Connect with us

Technology

Amazon CodeWhisperer is now called Q Developer and is expanding its features

Published

on

Pour one out for CodeWhisperer, Amazon’s AI-powered assistive coding tool. As of today, it’s kaput – in a way.

CodeWhisperer is now available Q-programmera part of Amazon’s Q family of business-oriented generative AI chatbots, which also includes the newly announced Q Business. Available via AWS, Q Developer helps with among the tasks developers perform of their every day work, akin to debugging and updating applications, troubleshooting, and performing security scans – very similar to CodeWhisperer did.

In an interview with TechCrunch, Doug Seven, CEO and director of AI developer experience at AWS, suggested that CodeWhisperer was a minor branding failure. Third party metrics reflect the identical; even with a free tier, CodeWhisperer has struggled to match the momentum of its fundamental rival GitHub Copilot, which has over 1.8 million paying individual users and tens of hundreds of enterprise customers. (Bad first impressions it definitely didn’t help.)

Advertisement

“CodeWhisperer is where we started (code generation), bbut we really wanted to have a brand and name that fit a broader set of use cases,” Seven said. “You can take into consideration Q Developer as an evolution of CodeWhisperer into something much broader.”

To do that, Q Developer can generate code, including SQL, a programming language commonly used to create and manage databases, in addition to test that code and help transform and deploy recent code developed based on developer queries.

As with Copilot, customers can tune Q Developer of their internal code bases to enhance the accuracy of the tool’s programming recommendations. (The now deprecated CodeWhisperer also offered this selection.) And with a capability called Q Agents, Developer can autonomously do things like deploy features and document and refactor (i.e. restructure) code.

Ask Q Developer to “create an ‘add to favorites’ button in my app” and Q Developer will analyze your app’s code, generate recent code if obligatory, create a step-by-step plan, and test your code app before implementing proposed changes. Developers can review and iterate the plan before Q implements it, linking steps together and applying updates to the obligatory files, code blocks, and test suites.

Advertisement

“Behind the scenes, Q Developer actually runs the development environment to work on the code,” Seven said. “So in the case of Q feature development, the Developer takes the entire code repository, creates a branch of that repository, parses the repository, does the work it was asked to do, and returns those code changes to the developer.”

Image credits: Amazon

Amazon says agents also can automate and manage code update processes because Java conversions are already available (specifically Java 8 and 11 built with Apache Maven to Java 17) and .NET conversions coming soon. “Q Developer analyzes the code – looking for anything that needs updating – and makes all those changes before returning it to the developer for review and approval,” Seven added.

In my opinion, Agents is very just like GitHub’s Copilot Workspace, which similarly generates and deploys roadmaps for bug fixes and recent software features. And – as with Workspace – I’m not entirely convinced that this more autonomous approach can solve the issues related to AI-based coding assistants.

Advertisement

GitClear’s evaluation of over 150 million lines of code committed to project repositories over the past few years found that The co-pilot generated more code errors pushed to code bases. Elsewhere, security researchers warn that Copilot and similar tools can do that amplify existing bugs and security issues in software projects.

This is not surprising. AI-powered coding assistants seem impressive. But they’re trained in existing code, and their suggestions reflect patterns in other developers’ work – work that will be seriously flawed. Assistants’ guesses cause errors which can be often difficult to detect, especially when developers – who adopt AI coding assistants great numbers — put aside for evaluation by assistants.

In a less dangerous area beyond coding, Q Developer can aid you manage your organization’s cloud infrastructure on AWS – or at the very least get the data you should manage it yourself.

Q Developer can fulfill requests akin to “List all my Lambda functions” and “List my resources located in other AWS regions.” Currently in preview, the bot also can generate (but not execute) AWS CLI commands and answer AWS cost-related questions akin to “What were the top three highest-cost services in the first quarter?”

Advertisement
Amazon Q Developer

Image credits: Amazon

So how much do these generative AI conveniences cost?

Q Developer is available without spending a dime on AWS Console, Slack, and IDEs akin to Visual Studio Code, GitLab Duo, and JetBrains – but with limitations. The free version doesn’t allow customization of custom libraries, packages and APIs and defaults to a knowledge collection scheme for users. It also imposes monthly limits of a maximum of 5 Agent tasks (e.g. feature deployment) per thirty days and 25 requests for AWS account resources per thirty days. (I find it surprising that Amazon places a limit on the questions you possibly can ask about its own services, but here we’re.)

The premium version of Q Developer, Q Developer Pro costs $19 per thirty days per user and provides higher usage limits, user and policy management tools, single sign-on, and – perhaps most significantly – mental property guarantee.

Advertisement
Amazon Q Developer

Image credits: Amazon

In many cases, the models underlying code generation services akin to Q Developer are trained on copyrighted or restrictively licensed code. Vendors say fair use protects them when models have been consciously or unconsciously developed using copyrighted code – but not everyone agrees. GitHub and OpenAI are there defendant In class movement which accuses them of copyright infringement by allowing Copilot to return licensed code snippets without attribution.

Amazon says it’ll defend Q Developer Pro customers against claims that the service infringes a 3rd party’s mental property rights so long as they permit AWS to regulate its defense and resolve “as AWS deems appropriate.”

Advertisement


This article was originally published on : techcrunch.com

Technology

As Musk manages his growing family: WSJ

Published

on

By

Elon Musk says his duty is to “make new people.” Now Investigation of WSJ He suggests that he could start greater than 14 known children, and the sources claim that the actual number will be much higher. The report also describes how Musk keeps these details within the package.

In the middle of all this, based on the report, there may be a longtime Fixer Jared Birchall, which runs the Muska’s family office, but additionally supports the logistics of the developing Muska family, including by developing Hush contracts and serving as a board for moms of some children.

For example, Musk reportedly asked the conservative influence of Ashley St. Clair for signing a restrictive agreement after she gave birth to their son last autumn. Agreement: $ 15 million plus an extra $ 100,000 per 30 days, so long as the kid is 21 in exchange for her silence. She refused; He says that the contract worsens with every treason perceived. (She told the journal that the Muska team sent her only $ 20,000 after they bowed to Musk to comment on his article).

Advertisement

As for Birchall, which can also be CEO Press-IMPLANTU-IMPLANTU VENTURE NEURALK IA partner In AI Venture XAI in Musk, Muska’s private life management can simply be the third full -time job. According to the journal, in a single two -hour conversation with St. Clair, Birchall told her that the transition “legal path” with musk “always, always leads to a worse result for this woman than otherwise.”

This article was originally published on : techcrunch.com
Continue Reading

Technology

Lime scooter and Ebike batteries will be recycled by Redwood Materials

Published

on

By

The joint company Micromobility Lime has reached an agreement on sending batteries utilized in scooters and electronic bikes to Sewoi materials that extract and recycle critical minerals, comparable to lithium, cobalt, nickel and copper.

The agreement announced on Monday makes Redwood Materials the only real battery recycling partner for common scooters and e-bike bikes situated in cities within the United States, Germany and the Netherlands. The contract doesn’t cover every region where lime worksAn inventory covering cities throughout Europe, Asia and Australia.

In Lime up to now he had other recycling partnerships, especially with Sprout through his suppliers. However, for the primary time, the joint company Micromobility had direct relations with battery recycling in North America, which might directly process the fabric for recovery and returns it to the availability chain.

Advertisement

Redwood Materials, The Carson City, Startup from Nevada founded by the previous CFO Tesla JB Straubel, will get better battery materials when they can’t be used. After recovering and recycling, the materials will be re -introduced within the battery production process. This production system of a closed loop-which can reduce the demand for extraction and refining of minerals-is on the Redwood Materials business center.

The effort can also be consistent with its own goals of limestone sustainable development. Lime is geared toward decarbonization of operations by 2030. The company has made progress in reducing the range 1, 2 and 3 of emissions by 59.5% in five years of basic years 2019. Wapno plans to report the outcomes of carbon dioxide emissions 2024 in May.

“This cooperation means significant progress in the establishment of a more round supply chain, helping our batteries not only to recycled responsibly after reaching the end of their lives, but that their materials are returned to the battery supply chain,” said Andrew Savage, vice chairman for balanced development in Lime.

Lime also has partnerships from Gomi in Great Britain and Voltr in France and other European countries to gather these live battery cells for “Second Life” applications, including, amongst others, in the sphere of consumer electronics, comparable to portable speakers and battery packages.

Advertisement

Redwood Materials has contracts with other micromobility corporations, including Lyft, RAD Power Bikes and bicycle batteries and scooters specialized in recycling. Redwood, which collected over $ 2 billion in private funds, announced at first of this month, opened the research and development center in San Francisco.

(Tagstranslat) ebikes

This article was originally published on : techcrunch.com
Continue Reading

Technology

The Legal Defense Fund withdraws from the META civil law advisory group over Dei Rolback

Published

on

By

Legal Defense Fund,, Meta, dei,


On April 11, the Legal Defense Fund announced that he was leaving the external advisory council for civil rights regarding the fear that the changes in technology company introduced diversity, own capital, inclusion and availability in January.

According to those changes that some perceived as the capitulation of meta against the upcoming Trump administration, contributed to their decision To leave the advisory council of the technology company.

In January, LDF, along with several other organizations of civil rights, which were a part of the board, sent a letter to Marek Zuckerberg, CEO of Meta, outlining their fears As for a way changes would negatively affect users.

Advertisement

“We are shocked and disappointed that the finish has not consulted with this group or its members, considering these significant changes in its content policy. Non -compliance with even its own advisory group of experts on external civil rights shows a cynical disregard for its diverse users base and undermines the commitment of the meta in the field of freedom of speech with which he claims to” return “.

They closed the letter, hoping that the finish would recommend the ideals of freedom of speech: “If the finish really wants to recommend freedom of speech, he must commit to freedom of speech for all his services. As an advisory group from external civil rights, we offer our advice and knowledge in creating a better path.”

These fears increased only in the next months, culminating in one other list, which from the LDF director, Todd A. Cox, who indicated that the organization withdraws its membership from the META civil law advisory council.

“I am deeply disturbed and disappointed with the announcement of Medical on January 7, 2025, with irresponsible changes in content moderation policies on platforms, which are a serious risk for the health and safety of black communities and risk that they destabilize our republic,” Cox wrote.

Advertisement

He continued: “For almost a decade, the NACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF) has invested a lot of time and resources, working with META as part of the informal committee advising the company in matters of civil rights. However, the finish introduced these changes in the policy of the content modification without consulting this group, and many changes directly with the guidelines from the guidelines from LDF and partners. LD can no longer participate in the scope. ” Advisory Committee for Rights “

In a separate but related LDF list, it clearly resembled a finish about the actual obligations of the Citizens’ Rights Act of 1964 and other provisions regarding discrimination in the workplace, versus the false statements of the Trump administration, that diversity, justice and initiative to incorporate discriminates against white Americans.

“While the finish has modified its policy, its obligations arising from federal regulations regarding civil rights remain unchanged. The title of VII of the Act on civic rights of 1964 and other regulations on civil rights prohibit discrimination in the workplace, including disconnecting treatment, principles in the workplace which have unfair disproportionate effects, and the hostile work environment. Also when it comes to inclusion, and access programs.

In the LDF press release, announcing each letters, Cox He called attention Metal insert into growing violence and division in the country’s social climate.

Advertisement

“LDF worked hard and in good faith with meta leadership and its consulting group for civil rights to ensure that the company’s workforce reflects the values ​​and racial warehouses of the United States and to increase the security priorities of many different communities that use meta platforms,” ​​said Cox. “Now we cannot support a company in good conscience that consciously takes steps in order to introduce changes in politics that supply further division and violence in the United States. We call the meta to reverse the course with these dangerous changes.”

(Tagstranslate) TODD A. COX (T) Legal Defense Fund (T) META (T) Diversity (T) Equality (T) inclusion

This article was originally published on : www.blackenterprise.com
Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending