longer term of promoting and commerce. With a long time of combined experience, these two business leaders have come together to create an agency uniquely equipped to navigate the complexities of multicultural marketing.

“The mission of Black Girl Digital is really about how to bring brand and creators together to go beyond partnerships and build a deeper relationship,” says Shambo BLACK ENTERPRISES.

The pair first met while collaborating on the 2023 Black Girl Digital Awards. While many individuals discuss women competing in business, Shambo and Bond saw a chance to mix their strengths and platforms.

“We went through the process of working together and I saw her talent and she saw my talent. We noticed that we both had these unique skills that worked really well together,” Shambo says.

Combining Black Girl Digital’s expertise in influencer marketing with the BBM Agency’s strength in celebrity business management, BGD Media is uniquely equipped to handle the intricacies of multicultural marketing.

“Because her company was more involved in paid marketing, brand management and communications strategy, it really complemented what we did on the Black Girl Digital side, through partnerships with corporate brands and diverse creators,” Shambo explains.

“Together, we have been able to join forces and offer our brands and creators a full range of media and marketing services, thanks to which the partnership goes deeper rather than superficial.”

Shambo attributes BGD Media’s success to its multimarketing service offering that “brings the customer closer to the creator and the creator closer to the customer.” One of the newest initiatives is the inaugural Black Influencer Weekend, which goals to showcase to major brands and corporations how Black creators are usually not only setting trends, but additionally driving significant cultural and economic change across industries.

During the three-day event, over 1,500 participants engaged in vigorous discussions and activations focused on community, connection and variety amongst creators. Highlights included the VIP Creator Games Night featuring bowling competitions and life-size Connect 4 video games, creating what Shambo describes as a “creator playland.”

On October 2, participants took part in a day stuffed with inspiring and influential discussions in the course of the Influencer Summit. Speakers included media personality Yandy Smith; creative director of beauty and lifestyle Tiarra Monet; and NCAA champion and ladies’s basketball coach Sydney Carter. Conversations covered topics equivalent to balancing a profession outside of social media, maintaining mental health, and constructing meaningful partnerships.

The weekend concluded with the third annual Black Girl Digital Awards, where content creators equivalent to Druski, Monet McMichael and Kai Cenat were honored for his or her power, position and recognition across various platforms. Additionally, business leaders equivalent to Yandy Smith, Marvet Britto and Mona Scott-Young have been recognized as pioneers of influence and visionaries redefining the digital landscape.

At its core, Black Girl Digital is about tackling the complexities of multicultural marketing, demonstrating that representation matters and that success comes when brands connect with communities on a human and private level.

“It’s not a monolith. This is not just one group of Black people. There are many people and many cultures in the Black community,” Shambo says. “Being able to express it. But that’s really why brands work with us. Because we are able to accommodate the different cultures found in each community.”

“We also mainly focus on the passion points and interests of audiences in these communities,” she added.

What’s next for Black Girl Digital? Shambo seeks global domination.

“These will be the Global Influencer Awards,” he says.


This article was originally published on : www.blackenterprise.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending