Connect with us

Technology

Midi creates a digital platform for the often overlooked area of ​​women’s health

Published

on

When Joanna Strober was about 47 years old, she stopped sleeping. Although sleep loss is a common symptom of perimenopause, she first needed to go to multiple doctors, similar to driving 45 minutes from San Francisco to pay $750 out of pocket, to get a diagnosis and appropriate treatment.

“That feeling of ‘wow, I’ve really suffered unnecessarily over the last year’ really stuck with me,” Strober said in a recent episode of Podcast Found on TechCrunch. “I started talking to all my friends and trying to understand what was happening to them, and it became clear that perimenopause and menopause were serious. This hits women like a pile of bricks. It has many different symptoms and very few providers are trained to care for this population.”

Advertisement

This realization inspired Strober to launch Midi Health, a telehealth platform designed to serve midlife women by connecting them with healthcare providers trained in the symptoms and coverings of perimenopause and menopause.

Despite her “aha” moment, Strober explained why she couldn’t launch her startup instantly. She said Midi would not have existed if the U.S. government hadn’t modified regulations around telehealth and access to care during the pandemic. Strober said that because of changes in digital health, the company was capable of launch a platform that gives women with care as a substitute of having to depend on in-person care.

“It was a very exciting discovery to understand that this problem, which has existed for a long time, could finally be solved through telehealth,” Strober said. “And that’s why I wanted to start this company.”

Strober said Midi operates a little in another way than many other digital health firms which have sprung up in the wake of the pandemic. She said Midi was not created as a digital avenue through which users could get one-off care or treatment as quickly as possible, like many other firms of the same era, but relatively as a platform where women built long-term relationships with women. suppliers who make them feel noticed.

Advertisement

This approach can also be why Strober believes Midi has been capable of proceed to grow and lift VC funding as VCs have lost interest in the category. The company recently raised a $60 million B round led by Emerson Collective, with participation from Google Ventures, SteelSky Ventures and Muse Capital, amongst others. This round brings the company’s total funding to $99 million.

According to. digital health startups raised $13.2 billion globally in 2023 CB Insights data. This represents a decline of 48% in comparison with 2022, to $25.5 billion, and a decline of 75% in comparison with 2021, when a record amount of $52.7 billion was invested.

“I think too few telehealth companies haven’t thought about long-term customer relationships,” Strober said. “We see ourselves as constructing a trustworthy brand in the healthcare industry. Our brand is due to this fact skilled women’s care. We have to offer you such amazing care that you’ll come back to us repeatedly. That’s what women do.”

Midi shouldn’t be Strober’s first digital health startup, and she or he shared how her past experience constructing Kurbo Health, a startup focused on childhood obesity before digital health even existed, influenced her decisions to construct Midi. She also shared how her previous life as a enterprise capitalist also played a role in her approach to business.

Advertisement

With this latest round of funding, Midi looks forward to expanding care in areas covered by perimenopause and menopause, including sexual well-being, hair and skincare, and testosterone access.

“People keep asking, when do you get out of perimenopause and menopause?” Strober said. “But perimenopause and menopause are a big market. So we’re working a lot to understand what women’s health needs are at this time in their lives and how we can address those concerns appropriately.”

Advertisement
This article was originally published on : techcrunch.com

Technology

Anysphere, which makes the cursor supposedly collect USD 900 million with a valuation of USD 9 billion

Published

on

By

AI robot face and programming code on a black background.

Anysphere, producer of coding cursor with AI drive, attracted $ 900 million in the recent financing round by Thrive Capital, Financial Times He informed, citing anonymous sources familiar with the contract.

The report said that Andreessen Horowitz (A16Z) and ACCEL also participate in the round, which values ​​about $ 9 billion.

The cursor collected $ 105 million from Thrive, and A16Z with a valuation of $ 2.5 billion, as TechCrunch said in December. Capital Thrive also led this round and in addition participated in A16Z. According to Crunchbase data, the startup has collected over $ 173 million thus far.

Advertisement

It is alleged that investors, including index ventures and a reference point, attempt to support the company, but plainly existing investors don’t want to miss the opportunity to support it.

Other coding start-ups powered by artificial intelligence also attract the interest of investors. Techcrunch announced in February that Windsurf, a rival for Aklesphere, talked about collecting funds at a valuation of $ 3 billion. Openai, an investor in Anysphere, was supposedly I’m attempting to get windsurf for about the same value.

(Tagstransate) A16Z

(*9*)This article was originally published on : techcrunch.com

Continue Reading

Technology

This is the shipping of products from China to the USA

Published

on

By

Shein and Temu icons are seen displayed on a phone screen in this illustration photo

The Chinese retailer has modified the strategy in the face of American tariffs.

Thanks to the executive ordinance, President Donald Trump ended the so -called de minimis principle, which allowed goods value 800 USD or less entering the country without tariffs. It also increases tariffs to Chinese goods by over 100%, forcing each Chinese firms and Shein, in addition to American giants, similar to Amazon to adapt plans and price increases.

CNBC reports that this was also affected, and American buyers see “import fees” from 130% to 150% added to their accounts. Now, nevertheless, the company is not sending the goods directly from China to the United States. Instead, it only displays the offers of products available in American warehouses, while goods sent from China are listed as outside the warehouse.

Advertisement

“He actively recruits American sellers to join the platform,” said the spokesman ago. “The transfer is to help local sellers reach more customers and develop their companies.”

(tagstotransate) tariffs

This article was originally published on : techcrunch.com
Continue Reading

Technology

One of the last AI Google models is worse in terms of safety

Published

on

By

The Google Gemini generative AI logo on a smartphone.

The recently released Google AI model is worse in some security tests than its predecessor, in line with the company’s internal comparative test.

IN Technical report Google, published this week, reveals that his Flash Gemini 2.5 model is more likely that he generates a text that violates its security guidelines than Gemini 2.0 Flash. In two indicators “text security for text” and “image security to the text”, Flash Gemini 2.5 will withdraw 4.1% and 9.6% respectively.

Text safety for the text measures how often the model violates Google guidelines, making an allowance for the prompt, while image security to the text assesses how close the model adheres to those boundaries after displaying the monitors using the image. Both tests are automated, not supervised by man.

Advertisement

In an e-mail, Google spokesman confirmed that Gemini 2.5 Flash “performs worse in terms of text safety for text and image.”

These surprising comparative results appear when AI is passing in order that their models are more acceptable – in other words, less often refuse to answer controversial or sensitive. In the case of the latest Llam Meta models, he said that he fought models in order to not support “some views on others” and answers to more “debated” political hints. Opeli said at the starting of this yr that he would improve future models, in order to not adopt an editorial attitude and offers many prospects on controversial topics.

Sometimes these efforts were refundable. TechCrunch announced on Monday that the default CHATGPT OPENAI power supply model allowed juvenile to generate erotic conversations. Opeli blamed his behavior for a “mistake”.

According to Google Technical Report, Gemini 2.5 Flash, which is still in view, follows instructions more faithfully than Gemini 2.0 Flash, including instructions exceeding problematic lines. The company claims that regression might be partially attributed to false positives, but in addition admits that Gemini 2.5 Flash sometimes generates “content of violation” when it is clearly asked.

Advertisement

TechCrunch event

Berkeley, California
|.
June 5

Book now

Advertisement

“Of course, there is a tension between (after instructions) on sensitive topics and violations of security policy, which is reflected in our assessment,” we read in the report.

The results from Meepmap, reference, which can examine how models react to sensitive and controversial hints, also suggest that Flash Gemini 2.5 is much less willing to refuse to reply controversial questions than Flash Gemini 2.0. Testing the TechCrunch model through the AI ​​OpenRoutter platform has shown that he unsuccessfully writes essays to support human artificial intelligence judges, weakening the protection of due protection in the US and the implementation of universal government supervisory programs.

Thomas Woodside, co -founder of the Secure AI Project, said that the limited details given by Google in their technical report show the need for greater transparency in testing models.

“There is a compromise between the instruction support and the observation of politics, because some users may ask for content that would violate the rules,” said Woodside Techcrunch. “In this case, the latest Flash model Google warns the instructions more, while breaking more. Google does not present many details about specific cases in which the rules have been violated, although they claim that they are not serious. Not knowing more, independent analysts are difficult to know if there is a problem.”

Advertisement

Google was already under fire for his models of security reporting practices.

The company took weeks to publish a technical report for the most talented model, Gemini 2.5 Pro. When the report was finally published, it initially omitted the key details of the security tests.

On Monday, Google published a more detailed report with additional security information.

(Tagstotransate) Gemini

Advertisement
This article was originally published on : techcrunch.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending