Connect with us

Crime

Body camera footage shows the fatal shooting of a black airman by a Florida deputy in an apartment doorway

Published

on

FORT WALTON BEACH, Fla. (AP) – A Florida sheriff on Thursday released body camera footage showing a deputy standing outside an apartment door and shooting immediately after it was opened by a black man carrying a gun pointing downward, in what a family called “unjustified ” .”

Okaloosa County Sheriff Eric Aden released the video hours after the family of U.S. Air Force Senior Airman Roger Fortson and his lawyers held a news conference in which they denied that the deputy general had acted in self-defense. Aden rejected claims by civil rights attorney Ben Crump, who represents Fortson’s family, that the deputy went to the unsuitable apartment, covered the peephole on the door and didn’t report himself.

Advertisement

The video shows a police deputy arriving at a Fort Walton Beach apartment constructing on May 3 and talking to a woman outside who described hearing someone arguing. The deputy then took the elevator and walked through the outside hallway.

The video shows a police deputy banging on the door and moving to the side, seemingly out of sight of the door. He shouted twice, “Sheriff’s office! Open the door!”

Fortson opened the door and may very well be seen holding what gave the impression to be a gun pointed toward the floor. The deputy shouted, “Stand back!” and fired shots. He then shouted, “Drop your weapon! Drop the weapon!”

“It’s there,” Fortson said.

Advertisement

“Drop the weapon!” – the deputy shouted back.

“I don’t have it,” Fortson said as he lay on the ground.

The deputy then radioed for paramedics.

The sheriff’s office declined to supply details about the responding deputy or his race. The deputy has been placed on administrative leave pending the end result of the investigation.

Advertisement

Crump later released a statement noting that the officer didn’t tell Fortson to drop his gun before he fired “several times within a split second of opening the door.”

“We have consistently maintained that police mistook the apartment because Roger had been on the phone with his girlfriend for a significant portion of the time leading up to the shooting and no one else was in the apartment,” the statement read.

Crump also previously told reporters that Fortson was talking to his girlfriend on FaceTime and grabbed his gun because he heard someone leaving his apartment. He said the deputy forced entry into the apartment, citing the report of the girl, who has not yet been identified.

“The girl admits that although she initially thought the police had broken down the door, she stands by her emotional memories of what happened,” Crump’s later statement read.

Advertisement

In a FaceTime video captured on Fortson’s cellphone, the airman could be heard groaning and saying, “I can’t breathe.” The deputy could be heard yelling at him, “Stop moving!” The phone is pointed towards the ceiling and doesn’t show what is occurring in the apartment.

Featured Stories

Aden said he met with the family on Thursday and expressed his sincerest condolences.

“This is the result we can never hope to achieve,” Aden said. “These investigations take time, but I want to assure you that we are not hiding anything or trying to cover up.”

Officials said the Florida Department of Law Enforcement is investigating the matter. FDLE spokeswoman Gretl Plessinger told The Associated Press on Wednesday that the agency was unlikely to supply any further comments until the investigation was accomplished.

Advertisement

The sheriff said the investigation is being treated as a criminal investigation and that no decision has yet been made on whether the deputy’s actions were justified or not. However, an initial release from the sheriff’s office describing the shooting said the deputy “reacted in self-defense after encountering a 23-year-old man armed with a gun.”

Fortson’s mother, Chantemekki Fortson, walked into the morning news conference, with Crump holding a framed portrait of her son in his dress uniform. She burst into tears as Crump spoke about her son’s death.

“My baby was shot,” she said.

Crump called the shooting a “justifiable homicide.”

Advertisement

“For some reason they thought he was a bad guy, but he was a good guy. He was a great guy. He was a special guy,” Crump said. “They took our patriot away.”

Crump said Fortson, an Atlanta native, was shot six times.

Crump said Fortson enlisted in the Air Force after graduating from highschool. He was stationed in the Special Operations Wing at Hurlburt Field. As a special mission aviator, one of his roles was to load the gunship’s guns during missions.

Crump, based in Tallahassee, Florida, has been involved in multiple high-profile cases of fatal encounters between black people and law enforcement and vigilantes, including Ahmaud Arbery, Trayvon Martin, Tir Nichols, George Floyd and Breonna Taylor, who also died in her own residence during a police raid no knock that targeted her ex-boyfriend in 2020.

Advertisement

Fortson’s death bears striking similarities to the deaths of other Black people killed by police in their homes in recent years.

In 2018, a white Dallas police officer shot and killed unarmed Botham Jean after mistaking his apartment for his own. Former officer Amber Guyger was sentenced to 10 years in prison for murder.

In 2019, a white officer in Fort Worth, Texas, fatally shot Atatiana Jefferson through the rear window of her home after responding to a non-emergency call reporting that Jefferson’s front door was open. Aaron Dean, a former officer, was convicted of manslaughter and sentenced to almost 12 years in prison.

In each cases, Crump represented the families as part of his efforts to force accountability for police killings of black people.

Advertisement


This article was originally published on : thegrio.com

Crime

New research: Demlitization police departments do not increase crime

Published

on

By

New studies say that demilitarization police departments do not increase crime

Richmond, Virginia – June 12: photo of George Floyd expected to the statue of confederate general Robert Lee on June 12, 2020 in Richmond, Virginia. Last week, the governor of Virginia Ralph Northam ordered the removal of Lee’s general statue as soon as possible, but court proceedings temporarily stopped these plans. Protests proceed in cities across the country after the death of George Floyd, who died in police detention in Minneapolis on May 25. (Photo eze amos/getty images)

Advertisement

Giving police departments equipment to military class does not reduce crime or increase safety based on two independent research. Studies appear in the course of the ongoing conversation concerning the importance of “rejecting the police” as a method.

IN “Police demilitarization and brutal crime“, Kenneth Lwande, a professor on the University of Michigan, questioned the claim that the military weapon exchange program reduced the crime rate, assaulting police officers and the variety of complaints towards police officers.

Finding problems in previously published data Lwande focused on the information available after ordering the Obama administration from 2015, required to demlate local police agencies. Answering public indignation after exposing the militarized police in Ferguson, Obama’s administration Forbade some Sales of military equipment to the police as a part of the controversial program 1033. Trump’s administration reversed this policy in 2017.

Advertisement

IN interview In the case of ABC, Lwande explained that earlier research found that the transfer of military equipment to police plots served as deterrent. But from his evaluation, evidence does not confirm such conclusions. “It’s just not an accurate record,” said Lwande. “[Prior studies] They clearly suggested that by transferring military police equipment, he would stop criminals from committing crimes. “

Published in the character of human behavior, London magazine, research emphasizes the reaper of Trump’s administration on potentially “unbelievable” data when making decisions about withdrawing restrictions from Obama’s time. After assessing previous research, Lipowde found that publicly published data utilized in previous studies were filled with inaccuracies. Earlier evaluation did not control the equipment that was transferred between agencies, unused or otherwise inoperable. In addition, Lwande did not find any evidence that the demilitarizing law enforcement authorities led to an increase in crime.

Program 1033, managed by the Defense Logistics Agency, is one in every of several ways through which law enforcement authorities acquire military assessment equipment. Established in 1997 as a part of the Act on authorization for national defense, is estimated Program 1033 has transferred over $ 7 billion in military equipment into $ 8,000 across the country. The program was originally created for the forces of “counteracting terrorism”, but later prolonged to cover all of the activities of law enforcement agencies.

Covering with the national uprisings this summer, several members of the Chamber introduced laws to eliminate the 1033 program in June. The Black Lives movement also published Act Breathe Act, a comprehensive legislative proposal, including financing specific politicians and the abolition of the police. Section I of the proposed respiratory act requires the opening of the 1033 program in its entirety.

Advertisement

This article was originally published on : www.essence.com
Continue Reading

Crime

Article archive – essence Being

Published

on

By

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement


This article was originally published on : www.essence.com
Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crime

Joe Biden defends the law on crime of 1994: “Every Black Mayor supported him”

Published

on

By

The former Vice President Joe Biden admits that some of the laws on the control of crime and law enforcement agencies in 1994, which exploded mass imprisonment in the United States and would proceed to devastate the Black and Brown communities, was a “mistake”, however it repeated that it was widely supported by black leaders and that she was still opposing the police.

During the town hall in Philadelphia, on Thursday, Biden, chief architect Bill, said it was a distinct time. “The black club voted for him, every black mayor supported him all over the board,” he said.

Referring the act on violence against women, which was part of the act, Biden blamed you for harmful parts of the provisions, unlike something that’s by nature bad with the bill itself.

Advertisement

“But there were mistakes here,” he said. “The error came in the scope of what you did locally.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zlgzvieziwe

Biden is comfortable to skip, they’re state incentives baked in the bill. He also skipped the way Democrats push the rhetoric of “hard crime” when comfortable and social justice indicates that this just isn’t the case.

Advertisement

“The liberal wing of the Democratic Party concerns 100,000 cops. The liberal wing of the Democratic Party affects 125,000 new prison cells,” said Biden in 1994 on the Senate floor. “I would like to see the conservative wing of the Democratic Party.”

After the adoption of the Act, signed by the then President Bill Clinton, many states would soon transfer their very own version of the provisions on “three strikes” and can be granted True in the subsidies of the sentence construct and expand prisons. In addition, the AtlanticTodd S. Purdum reports, “A 2002 Urban Institute Study He stated that in the years 1995–1999 nine states adopted such provisions for the first time, and 21 others changed existing regulations to qualify for funds. Until 1999, a total of 42 states had such provisions. At the same time, many states adopted their own stricter conviction, which only tightened this trend. “

Crime bill He had wide black supportBut not “every black mayor”, as Biden said. At that point, NAACP called this “Crime against the American nation. “When it passed in 1994, it was with the help of the overwhelming majority of the Black Congress Club and the support of Nimby Black Community Community, who believed that the increased penalty would save” good “black children from” bad “black children who were allegedly involved in criminal activities Michelle Alexander He explained that some leaders were reluctant to support the law and expected reinvestment in black communities – school, higher apartments, healthcare and work. But it happened.

Biden defends the law on crime of 1994:
Sense. Barbara Boxer, D-Clif. And Joe Biden, D-Del., In a meal after the address of Stan Unia. January 25, 1994 (photo Maureen Keating/CQ Roll Call by Getty Images)

Before the Crime Act in 1994 could undergo the house, Clinton agreed to remove Act on racial justice– which might allow trapped people to death sentences based on data indicating that racial prejudice was an element at the time of their trial.

The bill was also deprived of $ 3.3 billion-a third party from preventive programs-and a provision that may make 16,000 drug criminals eligible for early release.

Advertisement

Today, the USA is the largest prison in the world. And in 2019, talking a few criminal account project during breakfast in Washington, wherein they commemorate the ninetieth birthday of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., a former vice chairman, said: “It was an enormous mistake he made. Experts told us that “you may never come back with a crack” … It is trapped the whole generation. “

Despite this reality and as protests against rock violence and remodeling the world, Biden continued to defend his opposition to Movement at the Black Lives call to reject the police. However, he repeated his position that nobody needs to be imprisoned for using drugs, that marijuana needs to be decriminalized and that individuals with registration of cannabis needs to be cleaned. Instead of prisoners, he said that the United States should construct rehabilitation centers as a substitute and make mandatory treatment.

Of course, not all drug use is problematic, and compulsory rehabilitation just isn’t much different from imprisonment. In addition, most researchers agree that there is no such thing as a evidence that mandatory rehabilitation is acting, According to a worldwide Boston Medical Center evaluation.

After the Town Hall in Philadelphia, Stef Feldman, an worker of the Biden campaign, wrote on Twitter that Biden discusses the “86 bill for a crime”, not an invoice for the 1994 crime. In fact, Biden was sponsored by the first co -author of the Act on the anti -narcotic abuse of 1986, which created latest mandatory minimum drug judgments and Crack vs. cocaine unevenness-who was reduced but not erased by President Barack Obama. Biden also co -financed The Anti-Anti-Municipal Law of 1988.

Advertisement

He along with segregation – and recognized Rasistowski – Sen. Strom Thurmond (R-SC), managed 1984 Comprehensive Act on Controlwho prolonged the punishment of drug trafficking and federal forfeiture of civilian assets, enabling law enforcement authorities to take over real estate without proving that an individual is guilty of crime.

Bearing in mind these legislative acts, possibly the Biden campaign is best to focus on defending the “part” of the criminal account of 1994 and the limit -changing states for the others.


Advertisement
This article was originally published on : www.essence.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending