After nearly a decade of bubbling beneath the surface, Kendrick Lamar and Drake’s clash has blossomed into essentially the most influential hip-hop duel lately.
It began with a direct call out to Lamar during his performance of Metro Boomin & Future’s “Like That” on March 22. This battle is a singular product of the fashionable streaming era, where scathing diss tracks arrive at higher volumes and faster than another in history. Just on Friday, May 3, Kendrick received a 3rd response: “Meet the Grahams“arrived just 25 minutes after the second Drake”, “Family matters” The following weekend, they gave strategy to additional songs from each artist, making for a complete of never-before-seen songs with wordplay going backwards and forwards over the course of about 6 weeks.
It’s a really different take on the hip-hop conflicts of the ’90s and early ’90s, waged for months and years through responses to mixtapes, single pages and comments in magazine articles and radio interviews.
“Before, you had to wait for a Kay Slay mixtape or you had to wait for someone to come to the radio station [with the recording]and it didn’t necessarily happen in real time,” says the veteran rap host and Sirius XM hip-hop host Torah Carr. “The fact that these guys can go into the studio, upload a file to social media and get people reacting before it even hits the DSPs is just a testament to where we are with technology.”
“Streaming and real-time social media feedback have added new layers to some of the tactical issues around these issues,” says Nadeska Alexis of Apple Music.
This is clear from the covers chosen for these diss tracks – Kendrick’s assortment of Drake’s alleged personal effects, a Google Maps photo of his palatial Toronto estate, peppered with pins from the sex offender registry; Drake uses friend Kendrick Lamar’s Instagram comment and creative partner Dave Free pictured is Kendrick’s partner and kids. Combine that with the near-instantaneous reactions to IG stories, the cacophony of fan reactions on TikToks, dance battles on diss tracks, and podcast debates, and there is rather more to the song than simply the lyrics that set the rhythm and temperature of every emcee’s response.
As things heat up and the attacks turn into more personal and revealing, the audience swells in recognition that THIS is what hip-hop has been missing. The sparring, the focused, multi-threaded lyricism, the energy and excitement of wondering what each MC will say next and what personal and skilled revelations fans will likely be left with when the dust settles.
“It’s rare to see two rappers fighting each other in music these days,” Alexis says of the palpable excitement surrounding the newest rap. “We are used to seeing tension in tweets, on Instagram live, in DMs… literally everywhere in music.”
“This year we were fortunate to see two of the greatest rappers of our time – literally two generational talents – battle it out in a feud that has been simmering for over a decade. “Being able to see the lyricism and pageantry at the exhibition truly feels like a once-in-a-generation event.”
ATLANTA, GA – DECEMBER 9: Drake performs on stage in the course of the “Lil Baby & Friends Birthday Concert” at State Farm Arena on December 9, 2022 in Atlanta, Georgia. (Photo: Prince Williams/Wireimage)
But while men go head-to-head for rap’s respectability in musical moments like these, women on their periphery often take the brunt of essentially the most damaging slings and arrows, used as pawns to harm their opponents where it hurts most. This is a tactic rarely utilized in female hip-hop feuds. It seems that whatever the beef’s origins, the ladies related to the goal of every opponent’s ire are weaponized, whether through their sexuality, integrity, identity, or some combination of traits. Shopping mall.
Tupac poked fun at The Notorious B.I.G. by describing an affair along with his wife Faith Evans within the famous opening line of 1996’s “Hit ‘Em Up.” Nas’ ex-girlfriend Carmen Bryan was drawn right into a fight with Jay-Z when the Brooklyn-born rapper hinted that each he and then-76ers guard Allen Iverson had “more in Carmen” together – so to talk – in “Super” from 2002. -Ugly.” Drake’s baby mother, Sophie Brussaux, revealed her past in adult entertainment when Pusha T exposed her and son Drake’s existence in 2018’s “The Story of Adidon.” But why are women on the sidelines so are sometimes the fundamental goal when the true problem lies elsewhere?
“This is your weak point, especially if you are married, in a committed relationship or in a public relationship. “It’s a place where a rapper can pierce your armor if all else fails,” Carr says. He explains why essentially the most common response is, “Okay, ‘well, your girlfriend likes me,’ or ‘I was with your girlfriend,’ or ‘I had your girlfriend first,’ or ‘Your girlfriend is a rebound,’ or whatever.” I believe that is when people feel they will do essentially the most damage.
“Misogyny is still alive in hip-hop,” says Alexis. “We have made some progress over the last 50 years, but trying to break it down would require more words than we have time for.”
Now Kendrick Lamar’s longtime partner, Whitney Alford, despite having no known industry contacts and a largely private personality, has been publicly accused of infidelity and paternity fraud by the preferred rapper on the planet. Her racial identity was also scrutinized and, without her consent or personal input, she was identified as a victim of alleged domestic violence within the lyrics of Drake’s “Family Matters” and again in “Heart, part 6“
NEW YORK, NY – JANUARY 28: Whitney Alford and recording artist Kendrick Lamar attend the sixtieth Annual GRAMMY Awards at Madison Square Garden on January 28, 2018 in New York City. (Photo by Kevin Mazur/Getty Images for NARAS)
As streaming numbers for dedicated artists skyrocket, fans have their hunger for genre-specific lyricism, gossip and excitement, and social media, blogs, podcasts and music journalism platforms have more to debate, debate and judge for weeks and months to come back women often have a always tarnished repute. But as history has shown us, these are constant victims of rap battles.
“Some people say there are no rules in war, but you don’t cross the line into disrespecting your family, because that turns a war of words into a beef,” Carr tells ESSENCE. “I think something like this is great. It’s competitive and it’s good for business, and both [rappers] being UMG artists. This makes the register ring. DSPs love it. But involving children, family members and people who are innocent bystanders, I think that goes too far.”
“After this dispute, I think it’s become clear that moms, partners, kids, your health records, your record deals – literally everyone and everything is fair game,” Alexis says. “It wouldn’t be the rules, but that’s the game.”
But what becomes of the ladies whose names remain the topic of jokes and whose lives remain a source of speculation long after the dust has settled on rap’s war grounds?
Kendrick Lamar at Life Is Beautiful 2023 on September 23, 2023 in Las Vegas, Nevada. (Photo: Christopher Polk/Billboard via Getty Images)
“We’ve seen Carmen Bryan write books, make public appearances, and figure out how to capitalize on her name while being in the spotlight,” Carr says. “Faith Evans has denied all claims made against her, but she has already been in the public eye.”
“But for those who are a civilian, like Lady Kendricka Whitney, who is solely not involved on this business in any respect, it’s unfair to her. “Now he has to pick himself up and explain this to his children and family members, and maybe even go public to try to clear his name.”
Throwing uninvolved partners into the fray becomes an excellent more disturbing tactic once we consider the credibility of every emcee’s claims. The two provided salacious details about one another’s private lives and relationships with their partners and kids, but provided no evidence for these claims. But just because the digital age has modified the speed and content of disses and replies, it also seems to have shifted the burden of proof onto investigative fans, if not completely erased it.
“Unfortunately, it is becoming increasingly difficult to distinguish what is fact and what is pure fiction for entertainment purposes. I think this trend will continue,” says Alexis. The latest standards in hip-hop revelations appear to be barely different than 5 years ago.
TORONTO, ON – DECEMBER 27: Drake in his seats along with his best friend and his little boy. Toronto Raptors vs. Los Angeles Clippers in the primary half of an NBA regular season game at Scotiabank Arena. Toronto Star (Rick Madonik/TORONTO STAR/Toronto Star via Getty Images)
“I’m from a different era and things like that. If you said something like that, you had to have evidence to back it up,” Carr says. “Now, because of the size of the audience and the fan base and how vocal people are on social media, they’re really just going to compare what’s being said. I don’t think it needs to be proven.”
“In light of this, I think fans will simply use different criteria to judge these diss songs, including timing and execution,” Alexis explains. “But trust and believe that internet sleuths will come here and invest in all the claims made in these pieces. It just adds another dimension to the beef in the age of artificial intelligence and streaming.”
Bravado and skill battles for respect and bragging rights have been a component of hip-hop culture since its inception within the Seventies. But because the genre has spanned 50 years of existence, the culture of emcees trading personal attacks has turn into increasingly pervasive, and bars have turn into increasingly more virulent, and sometimes spill out of the “wax” into the streets, ending in violence. It’s traditional at this point, but given the tragic outcomes we have seen previously, is hip-hop beef still a obligatory cornerstone of the culture?
“I really can’t say that [beefs are] ‘necessary,’ but I think they bring us back to the true essence and competitive spirit of hip-hop,” says Alexis. “Over the last few decades, hip-hop has become a commercial phenomenon, but at its core, some things are still dear to us.”
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA – FEBRUARY 08: Kendrick Lamar performs on stage while unveiling the 2024 Visa Cash App RB Formula One Team colours on February 8, 2024 in Las Vegas, Nevada. (Photo: Daniel Boczarski/Getty Images for Cash App)
“I think this competition produces the best work,” Carr says. “Hip-hop is built on that, but anything that’s going to grow needs some kind of competition to push yourself to be better.”
“I think where we are in hip-hop right now, where everyone has an opinion and has a public forum to express it, Drake fans will say, ‘Drake got it.’ Kendrick fans will say: Kendrick did it. The media will go with whatever makes the most sense for what they do. At the end of the day, there are really no losers.”
No matter who wins or loses in a given battle, all wars ultimately involve casualties. As words are exchanged in lyrics and reputations are destroyed within the court of public opinion, the one real losers could also be those on the periphery, and the winner is the hip-hop fandom. Their trophies are latest cultural debates, latest party anthems for the summer, and renewed enthusiasm for a genre of black music that has just begun to lose its dominance on the charts.
“No marketing campaign could galvanize and revitalize the culture the way a clash like this does,” Alexis says of this now-historic rap feud. “As long as it stays in the music (and social media comments).”
This article was originally published on : www.essence.com
Jury awarded $310 million to parents of teenager who died after falling on a ride at Florida amusement park – Essence
Published
6 days ago
on
December 9, 2024
By
Sun Sentinel/Getty Images
The family of Tire Sampson, the 14-yr-old who tragically died on an amusement park ride in Orlando, Florida, in 2022, has been awarded $310 million in a civil lawsuit.
Tire, who was visiting ICON Park along with his family on March 24, 2022, fell from the FreeFall drop tower. Although he was taken to a nearby hospital, he didn’t survive his injuries.
Now, greater than two years later, a jury has held the vehicle manufacturer, Austria-based Funtime Handels, responsible for the accident and awarded the Tire family $310 million. According to reports from local news stations WFTV AND KSDKthe jury reached its verdict after about an hour of deliberation.
Tyre’s parents will each receive $155 million, according to attorney spokesman Michael Haggard.
Attorneys Ben Crump and Natalie Jackson, who represented Tyre’s family, shared their thoughts on this landmark decision via X (formerly Twitter). “This ruling is a step forward in holding corporations accountable for the safety of their products,” they said in a statement.
Lawyers stressed that Tyre’s death was attributable to “gross negligence and a failure to put safety before profits.” They added that the ride’s manufacturer had “neglected its duty to protect passengers” and that the substantial award ensured it could “face the consequences of its decisions.”
Crump and Jackson said they hope the result will encourage change throughout the theme park industry. “We hope this will spur the entire industry to enforce more stringent safety measures,” they said. “Tire heritage will provide a safer future for drivers around the world.”
An investigation previously found that Tyre’s harness was locked through the descent, but he dislodged from his seat through the 430-foot fall when the magnets engaged. Tire’s death was ruled the result of “multiple injuries and trauma.”
ICON Park said at the time that it could “fully cooperate” with the authorities.
This article was originally published on : www.essence.com
A. Cornelius Baker, a tireless advocate of HIV and AIDS testing, research and vaccination, died Nov. 8 at his home in Washington, D.C., of hypertensive, atherosclerotic heart problems, in response to his partner, Gregory Nevins.
As previously reported, Baker was an early supporter for people living with HIV and AIDS within the Nineteen Eighties, when misinformation and fear-mongering in regards to the disease were rampant.
According to Douglas M. Brooks, director of the Office of National AIDS Policy under President Obama, it was Baker’s Christian faith that guided him toward compassion for others.
“He was very kind, very warm and inclusive – his circles, both professional and personal, were the most diverse I have ever seen, and he was guided by his Christian values,” Brooks told the outlet. “His ferocity was on display when people were marginalized, rejected or forgotten.”
In 1995, when he was executive director of the National AIDS Association, Baker pushed for June 27 to be designated National HIV Testing Day.
In 2012, he later wrote on the web site of the Global Health Advisor for which he was a technical advisor that: “These efforts were intended to help reduce the stigma associated with HIV testing and normalize it as part of regular screening.”
Baker also feared that men like himself, black gay men, and other men from marginalized communities were disproportionately affected by HIV and AIDS.
Baker pressured the Clinton administration to incorporate black and Latino people in clinical drug trials, and in 1994 he pointedly told the Clinton administration that he was bored with hearing guarantees but seeing no motion.
“Cornelius was a legendary leader in the fight for equality for LGBTQ+ people and all people living with HIV,” Jennings said in a press release. “In the more than twenty years that I knew him, I was continually impressed not only by how effective he was as a leader, but also by how he managed to strike the balance between being fierce and kind at the same time. His loss is devastating.”
Jennings continued: “Cornelius’ leadership can’t be overstated. For many years, he was one in all the nation’s leading HIV/AIDS warriors, working locally, nationally and internationally. No matter where he went, he proudly supported the HIV/AIDS community from the Nineteen Eighties until his death, serving in various positions including the Department of Health and Human Services, the National Association of Persons with Disabilities AIDS, and the Whitman-Walker Clinic . Jennings explained.
Jennings concluded: “His career also included several honors, including being the first recipient of the American Foundation for AIDS Research Foundation’s organization-building Courage Award. Our communities have lost a pillar in Cornelius, and as we mourn his death, we will be forever grateful for his decades of service to the community.”
“It is difficult to overstate the impact his loss had on public health, the HIV/AIDS community or the place he held in my heart personally,” Hayes told Hiv.gov. “He was pushing us, charging us, pulling us, pushing us. With his unwavering commitment to the HIV movement, he represented the north star, constructing coalitions across sectors and dealing with leaders across the political spectrum to deal with health disparities and advocate for access to HIV treatment and look after all. He said, “The work isn’t done, the charge is still there, move on – you know what you have to do.” It’s in my ear and in my heart in the case of this job.
Hayes added: “His death is a significant loss to the public health community and to the many others who benefited from Cornelius’ vigilance. His legacy will continue to inspire and motivate us all.”
Baker is survived by his mother, Shirley Baker; his partner Nevins, who can be senior counsel at Lambda Legal; his sisters Chandrika Baker, Nadine Wallace and Yavodka Bishop; in addition to his two brothers, Kareem and Roosevelt Dowdell; along with the larger HIV/AIDS advocacy community.
This article was originally published on : www.blackenterprise.com
There has been an enormous amount of misinformation in regards to the safety of 3-NOP, with some milk from herds fed this additive being labeled “Frankenmilk”. Others feared it could get to humans through beef.
The most significant thing is that 3-NOP is secure. Let’s clear up some major misconceptions.
Why do we want to limit methane production?
In our attempts to limit global warming, we’ve placed the best emphasis on CO₂ because the major man-made greenhouse gas. But methane is also a greenhouse gas, and although we produce less of it, it is: a much stronger greenhouse gas than CO₂.
Agriculture is the largest a man-made source of methane. As cattle herds expand to meet our growing demand for meat and milk, reducing methane production from cows is a vital way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
3-NOP is not the one compound tested as a feed additive. Australian product based on seaweed, Rumin8for instance, it is also in development. Saponins, soap-like chemicals present in plants, and essential oils as well has been examined.
In contrast, 3-NOP was not lethal on the doses utilized in safety studies, up to 600 mg 3-NOP per kg body weight. At a dose of 100 mg per kg body weight in rats, it didn’t cause any adversarial effects.
What about reproductive issues?
The effect of 3-NOP on the reproductive organs has generated numerous commentary.
In comparison, to achieve the identical exposure in humans, a 70 kg human would want to eat 21–35 grams (about 2 tablespoons) of pure 3-NOP every day for a lot of weeks to see this effect.
No human will likely be exposed to this amount because 3-NOP doesn’t pass into milk – is fully metabolized within the cow’s intestines.
No cow will likely be exposed to these levels either.
What about cancer?
3-NOP is not genotoxic or mutagenicwhich implies it cannot damage DNA. Thus, the results of 3-NOP are dose-limited, meaning that small doses will not be harmful, while very high doses are (unlike radiation where there is no secure dose).
Scientists found that at a dose of 300 mg per kilogram of body weight benign tumors of the small intestine of female ratsbut not male rats, after 2 years of every day consumption. At a dose of 100 mg 3-NOP per kg body weight, no tumors were observed.
Milk and meat consumers will likely be exposed to zero 3-NOP. 3-NOP doesn’t penetrate milk and meat: is completely metabolized within the cow’s intestines.
Farmers could also be exposed to small amounts of the feed additive, and industrial employees producing 3-NOP will potentially be exposed to larger amounts. Farmers and industrial employees already wear personal protective equipment to reduce exposure to other agricultural chemicals – and it is advisable to do that with Bovear 10 as well.
It has been extensively tested over months of exposure to cattle and has produced no unintended effects. Some studies actually say so improves the standard of milk and meat.
A really small amount of 3-NOP enters the environment (lower than 0.2% of the dose taken), no accumulates and is easily decomposed subsequently, it doesn’t pose a threat to the environment.
Since humans will not be exposed to 3-NOP through milk and meat, long-term exposure is not an issue.